ARTIFICIAL CONTROVERSY
An 'artificial controversy', or variously a 'contrived controversy', 'engineered controversy', 'fabricated controversy', or 'manufactured controversy', is a controversy that is claimed to not stem from genuine difference of opinion. The controversy is typically developed by an interest group, such as a political party[1]
or a marketing company, to attract media attention,[2]
or to facilitate framing of a particular issue. Creating controversy is also a controversial legal tactic used to gain advantage in a negotiation or trial.
The controversy may stem from a minor incident blown out of proportion,[3]
from a false claim of controversy where no serious dispute existed,
or no reasonable doubt remains,
or unintentionally from misinterpreting data.
Writing on the politics of cancer and the influence of special interest groups on the public policy debate, Dr. Robert N. Proctor, history of science professor at Stanford University specializing in scientific controversy and the cultural production of ignorance,[4]
which he calls agnotology,[5]
described the use of artificial controversy: "The relation between knowledge and ignorance in these matters is complex....The problem is partly that ignorance can be manufactured, controversy can be engineered."[6]
In a 2006 interview regarding public perceptions of the press in the United States, iconic journalist Carl Bernstein, one half of the Woodward & Bernstein team who broke the Watergate scandal story that ultimately ended the presidency of Richard Nixon, lamented, "Well, let's take a look at what we're talking about: misinformation, disinformation, celebrity stuff -- gossip, sensationalism and especially manufactured controversy.... Increasingly, sensationalism, gossip, manufactured controversy have become our agenda instead of the best obtainable version of the truth. We've become frivolous."[7]
Main articles: Denialism
A common method of making denial look legitimate is generating artificial controversies over the subject matter.
★ Holocaust deniers typically brand the historical consensus of the Holocaust genocide of World War II as 'controversial' to try to get others to believe there is a genuine difference of opinions between reputable historians, or that there is reasonable doubt as to the reality of the Holocaust. For example, French holocaust denier Robert Faurisson has actively generated controversy over the existence of Nazi gas chambers, including questioning their technical characteristics, and labeling his opponents as "exterminationists."[8]
★ Tobacco industry documents show that the industry created controversy over the dangers of tobacco smoking, and later passive smoking, Tobacco industry tactics for resisting public policy on health, Saloojee, Y., , , Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2000 without actually denying the claims. A 1969 Brown and Williamson internal document describes the strategy: “Doubt is our product, since it is the best means of competing with the ‘body of fact’ that exists in the mind of the general public. It is also the means of establishing a controversy. ... Spread doubt over strong scientific evidence and the public won’t know what to believe.”[9][10] The same tactics were used a generation later in the passive smoking debate. A 1988 meeting of the United Kingdom tobacco industry concerned Philip Morris's plans to use "vast sums of money" to fund research that could cast doubt on the health effects of second-hand smoke. Their intention was to "coordinate and pay scientists on an international basis to keep the environmental tobacco smoke controversy alive".
★ Teach the Controversy, a Discovery Institute ideological denialism campaign against the Theory of Evolution is often labeled as artificial or manufactured controversy.[11]
"Some bills seek to discredit evolution by emphasizing so-called "flaws" in the theory of evolution or "disagreements" within the scientific community. Others insist that teachers have absolute freedom within their classrooms and cannot be disciplined for teaching non-scientific "alternatives" to evolution. A number of bills require that students be taught to "critically analyze" evolution or to understand "the controversy." But there is no significant controversy within the scientific community about the validity of the theory of evolution. The current controversy surrounding the teaching of evolution is not a scientific one." AAAS Statement on the Teaching of Evolution American Association for the Advancement of Science. February 16, 2006 [12] Doubting Darwin?: Creationist Designs on Evolution, Sarkar, Sahotra, , , Blackwell Publishing Limited, 2007, The issue reached the United States federal court system in the 2005 case of Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. Several students and their parents challenged the school board's policy inspired by the intelligent design movement ((IDM) requiring science teachers to read a prepared statement on intelligent design (ID) in science class. After a 40-day trial, conservative judge John E. Jones III wrote in his his 139-page findings of fact and decision, "ID’s backers have sought to avoid the scientific scrutiny which we have now determined that it cannot withstand by advocating that the ''controversy'', but not ID itself, should be taught in science class. This tactic is at best disingenuous, and at worst a canard. The goal of the IDM is not to encourage critical thought, but to foment a revolution which would supplant evolutionary theory with ID."[13]
A partial list of notable controversies labeled as artificial, contrived, engineered, fabricated, or manufactured by a credible though not necessarily objective source, and without regard to whether the controversy is in fact genuine or artificial:
★ Former U.S. Army Aviator and Philippine political prisoner William J. Pomeroy called opposition to the 1933 Hare-Hawes-Cutting Act for Philippine independence an "artificial controversy" launched for political advantage.[14]
★ ''Steven's Handbook of Experimental Psychology'' states that arbitrary statistical thresholds for interpreting experimental data cause unnecessary confusion and "artificial controversy"[15]
★ Mark Beeson, a senior lecturer in International Relations at Griffith University, characterized possible reunification with Malaysia in Singapore as "highly contrived controversy."[16]
★ Former FBI profiler Stephen G. Michaud wrote that the media circus surrounding the 1987 Tawana Brawley rape case in New York was a "contrived controversy."[17]
★ The Congress Legislature Party (CLP) in India has termed the uproar over the Sripada Sagar Project on the Pranahita River an "engineered controversy" designed to delay work.[18]
★ Biographer Andrew Morton contrasted the "engineered controversy" and deliberate chaos the entertainer Madonna causes in her artistic life with the order and regimentation of her business routine.[19]
★ Writer Laura Miller characterized the 2001 brouhaha over the display of artist Renée Cox's "Yo Mama's Last Supper" at the Brooklyn Museum as an "engineered controversy" on the part of the museum.[20][21]
★ U.S. Senator and 2008 Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama accused his opponent, fellow senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, of creating a "fabricated controversy" over his foreign policy comments in July 2007.[22]
★ Pace University Professor of Law John A. Humbach argues that "fabricated controversy" as a lawyering technique undercuts the trial as a "search for truth," and thereby undermines justice and the rule of law. Abuse of Confidentiality and Fabricated Controversy: Two Proposals, Humbach, John A., , , Professional Lawyer, Vol. 11, No. 4,, 2000
★ In early 2007, U.S. retail giant Walmart claimed a "manufactured controversy" forced it to drop plans to open an industrial loan corporation, a type of bank.[23]
★ Time Magazine dubbed Ken Starr's investigation into U.S. President Bill Clinton's infidelity a "manufactured controversy" in a 1998 cover feature story.[24]
★ United Kingdom's National Secular Society has called the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy a "manufactured controversy," and expressed concern over this incident's influence on free speech in Europe.[25]
★ Roger A. Pielke (Jr), a climate change scientist, argued that a June 8, 2005 New York Times cover story about a Bush Administration official's editing of two high level climate reports was a "manufactured controversy."[26]
★ Musician Mathew Callahan wrote that sex and violence in popular music are intended by the music industry to create "manufactured controversies."[27]
★ Canadian politician Howard Hampton wrote that in the pre-World War II period, Ontario Hydro expansion plans were hampered by political interference and "manufactured controversy."[28]
★ Patrick Troy, Professor of Urban Research at the Australian National University, called lack of choice in Australian housing "manufactured controversy."[29]
★ Journalist Eric Boehlert called criticism of the 2005 Pulitzer Prize winning photograph of a murder on Haifa Street in Baghdad a "manufactured controversy" for censorship purposes.[30]
★ Controversy#In propaganda
★ Cause célèbre
★ Gibson's law
★ Publicity stunt
★ Succès de scandale
★ Agnotology
★ ''Precaution and the Methodological Status of Scientific (Un)certainty'' by A. Van Dommelen, published in the Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Volume 15, Number 1, 2002, pages 123–139 (abstract)
★ ''The Media and Political Process'' by Eric Louw, 2005, ISBN 0761940839
★ ''Prelude and temptation: arresting a vitriolic and defamatory controversy'' by Leslie G. Roman, published in the International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Volume 16, Issue 2 March 2003, pages 149–156
★ The Republican War on Science by Chris Mooney, ISBN 0465046762
★ GameDaily BIZ: Controversial Games and PR: Warning! Contents May Be Hot
1. At cross purposes: U. S.-Taiwan relations since 1942, Bush, Richard Clarence, , , M.E. Sharpe, 2004,
2. Hollywood, hype and audiences: selling and watching popular film in the 1990s, Austin, Thomas, , , Manchester University Press, 2002,
3. Chief's Clipboard: Twenty Years of Ronny Coleman, Coleman, Ronny J., , , Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2005,
4. Stanford History Department : Robert N. Proctor
5. What Organizations Don't Want to Know Can Hurt
6. Thinking about evolution: historical, philosophical, and political perspectives. Volume two, Proctor, Robert N., , , Cambridge University Press, 2001,
7. Interview: Carl Bernstein
8. Denying history: who says the Holocaust never happened and why do they say it?, Grobman, Alex; Shermer, Michael, , , University of California Press, 2000,
9. Fuelling Controversy
10. The denial industry : George Monbiot on climate change and Big Tobacco
11. "That this controversy is one largely manufactured by the proponents of creationism and intelligent design may not matter, and as long as the controversy is taught in classes on current affairs, politics, or religion, and not in science classes, neither scientists nor citizens should be concerned." Intelligent Judging — Evolution in the Classroom and the Courtroom George J. Annas, New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 354:2277-2281 May 25, 2006
12. Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals. A Position Paper from the Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy Barbara Forrest. May, 2007.
13.
14. The Philippines: colonialism, collaboration, and resistance, Pomeroy, William J., , , International Publishers, 1992,
15. Steven's handbook of experimental psychology, Pashler, Harold E.; Stevens, S. S., , , John Wiley & Sons, 2002,
16. Reconfiguring East Asia: regional institutions and organizations after the crisis, , Mark, Beeson, RoutledgeCurzon, 2002,
17. The Evil That Men Do, Hazelwood, Roy; Michaud, Stephen G., , , St. Martin's True Crime, 2000,
18. Hyderabad News : It's engineered controversy, says CLP
19. Madonna, Morton, Andrew R., , , St. Martin's Paperbacks, 2002,
20. The new victimology Laura Miller
21. The new anti-Catholicism: the last acceptable prejudice, Jenkins, Philip, , , Oxford University Press, 2003,
22. Clinton and Obama Campaigns Spar Over Debate
23. Wal-Mart ends attempt to start bank : FDIC calls move wise, retailer cites 'manufactured controversy'
24. In defense of Clinton
25. New EU Meeting Will Push For Europe-Wide Restrictions On Free Speech
26. - Prometheus: Manufactured Controversy Archives
27. The Trouble With Music, Callahan, Mathew, , , AK Press, 2005,
28. Public Power: Energy Production in the 21st Century, Howard Hampton, , , Insomniac Press, 2003,
29. The Compact city: a sustainable urban form?, Williams, Katie; Jenks, M.; Burton, Elizabeth, , , E & FN Spon, 1996,
30. Lapdogs: how the press rolled over for Bush, Eric Boehlert, , , Free Press, 2006,
or a marketing company, to attract media attention,[2]
or to facilitate framing of a particular issue. Creating controversy is also a controversial legal tactic used to gain advantage in a negotiation or trial.
The controversy may stem from a minor incident blown out of proportion,[3]
from a false claim of controversy where no serious dispute existed,
or no reasonable doubt remains,
or unintentionally from misinterpreting data.
Writing on the politics of cancer and the influence of special interest groups on the public policy debate, Dr. Robert N. Proctor, history of science professor at Stanford University specializing in scientific controversy and the cultural production of ignorance,[4]
which he calls agnotology,[5]
described the use of artificial controversy: "The relation between knowledge and ignorance in these matters is complex....The problem is partly that ignorance can be manufactured, controversy can be engineered."[6]
In a 2006 interview regarding public perceptions of the press in the United States, iconic journalist Carl Bernstein, one half of the Woodward & Bernstein team who broke the Watergate scandal story that ultimately ended the presidency of Richard Nixon, lamented, "Well, let's take a look at what we're talking about: misinformation, disinformation, celebrity stuff -- gossip, sensationalism and especially manufactured controversy.... Increasingly, sensationalism, gossip, manufactured controversy have become our agenda instead of the best obtainable version of the truth. We've become frivolous."[7]
| Contents |
| Denialism |
| Some notable usage examples |
| Artificial controversy |
| Contrived controversy |
| Engineered controversy |
| Fabricated controversy |
| Manufactured controversy |
| See also |
| Further reading |
| References |
Denialism
Main articles: Denialism
A common method of making denial look legitimate is generating artificial controversies over the subject matter.
★ Holocaust deniers typically brand the historical consensus of the Holocaust genocide of World War II as 'controversial' to try to get others to believe there is a genuine difference of opinions between reputable historians, or that there is reasonable doubt as to the reality of the Holocaust. For example, French holocaust denier Robert Faurisson has actively generated controversy over the existence of Nazi gas chambers, including questioning their technical characteristics, and labeling his opponents as "exterminationists."[8]
★ Tobacco industry documents show that the industry created controversy over the dangers of tobacco smoking, and later passive smoking, Tobacco industry tactics for resisting public policy on health, Saloojee, Y., , , Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2000 without actually denying the claims. A 1969 Brown and Williamson internal document describes the strategy: “Doubt is our product, since it is the best means of competing with the ‘body of fact’ that exists in the mind of the general public. It is also the means of establishing a controversy. ... Spread doubt over strong scientific evidence and the public won’t know what to believe.”[9][10] The same tactics were used a generation later in the passive smoking debate. A 1988 meeting of the United Kingdom tobacco industry concerned Philip Morris's plans to use "vast sums of money" to fund research that could cast doubt on the health effects of second-hand smoke. Their intention was to "coordinate and pay scientists on an international basis to keep the environmental tobacco smoke controversy alive".
★ Teach the Controversy, a Discovery Institute ideological denialism campaign against the Theory of Evolution is often labeled as artificial or manufactured controversy.[11]
"Some bills seek to discredit evolution by emphasizing so-called "flaws" in the theory of evolution or "disagreements" within the scientific community. Others insist that teachers have absolute freedom within their classrooms and cannot be disciplined for teaching non-scientific "alternatives" to evolution. A number of bills require that students be taught to "critically analyze" evolution or to understand "the controversy." But there is no significant controversy within the scientific community about the validity of the theory of evolution. The current controversy surrounding the teaching of evolution is not a scientific one." AAAS Statement on the Teaching of Evolution American Association for the Advancement of Science. February 16, 2006 [12] Doubting Darwin?: Creationist Designs on Evolution, Sarkar, Sahotra, , , Blackwell Publishing Limited, 2007, The issue reached the United States federal court system in the 2005 case of Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. Several students and their parents challenged the school board's policy inspired by the intelligent design movement ((IDM) requiring science teachers to read a prepared statement on intelligent design (ID) in science class. After a 40-day trial, conservative judge John E. Jones III wrote in his his 139-page findings of fact and decision, "ID’s backers have sought to avoid the scientific scrutiny which we have now determined that it cannot withstand by advocating that the ''controversy'', but not ID itself, should be taught in science class. This tactic is at best disingenuous, and at worst a canard. The goal of the IDM is not to encourage critical thought, but to foment a revolution which would supplant evolutionary theory with ID."[13]
Some notable usage examples
A partial list of notable controversies labeled as artificial, contrived, engineered, fabricated, or manufactured by a credible though not necessarily objective source, and without regard to whether the controversy is in fact genuine or artificial:
Artificial controversy
★ Former U.S. Army Aviator and Philippine political prisoner William J. Pomeroy called opposition to the 1933 Hare-Hawes-Cutting Act for Philippine independence an "artificial controversy" launched for political advantage.[14]
★ ''Steven's Handbook of Experimental Psychology'' states that arbitrary statistical thresholds for interpreting experimental data cause unnecessary confusion and "artificial controversy"[15]
Contrived controversy
★ Mark Beeson, a senior lecturer in International Relations at Griffith University, characterized possible reunification with Malaysia in Singapore as "highly contrived controversy."[16]
★ Former FBI profiler Stephen G. Michaud wrote that the media circus surrounding the 1987 Tawana Brawley rape case in New York was a "contrived controversy."[17]
Engineered controversy
★ The Congress Legislature Party (CLP) in India has termed the uproar over the Sripada Sagar Project on the Pranahita River an "engineered controversy" designed to delay work.[18]
★ Biographer Andrew Morton contrasted the "engineered controversy" and deliberate chaos the entertainer Madonna causes in her artistic life with the order and regimentation of her business routine.[19]
★ Writer Laura Miller characterized the 2001 brouhaha over the display of artist Renée Cox's "Yo Mama's Last Supper" at the Brooklyn Museum as an "engineered controversy" on the part of the museum.[20][21]
Fabricated controversy
★ U.S. Senator and 2008 Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama accused his opponent, fellow senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, of creating a "fabricated controversy" over his foreign policy comments in July 2007.[22]
★ Pace University Professor of Law John A. Humbach argues that "fabricated controversy" as a lawyering technique undercuts the trial as a "search for truth," and thereby undermines justice and the rule of law. Abuse of Confidentiality and Fabricated Controversy: Two Proposals, Humbach, John A., , , Professional Lawyer, Vol. 11, No. 4,, 2000
Manufactured controversy
★ In early 2007, U.S. retail giant Walmart claimed a "manufactured controversy" forced it to drop plans to open an industrial loan corporation, a type of bank.[23]
★ Time Magazine dubbed Ken Starr's investigation into U.S. President Bill Clinton's infidelity a "manufactured controversy" in a 1998 cover feature story.[24]
★ United Kingdom's National Secular Society has called the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy a "manufactured controversy," and expressed concern over this incident's influence on free speech in Europe.[25]
★ Roger A. Pielke (Jr), a climate change scientist, argued that a June 8, 2005 New York Times cover story about a Bush Administration official's editing of two high level climate reports was a "manufactured controversy."[26]
★ Musician Mathew Callahan wrote that sex and violence in popular music are intended by the music industry to create "manufactured controversies."[27]
★ Canadian politician Howard Hampton wrote that in the pre-World War II period, Ontario Hydro expansion plans were hampered by political interference and "manufactured controversy."[28]
★ Patrick Troy, Professor of Urban Research at the Australian National University, called lack of choice in Australian housing "manufactured controversy."[29]
★ Journalist Eric Boehlert called criticism of the 2005 Pulitzer Prize winning photograph of a murder on Haifa Street in Baghdad a "manufactured controversy" for censorship purposes.[30]
See also
★ Controversy#In propaganda
★ Cause célèbre
★ Gibson's law
★ Publicity stunt
★ Succès de scandale
★ Agnotology
Further reading
★ ''Precaution and the Methodological Status of Scientific (Un)certainty'' by A. Van Dommelen, published in the Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Volume 15, Number 1, 2002, pages 123–139 (abstract)
★ ''The Media and Political Process'' by Eric Louw, 2005, ISBN 0761940839
★ ''Prelude and temptation: arresting a vitriolic and defamatory controversy'' by Leslie G. Roman, published in the International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Volume 16, Issue 2 March 2003, pages 149–156
★ The Republican War on Science by Chris Mooney, ISBN 0465046762
★ GameDaily BIZ: Controversial Games and PR: Warning! Contents May Be Hot
References
1. At cross purposes: U. S.-Taiwan relations since 1942, Bush, Richard Clarence, , , M.E. Sharpe, 2004,
2. Hollywood, hype and audiences: selling and watching popular film in the 1990s, Austin, Thomas, , , Manchester University Press, 2002,
3. Chief's Clipboard: Twenty Years of Ronny Coleman, Coleman, Ronny J., , , Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2005,
4. Stanford History Department : Robert N. Proctor
5. What Organizations Don't Want to Know Can Hurt
6. Thinking about evolution: historical, philosophical, and political perspectives. Volume two, Proctor, Robert N., , , Cambridge University Press, 2001,
7. Interview: Carl Bernstein
8. Denying history: who says the Holocaust never happened and why do they say it?, Grobman, Alex; Shermer, Michael, , , University of California Press, 2000,
9. Fuelling Controversy
10. The denial industry : George Monbiot on climate change and Big Tobacco
11. "That this controversy is one largely manufactured by the proponents of creationism and intelligent design may not matter, and as long as the controversy is taught in classes on current affairs, politics, or religion, and not in science classes, neither scientists nor citizens should be concerned." Intelligent Judging — Evolution in the Classroom and the Courtroom George J. Annas, New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 354:2277-2281 May 25, 2006
12. Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals. A Position Paper from the Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy Barbara Forrest. May, 2007.
13.
14. The Philippines: colonialism, collaboration, and resistance, Pomeroy, William J., , , International Publishers, 1992,
15. Steven's handbook of experimental psychology, Pashler, Harold E.; Stevens, S. S., , , John Wiley & Sons, 2002,
16. Reconfiguring East Asia: regional institutions and organizations after the crisis, , Mark, Beeson, RoutledgeCurzon, 2002,
17. The Evil That Men Do, Hazelwood, Roy; Michaud, Stephen G., , , St. Martin's True Crime, 2000,
18. Hyderabad News : It's engineered controversy, says CLP
19. Madonna, Morton, Andrew R., , , St. Martin's Paperbacks, 2002,
20. The new victimology Laura Miller
21. The new anti-Catholicism: the last acceptable prejudice, Jenkins, Philip, , , Oxford University Press, 2003,
22. Clinton and Obama Campaigns Spar Over Debate
23. Wal-Mart ends attempt to start bank : FDIC calls move wise, retailer cites 'manufactured controversy'
24. In defense of Clinton
25. New EU Meeting Will Push For Europe-Wide Restrictions On Free Speech
26. - Prometheus: Manufactured Controversy Archives
27. The Trouble With Music, Callahan, Mathew, , , AK Press, 2005,
28. Public Power: Energy Production in the 21st Century, Howard Hampton, , , Insomniac Press, 2003,
29. The Compact city: a sustainable urban form?, Williams, Katie; Jenks, M.; Burton, Elizabeth, , , E & FN Spon, 1996,
30. Lapdogs: how the press rolled over for Bush, Eric Boehlert, , , Free Press, 2006,
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves

العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español