CARGO CULT SCIENCE

'Cargo cult science' is a term used by Richard Feynman in his 1974 Caltech commencement address to describe work that has the semblance of being scientific, but is missing "a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty".

Contents
Definition by Feynman
Differing definition
See also
References
External links

Definition by Feynman


The speech is reproduced in the book ''Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!'' and on many web sites. He based the phrase on a concept in anthropology, the cargo cult. Feynman cautioned that to avoid becoming cargo cult scientists, researchers must first of all avoid fooling themselves, be willing to question and doubt their own theories and their own results, and investigate possible flaws in a theory or an experiment.
He recommended that researchers adopt an unusually high level of honesty which is rarely encountered in everyday life, and gives examples from advertising, politics and behavioral psychology to illustrate the everyday dishonesty which should be unacceptable in science. Feynman cautions that "We've learned from experience that the truth will come out. Other experimenters will repeat your experiment and find out whether you were wrong or right. Nature's phenomena will agree or they'll disagree with your theory. And, although you may gain some temporary fame and excitement, you will not gain a good reputation as a scientist if you haven't tried to be very careful in this kind of work. And it's this type of integrity, this kind of care not to fool yourself, that is missing to a large extent in much of the research in cargo cult science."
An example of cargo cult science is an experiment that uses another researcher's results in lieu of an experimental control. Since the other researcher's conditions might differ from those of the present experiment in unknown ways, differences in the outcome might have no relation to the independent variable under consideration. Other examples, given by Feynman, are from educational research, psychology (particularly parapsychology), and physics. He also mentions other kinds of dishonesty, for example, falsely promoting one's research to secure funding.

Differing definition


In his book ''Little Science, Big Science'', Derek J. de Solla Price mentioned "the cargo cult of modern science", citing a 1961 paper that explored a perspective different from Feynman's. Under a heading "The Cargo Cult", Dupree suggested that science was a cargo cult to the public, with scientists appearing "as white-coated witch doctors manipulating the mysteries of an esoteric cult". The public, Dupree wrote, failed to understand science but "nevertheless worships it as a messiah while fearing its diabolical power."[1]

See also



Transgressing the boundaries

Bad science

Junk science

Magical thinking

Pseudoscience

Post-normal science

References


1. Public Education for Science and Technology, A. Hunter Dupree, , , Science, 1961



Diaconis, P (1985) "Theories of data analysis: from magical thinking through classical statistics", in Exploring Data Tables Trends and Shapes, Hoaglin, D.C ''et al.'' (eds), , , Wiley, , ISBN 0-471-09776-4

External links



Cargo Cult Science (pdf) article with pictures as originally published in ''Engineering and Science'', Volume 37:7, June 1974.

Cargo Cult Science (html) by Richard P. Feynman.

Audio Excerpts

This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.

psst.. try this: add to faves