CAIAPHAS

'Yehosef Bar Kayafa' (Hebrew יְהוֹסֵף בַּר קַיָּפָא, ) (which translates as 'Joseph, son of Caiaphas'^[1]), also known simply as 'Caiaphas' (Greek Καϊάφας) in the New Testament, was the Jewish high priest who organized the plot to kill Jesus.
As alleged by the New Testament Writers, Caiaphas convinced the Jewish priests and Pharisees that Jesus should die and was also involved in the trial of Jesus after his arrest in the garden of Gethsemane. Although Caiaphas and the rest of the people who crucified Jesus were only a small fraction of the whole Jewish people, passages involving Caiaphas are among those cited by those claiming a Biblical justification for anti-Semitism.

Contents

In the New Testament

Matthew: trial of Jesus

John: relations with Romans

Political implications

Acts: Peter and John urged silence

Caiaphas in other sources

Etymology

Notes

References

External links

In the New Testament

Matthew: trial of Jesus

In Matthew , Caiaphas, other chief priests, and the Sanhedrin are depicted interrogating Jesus. They are looking for "false evidence" with which to frame Jesus but are unable to find any. Jesus remains silent throughout the procedings until Caiaphus demands that Jesus say whether he is the Christ. Jesus never explicitly declares he is the Son of God but does not deny the charge and makes an allusion to the Son of Man. Caiaphas and the other men charge him with blasphemy and order him beaten.

John: relations with Romans

In John , Jesus is brought before Annas and Caiaphas and questioned, with intermittent beatings. Afterward, the other priests (Caiaphas does not accompany them) take Jesus to Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor of Judea, and insist upon Jesus' execution. Pilate tells the priests to judge Jesus themselves, to which they respond they lack authority to do so. Pilate questions Jesus, after which he states, "I find no basis for a charge against him." Pilate then offers the Jews the choice of one prisoner to release — said to be a Passover tradition — and the Jews choose a rebel named Barabbas instead of Jesus.

Political implications

For Jewish leaders of the time, there were serious concerns about Roman rule and an insurgent Zealot movement to eject Romans from Israel. They would have feared any religious reformer or leader who either denied their own authority to rule or who suggested rebellion against the Romans. The Romans would not perform execution over violations of Jewish law, and therefore the charge of blasphemy would not have mattered to Pilate. Caiaphas's legal position, therefore, was to establish that Jesus was guilty not only of blasphemy, but also of proclaiming himself the messiah, which was understood as the return of the Davidic king. This would have been an act of sedition and prompted Roman execution. Pilate initially wished for Herod Antipas to deal with the matter, whereas the Sanhedrin would have wished for a Roman execution.

Acts: Peter and John urged silence

Later, in Acts , Peter and John went before Annas and Caiaphas after having healed a crippled man. Caiaphas and Annas questioned the apostles' authority to perform such a miracle. When Peter, full of the Holy Spirit, answered that Jesus of Nazareth was the source of their power, Caiaphas and the other priests realized that the two men had no formal education yet spoke eloquently about the man they called their savior. Caiaphas sent the apostles away, and agreed with the other priests that the word of the miracle had already been spread too much to attempt to refute, and instead the priests would need to warn the apostles not to spread the name of Jesus. However, when they gave Peter and John this command, the two refused, saying "We cannot keep quiet. We must speak about what we have seen and heard." (Acts 4:20 NCV)

Caiaphas in other sources

Caiaphas' term in office was recorded by the contemporary Roman historian Josephus. He was appointed in 18 by the Roman procurator who preceded Pilate, Valerius Gratus.
In 1990, two miles south of present day Jerusalem, 12 ossuaries in the family tomb of a "Caiaphas" were discovered. One ossuary was inscribed with the full name, in Aramaic of "Joseph, son of Caiaphas", and a second with simply the family name of "Caiaphas". After examination the bones were reburied on the Mount of Olives.

Etymology

The name ''Caiaphas'' has two possible origins:

★ "as comely" in Aramaic

★ a "dell", or a "depression" in Chaldean

Notes

1. Metzger & Coogan (1993) ''Oxford Companion to the Bible'', p97.

References

★ The Oxford Companion to the Bible, , Bruce M. (ed), Metzeger, Oxford University Press, ,

★ NETBible: Caiaphas

External links

★ Images of the Ossuary of Caiaphas

★ Jewish Encyclopedia: Caiaphas

★ Catholic Encyclopedia: Caiaphas