:''This article refers to the Battle of Anchialus fought in 917. For other battles with the same name, see
Battle of Anchialus (disambiguation)''
The 'Battle of Anchialus' () took place on
August 20,
917, on the
Black Sea coast near the
Bulgarian fortress
Tuthom, which is now the town of
Pomorie, between
Bulgarian and
Byzantine Empire forces.
Background
After the Bulgarian victory in the war between
894 and
896 the Byzantines were forced to pay tribute to King
Simeon I of Bulgaria. In 912 when the Byzantine emperor
Leo VI died, his brother
Alexander refused to pay tribute to the Bulgarians. Simeon saw an opportunity to wage a new war and fulfill his ambitions to conquer
Constantinople. Alexander died in the same year and the new government under the Patriarch
Nicholas Mystikos made desperate attempts to avoid the war, promising that the infant Emperor
Constantine VII would marry one of Simeon's daughters
[1]. After a plot in the Byzantine Court in
914, however, the new regent
Zoe, Constantine's mother, rejected the marriage. In answer the Bulgarians conquered Eastern
Thrace, and its population recognised Simeon as their ruler
[2] and in September 914 they captured
Adrianople[3][4][5], while the Byzantine army was occupied in the east
[6]. In the next year the Bulgarian armies attacked the areas of
Drach and
Solun[7].
Preparations for battle
Both sides carefully prepared for a decisive end of the conflict. The Empress Zoe wanted to swiftly make a peace settlement with the
Arabs and to engage the whole army of the East in a war with Simeon and destroy him
[8][9]. The Byzantines tried to find allies
[10] and sent emissaries to the
Magyars,
Pechenegs and
Serbs[11] but Simeon was familiar with the methods of Byzantine diplomacy and from the very beginning took successful actions to subvert a possible alliance between his enemies
[12]. Thus the Byzantines were forced to fight alone.
The Byzantine Army
In 917, the Byzantine empire had stabilized its eastern borders, and the generals
John Bogas and
Leo Phocas were able to gather additional troops from
Asia Minor[13], perhaps as many as 110,000. This was an enormous army and its goal was the ultimate elimination of the Bulgarian threat from the north. The Byzantine commanders were convinced that their strategy would be successful. The morale was raised as the soldiers vowed in the miraculous Wooden Cross to die for one another. The spirit of the army was further raised as the troops were paid in advance and a fleet commanded by
Romanus Lecapenus set off to the north at the mouth of the
Danube. The Byzantines had tried to pay some Pecheneg tribes to attack, but Romanus would not agree to transport them across the Danube, and instead they attacked Bulgarian territory on their own
[14].
The Bulgarian Army
The Bulgarians, under
Simeon I of Bulgaria, had an army of only 70,000 men
[15]. Although they ruined the Byzantine negotiations, the Bulgarians were still afraid that the old allies of the Byzantines, the
Pechenegs and the
Hungarians, would attack them from the north, so two small armies were sent to protect the northern borders of the vast Bulgarian empire that spread from
Bosnia in the west to the
Dnieper River in the east. In addition Bulgarian forces under
Marmais were deployed near the western borders with the
Serb principalities to prevent possible unrest.
The battle
The enormous Byzantine army marched northwards and set its camp in the vicinity of the strong fortress Anchialus. Leo Phocas intended to invade
Moesia and meet the Pechenegs and Lacapenus's troops in
Dobrudzha. Simeon swiftly concentrated his army on the heights around the fortress.
On the morning of
20 August,
917, the battle between Bulgarians and Byzantines began by the river Acheloos (near the modern village
Acheloi, 8 kilometers to the north of Anchialos (modern
Pomorie) on
Bulgaria's
Black Sea coast). The Byzantine generals planned to outflank the right Bulgarian wing in order to detach Simeon's troops from the Balkan Passes. The Bulgarian ruler concentrated his most powerful forces in the two wings and left the centre relatively weak in order to surround the enemy when the centre would yield to the Byzantine attack. Simeon himself was in charge of large cavalry reserves hidden behind the hills who were supposed to make the decisive blow.

The Bulgarian victory at Anchialos.
The Byzantine attack was fierce and it was not long before the Bulgarians began slowly to retreat
[16]. The enemy cavalry charged the infantry in the centre killing many Bulgarians. The Bulgarian position became desperate as they could not manage to hold the heights to the south of the river and began a hasty retreat to the north. Elated, the Byzantines started a bitter chase and their battle formations soon began to break. The battle was fought furiously. The decisive moment came when the heavy cavalry corps of Bulgarians, led by Simeon, attacked the Byzantine left wing from behind the hills
[17]. With an irresistible rush the cavaliers dashed down at the confused enemy who immediately bent under their attack, panicked and took on their heels
[18].
Some Byzantines tried to repulse the cavalry charge but they were also attacked by the infantry. Tsar Simeon personally took part in the fight, his white horse was killed at the height of the battle. The Byzantines were completely routed. Their headlong flight was punctuated by fearful cries as some men were trampled by comrades and others were killed by the Bulgarians; there was such a letting of blood as had not been seen for very many years. Leo Phocas was saved by fleeing to Mesembria (modern
Nesebar) in
Bulgaria, but in the thick of the battle Constantine Lips, John Grapson and many other commanders (archontes) were cut down along with enormous number of soldiers and officers
[19]. By the end of the day the Bulgarians overwhelmed the defenders of Mesembria and captured the town. Leo Phocas barely escaped boarding a ship.
It is estimated that approximately 70,000 Byzantine soldiers died in this battle. The Byzantine historian
Leo Diaconus says that 75 years after this military catastrophe the field at Anchialus was still covered with tens of thousands of Roman skeletons. With a total of 90,000 killed the battle was among the bloodiest in the whole
Medieval history and some historians refer to it as "the battle of the century".
Aftermath
.svg.png)
Progress of the Battle of Anchialus
The remainder of the Byzantine army fled all the way back to
Constantinople, followed by the Bulgarians. Several days later Phokas was defeated once more at
Katasyrtai where the last Byzantine troops were routed after a night fight
[20]. The way to Constantinople was clear
[21][22]. The Byzantines proposed a new peace treaty, and Simeon entered the imperial city and was crowned for a second time as "
Tsar" (the
Slavonic title for ''
Caesar'') "of all Bulgarians and Romans"
[23]. Simeon also demanded that his daughter would marry
Constantine VII, the son of empress
Zoe Karvounopsina, but Zoe refused and allied with
Serbia and Hungary against him. However in August of
918, the general Romanus engineered a coup to depose Zoe and confined her to the monastery of St Euphemia-in-Petrium, allowing him to assume the purple. The alliance with the Serbs postponed the decisive assault of Constantinople. Simeon decided to secure his rear and sent an army under
Marmais and
Theodore Sigritsa to destroy them
[24]. His generals captured the Serb prince
[11] but that gave the Byzantines precious time to recover.
Significance
The battle of Anchialus was one of the most important battles for Bulgaria. It secured the Imperial title of the Bulgarian rulers of centuries which was an enormous humiliation for the Byzantine Empire whose rulers claimed to have been God's only representatives on Earth. The battle also secured the survival of the Bulgarian nation as the main objective of the 110,000 enemy army was to thoroughly eliminate its dangerous northern neighbour.
Footnotes
1. Nicolaus Patriarcha. Epistolae, ep. 8, col. 61C-68C
2. Островски, Г. Историја Византије, с.255
3. Theophanes Continuatus. Chronographia, p.387
4. Leo Grammaticus. Chronographia, p.293-294
5. Pseudo-Simeon. Chronographia, p.723
6. Georgius Monachus Continuatus. Chronicon, p.805
7. Nicolaus Patriarcha. Epistolae, ep. 9, col. 76C
8. Theophanes Continuatus. Chronographia, p.388
9. Georgius Monachus Continuatus. Chronicon, p.806
10. Ioannes Skylitzes. Historia, 2, p.283-284
11. Constantinus Porphyrogenitus. De administrando imperio, §32, p.156
12. Божилов, Ив. България и печенезите, 47-51
13. Leo Grammaticus. Chronographia, p.244
14. Nicolaus Patriarcha. Epistolae, ep. 9, col. 73A
15. MiraculaS. Georgii, p.20
16. Theophanes Continuatus. Chronographia, p.388-390
17. Leo Grammaticus. Chronographia, p.294-296
18. Ioannes Skylitzes. Historia, 2, p.284-288
19. Ioannes Skylitzes. Historia, 2, p.288
20. Theophanes Continuatus. Chronographia, p.290
21. Leo Grammaticus. Chronographia, p.296
22. Georgius Monachus Continuatus. Chronicon, p.808
23. Nicolaus Patriarcha. Epistolae, ep. 9, col. 68A
24. Obolensky, D. The Byzantine Commonwealth, London, 1971, p.111
25. Constantinus Porphyrogenitus. De administrando imperio, §32, p.156
Sources
★ Theophanes Continuatus, The Byzantine Attack on Bulgaria, AD 917, Theophanes Continuatus, ed. Bekker, 388-90.
★ John Skylitzes, ''Synopsis Historion'', translated by Paul Stephenson.
★ Васил Н. Златарски, История на българската държава през средните векове, Част I, II изд., Наука и изкуство, София 1970.
★ Атанас Пейчев и колектив, 1300 години на стража, Военно издателство, София 1984.
★ Йордан Андреев, Милчо Лалков, Българските ханове и царе, Велико Търново, 1996.