CAMERON-MARTIN THEOREM

In mathematics, the 'Cameron-Martin theorem' or 'Cameron-Martin formula' is a theorem of measure theory that describes how abstract Wiener measure changes under translation by certain elements of the Cameron-Martin Hilbert space.

Contents
Motivation
Statement of the theorem
Integration by parts

Motivation


Recall that standard Gaussian measure gamma^{n} on mathbb{R}^{n} is not translation-invariant, but does satisfy the relation
:: rac{mathrm{d} (T_{h})_{
★ } (gamma^{n})}{mathrm{d} gamma^{n}} (x) = exp left( langle h, x
angle_{mathbb{R}^{n}} - rac{1}{2} | h |_{mathbb{R}^{n}}^{2}
ight),
where the derivative on the left-hand side is the Radon-Nikodym derivative, and (T_{h})_{
★ } (gamma^{n}) is the push forward of standard Gaussian measure by the translation map T_{h} : x mapsto x + h.
Abstract Wiener measure gamma on a separable Banach space E, where i : H o E is an abstract Wiener space, is also "Gaussian" in some sense. How does it change under translation? It turns out that a similar formula to the one above holds if we consider only translations by elements of the dense subspace i(H) subseteq E.

Statement of the theorem


Let i : H o E be an abstract Wiener space with abstract Wiener measure gamma : mathrm{Borel} (E) o [0, 1]. For h in H, define T_{h} : E o E by T_{h} : x mapsto x + i(h). Then (T_{h})_{
★ } (gamma) is equivalent to gamma with Radon-Nikodym derivative
:: rac{mathrm{d} (T_{h})_{
★ } (gamma)}{mathrm{d} gamma} (x) = exp left( langle h, x
angle^{sim} - rac{1}{2} | h |_{H}^{2}
ight),
where langle h, x
angle^{sim} = I(h) (x) denotes the Paley-Wiener integral.
It is important to note that the Cameron-Martin formula is only valid for translations by elements of the dense subspace i(H) subseteq E, and not by arbitrary elements of E. If the Cameron-Martin formula did hold for arbitrary translations, it would contradict the following result:
If E is a separable Banach space and mu is a locally finite Borel measure on E that is equivalent to its own push forward under any translation, then either E has finite dimension or mu is the trivial (zero) measure. (See quasi-invariant measure.)
In fact, gamma is quasi-invariant under x mapsto x + v if and only if v in i(H). Vectors in i(H) are sometimes known as 'Cameron-Martin directions'.

Integration by parts


The Cameron-Martin formula gives rise to an integration by parts formula on E: if F : E o mathbb{R} has bounded Fréchet derivative mathrm{D} F : E o mathrm{Lin} (E; mathbb{R}) = E^{
★ }, integrating the Cameron-Martin formula with respect to Wiener measure on both sides gives
::int_{E} F(x + t i(h)) , mathrm{d} gamma (x) = int_{E} F(x) exp left( t langle h, x
angle^{sim} - rac{1}{2} t^{2} | h |_{H}^{2}
ight) , mathrm{d} gamma (x) for anyt in mathbb{R}.
Formally differentiating with respect to t and evaluating at t = 0 gives the integration by parts formula
::int_{E} mathrm{D} F(x) (i(h)) , mathrm{d} gamma (x) = int_{E} F(x) langle h, x
angle^{sim} , mathrm{d} gamma (x)
Comparison with the divergence theorem of vector calculus suggests
::mathrm{div} [V_{h}] (x) = - langle h, x
angle^{sim},
where V_{h} : E o E is the constant "vector field" x mapsto i(h) for x in E. The wish to consider more general vector fields leads to the study of stochastic processes and the Malliavin calculus, and, in particular, the Clark-Ocone theorem and its associated integration by parts formula.

This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.

psst.. try this: add to faves