
This graph shows a sharp drop-off in violent crime since 1993.
[1]
'Crime in the United States' is characterized by relatively high levels of
gun violence and
homicide, compared to other
developed countries although this is explained by the fact that criminals in America are more likely to use firearms.
[2][3] Crime statistics are published annually by the
Federal Bureau of Investigation in the
Uniform Crime Reports which represents
crimes reported to the
police. The
Bureau of Justice Statistics conducts the annual
National Crime Victimization Survey which captures crimes not reported to the police.
The country's overall crime rate is reflected through Index crimes, which include
homicide, forcible
rape,
robbery,
assault, classified as
violent crimes. Property crimes include
burglary,
larceny/
theft,
motor vehicle theft, and
arson. Statistics for index offenses are generally available for the country as a whole, all fifty
states and all communities within the
United States with 10,000 or more residents. The crime rate is measured by the number of crimes being reported per 100,000 people. While the crime rate had risen sharply in the late 1960s and early 1970s, bringing it to a constant all-time high during much of the 1970s and 1980s, it has drastically declined ever since 1991. In 2004 America's crime rate is roughly the same as in 1970, with the
homicide rate being at its lowest level since 1965. Overall the national crime rate was 3982 crimes per 100,000 residents, down 17.6% from 4852 crimes per 100,000 residents thirty years earlier in 1974.
[4][5] The severity of crime in international comparison depends on the nature of the crimes considered in such comparison. For example, while the
homicide and violent crime rates of the
United States were much higher than those of
Canada, property crime rates in the US were considerably lower. The overall crime rate in the
United States is similar to that of other highly developed countries such as
Canada.
[6][7] Additionally there tend to be great regional differences within the US with New England having a violent crime and homicide rate comparable to that of most other developed nations, while southern states were among the most violent.
The likelihood of committing and falling victim to crime also depends on several demographic characteristics, as well as location of the population. Overall minorities, the young, and those in financially less favorable positions were more likely to be victimized by, as well as commit crimes.
[8] Crime in the US is also concentrated to certain areas. It is quite common for crime in American cities to be highly concentrated in a few, often economically disadvantaged areas. For example, the responding communities in
San Mateo County, California had a population of approximately 624,000 and 17 homicides in 2001. 6 of these 17 homicides took place in relatively poor, largely
African and Hispanic American
East Palo Alto, which had a population of roughly 30,000. So, while East Palo Alto only accounted for 4.8% of the population, 35.3% of all homicides took place there.
[9] Thus it becomes very clear that the distribution of crime among different demographical groups and locales varies significantly.
Crime over time

The violent crime rate of the United States, 1960 to 2005.
[10][11]

The property crime rate of the US, 1960 to 2005.
[10][11]
Crime has been a long-standing concern in the
United States, with relatively high rates at beginning of the 20th century when compared to parts of Europe. In 1916, 198 homicides were recorded in
Chicago, for a city of slightly over 2 million. This level of crime was not exceptional when compared to other American cities such as
New York City, but was much high relative to European cities, such as
London which at the time was three-times the size, but recorded 45 homicides in the same year.
[14]
Crime in the United States has fluctuated considerably over the course of the past half-century, rising significantly in the late 1960s and 1970s, while decreasing considerably in the 1990s. Over the past twenty years, the crime rate rose throughout the 1980s, reached its peak in 1991 and has decreased. Recent statistics indicate crime is again increasing
[11]. The year 2005 was overall the safest year in the past thirty years. The recent overall decrease has reflected upon all significant types of crime, with all violent and property crimes having decreased and reached an all-time low. The
homicide rate in particular has decreased over 42% between its record high point in 1991 and 2005.
Recently, however, the
homicide rate has stagnated.
[11] While the homicide rate decreased continuously between 1991 and 2000 from 9.8 homicides per 100,000 persons to 5.5 per 100,000, it has remained level through 2005. In the years between 2000 and 2005 the homicide rate has remained at its all time low between 5.5 and 5.7 homicides per 100,000 individuals. Despite the recent stagnation of the homicide rate, however, property and violent crimes overall have continued to decrease, though at a considerably slower pace than in the 1990s.
[11] Overall the crime rate in the
US was the same in 2004 as in 1969, with the homicide rate being roughly the same as in 1966. Violent crime overall, however, is still at the same level as in 1974, despite having decreased steadily since 1991.
[10]
| Crime Rate[10][11] | 1960 | 1961 | 1963 | 1965 | 1967 | 1969 | 1971 | 1973 | 1975 | 1977 | 1979 | 1981 | 1983 | 1985 | 1987 | 1989 | 1991 | 1993 | 1995 | 1997 | 1999 | 2001 | 2003 | 2005 |
|---|
| Violent crime rate | 160.9 | 158.1 | 168.2 | 200.2 | 253.2 | 328.7 | 396.0 | 417.4 | 487.8 | 475.9 | 548.9 | 594.3 | 537.7 | 556.6 | 609.7 | 663.1 | 758.1 | 746.8 | 684.6 | 610.8 | 523.0 | 504.4 | 475.8 | 469.2 |
| Homicide rate | 5.1 | 4.8 | 4.6 | 5.1 | 6.2 | 7.3 | 8.6 | 9.4 | 9.6 | 8.8 | 9.8 | 9.8 | 8.3 | 8.0 | 8.3 | 8.7 | 9.8 | 9.5 | 8.2 | 6.8 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 5.6 |
| Property crime rate | 1,726 | 1,747 | 2,012 | 2,249 | 2,736 | 3,351 | 3,769 | 3,737 | 4,811 | 4,602 | 5,017 | 5,264 | 4,637 | 4,650 | 4,940 | 5,078 | 5,140 | 4,738 | 4,591 | 4,312 | 3,744 | 3,656 | 3,591 | 3,430 |
'SOURCES: US Bureau of Justice Statistics (2004),
[10] Federal Bureau of Investigation, (2005)
[11]'
Characteristics of crime offenders
A subsequent
United States Department of Justice report which surveyed homicide statistics between 1974 and 2004 stated that of the crimes surveyed, 52.1% of the offenders were Black, 45.9% were White, and 2% were Other Races. Of the victims in those same crimes, 51% were White, 46.9% were Black, and 2.1% were Other Races. The report further noted that, "most
murders are intraracial", with 86% of White murders committed by Whites, and 94% of Black murders committed by Blacks.
[23] It should be noted that the document does not provide any details concerning what races or ethnicities are included in the designations "White", "Black", or "Other Races".
A February 1997 report on rape and sexual-based crime published by the United States Department of Justice stated that of the crimes surveyed, 56% of arrestees were White, 42% were Black, and 2% were of other races; though it should be noted that "Hispanic" was not recognized as a racial category, with Hispanics predominantly being grouped together with Non-Hispanic Whites. The report additionally noted that "[v]ictims of rape were about evenly divided between whites and blacks; in about 88% of forcible rapes, the victim and offender were of the same race."
[23] In 1998, nearly one out of three Black men between the ages of 20-29 were in
prison or
jail, on probation or parole on any given day.
[25][26] Approximately 70% of prisoners in the United States are non-Whites.
[27]
Compared with other countries, the
United States has among the highest incarceration rates in the world. As of 2006, a record 7 million people were behind bars, on
probation or on
parole. Of the total 2.2 million were incarcerated. The
People's Republic of China ranks second with 1.5 million. The United States has 5% of the
world's population and 25% of the world's incarcerated population.
[28]
In terms of
federal prison, 57 % of those incarcerated were sentenced for
drug offenses. Currently, considering local jails as well, almost a million of those incarcerated are in prison for non-violent crime.
[29] In 2002, roughly 93.2 % of prisoners were
male. About 10.4 % of all black males in the United States between the ages of 25 and 29 were sentenced and in prison by year end, compared to 2.4 % of Hispanic males and 1.2 % of white males.
[30]
Characteristics of crime victims

This graph shows the homicide victimization rate for European and African Americans, according to the US Bureau of Justice Statistics.
[31]
Overall the financially disadvantaged, males, those younger than 25 and non
European-Americans were more likely to fall victim to crime.
Income, sex and age had the most dramatic effect on the chances of a person being victimized by crime, while the effect on race dependent on the crime. In 2005 27 out of 1,000
African Americans became the victim of a violent crime, compared to 20 out of every 1,000
White Americans. This means that African Americans were overall 26% more likely to sustain a violent crime. The likelihood of being murdered was drastically higher for African Americans.
[32] In 2004 African Americans constituted roughly 13.4% of the general population,
[33] yet, nearly half, 49%, of all murder victims in 2005 were African American. Sexual assault and rape rates, however, were roughly the same for all races, while Whites and African Americans had approximately the same chances of falling victim to simple assaults. In terms of sex, males were more likely to become crime victims then were females with 79% percent of all murder victims being male. Males were also twice as likely to be carjacked as were females. In terms of income all households had roughly the same chance of becoming victims of property theft. Yet, households with an
annual income of less than $7,500 were far more likely to be assaulted, robbed and have their homes burglarized. Concerning age, those younger than twenty-five were more likely to fall victim to crime, especially violent crime. The chances of being victimized by violent crime decreased far more substantially with age than the chances of becoming the victim of property crime. For example, 1 out of every 33 crime committed against a young person was theft, while 1 out of every 5 crimes committed against an elderly person was theft. Thus one can conclude that the probability of becoming a crime victim decreases as income and age increase, in addition to being lower for European Americans and females.
[32]
US Department of Justice survey stated that more than 6.6 million violent crimes (murder, rape, assault and robbery) are committed in the United States each year, of which about 20%, are inter-racial crimes.
[35] According to research done by
Larry Elder, a radio host and
New York Times best-selling author, of the approximately 1,700,000 interracial crimes of violence each year, nearly 1,200,000 involved black-white crime. In 90% of those crimes, African American offenders attacked
White American victims.
[36][37] African Americans are more than 50 times more likely to commit violent crimes against White Americans than vice versa.
[38]
According to United States Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, in the United States in 2005, 37,460 White females were sexually assaulted or
raped by a Black man, while between zero and ten Black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a White man. There were overall 111,590 white victims of rape/sexual assault in 2005. In those 111,590 cases the offender was White in 44.5 percent of the cases and Black in 33.6 percent of the cases.
[39]
International comparison

The Burglary rates of selected developed countries as published by the US Bureau of Justice Statistics.
The manner in which
America's crime rate compared to other countries of similar wealth and development depends on the nature of the crime used in the comparison.
[40] Overall crime statistic comparisons are difficult to conduct, as the definition of crimes significant enough to be published in annual reports varies across countries. Thus an agency in a foreign country may include crimes in its annual reports which the
United States omits. Some countries such as
Canada, however, have similar definitions of what constitutes a violent crime, and nearly all countries had the same definition of the characteristics that constitutes a homicide. Overall the total crime rate of the United States is similar to that of other highly developed countries. Reported property crime in the US is actually lower than in Germany or Canada, yet the American
homicide rate in the United States is substantially higher. Interestingly enough, the overall violent crime rate in the United States was roughly half that of Canada, despite its homicide rate being 189.5% higher; note from the references, however, that the US violent crime rate includes only Aggravated Assault, whereas the Canadian violent crime rate includes all categories of assault, including the much-more-numerous Simple Assault (i.e., assault not using a weapon and not resulting in serious bodily harm).
[6][42] According to a recent study by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, where crime figures were adjusted for international comparison, the United States had a lower overall
burglary rate than
Scotland,
England,
Canada,
the Netherlands, and
Australia. The other two countries included in the study,
Sweden and
Switzerland, had only slightly lower
burglary rates.
[43]
Despite the overall crime rate of the
United States being seemingly in line with that of other industrialized countries, its homicide rate, which has declined substantially since 1991, is still among the highest in the industrialized world. Comparing just
homicide rates by themselves, however, may not be representative of the overall crime rate of a country. Only the homicide rate of
Northern Ireland in the early 1990s compares to that of the United States today. In 2004, there were 5.5 homicides for every 100,000 persons, compared to 1.9 in Canada and 1.0 in Germany.
[42] This means that the homicide rate in the United States was nearly three times as high as in
Canada and slightly more then five times as high as in
Germany.
[6][46] Most industrialized countries had homicide rates below the 2.5 mark. Overall the homicide rate in the United States was similar to that of some lesser developed
Eastern European countries.
[47][48][49]
| Country | Ireland[50] | Norway[50] | Germany[52] | United Kingdom[50] | France[50] | Canada[6] | United States[7] | Russia[50] | Venezuela[50] | Jamaica[50] | South Africa[50] | Colombia[50] |
|---|
| Homicide rate | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 5.5 | 20.15 | 31.61 | 32.41 | 49.60 | 61.78 |
| Year | ''2000'' | ''2000'' | ''2004'' | ''2000'' | ''2004'' | ''2004'' | ''2004'' | ''2000'' | ''2000'' | ''2000'' | ''2000'' | ''2000'' |
'SOURCES: US Bureau of Justice Statistics (2004),
[7] Bundeskriminalamt, BKA (2004),
[42] Canada Statistics (2004),
[6] Seventh United Nations Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems (2000)
[50]'
Crime by locale

This graph shows the homicide rate for America's three worst and five best ranking jurisdictions in 2004.
[66]
Location has a very significant impact on crime in the
United States. While some responding jurisdictions are nearly free of serious crime, others are plagued by some of the highest serious crime rates in the industrialized world. The homicide rate exemplifies the stark differences between communities. In 2004, the
Baltimore police departments reported more homicides per 100,000 residents than any other jurisdiction. The rate of homicide per 100,000 was 43.5, nearly eight times the national average. In 2005, ''
Forbes'' magazine listed
Long Island, one of the suburban areas of
New York City, which is also one of the wealthiest and most expensive communities in the United States, as having 2,042 crimes per 100,000 residents; the lowest crime rate and less than half the US average
[1].
Fairfax County, Virginia, a very
affluent suburban enclave of the
nation's capital with 1,041,200 residents, had the lowest homicide rate of any jurisdiction. In 2004, Fairfax County's homicide rate was reported at 0.3 homicides per 100,000 persons, 94.5% below the national average and 1/145 of Baltimore's homicide rate. It is therefore important to remember that the risk of being victimized by crime in the United States varies greatly from locale to locale.
[67][68]
Large cities
Crime among the country's largest ten cities tended to be above the national average. It is, however, important to note that these statistics exclude the given city's suburbs and only reflect the crime rates within the jurisdiction of the given city's police department. Overall
San Jose, California was the safest of America's largest cities, while
Houston, Texas was the most dangerous.
[69] The most violent of the top ten was
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania whose violent crime rate was more than 3.5 times as high as that of San Jose, the least violent city.
[70][66]
| City | Number of Crimes per 100,000 persons (Crime Rates) |
|---|
| Violent Crime Rates | Property Crime Rates | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | Violent Crime | Homicide | Rape | Robbery | Assault | Property Crime | Burglary | Larceny | Motor vehicle theft |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York City, New York[72][73] | 8,101,321 | 687.4 | 7.0 | 17.6 | 300.9 | 361.9 | 2,113.1 | 322.2 | 1,530.8 | 260.1 |
| Los Angeles, California[66][73] | 3,864,018 | 1,107.3 | 13.4 | 29.3 | 367.0 | 697.6 | 3,240.2 | 599.9 | 1,864.5 | 775.7 |
| Chicago, Illinois[76][73] | 2,882,746 | 1,217.8 | 15.5 | N/A | 552.0 | 650.3 | 4,877.4 | 847.4 | 3,239.1 | 790.9 |
| Houston, Texas[70][73] | 2,043,446 | 1,146.4 | 13.3 | 44.4 | 498.3 | 590.4 | 6,040.0 | 1,326.7 | 3,658.1 | 1,055.2 |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania[80][73] | 1,484,224 | 1,408.3 | 22.2 | 67.4 | 657.4 | 661.2 | 4,105.2 | 709.9 | 2,547.3 | 848.1 |
| Phoenix, Arizona[82][73] | 1,428,973 | 662.4 | 14.1 | 34.3 | 260.5 | 353.4 | 6,606.6 | 1,154.4 | 3,711.8 | 1,740.3 |
| San Antonio, Texas[70][73] | 1,235,128 | 635.2 | 7.6 | 54.8 | 172.2 | 400.6 | 6,578.7 | 1,191.8 | 4,928.1 | 458.8 |
| San Diego, California[66][73] | 1,281,366 | 528.7 | 4.8 | 29.1 | 128.8 | 365.9 | 3,546.4 | 570.1 | 1,964.2 | 1,012.2 |
| Dallas, Texas[70][73] | 1,228,613 | 1,315.7 | 20.2 | 47.9 | 607.7 | 640.0 | 7,656.3 | 1,882.3 | 4,481.4 | 1,292.6 |
| San Jose, California[66][73] | 908,712 | 371.8 | 2.6 | 28.2 | 86.4 | 254.6 | 2,453.8 | 397.9 | 1,558.8 | 497.1 |
| San Francisco, California[66][73] | 760,353 | 757.1 | 11.6 | 20.0 | 399.9 | 325.6 | 4,717.4 | 801.9 | 2,855.4 | 1,060.2 |
| Seattle, Washington[94][73] | 579,215 | 709.4 | 4.3 | 23.8 | 277.4 | 403.8 | 7,505.2 | 1,167.3 | 4,686.9 | 1,651.0 |
'SOURCES: US Bureau of Justice Statistics (2004),
[73] FBI Uniformed Crime Reports (2005)
[66]'
States
Crime rates vary greatly across the states. Crime statistics for 2004 seem to dispel the notion that crime is lower in rural states than in urban states, as many of both America's most urbanized and populous as well as rural and scarcely populated states fell well below the national average, while some rural southern states ranked significantly above the national average. Overall,
New England had by far the lowest crime rates, for both violent and property crimes. New England states also had the lowest homicide rates in the country. Densely populated states such as
New York and
New Jersey also had crime rates well below the national average.
Southern states had the highest overall crime rates. Crime can also be isolated to one particular part of a state.
Lafayette, Louisiana, for instance had only 6 murders per 100,000 people in 2004, while
New Orleans, Louisiana, had 32.5 murders per 100,000 people.
[98]
With few exceptions, there also seems to be a strong correlation between
median household income and crime rates. In addition to having the country's lowest crime rates,
New England states also had the country's highest median household income. Almost all of the
nation's wealthiest twenty states, which included northern mid-western and western states such as
Wisconsin and
California, had crime rates below the national average. The nation's more dangerous states such as
Arizona,
Arkansas and
Texas in turn ranked among those with a household income below the national median. For example,
New Hampshire was the
nation's wealthiest state and safest state. New Hampshire's total crime rate was 57.9%; its violent crime rate was 64.1% and its homicide rate 69.1% below the national average.
Connecticut, the nation's fourth wealthiest state, had a crime rate 27% and a homicide rate 52.7% below the national average. This contrasts starkly to some of the
nation's poorer states such as
Georgia,
Florida or
Louisiana. Louisiana had a crime rate 27% and a homicide rate 130.9% above the national average and ranked as the nation's fourth poorest state with a median household income 20% below the national median. While these trends hold generally true, it should be noted, that several states who fell below the national median for household income such as
New York,
Maine and
Kentucky also had crime rates below the national average, while some wealthy states such as
Maryland and
Hawaii had crime rates above the national average.
[98][100]
The highest total crime rate of any state, except for the
District of Columbia, was found in
Arizona, followed by
South Carolina. The crime rate in Arizona was 46.82% above the national average and three and half (3.5) times as high as that of
New Hampshire, America's safest state. The homicide rate was highest in the District of Columbia and
Louisiana, as both states are home to some of the most violent areas in the entire country, namely eastern
Washington, D.C. and the city of
New Orleans. Overall there were six states with fewer than two homicides per 100,000 residents. Yet there were also eight states with more than seven homicides per 100,000 residents. These findings further illustrate the drastic degree to which crimes rates vary from state to state.
[98]
| State | Number of Crimes per 100,000 persons (Crime Rates)[100] |
|---|
| Violent Crime Rates | Property Crime Rates | Total | Rank | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | Violent Crime | Homicide | Rape | Robbery | Assault | Property Crime | Burglary | Larceny | Motor vehicle theft |
|---|
| Alabama | 4,530,182 | 426.6 | 5.6 | 38.5 | 133.4 | 249.1 | 4,025.0 | 986.0 | 2,729.5 | 309.6 | 4,451.6 | 17 |
| Alaska | 655,435 | 634.5 | 5.6 | 85.1 | 68.2 | 475.6 | 3,382.8 | 575.6 | 2,465.4 | 341.8 | 4,017.3 | 23 |
| Arizona | 5,743,834 | 504.1 | 7.2 | 33.0 | 134.4 | 329.4 | 5,340.5 | 990.4 | 3,387.2 | 962.9 | 5,844.6 | 2 |
| Arkansas | 2,752,629 | 499.1 | 6.4 | 42.4 | 86.2 | 364.1 | 4,013.0 | 1,093.5 | 2,683.8 | 235.8 | 4,512.1 | 16 |
| California | 35,893,799 | 551.8 | 6.7 | 26.8 | 172.1 | 346.3 | 3,419.0 | 685.1 | 2,030.1 | 703.8 | 3,970.8 | 25 |
| Colorado | 4,601,403 | 373.5 | 4.4 | 42.5 | 81.5 | 245.1 | 3,919.3 | 717.3 | 2,679.0 | 522.9 | 4,292.8 | 22 |
| Connecticut | 3,503,604 | 286.3 | 2.6 | 20.7 | 120.5 | 142.6 | 2,627.2 | 444.4 | 1,868.1 | 314.7 | 2,913.5 | 39 |
| Delaware | 830,364 | 568.4 | 2.0 | 41.5 | 146.7 | 378.1 | 3,163.9 | 648.3 | 2,257.1 | 258.6 | 3,732.3 | 28 |
| District of Columbia | 553,523 | 1,371.2 | 35.8 | 40.1 | 578.5 | 716.9 | 4,859.1 | 712.9 | 2,627.2 | 1,519.0 | 6,230.3 | 1 |
| Florida | 17,397,161 | 711.3 | 5.4 | 38.0 | 172.4 | 495.5 | 4,179.7 | 956.1 | 2,773.3 | 450.2 | 4,891.0 | 10 |
| Georgia | 8,829,383 | 455.5 | 6.9 | 27.0 | 154.7 | 266.8 | 4,265.9 | 940.0 | 2,825.0 | 501.0 | 4,721.4 | 14 |
| Hawaii | 1,262,840 | 254.4 | 2.6 | 26.4 | 74.8 | 150.7 | 4,792.8 | 857.4 | 3,252.8 | 682.6 | 5,047.2 | 6 |
| Idaho | 1,393,262 | 244.9 | 2.2 | 40.9 | 17.2 | 184.6 | 2,794.4 | 547.3 | 2,051.5 | 195.5 | 3,039.3 | 37 |
| Illinois | 12,713,634 | 542.9 | 6.1 | 33.2 | 177.2 | 326.4 | 3,186.1 | 597.3 | 2,271.3 | 317.4 | 3,729.0 | 29 |
| Indiana | 6,237,569 | 325.4 | 5.1 | 28.9 | 102.2 | 189.2 | 3,397.6 | 676.0 | 2,383.5 | 338.1 | 3,723.0 | 30 |
| Iowa | 2,954,451 | 270.9 | 1.6 | 26.7 | 38.0 | 204.5 | 2,905.3 | 615.1 | 2,107.3 | 182.9 | 3,176.2 | 35 |
| Kansas | 2,735,502 | 374.5 | 4.5 | 40.4 | 66.3 | 263.4 | 3,973.5 | 731.1 | 2,934.0 | 308.4 | 4,348.0 | 19 |
| Kentucky | 4,145,922 | 244.9 | 5.7 | 29.9 | 78.8 | 130.5 | 2,537.7 | 624.8 | 1,701.3 | 211.6 | 2,782.6 | 44 |
| Louisiana | 4,515,770 | 638.7 | 12.7 | 35.8 | 145.4 | 444.9 | 4,410.2 | 1,004.5 | 2,969.2 | 436.6 | 5,048.9 | 5 |
| Maine | 1,317,253 | 103.5 | 1.4 | 23.9 | 21.9 | 56.3 | 2,409.6 | 481.4 | 1,829.3 | 98.9 | 2,513.1 | 47 |
| Maryland | 5,558,058 | 700.5 | 9.4 | 23.7 | 229.6 | 437.8 | 3,640.2 | 660.0 | 2,335.1 | 645.2 | 4,340.7 | 20 |
| Massachusetts | 6,416,505 | 458.8 | 2.6 | 28.0 | 116.4 | 311.7 | 2,459.7 | 537.2 | 1,578.8 | 343.7 | 2,918.5 | 40 |
| Michigan | 10,112,620 | 490.2 | 6.4 | 54.2 | 111.9 | 317.7 | 3,057.6 | 636.8 | 1,921.0 | 499.9 | 3,547.8 | 32 |
| Minnesota | 5,100,958 | 269.6 | 2.2 | 41.6 | 79.8 | 146.0 | 3,039.0 | 549.9 | 2,224.2 | 265.0 | 3,308.6 | 33 |
| Mississippi | 2,902,966 | 295.1 | 7.8 | 40.0 | 86.2 | 161.1 | 3,478.5 | 952.9 | 2,254.2 | 271.4 | 3,773.6 | 27 |
| Missouri | 5,754,618 | 490.5 | 6.2 | 25.7 | 115.2 | 343.4 | 3,903.5 | 703.3 | 2,750.2 | 450.0 | 4,394.0 | 18 |
| Montana | 926,865 | 293.8 | 3.2 | 29.5 | 25.1 | 236.0 | 2,936.2 | 379.2 | 2,382.4 | 174.6 | 3,230.0 | 34 |
| Nebraska | 1,747,704 | 308.6 | 2.3 | 35.5 | 65.1 | 205.7 | 3,519.6 | 562.2 | 2,654.9 | 302.5 | 3,828.2 | 26 |
| Nevada | 2,334,771 | 615.9 | 7.4 | 40.9 | 210.1 | 357.6 | 4,206.6 | 991.2 | 2,246.0 | 969.5 | 4,822.5 | 12 |
| New Hampshire | 1,299,500 | 167.0 | 1.4 | 35.3 | 38.5 | 91.8 | 2,040.1 | 382.1 | 1,508.5 | 149.4 | 1,675.5 | 51 |
| New Jersey | 8,698,879 | 355.7 | 4.5 | 15.3 | 150.3 | 185.6 | 2,429.2 | 471.7 | 1,609.1 | 348.4 | 2,784.9 | 43 |
| New Mexico | 1,903,289 | 687.3 | 8.9 | 54.6 | 108.3 | 515.5 | 4,197.7 | 1,046.8 | 2,735.7 | 415.2 | 4,885.0 | 11 |
| New York | 19,227,088 | 441.6 | 4.6 | 18.8 | 174.3 | 244.0 | 2,198.6 | 367.7 | 1,617.7 | 213.3 | 2,640.2 | 46 |
| North Carolina | 8,541,221 | 447.8 | 6.2 | 27.4 | 137.9 | 276.2 | 4,160.2 | 1,184.8 | 2,659.4 | 316.0 | 4,608.0 | 15 |
| North Dakota | 634,366 | 79.4 | 1.4 | 25.1 | 6.1 | 46.8 | 1,916.6 | 301.1 | 1,472.7 | 142.8 | 1,996.0 | 50 |
| Ohio | 11,459,011 | 341.8 | 4.5 | 40.5 | 153.1 | 143.6 | 3,673.2 | 846.1 | 2,470.6 | 356.5 | 4,015.0 | 24 |
| Oklahoma | 3,523,553 | 500.5 | 5.3 | 44.2 | 87.7 | 363.3 | 4,242.1 | 1,000.2 | 2,874.1 | 367.7 | 4,742.6 | 13 |
| Oregon | 3,594,586 | 298.3 | 2.5 | 35.7 | 76.5 | 183.6 | 4,631.3 | 836.6 | 3,279.0 | 515.6 | 4,929.6 | 9 |
| Pennsylvania | 12,406,292 | 411.1 | 5.2 | 28.5 | 148.9 | 228.4 | 2,415.0 | 438.8 | 1,726.5 | 249.6 | 2,926.1 | 39 |
| Rhode Island | 1,080,632 | 247.4 | 2.4 | 29.6 | 67.6 | 147.7 | 2,884.1 | 505.7 | 2,001.0 | 377.4 | 3131.5 | 36 |
| South Carolina | 4,198,068 | 784.2 | 6.9 | 40.9 | 129.7 | 606.7 | 4,504.8 | 1,034.4 | 3,097.9 | 372.5 | 5,289.0 | 3 |
| South Dakota | 770,883 | 171.5 | 2.3 | 43.8 | 14.8 | 110.5 | 1,933.5 | 408.5 | 1,415.3 | 109.7 | 2,105.0 | 49 |
| Tennessee | 5,900,962 | 695.2 | 5.9 | 37.6 | 149.8 | 501.8 | 4,306.5 | 1,020.3 | 2,866.8 | 419.4 | 5001.7 | 8 |
| Texas | 22,490,022 | 540.5 | 6.1 | 37.3 | 159.3 | 337.9 | 4,494.0 | 978.7 | 3,097.0 | 418.3 | 5,034.5 | 7 |
| Utah | 2,389,039 | 236.0 | 1.9 | 39.1 | 51.7 | 143.3 | 4,085.6 | 637.1 | 3,128.2 | 320.3 | 4,321.6 | 21 |
| Vermont | 621,394 | 112.0 | 2.6 | 24.5 | 12.2 | 72.7 | 2,308.2 | 544.9 | 1,670.8 | 92.5 | 2,420.2 | 48 |
| Virginia | 7,459,827 | 275.6 | 5.2 | 23.7 | 92.6 | 154.1 | 2,676.6 | 386.0 | 2,057.2 | 233.4 | 2,952.2 | 38 |
| Washington | 6,203,788 | 343.8 | 3.1 | 46.1 | 94.6 | 200.2 | 4,849.2 | 977.3 | 3,175.0 | 696.9 | 5,193.0 | 4 |
| West Virginia | 1,815,354 | 271.2 | 3.7 | 17.6 | 42.3 | 207.6 | 2,506.2 | 602.2 | 1,698.1 | 206.0 | 2,777.4 | 45 |
| Wisconsin | 5,509,026 | 209.6 | 2.8 | 20.6 | 73.8 | 112.4 | 2,663.1 | 433.0 | 2,023.6 | 206.5 | 2,872.2 | 42 |
| Wyoming | 506,529 | 229.6 | 2.2 | 22.1 | 13.2 | 192.1 | 3,334.3 | 540.5 | 2,636.0 | 157.7 | 3,563.9 | 31 |
| United States (Total) | 293,655,404 | 465.5 | 5.5 | 32.2 | 136.7 | 291.1 | 3,517.1 | 729.9 | 2,365.9 | 421.3 | 3,980.6 | (26) |
|---|
'SOURCE: US Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2004'
See also
US related topics
References
1. Violent Crime since 1993, US Department of Justice
2. Firearm-related deaths in the United States and 35 other high- and upper-middle income countries, Krug, E.G, K.E. Powell, L.L. Dahlberg, , , International Journal of Epidemiology, 1998
3. The Seventh United Nations Survey on Crime Trends and the Operations of Criminal Justice Systems (1998 - 2000)
4. Crime rates, 1960 to 2004, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
5. Bureau of Justice Statistics, crime 1974-2004
6. Crime in Canada, Canada Statistics
7. All crimes in the US in 2004, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
8. Characteristics of crime victims, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
9. Crime in San Mateo County in 2001, US Bureau of Justics Statistics
10. Crime in the US, 1960-2004, Bureau of Justice Statistics
11. Crime in the US, 1986-2005, FBI
12. Crime in the US, 1960-2004, Bureau of Justice Statistics
13. Crime in the US, 1986-2005, FBI
14. American Police Systems, Fosdick, Raymond, , , The Century Co., 1920,
15. Crime in the US, 1986-2005, FBI
16. Crime in the US, 1986-2005, FBI
17. Crime in the US, 1986-2005, FBI
18. Crime in the US, 1960-2004, Bureau of Justice Statistics
19. Crime in the US, 1960-2004, Bureau of Justice Statistics
20. Crime in the US, 1986-2005, FBI
21. Crime in the US, 1960-2004, Bureau of Justice Statistics
22. Crime in the US, 1986-2005, FBI
23.
24.
25. Prison Racism
26. Race and the Criminal Justice System
27. State University of New York - Binghamton
28. Report: 7 million Americans in justice system
29. America's One-Million Nonviolent Prisoners
30. Prisoners in 2002
31. Victimization graph, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
32. Victim characteristics, US Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2005
33. Percentage of African Americans among the general population. US Census Bureau, 2004
34. Victim characteristics, US Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2005
35. The Sydney Morning Herald
36. The color of racism:: By Larry Elder
37. Inter-Racial Crime: The Dirty Little Secret by John Perazzo
38. Out of Control | The Cornell Daily Sun
39. United States Department of Justice document
40. National Crime Rates Compared
41. Crime in Canada, Canada Statistics
42. BKA, German federal crime statistics (German)
43. Comparison of National Crime Rates, Bureau of Justice Statistics
44. BKA, German federal crime statistics (German)
45. Crime in Canada, Canada Statistics
46. German federal crime statistics
47. International homicide rates from GunCite
48. Homicide rate comparisons
49. National homicide rates, Nation Master.com
50. National homicide rates, UN data published by Nation Master.com
51. National homicide rates, UN data published by Nation Master.com
52. BKA, German federal crime statistics
53. National homicide rates, UN data published by Nation Master.com
54. National homicide rates, UN data published by Nation Master.com
55. Crime in Canada, Canada Statistics
56. All crimes in the US in 2004, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
57. National homicide rates, UN data published by Nation Master.com
58. National homicide rates, UN data published by Nation Master.com
59. National homicide rates, UN data published by Nation Master.com
60. National homicide rates, UN data published by Nation Master.com
61. National homicide rates, UN data published by Nation Master.com
62. All crimes in the US in 2004, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
63. BKA, German federal crime statistics (German)
64. Crime in Canada, Canada Statistics
65. National homicide rates, UN data published by Nation Master.com
66. Crime in CA, FBI, 2005
67. Crime in MD, FBI, 2005
68. Crime in VA counties, FBI, 2005
69. Violent Crime in TX, FBI, 2005
70. Crime in TX, FBI, 2005
71. Crime in CA, FBI, 2005
72. Crime in NY, FBI, 2005
73. Crime statistics for large US cities, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
74. Crime in CA, FBI, 2005
75. Crime statistics for large US cities, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
76. Crime in IL, FBI, 2005
77. Crime statistics for large US cities, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
78. Crime in TX, FBI, 2005
79. Crime statistics for large US cities, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
80. Crime in PA, FBI, 2005
81. Crime statistics for large US cities, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
82. Crime in AZ, FBI, 2005
83. Crime statistics for large US cities, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
84. Crime in TX, FBI, 2005
85. Crime statistics for large US cities, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
86. Crime in CA, FBI, 2005
87. Crime statistics for large US cities, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
88. Crime in TX, FBI, 2005
89. Crime statistics for large US cities, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
90. Crime in CA, FBI, 2005
91. Crime statistics for large US cities, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
92. Crime in CA, FBI, 2005
93. Crime statistics for large US cities, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
94. Crime in WA, FBI, 2005
95. Crime statistics for large US cities, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
96. Crime statistics for large US cities, US Bureau of Justice Statistics
97. Crime in CA, FBI, 2005
98. Crime by State and region, FBI
99. Crime by State and region, FBI
100. US Census Bureau, median household income by state 2004
101. Crime by State and region, FBI
102. US Census Bureau, median household income by state 2004