(Redirected from Council of Basel)
The 'Council of Florence' (Originally 'Council of Basel') was a council of
bishops and other ecclesiastics of the
Roman Catholic Church. It began in 1431 in
Basel, Switzerland, and became known as the 'Council of Ferrara' after its transfer to
Ferrara was decreed by
Pope Eugene IV to convene in 1438. The council transferred to
Florence in 1439 because of the threat of
plague, and the financial support of the
Medici family. The initial location at Basel reflected the desire among parties seeking reform to meet outside the
territories of the Papacy, the
Holy Roman Empire, or the
kings of
Aragon and
France, whose influences the council hoped to avoid.
Ambrogio Traversari attended the Council of Basel as
legate of
Pope Eugene IV.
The council was convened at a period when the
Conciliar movement was strong and the authority of the papacy weak. Under pressure for ecclesiastical reform
Pope Martin V sanctioned a decree of the
Council of Constance (
9 October 1417) obliging the
papacy to summon general councils periodically. At the expiration of the first term fixed by this decree,
Pope Martin V complied by calling a council at
Pavia. Due to an epidemic the location transferred almost at once to
Siena (see
Council of Siena) and disbanded—owing to circumstances still imperfectly known—just as it had begun to discuss the subject of reform (
1424).
The next council fell due at the expiration of seven years in
1431; Martin V duly convoked it for this date to the town of
Basel, and selected to preside over it the cardinal
Julian Cesarini, a well-respected
prelate. Martin himself, however, died before the opening of the synod.
Composition of the council
The
democratic character of the assembly at Basel was a result of both its composition and its organization. Doctors of
theology, masters and representatives of chapters,
monks and clerks of inferior orders constantly outnumbered the prelates in it, and the influence of the superior clergy had less weight because, instead of being separated into "
nations", as at Constance, the fathers divided themselves according to their tastes or aptitudes into four large committees or "deputations" (''deputationes''). One was concerned with questions of
faith (''fidei''), another with negotiations for
peace (''pacis''), the third with
reform (''reformatorii''), and the fourth with what they called "common concerns" (''pro communibus''). Every decision made by three of these "deputations" — and in each of them the lower clergy formed the majority — received ratification for the sake of form in general congregation, and if necessary led to
decrees promulgated in session. For this reason papal critics termed the council "an assembly of copyists" or even "a set of grooms and scullions". One should note, however, that some prelates, although absent, were represented by their proctors.
Attempted dissolution
From
Italy,
France and
Germany the fathers came late to Basel. Cesarini devoted all his energies to the war against the
Hussites, until the
disaster of Taus forced him to evacuate
Bohemia in haste.
Pope Eugene IV, Martin V's successor, lost hope that the council could be useful owing to the progress of
heresy, the reported troubles in
Germany, the war which had lately broken out between the
dukes of
Austria and
Burgundy, and finally, the small number of fathers who had responded to the summons of Martin V. This opinion, added to his desire to preside over the council in person, induced him to recall the fathers from Germany, as his poor health made it difficult for him to go. He commanded the council to disperse, and appointed
Bologna as their meeting-place in eighteen months' time, with the intention of making the session of the council coincide with some conferences with representatives of the
Greek church, scheduled to be held there with a view to
ecumenical union (
18 December 1431).
This order led to an outcry among the fathers and incurred the deep disapproval of the legate Cesarini. They argued that the Hussites would think the Church afraid to face them, and that the
laity would accuse the clergy of shirking reform, both with disastrous effects. The pope explained his reasons and yielded certain points, but the fathers were intransigent. Considerable powers had been decreed to Church councils by the
Council of Constance, which amid the troubles of the
Western Schism had proclaimed the superiority, in certain cases, of the council over the pope, and the fathers at Basel insisted upon their right of remaining assembled. They held sessions, promulgated decrees, interfered in the government of the
papal countship of Venaissin, treated with the Hussites, and, as representatives of the universal Church, presumed to impose laws upon the sovereign pontiff himself.
Eugene IV resolved to resist the Council's claim of supremacy, but he did not dare openly to repudiate the conciliar
doctrine considered by many to be the actual foundation of the authority of the popes before the
schism. He soon realized the impossibility of treating the fathers of Basel as ordinary
rebels, and tried a compromise; but as time went on, the fathers became more and more intractable, and between him and them gradually arose an impassable barrier.
Abandoned by a number of his
cardinals, condemned by most of the powers, deprived of his
dominions by ''
condottieri'' who shamelessly invoked the authority of the council, the pope made concession after concession, and ended on
15 December 1433 with a pitiable surrender of all the points at issue in a
Papal bull, the terms of which were dictated by the fathers of Basel, that is, by declaring his bull of dissolution null and void, and recognising that the synod as legitimately assembled throughout. However, Eugene IV did not ratify all the decrees coming from Basel, nor make a definite submission to the supremacy of the council. He declined to express any forced pronouncement on this subject, and his enforced silence concealed the secret design of safeguarding the principle of
sovereignty.
The fathers, filled with suspicion, would allow only the legates of the pope to preside over them on condition of their recognizing the superiority of the council. The legates did submit to this humiliating formality but in their own names, it was asserted only after the fact, thus reserving the final judgment of the
Holy See. Furthermore, the difficulties of all kinds against which Eugene had to contend, such as the insurrection at
Rome, which forced him to escape by the
Tiber lying in the bottom of a boat, left him at first little chance of resisting the enterprises of the council.
Issues of reform
Emboldened by their success, the fathers approached the subject of reform, their principal object being to further curtail the power and resources of the papacy. They took decisions on the disciplinary measures which regulated the
elections, on the celebration of
divine service, on the periodical holding of diocesan
synods and provincial councils, which were usual topics in Catholic councils. They also made decrees aimed at some of the assumed rights by which the popes had extended their power and improved their finances at the expense of the local churches. Thus the council abolished
annates, greatly limited the abuse of "reservation" of the patronage of benefices by the pope, and completely abolished the right claimed by the pope of "next presentation" to benefices not yet vacant (known as ''gratiae expectativae''). Other conciliar decrees severely limited the jurisdiction of the court of Rome, and even made rules for the election of popes and the constitution of the Sacred College. The fathers continued to devote themselves to the subjugation of the Hussites, and they also intervened, in rivalry with the pope, in the negotiations between France and
England which led to the
treaty of Arras, concluded by
Charles VII of France with the duke of
Burgundy. Finally, they investigated and judged numbers of private cases — lawsuits between prelates, members of religious orders and holders of benefices—thus themselves committing one of the serious abuses for which they had criticised the court of Rome.
Eugene IV's eastern strategy
Eugene IV, however much he may have wished to keep on good terms with the fathers of Basel, found himself neither able nor willing to accept or observe all their decrees. The question of the union with the Greek church, especially, gave rise to a misunderstanding between them which soon led to a rupture. The
Byzantine emperor John VIII Palaeologus, pressed hard by the
Ottoman Turks, was keen to ally himself with the Catholics. He consented to come with the principal representatives of the Greek church to some place in the West where the union could be concluded in the presence of the pope and of the Latin council. There arose a double negotiation between him and Eugene IV on the one hand and the fathers of Basel on the other. The council wished to fix the meeting-place at a place remote from the influence of the pope, and they persisted in suggesting Basel,
Avignon or
Savoy. On the other hand, the Greeks wanted a coastal location in Italy for their ease of access by ship.
Council transferred to Ferrara and attempted union with the Eastern Orthodox Church
As a result of negotiations with the East,
John VIII Palaeologus accepted the pope's offer, who, by a bull dated
18 September,
1437, again pronounced the dissolution of the council of Basel, and summoned the fathers to
Ferrara.
The first public session at Ferrara began on 10 January 1438. Its first act was to declare the Council of Basel transferred to Ferrara and to nullify all further proceedings at Basel. In the second public session (15 February 1438), Pope Eugene IV excommunicated all who continued to assemble at Basel.
In early April 1438, the Greek contingent arrived at Ferrara over 700 strong. On 9 April 1438 the first solemn session at Ferrara began with the Eastern Roman Emperor, the Patriarch of Constantinople and representatives of the Patriarchal Sees of Antioch, Alexandria and Jerusalem in attendance and Pope Eugene IV presiding. The early sessions lasted until 17 July 1438 with each theological issue of the Great Schism (1054) hotly debated, including the Processions of the Holy Spirit
Filioque, Purgatory and Papal Primacy. Resuming proceedings on 8 October 1438, the council focused exclusively on the
Filioque matter. Even as it became clear the Greek Church would never consent to the
Filioque clause, the Emperor continued to press for a reconciliation.
Council transferred to Florence and the near East-West union
With finances running thin and pestilence spreading in the area, both the Latins and the Greeks agreed to transfer the council to Florence. Continuing at Florence in January 1439, the Council made steady progress on a compromise formula, "ex filio." In the following months, agreement was reached on the Western doctrine of Purgatory and a return to the pre-schism prerogatives of the Papacy. On 8 June 1439 an agreement was signed by
Patriarch Joseph II of Constantinople and all the Eastern bishops but one,
Mark of Ephesus, who held that Rome continued in both
heresy and
schism. Apparently, the Great Schism was over. However, after
Patriarch Joseph II of Constantinople died only two days later, the Greeks insisted that ratification by the Eastern Church could be achieved only by the agreement of an Eastern synod. Upon their return, the Eastern bishops found their agreement with the West broadly rejected by the populace and by civil authorities (with the notable exception of the Emperors of the East who remained committed to union until the fall of the Byzantine Empire two decades later). The union signed at Florence, even down to the present, has never been accepted by the Eastern churches.
"Deposition of Eugene IV" and schism at Basel
During this time the council of Basel, though nullified at Ferrara and abandoned by Cesarini and most of its members, persisted nonetheless, under the presidency of
Cardinal Aleman. Affirming its
ecumenical character on
24 January 1438, it suspended Eugene IV. The council went on (in spite of the intervention of most of the powers) to pronounce Eugene IV deposed (
25 June 1439), giving rise to a new schism by electing (
4 November 1439) duke
Amadeus VIII of Savoy, as (anti)pope, who took the name of Felix V.
Effects of the schism
This schism lasted fully ten years, although the antipope found few adherents outside of his own hereditary states, those of
Alfonso V of Aragon, of the
Swiss confederation and of certain universities. Germany remained neutral; Charles VII of France confined himself to securing to his kingdom (by the
Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges, which became law on
13 July 1438) the benefit of a great number of the reforms decreed at Basel; England and Italy remained faithful to Eugene IV. Finally, in
1447,
Frederick III,
Holy Roman Emperor, after negotiations with Eugene, commanded the burgomaster of Basel not to allow the presence of the council any longer in the imperial city.
Schism reconciled at Lausanne
In June 1448 the rump of the council migrated to
Lausanne. The antipope, at the insistence of France, ended by abdicating (
7 April 1449). Eugene IV died on
23 February 1447, and the council at Lausanne, to save appearances, gave their support to his successor,
Pope Nicholas V, who had already been governing the Church for two years. Trustworthy evidence, they said, proved to them that this pontiff accepted the dogma of the superiority of the council as defined at Constance and at Basel.
Aftermath
The struggle for East-West union at Ferrara and Florence, while promising, never bore fruit. While progress toward union in the East continued to be made in the following decades, all hopes for a proximate reconciliation were dashed with the fall of Constantinople in 1453.
The seventeen-year struggle to defend conciliarism carried on at Basel and Lausanne ended in a defeat. The papacy, so fundamentally shaken by the earlier schism of the West, came through this trial with a
Pyrrhic victory. The era of the great councils of the
15th century closed and the constitution of the Roman Church remained monarchical. Yet, left unresolved were many of the tensions which provoked the
Reformation in the next century.
References
★
★
Mansi, vol. xxix.-xxxi.
★
Aeneas Sylvius, ''De rebus Basileae gestis'' (Fetmo, 1803)
★
Hefele, Conciliengeschichte, vol. vii. (Freiburg-im-Breisgau, 1874)
★
O. Richter, ''Die Organisation and Geschäftsordnung des Basler Konziis'' (Leipzig, 1877)
★ ''Monumenta Conciliorum generalium seculi xv., Scriptorum,'' vol. i., ii. and iii. (Vienna, 1857-1895)
★
J. Haller, ''Concilium Basiliense'', vol. i.-v. (Basel,1896-1904)
★
G. Perouse, ''Le Cardinal Louis Aleman, président du concile de Bâle'' (Paris, 1904).
★
J. C. L. Gieseler, ''Ecclesiastical History'', vol. iv. p. 312ff (Eng. trans., Edinburgh, 1853).
★
Johannes Helmrath, ''Das Basler Konzil; 1431 - 1449; Forschungsstand und Probleme,'' Köln 1978.
★ Stefan Sudmann,'' Das Basler Konzil: Synodale Praxis zwischen Routine und Revolution'' (= Tradition - Reform - Innovation, Studien zur Modernität des Mittelalters, Bd. 8), Peter-Lang-Verlag, Frankfurt am Main 2005 (Diss. Münster/Westf. 2004), ISBN 3-631-54266-6
[1]
External links
★
Catholic Encyclopedia: Council of Basle
★
Catholic Encyclopedia: Ferrara
★
Catholic Encyclopedia: Council of Florence
العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español
