(Redirected from Armor)

A suit of Gothic plate armour
'Armour' (U.S., ''armor'') is protective clothing intended to defend its wearer from intentional harm in
combat and
military engagements, typically associated with soldiers. Armour has been used throughout
recorded history, beginning with
hides,
leather, and
bone, before progressing to
bronze, then
steel during the
Roman Era, to modern fabrics such as
Kevlar,
Dyneema and
ceramics.
Armour was also commonly used to protect
war animals, such as
war horses and
elephants. Armour for war horses was called
barding. Armour has also been produced for
hunting dogs that hunt dangerous game, such as
boars. Since
World War I,
armoured fighting vehicles are protected by
vehicle armour.
In modern usage, 'Armour', or ''
the armoured'' is also a heavily armoured military force or organisation, such as heavy
infantry or heavy
cavalry (as opposed to
light infantry or cavalry). In modern
armoured warfare, 'armoured units' equipped with
tanks serve the historic role of heavy cavalry, and belong to the 'armoured branch' in a national
army's organisation (sometimes, the ''armoured corps'').
Mechanised infantry has replaced heavy infantry.
History
Many factors have affected the development of armour throughout human history. Significant factors in the development of armour include the economic and technological necessities of armour production. For instance plate armour first appeared in Medieval Europe when water-powered trip hammers made the formation of plates faster and cheaper. Also modern militaries usually do not provide the best armour to their forces since doing so would be prohibitively costly. At times the development of armour has run parallel to the development of increasingly effective weaponry on the battlefield. With armourers seeking to create better protection without sacrificing mobility.
In
European history, well-known armour types include the
lorica segmentata of the
Roman legions, the
mail hauberk of the early medieval age, and the full steel
plate harness worn by later
Medieval and
Renaissance knights, and a few key components, (breast and back plates) by heavy cavalry in several European countries until the first year of World War I. (1914-15).
In November 2006 it was announced in
Greece that the oldest armour that exists in Greece was restored and will be put on display soon. The armour dates from the
Mycenaean Era around 1400 BC, some 200 years before the
Trojan War.
In East Asian history laminated armour such as
lamellar and
brigandine were commonly used. In pre-Qin dynasty times, leather armour was made out of exotic animals such as rhinoceros. Chinese influence in Japan would result in the Japanese adopting Chinese styles, their famous 'samurai armour' being a result of this influence.
History of armour in post-Ancient Europe
Mail
Main articles: Mail (armour)
Mail, sometimes called by the
neologism "chainmail", is made of interlocking iron or steel rings, which may be riveted or welded shut or, solely in modern manufacture, simply closed with the ends abutting. It is believed to have been invented by the
Celtic people in
Eastern Europe about 500 BC. When these Celts moved West they took mail with them. Most cultures who used mail used the Celtic word ''Byrnne'' or a variant, suggesting the Celts as the originators. The Roman Army used mail for almost all of its history. After the collapse of the Roman Empire in 476 AD the infrastructure to make plate was largely lost in Europe, as a result mail was the best available armour during the ensuing Early Medieval period.
Transition to plate
Little by little, small additional plates or disks of steel were added to the mail to protect vulnerable areas. By the late 1200s, the knees
were capped with steel, and two circular disks, called
besagews were fitted to protect the underarms. A variety of methods for improving the protection provided by mail were used as armourers seemingly experimented. Hardened leather and
splinted construction were used for arm and leg pieces. The
coat of plates was developed, an armour made of large plates sewn inside a textile or leather coat.
Solid steel plate was then developed to protect the shins, feet, throat and upper chest, and soon (mid to late 1300s) these protective plates covered most of the mail. The next phase saw the plate cover
almost all parts of the mail. Eventually a full mail hauberk was no longer worn as it had been made redundant. Mail continued to be used to protect those joints which could not be adequately protected by plate, such as the armpit, crook of the elbow and groin.
The small skull cap evolved into a bigger true helmet, the
bascinet, as it was lengthened downward to protect the back of the neck and the sides of the head. Additionally, several new forms of fully enclosed helmets were introduced in the late 1300s to replace the
great helm, such as the
sallet and
barbute.
Plate armour, 1300 - 1620
Probably the most recognised style of armour in the world, associated with the
knights of Late Medieval Europe, but continuing later through the 16th and 17th Centuries in all European countries. Heavy cavalry was being used before plate armour became the norm. In the 14th Century, horseman were using a small, mobile "
hand cannon", which along with improved
crossbows, and the first
pistols, began to take a heavy toll on the mail clad, and partially plated knights and foot soldiers. Rather than dooming the use of body armour, the threat of small firearms intensified the use and further refinement of plate armour. There was a 150 year period in which more and better metallurgically advanced steel armour was being used, precisely because of the danger posed by the gun.
In the early years of pistol and muskets, firearms were relatively low in velocity. The full suits of armour, or breast plates actually stopped bullets fired from a modest distance. The front breast plates were, in fact, commonly shot as a test. The impact point would often be encircled with engraving to point it out. This was called the "proof". It was not uncommon for a man in armour, mounted on a horse, to ride up closer to the enemy, wheel in a tactical manoeuvre called a caracole, and discharge his hand-cannon or later, pistols, right into the faces of the adversary at close range. Cross-bow arrows, if still used, would seldom penetrate good plate, nor would any bullet unless fired from close range. In effect, rather than making plate armour obsolete, the use of firearms stimulated the development of plate armour into its later stages. Hence, guns and cavalry in plate armour were "threat and remedy" together on the battlefield for almost 400 years. For most of that period, it allowed horsemen to fight while being the targets of defending arquebuseers without being easily killed. Full suits of armour were actually worn by generals and princely commanders right up to the second decade of the 18th Century. It was the only way they could be mounted & survey the overall battlefield with safety from distant musket fire.
The horse was afforded protection from lances and infantry weapons by steel plate
barding. This gave the horse protection and enhanced the visual impression of a mounted knight. Late in the era, elaborate barding was used in parade armour.
See
components of medieval armour for a summary description and comparison of the various parts of a harness as plate armour developed over time.
Characteristics of armour
Since the 15th Century, most parts of the
human body had been fitted with specialised steel pieces, typically worn over linen or woollen underclothes and attached to the body via leather straps and buckles. Mail protected those areas that could not be fitted with plate; for example, the back of the knee. Well-known constituent parts of plate armour include the
helm,
gauntlets,
gorget or 'neckguard',
breastplate, and
greaves worn on the lower legs.
Typically, full-body plate armour was custom-made for the individual. This was understandably a very time-consuming and expensive undertaking, costing as much as a family house or high-powered car in today's money. As such, it was almost exclusively the luxury of the noble and landed classes, with soldiers of lower standing generally wearing cheaper armour (if at all) typically limited to a helm and a breastplate. Armour often bore an insignia in the interior, that was only visible to the wearer upon removal. Full plate armour made the wearer virtually impervious to sword blows as well as providing some protection against arrows, bludgeons and even early musket shot. Although sword edges could not penetrate the relatively thin (as little as 2 mm) plate, they ''could'' cause serious concussive damage via the impact. Also, although arrows shot from bows could often pierce early plate at close range, later improvements in the steel forging techniques and armour design made even this line of attack increasingly difficult. By its apex, toughened steel plate was almost impregnable on the battlefield. Knights were instead increasingly felled by blunt weapons such as
maces or
war hammers that could send concussive force through the plate armour resulting in injuries such as broken bones, organ
haemorrhage and/or head trauma. Another tactic was to attempt to strike though the gaps between the armour pieces, using daggers to attack the Knight's eyes or joints.
Contrary to common misconceptions, a well-made suit of medieval 'battle' armour (as opposed to the primarily ceremonial 'parade' and 'tournament' armour popular with kings and nobility of later years) hindered its wearer no more than the equipment carried by soldiers today. An armoured knight, trained for wearing it since his teens, could comfortably run, crawl, climb ladders, as well as mount and dismount his horse without recourse to a crane (a myth probably originating from an English
music hall comedy of the 1830s, and popularised in
Mark Twain's ''
A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court''). A full suit of medieval plate is thought to have weighed little more than 60 lb (27 kg) on average, considerably lighter than the equipment often carried by the elite of today’s armies. (For example,
SAS patrols have been known to carry equipment weighing well over 200 lb (91 kg) for many miles.)
Plate armour slowly discarded
Gradually starting in the mid 16th Century, one plate element after another was discarded to save weight for foot soldiers, but breast and back plates continued to be used through the entire period of the 18th Century through Napoleonic times in many (heavy) European cavalry units, all the way to the early 20th Century. Muskets from about 1700 and later could pierce plate, so cavalry had to be far more mindful of the fire. At the start of
World War I the French
Cuirassiers, in the thousands, rode out to engage the German Cavalry who likewise used helmets and armour. By that period, the shiny armour plate was covered in dark paint and a canvas wrap covered their elaborate Napoleonic style helmets. Their armour was meant to protect only against
sabres and light
lances. The cavalry had to beware of high velocity
rifles and
machine guns like the foot soldiers, who at least had a
trench to protect them. Machine gunners in that war also occasionally wore a crude type of heavy armour. Towards the end of WWI, armies on both sides were experimenting with plate armor as protection against
shrapnel and ricocheting projectiles.
Modern personal armour
Ballistic

A modern ballistic vest.
Today,
bullet proof vests made of ballistic cloth (e.g
kevlar,
dyneema,
twaron,
spectra etc.) and ceramic or metal plates are common among
police forces,
security staff,
corrections officers and some branches of the military. For
infantry applications, lighter protection (historically known as a
flak jacket) is often used to protect
soldiers from
grenade fragments and indirect effects of
bombardment, but usually not
small arms fire. This is because
assault rifles usually fire harder, higher-energy
bullets than
pistols, and the increased protection needed to stop these would be too cumbersome and heavy to use in
combat.
The US Army has adopted
Interceptor body armor, however, which uses Enhanced Small Arms Protective Inserts (E-S.A.P.I) in the chest, sides and back of the armour. Each plate is rated to stop a range of ammunition including 3 hits from a
7.62×51 NATO AP round at a range of 10 m, though accounts in Iraq and Afghanistan tell of soldiers shot as much as seven times in the chest without penetration .
Non-ballistic

Riot police with body protection against blows
Despite advances in the protection offered by ballistic armour against projectiles, as the name implies, modern ballistic armour is much less impervious to 'stabbing' weapons unless they are augmented with anti-knife/anti-stab armour(usually a form of chain-mail).
Riot police are usually equipped with armour against
blows.
See also
★
Chinese armour
★
Korean armour
★
Mongolian armour
★
Dragon Skin body armor
★
Military uniforms
★
Battledress
★
Military history
★
Vehicle armour
★
Rolled Homogeneous Armour
★
Hillbilly armour
★
Powered exoskeleton
External links
★
Medieval Armour Reproduction and History
★
DSM's Dyneema page - modern materials
★
Honeywell's Spectra page - modern materials
★
Lightweight ballistic composites: Military and law-enforcement applications. Edited by A Bhatnagar, Honeywell International, USA
★
International Testing Standards for Modern Personal Body Armor