(Redirected from Augsburg confession)
The '''Augsburg Confession''', also known as the "Augustana" from its
Latin name, ''Confessio Augustana,'' is the primary confession of faith of the
Lutheran Church. The Augsburg Confession is, by its catholic nature (meaning "universal" in its application to Lutheran churches), normative to all Lutheran Churches everywhere and in all times. It is also one of the most important documents of the
Lutheran reformation. The Augsburg Confession was written in both
German and
Latin, and was presented by a number of
German rulers and free-cities at the
Diet of Augsburg on
June 25,
1530. The
Holy Roman Emperor Charles V had called on the Princes and Free Territories in
Germany to explain their religious convictions in an attempt to restore religious and political unity in the Holy Roman Empire, and rally support against the
Turkish invasion. It is the fourth document contained in the Lutheran
Book of Concord.
Felix Mendelssohn's 5th Symphony (actually his 2
nd Symphony in order of composition) was commissioned to celebrate the 300th anniversary of the Augsburg Confession and thus bears the title ''The Reformation Symphony''.
Origin of the Confession
On
January 21,
1530, the
Emperor Charles V issued letters from
Bologna, inviting the German
diet to meet in
Augsburg April 8, for the purpose of discussing and deciding various important questions. Although the writ of invitation was couched in very peaceful language, it was received with suspicion by some of the Evangelicals. The far-seeing
Landgrave of Hesse hesitated to attend the diet, but the Elector
John of Saxony, who received the writ
March 11, on
March 14 directed
Luther,
Jonas,
Bugenhagen, and
Melanchthon to meet in
Torgau, where he was, and present a summary of the Lutheran faith, to be laid before the emperor at the diet.
This summary has received the name of the "Torgau Articles". On
April 3 the elector and reformers started from
Torgau and reached
Coburg on
April 23. There Luther was left behind. The rest reached Augsburg
May 2. On the journey Melanchthon worked on an "apology", using the Torgau articles, and sent his draft to Luther at Coburg on
May 11, who approved it. Several alterations were suggested to Melanchthon in his conferences with Jonas, the Saxon chancellor
Bruck, the conciliatory bishop
Stadion of Augsburg, and the imperial secretary
Alfonso Valdez.
On
June 23 the final form of the text was adopted in the presence of the Elector John of Saxony, the Landgrave
Philip of Hesse, the Margrave
George of Brandenburg, the Dukes Ernest and
Francis of Luneburg, the representatives of
Nuremberg and
Reutlingen, and other counselors, besides twelve theologians. After the reading the confession was signed by the Elector John of Saxony, Margrave George of Brandenburg, Duke
Ernest of Luneburg, the Landgrave Philip of Hesse, the Prince
Wolfgang of Anhalt, the representatives of Nuremberg and Reutlingen, and probably also by the electoral prince John Frederick and Duke Francis of Luneburg.
During the diet the cities of
Weißenburg in Bayern,
Heilbronn,
Kempten, and
Windesheim also expressed their concurrence with the confession. The emperor had ordered the confession to be presented to him at the next session,
June 24; but when the evangelical princes asked that it be read in public, their petition was refused, and efforts were made to prevent the public reading of the document altogether. The evangelical princes, however, declared that they would not part with the confession until its reading should be allowed. The 25th was then fixed for the day of its presentation. In order to exclude the people, the little chapel of the episcopal palace was appointed in place of the spacious city hall, where the meetings of the diet were held. The two Saxon chancellors Bruck and Beyer, the one with the Latin copy, the other with the German, stepped into the middle of the assembly, and against the wish of the emperor the German text was read. The reading lasted two hours and was so distinct that every word could be heard outside. The reading being over, the copies were handed to the emperor. The German he gave to the imperial chancellor, the Elector of Mainz, the Latin he took away. Neither of the copies is now extant.
The first official publication (''
Editio princeps'') was edited by
Philipp Melanchthon, a professor at the
University of Wittenberg and close friend of
Martin Luther.
In
1540, Melanchthon produced a revised edition, the ''
Variata'', which was signed by
John Calvin. Many Lutheran churches specify in their official documents that they subscribe to the "Unaltered Augsburg Confession", as opposed to the Variata.
The Unaltered Augsburg Confession is the primary confessional document of the Lutheran faith and is part of
The Book of Concord.
Contents
Preface
A plea for Christian unity, and a promise that the Lutherans "are neglecting nothing that may serve the cause of Christian unity."
Articles of Faith
I. Concerning God — a brief explanation of the
Trinity, which was not a point of controversy. However, various opponents claimed that Luther did not accept such a doctrine, so its inclusion is understandable.
II. Concerning Original Sin — a brief explanation of
Original Sin, which was not a point of controversy either.
III. Concerning the
Son of God — a standard, short explanation of the dual nature of
Jesus. Not a point of controversy.
IV. Concerning Justification — the doctrine of
Justification by Faith. This was the primary difference between
Lutherans and
Roman Catholics at the time. This article appeals to
Paul's epistle to the
Romans.
V. Concerning the Office of Preaching — a brief statement on the preaching. Not a point of controversy, though the
Anabaptists are condemned for teaching that the
Holy Spirit does not come to humans without their "preparations and works".
VI. Concerning New Obedience — a statement saying that works are good, but have no merit before
God. This is opposed to the
Roman Catholic doctrine of
justification.
VII. Concerning the Church — a statement on the belief in one Christian Church. Not a point of controversy.
VIII. What is the Church? — a statement on the acceptance of all believers into the aforementioned church. The
Donatists are condemned for obvious reasons.
IX. Concerning
Baptism — a statement on the belief in
infant baptism and a condemnation of the
Anabaptists for preaching otherwise. Not a point of controversy for the Diet.
X. Concerning the Lord's Supper — a statement on the Lutheran view of the
Real Presence in the
Eucharist. All other views are condemned.
XI. Concerning
Confession — a statement supporting the practice of confession, although it is stated that no one was able to confess all their sins.
XII. Concerning
Repentance — a statement on the belief that repentance is to feel sorrow for one's sins; it includes both contrition and faith and that the Church ought to impart
absolution to those thus returning to repentance.
Anabaptists who teach that to be baptized is to be free of sin are condemned, as well as
Novatians.
XIII. Concerning the Use of
Sacraments — a standard statement on the use of sacraments, which was not a point of controversy. Those who say that one is justified by use of sacraments without faith are condemned.
XIV. Concerning Church Government — a standard statement on the belief that one must be called to be a minister. Not a point of controversy.
XV. Concerning Church Regulations — a statement about how festivals not commanded in the
Bible will have no bearing on justification and are contrary to the gospel.
XVI. Concerning Public Order and Secular Government — a statement in support of secular government.
Anabaptists are condemned for teaching otherwise, along with a condemnation of those who do good for fear of the government and not
God. Not a point of controversy.
XVII. Concerning the Return of
Christ to Judgment — a standard statement about the
End Times, which states that
Jesus will judge the living and the dead, the elect will go to
heaven and the "ungodly" will go to
Hell. Condemned are
Universalism and the belief that the elect will have a secular government. Not a point of controversy.
XVIII. Concerning
Free Will — a statement about the belief in man's inclination to sin, and the need for external help from the
Holy Spirit to please God. Those who teach that man can keep the commandments without the Holy Spirit are condemned. This is only a controversy insofar as the scholastics who taught that man does have some say in whether or not he/she may please God.
XIX. Concerning the Cause of Sin — a statement on the inclination of evil and "ungodly" people to sin. This was not a point of controversy.
XX. Concerning Faith and Good Works — a statement about good works being good, but not assisting in salvation and standing before
God. This is followed by an explanation and defense of the doctrine of
Justification by Faith.
XXI. Concerning the Cult of the Saints — a statement about the nature of saints: helpful to assisting in one's personal faith, but of no post-mortem metaphysical use.
Disputed Articles, Listing Abuses That Have Been Corrected
This deals with some of the wrongs that had been "righted" by the Evangelicals and explains their reasons for such changes. At other points, arguments are made about necessary changes.
XXII. Concerning Both Kinds of the
Sacrament — a statement explaining scriptural and historical grounds for distributing both elements of the
Eucharist to laity, who had been permitted to receive the bread only.
XXIII. Concerning the
Marriage of Priests — a lengthy argument that there is Scriptural basis for allowing priests to marry.
XXIV. Concerning the
Mass — another lengthy argument, this time as to the nature of mass. It is argued that all sins were forgiven by the "satisfaction" (from the Latin ''satis facere'', 'make complete') of Jesus' death. Roman Catholics hold that the death of
Jesus forgives all sins, but distinguish between forgiving the guilt of sin, and the 'satisfaction' (making complete) required for the 'pain' of sin, i.e., penance.
XXV. Concerning
Confession — reiteration of the view that private
absolution is no better than general absolution. While the Evangelical Church still practiced private absolution, it was maintained that it was
Christ, not the pastor, who forgave the sins. The Catholic and Orthodox view is the same.
XXVI. Concerning the Distinction among Foods — a statement that scheduled fasting, ceremonies, etc., were not necessary under
Justification by Faith.
XXVII. Concerning Monastic Vows — a statement is made that monasticism was once a desirable (i.e., voluntary) lifestyle, but had since been corrupted. The vows of monks are also rejected.
XXVIII. Concerning the Power of Bishops — a lengthy statement calling for the separation of political and theological power.
Conclusion
"That in doctrine and ceremonies nothing has been received on our part against Scripture or the Church Catholic". Signatures of several secular leaders in Saxony.
See also
★
Confessio Catholica
References
★
External links
★
The Augsburg Confession (1530) in
Latin with a parallel English translation and with notes on the differences in the 1540 edition; from
Philip Schaff's ''Creeds of the Evangelical Protestant Churches'' at the
Christian Classics Ethereal Library