COLLINEATION
A 'collineation' is a one-to-one map from one projective space to another, or from a projective plane onto itself, such that the images of collinear points are themselves collinear. All automorphisms induce a collineation.
Let ''V'' be a vector space (of dimension at least three) over a field ''K'' and ''W'' a vector space over a field ''L''. Consider the projective spaces ''PG(V)'' and ''PG(W)''.
Call ''D(V)'' and ''D(W)'' the set of subspaces of ''V'' and ''W'' respectively. A collineation from ''PG(V)'' to ''PG(W)'' is a map , such that :
★ is a bijection.
★
When ''V'' has dimension one, a collineation from ''PG(V)'' to ''PG(W)'' is a map , such that :
★ is mapped onto the trivial subspace of ''W''.
★ ''V'' is mapped onto ''W''.
★ There is a nonsingular semilinear map from ''V'' to W'' such that :
The reason for the seemingly completely different definition when ''V'' has geometric dimension one will become clearer further on in this article.
When the collineations are also called automorphisms.
Briefly, every collineation is the product of a homography and an automorphic collineation. In particular, the collineations of PG(2,R) are exactly the homographies.
Suppose is a semilinear nonsingular map from ''V'' to ''W'', with the dimension of ''V'' at least three.
Define in this way:
As is semilinear, one easily checks that this map is properly defined, and further more, as is not singular, it is bijective. It is obvious now that is a collineation. We say is induced by .
The fundamental theorem of projective geometry states the converse:
Suppose ''V'' is a vector space over a field ''K'' with dimension at least three, ''W'' is a vector space over a field ''L'', and is a collineation from ''PG(V)'' to ''PG(W)''. This implies ''K'' and ''L'' are isomorphic fields, ''V'' and ''W'' have the same dimension, and there is a semilinear map such that induces .
The fundamental theorem explains the different definition for projective lines. Otherwise, every bijection between the points would be a collineation, and then there would be no nice algebraic relationship.
★ Homography
★ Correlation
| Contents |
| Definition |
| Fundamental theorem of projective geometry |
| See also |
Definition
Let ''V'' be a vector space (of dimension at least three) over a field ''K'' and ''W'' a vector space over a field ''L''. Consider the projective spaces ''PG(V)'' and ''PG(W)''.
Call ''D(V)'' and ''D(W)'' the set of subspaces of ''V'' and ''W'' respectively. A collineation from ''PG(V)'' to ''PG(W)'' is a map , such that :
★ is a bijection.
★
When ''V'' has dimension one, a collineation from ''PG(V)'' to ''PG(W)'' is a map , such that :
★ is mapped onto the trivial subspace of ''W''.
★ ''V'' is mapped onto ''W''.
★ There is a nonsingular semilinear map from ''V'' to W'' such that :
The reason for the seemingly completely different definition when ''V'' has geometric dimension one will become clearer further on in this article.
When the collineations are also called automorphisms.
Fundamental theorem of projective geometry
Briefly, every collineation is the product of a homography and an automorphic collineation. In particular, the collineations of PG(2,R) are exactly the homographies.
Suppose is a semilinear nonsingular map from ''V'' to ''W'', with the dimension of ''V'' at least three.
Define in this way:
As is semilinear, one easily checks that this map is properly defined, and further more, as is not singular, it is bijective. It is obvious now that is a collineation. We say is induced by .
The fundamental theorem of projective geometry states the converse:
Suppose ''V'' is a vector space over a field ''K'' with dimension at least three, ''W'' is a vector space over a field ''L'', and is a collineation from ''PG(V)'' to ''PG(W)''. This implies ''K'' and ''L'' are isomorphic fields, ''V'' and ''W'' have the same dimension, and there is a semilinear map such that induces .
The fundamental theorem explains the different definition for projective lines. Otherwise, every bijection between the points would be a collineation, and then there would be no nice algebraic relationship.
See also
★ Homography
★ Correlation
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves

العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español