ART REPATRIATION
'Art (and cultural) repatriation' is the return of art or cultural objects to their country of origin (usually referring to ancient art), or (for looted art) its former owners (or their heirs).
Cultural repatriation usually refers to aboriginal objects and human remains. An example is the Haisla Totem Pole Repatriation Project of Kitimat, British Columbia, Canada, which seeks the return of a totem pole, one of the community's most culturally significant treasures, which had been taken to Sweden in 1929.
The concept of art and cultural repatriation gained momentum through the latter decades of the twentieth century and began to show fruition by the end of the century when key works were ceded back to claimants. Nonetheless, the concept remains controversial as opponents argue that ownership regained by one country is heritage lost by another, especially where art objects have been held sometimes for very long periods of time. For example, the British Museum has held the Elgin Marbles since 1816 and the Museum strongly defends its right to own and display the marbles. On the other hand, the Metropolitan Museum of Art recently negotiated the repatriation of the Euphronios krater to Italy, from where it was thought to have been looted in the early 1970s.
'Art repatriation'
★ Culture Without Context
★ Discussion of ethics
★ 2006 article from the University of Wisconsin
'Looted art'
★ ''San Francisco Chronicle'', 2003 article on repatriation of looted art
★ Attempts to locate looted art in British regional museums
★ WWII and the Looted Art Problem
★ Quedlinberg Art Affair
★ Dispute: "Cuneiform Tablets in the News"
'Cultural repatriation'
★ US National Park Service on International Repatriation
★ Haisla Totem Pole Repatriation Project
★ Return of Aboriginal Australian remains from England
★ Smithsonian cultural repatriation program
Cultural repatriation usually refers to aboriginal objects and human remains. An example is the Haisla Totem Pole Repatriation Project of Kitimat, British Columbia, Canada, which seeks the return of a totem pole, one of the community's most culturally significant treasures, which had been taken to Sweden in 1929.
The concept of art and cultural repatriation gained momentum through the latter decades of the twentieth century and began to show fruition by the end of the century when key works were ceded back to claimants. Nonetheless, the concept remains controversial as opponents argue that ownership regained by one country is heritage lost by another, especially where art objects have been held sometimes for very long periods of time. For example, the British Museum has held the Elgin Marbles since 1816 and the Museum strongly defends its right to own and display the marbles. On the other hand, the Metropolitan Museum of Art recently negotiated the repatriation of the Euphronios krater to Italy, from where it was thought to have been looted in the early 1970s.
| Contents |
| External links |
External links
'Art repatriation'
★ Culture Without Context
★ Discussion of ethics
★ 2006 article from the University of Wisconsin
'Looted art'
★ ''San Francisco Chronicle'', 2003 article on repatriation of looted art
★ Attempts to locate looted art in British regional museums
★ WWII and the Looted Art Problem
★ Quedlinberg Art Affair
★ Dispute: "Cuneiform Tablets in the News"
'Cultural repatriation'
★ US National Park Service on International Repatriation
★ Haisla Totem Pole Repatriation Project
★ Return of Aboriginal Australian remains from England
★ Smithsonian cultural repatriation program
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves

العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español