NASTIKA
(Redirected from Astika)
'Astika' (Sanskrit: आसà¥à¤¤à¤¿à¤•, IAST:; "orthodox") and 'Nastika' (नासà¥à¤¤à¤¿à¤•, ; "heterodox") are technical terms in Hinduism used to classify philosophical schools and persons, according to whether they accept the authority of the Vedas as supreme revealed scriptures, or not.[1] By this definition, Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Samkhya, Yoga, Purva Mimamsa and Vedanta are classified as ''astika'' schools; while Charvaka, Jainism and Buddhism are considered ''nastika'' schools. [2]
In non-technical usage, the term ''astika'' is sometimes loosely translated as "theist" while ''nastika'' is translated as "atheist".[3] However this interpretation is distinct from the use of the term in Hindu philosophy. Notably even among the ''astika'' schools, ''samkhya''[4]and the early ''mimamsa'' school do not accept a God (see Atheism in Hinduism) while accepting the authority of the Vedas; they thus are "atheistic ''astika'' schools".
The different usages of these terms are explained by Chatterjee and Datta as follows:
''Astika'' (IAST:) is a Sanskrit adjective (and noun) that is derived from ''asti'' ("it is or exists") meaning "believing" or "pious";[1] or "one who believes in the existence (of God, of another world, etc.)." ''Nastika'' (''na'' (not) + '') is its negative, literally meaning "not believing" or "not pious". As used in Indian philosophy ''nastika'' refers to belief in Vedic authority, not belief or lack of belief in theism. As N. N. Bhattacharyya writes:
Many Indian intellectual traditions were codified during the medieval period into a standard list of six orthodox systems, the shaddarshanas (''), all of which cite Vedic authority as their source:[1]
★ Nyaya, the school of logic
★ Vaisheshika, the atomist school
★ Samkhya, the enumeration school
★ Yoga, the school of Patanjali (which assumes the metaphysics of Samkhya)
★ Purva Mimamsa (or simply Mimamsa), the tradition of Vedic exegesis, and
★ Vedanta (also called Uttara Mimamsa), the Upanishadic tradition.
These are often coupled into three groups for both historical and conceptual reasons: Nyaya-Vaishesika, Samkhya-Yoga, and Mimamsa-Vedanta.
The three main heterodox schools of Indian philosophy do not base their beliefs on Vedic authority:
★ Buddhism
★ Jainism
★ Carvaka
The use of the term ''nastika'' to describe Buddhism and Jainism in India is explained by Gavin Flood as follows:
The Tantric traditions in Hinduism, have both ''astika'' and ''nastika'' lines; as Banerji writes in "''Tantra in Bengal''":
★ Hinduism
★ Hindu philosophy
★ Atheism in Hinduism
1.
2. For an overview of this method of classification, with detail on the grouping of schools, see:
3. For instance, the "Atheist Society of India" produces a monthly publications ''Nasthika Yugam'' which it translates as "The Age of Atheism".
4. "By reasoning, the material principle itself simply evolves into complex forms, and there is no need to hold that some spiritual power governs the material principle or its ultimate source." Francis Clooney, CJ, "''Restoring 'Hindu Theology' as a category in Indian intellectual discourse", in
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
★
★
★
★ Chatterjee, Satischandra and Datta, Dhirendramohan. An Introduction to Indian Philosophy. Eighth Reprint Edition. (University of Calcutta: 1984).
★
★ Flood, Gavin (Ed.), "''Blackwell companion to Hinduism"'', Blackwell Publishing, 2003. ISBN 0-631-21535-2
★ Monier-Williams, Monier, ''"Monier-Williams Sanskrit Dictionary"'', Nataraj Books, 2006, ISBN 18-81338-58-4
★ Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli; and Moore, Charles A. ''A Source Book in Indian Philosophy''. Princeton University Press; 1957. Princeton paperback 12th edition, 1989. ISBN 0-691-01958-4.
'Astika' (Sanskrit: आसà¥à¤¤à¤¿à¤•, IAST:; "orthodox") and 'Nastika' (नासà¥à¤¤à¤¿à¤•, ; "heterodox") are technical terms in Hinduism used to classify philosophical schools and persons, according to whether they accept the authority of the Vedas as supreme revealed scriptures, or not.[1] By this definition, Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Samkhya, Yoga, Purva Mimamsa and Vedanta are classified as ''astika'' schools; while Charvaka, Jainism and Buddhism are considered ''nastika'' schools. [2]
In non-technical usage, the term ''astika'' is sometimes loosely translated as "theist" while ''nastika'' is translated as "atheist".[3] However this interpretation is distinct from the use of the term in Hindu philosophy. Notably even among the ''astika'' schools, ''samkhya''[4]and the early ''mimamsa'' school do not accept a God (see Atheism in Hinduism) while accepting the authority of the Vedas; they thus are "atheistic ''astika'' schools".
The different usages of these terms are explained by Chatterjee and Datta as follows:
"In modern Indian languages, 'Ästika' and 'nÄstika' generally mean 'theist' and 'atheist', respectively. But in Sanskrit philosophical literature, 'Ästika' means 'one who believes in the authority of the Vedas' or 'one who believes in life after death'. ('nÄstika' means the opposite of these). The word is used here in the first sense. In the second sense, even the Jaina and Bauddha schools are 'Ästika', as they believe in life after death. The six orthodox schools are 'Ästika', and the CÄrvÄka is 'nÄstika' in both the senses."[1]
| Contents |
| Etymology |
| Classification of schools |
| See also |
| Notes |
| References |
Etymology
''Astika'' (IAST:) is a Sanskrit adjective (and noun) that is derived from ''asti'' ("it is or exists") meaning "believing" or "pious";[1] or "one who believes in the existence (of God, of another world, etc.)." ''Nastika'' (''na'' (not) + '') is its negative, literally meaning "not believing" or "not pious". As used in Indian philosophy ''nastika'' refers to belief in Vedic authority, not belief or lack of belief in theism. As N. N. Bhattacharyya writes:
The followers of Tantra are often branded as NÄstika by the upholders of the Vedic tradition. The term NÄstika does not denote an atheist. It is applied only to those who do not believe in the Vedas. The and do not believe in God, buth they believe in the Vedas and hence they are not NÄstikas. The Buddhists, Jains, and CÄrvÄkas do not believe in the Vedas; hence they are NÄstikas. [1]
Classification of schools
Many Indian intellectual traditions were codified during the medieval period into a standard list of six orthodox systems, the shaddarshanas (''), all of which cite Vedic authority as their source:[1]
★ Nyaya, the school of logic
★ Vaisheshika, the atomist school
★ Samkhya, the enumeration school
★ Yoga, the school of Patanjali (which assumes the metaphysics of Samkhya)
★ Purva Mimamsa (or simply Mimamsa), the tradition of Vedic exegesis, and
★ Vedanta (also called Uttara Mimamsa), the Upanishadic tradition.
These are often coupled into three groups for both historical and conceptual reasons: Nyaya-Vaishesika, Samkhya-Yoga, and Mimamsa-Vedanta.
The three main heterodox schools of Indian philosophy do not base their beliefs on Vedic authority:
★ Buddhism
★ Jainism
★ Carvaka
The use of the term ''nastika'' to describe Buddhism and Jainism in India is explained by Gavin Flood as follows:
At an early period, during the formation of the UpaniÅŸads and the rise of Buddhism and Jainism, we must envisage a common heritage of meditation and mental discipline practiced by renouncers with varying affiliations to non-orthodox (Veda-rejecting) and orthodox (Veda-accepting) traditions.... These schools [such as Buddhism and Jainism] are understandably regarded as heterodox (''nÄstika'') by orthodox (''Ästika'') Brahmanism. [1]
The Tantric traditions in Hinduism, have both ''astika'' and ''nastika'' lines; as Banerji writes in "''Tantra in Bengal''":
Tantras are ... also divided as ''Ästika'' or Vedic and ''nÄstika'' or non-Vedic. In accordance with the predominance of the deity the ''Ästika'' works are again divided as .[1]
See also
★ Hinduism
★ Hindu philosophy
★ Atheism in Hinduism
Notes
1.
2. For an overview of this method of classification, with detail on the grouping of schools, see:
3. For instance, the "Atheist Society of India" produces a monthly publications ''Nasthika Yugam'' which it translates as "The Age of Atheism".
4. "By reasoning, the material principle itself simply evolves into complex forms, and there is no need to hold that some spiritual power governs the material principle or its ultimate source." Francis Clooney, CJ, "''Restoring 'Hindu Theology' as a category in Indian intellectual discourse", in
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
References
★
★
★
★ Chatterjee, Satischandra and Datta, Dhirendramohan. An Introduction to Indian Philosophy. Eighth Reprint Edition. (University of Calcutta: 1984).
★
★ Flood, Gavin (Ed.), "''Blackwell companion to Hinduism"'', Blackwell Publishing, 2003. ISBN 0-631-21535-2
★ Monier-Williams, Monier, ''"Monier-Williams Sanskrit Dictionary"'', Nataraj Books, 2006, ISBN 18-81338-58-4
★ Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli; and Moore, Charles A. ''A Source Book in Indian Philosophy''. Princeton University Press; 1957. Princeton paperback 12th edition, 1989. ISBN 0-691-01958-4.
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves

العربية
ä¸å›½
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिनà¥à¤¦à¥€
Italiano
日本語
Português
РуÑÑкий
Español



