(Redirected from Diplomatic relations)
'Diplomacy' is the art and practice of conducting
negotiations between representatives of groups or states. It usually refers to international diplomacy, the conduct of
international relations through the intercession of professional diplomats with regard to issues of peace-making, trade,
war,
economics and
culture. International
treaties are usually negotiated by diplomats prior to endorsement by national politicians.
The word stems from the
Greek word "''diploma''", which literally means 'folded in two'. In
ancient Greece, a diploma was a certificate certifying completion of a course of study, typically folded in two. In the days of the
Roman Empire, the word diploma was used to describe official travel documents, such as passports and passes for imperial roads, that were stamped on double metal plates. Later, the meaning was extended to cover other official documents such as treaties with foreign tribes. In the 1700s the
French called their body of officials attached to foreign legations the corps "diplomatique". The word "diplomacy" was first introduced into the
English language by
Edmund Burke in 1796, based on the French word "diplomatie".
[1]
In an informal or social sense, diplomacy is the employment of tact to gain
strategic advantage, one set of tools being the phrasing of statements in a non-confrontational, or polite manner.
Diplomats and diplomatic missions
A diplomat is someone involved in diplomacy; the collective term for a group of diplomats from a single country who are resident in another country is a
diplomatic mission.
Ambassador is the most senior diplomatic rank; a diplomatic mission headed by an ambassador is known as an
embassy. The collective body of all diplomats of particular country is called that country's
diplomatic corps. (See also
diplomatic rank.)
History
Europe
The ability to practice diplomacy is one of the defining elements of a state, and diplomacy has been practiced since the first
city-states were formed millennia ago. For most of human history diplomats were sent only for specific negotiations, and would return immediately after their mission concluded. Diplomats were usually relatives of the ruling family or of very high rank in order to give them legitimacy when they sought to negotiate with the other state.
One notable exception involved the relationship between the
Pope and the
Byzantine Emperor; papal agents, called ''
apocrisiarii'', were permanently resident in
Constantinople. After the 8th century, however, conflicts between the Pope and Emperor (such as the
Iconoclastic controversy) led to the breaking of close ties.
Modern diplomacy's origins are often traced to the states of
Northern Italy in the early
Renaissance, with the first embassies being established in the thirteenth century.
Milan played a leading role, especially under
Francesco Sforza who established permanent embassies to the other city states of Northern Italy. It was in Italy that many of the traditions of modern diplomacy began, such as the presentation of an ambassadors credentials to the
head of state.
From Italy the practice was spread to the other
European powers. Milan was the first to send a representative to the court of France in 1455. However, Milan refused to host French representatives fearing espionage and that the French representatives would intervene in its internal affairs. As foreign powers such as France and
Spain became increasingly involved in Italian politics the need to accept emissaries was recognized. Soon the major European powers were exchanging representatives. Spain was the first to send a permanent representative; it appointed an ambassador to the
Court of England in 1487. By the late 16th century, permanent missions became customary. The
Holy Roman Emperor, however, did not regularly send permanent legates, as they could not represent the interests of all the German princes (who were in theory subordinate to the Emperor, but in practice independent).
During that period the rules of modern diplomacy were further developed. The top rank of representatives was an ambassador. At that time an ambassador was a nobleman, the rank of the noble assigned varying with the prestige of the country he was delegated to. Strict standards developed for ambassadors, requiring they have large residences, host lavish parties, and play an important role in the court life of their host nation. In Rome, the most prized posting for a
Catholic ambassador, the French and Spanish representatives would have a retinue of up to a hundred. Even in smaller posts, ambassadors were very expensive. Smaller states would send and receive
envoys, who were a rung below ambassador. Somewhere between the two was the position of
minister plenipotentiary.
Diplomacy was a complex affair, even more so than now. The ambassadors from each state were ranked by complex levels of precedence that were much disputed. States were normally ranked by the title of the sovereign; for Catholic nations the emissary from the Vatican was paramount, then those from the
kingdoms, then those from
duchies and principalities. Representatives from
republics were considered the lowest of the low. Determining precedence between two kingdoms depended on a number of factors that often fluctuated, leading to near constant squabbling.
Ambassadors, nobles with little foreign experience and no expectation of a career in diplomacy, needed to be supported by large embassy staff. These professionals would be sent on longer assignments and would be far more knowledgeable than the higher-ranking officials about the host country. Embassy staff would include a wide range of employees, including some dedicated to
espionage. The need for skilled individuals to staff embassies was met by the graduates of universities, and this led to a great increase in the study of
international law,
modern languages, and history at universities throughout Europe.
At the same time, permanent foreign ministries began to be established in almost all European states to coordinate embassies and their staffs. These ministries were still far from their modern form, and many of them had extraneous internal responsibilities. Britain had two departments with frequently overlapping powers until 1782. They were also far smaller; France, which boasted the largest foreign affairs department, had only some 70 full-time employees in the 1780s.
The elements of modern diplomacy slowly spread to
Eastern Europe and
Russia, arriving by the early eighteenth century. The entire edifice would be greatly disrupted by the
French Revolution and the subsequent years of warfare. The revolution would see commoners take over the diplomacy of the French state, and of those conquered by revolutionary armies. Ranks of precedence were abolished.
Napoleon also refused to acknowledge diplomatic immunity, imprisoning several British diplomats accused of scheming against France.
After the fall of Napoleon, the
Congress of Vienna of 1815 established an international system of
diplomatic rank. Disputes on precedence among nations (and therefore the appropriate diplomatic ranks used) persisted for over a century until after
World War II, when the rank of
ambassador became the norm. In between that time, figures such as the German Chancellor
Otto von Bismark were renowned for international diplomacy.
Asia
Diplomatic traditions outside of Europe were more or less very different. A feature necessary for diplomacy is the existence of a number of states of somewhat equal power, as existed in Italy during the Renaissance, and in Europe for much of the modern period. By contrast, in
Asia and the
Middle East,
China and the
Ottoman Empire were reluctant to practice bilateral diplomacy as they viewed themselves to be unquestionably superior to all their neighbours (hence, set up smaller nations as
tributaries and
vassals). The
Ottoman Turks, for instance, would not send missions to other states, expecting representatives to come to
Istanbul. It would not be until the nineteenth century that the Ottoman Empire established permanent embassies in other capitals. Likewise, the
Koreans and
Japanese during the Chinese
Tang Dynasty (
618-
907 AD) looked to the Chinese capital of
Chang'an as the hub of civilization and emulated its central bureaucracy as the pristine model of governance.
There were periods of
Chinese history where China was weakened and threatened enough so that skillful international diplomacy was necessary. Such was the case in the 11th century during the
Song Dynasty, where the cunning ambassadors
Shen Kuo and
Su Song achieved diplomatic success with the
Liao Dynasty, the often hostile
Khitan neighbor to the north. This situation was made into a triad of warfare and diplomacy with the
Tangut Western Xia Dynasty to the northwest of Song China (centered in modern-day
Shaanxi). Long before this, the Chinese had sent envoys into
Central Asia,
India, and
Persia starting with
Zhang Qian in the 2nd century BC, the Chinese embassy mission of
Zhou Daguan to the
Khmer Empire of
Cambodia in the 13th century, and diplomacy as a necessity in the distinctive period of
Chinese exploration. Since the Tang Dynasty (618-907 AD), the Chinese also became heavily invested in sending diplomatic envoys abroad on
maritime missions into the
Indian Ocean, to India, Persia,
Arabia,
East Africa, and
Egypt. One of the earliest realists in
international relations theory was the 6th century BC military strategist
Sun Tzu, author of the ''
Art of War'', who lived during the
Warring States (
403 BC-
221 BC). Also, at the times of the
Mongol Empire (1206-1294) the Mongols created something similar to today's diplomatic passport called paiza. The paiza were in three different types (golden, silver, and copper) depending on the envoy's level of importance. With the paiza, there came authority that the envoy can ask for food, transport, place to stay from any city, village, or clan within the empire with no difficulties. There was also the 17th century border treaty between
Qing Dynasty China and
Czarist Russia, the
Treaty of Nerchinsk in 1689. This was followed up by the
Aigun Treaty and the
Convention of Peking in the mid 19th century.
Nevertheless, as European power spread around the world in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries so too did its diplomatic model and system become adopted by Asian countries.
Diplomatic strategy
Real world diplomatic negotiations are very different from intellectual debates in a university where an issue is decided on the merit of the arguments and negotiators make a deal by splitting the difference. Though diplomatic agreements can sometimes be reached among liberal democratic nations by appealing to higher principles, most real world diplomacy has traditionally been heavily influenced by
hard power.
The interaction of strength and diplomacy can be illustrated by a comparison to labor negotiations. If a labor union is not willing to strike, then the union is not going anywhere because management has absolutely no incentive to agree to union demands. On the other hand, if management is not willing to take a strike, then the company will be walked all over by the labor union, and management will be forced to agree to any demand the union makes. The same concept applies to diplomatic negotiations.
There are also incentives in diplomacy to act reasonably, especially if the support of other actors is needed. The gain from winning one negotiation can be much less than the increased hostility from other parts. This is also called
soft power.
Many situations in modern diplomacy are also rules based. When for instance two
WTO countries have trade dispute, it is in both interest to limit the spill over damage to other areas by following some agreed-upon rules.
Diplomatic immunity
Main articles: Diplomatic immunity
The sanctity of diplomats has long been observed. This sanctity has come to be known as
diplomatic immunity. While there have been a number of cases where diplomats have been killed, this is normally viewed as a great breach of honour.
Genghis Khan and the
Mongols were well known for strongly insisting on the rights of diplomats, and they would often wreak horrific vengeance against any state that violated these rights. This was shown when, having sent an ambassador to
Persia, Genghis Khan received his ambassador's head sent by the Persians. Because of this act the Mongols invaded the whole of Persia, leading to even larger invasions by Khan in the future.
Diplomatic rights were established in the mid-seventeenth century in Europe and have spread throughout the world. These rights were formalized by the
1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which protects diplomats from being persecuted or
prosecuted while on a diplomatic mission. If a diplomat does commit a serious crime while in a host country he may be declared as
persona non grata (unwanted person). Such diplomats are then often tried for the crime in their homeland.
Diplomatic communications are also viewed as sacrosanct, and diplomats have long been allowed to carry documents across borders without being searched. The mechanism for this is the so-called "
diplomatic bag" (or, in some countries, the "diplomatic pouch"). In recent years, however,
signals intelligence has led to this use of diplomatic bags being largely discarded.
In times of hostility, diplomats are often withdrawn for reasons of personal safety, as well as in some cases when the host country is friendly but there is a perceived threat from internal dissidents. Ambassadors and other diplomats are sometimes recalled temporarily by their home countries as a way to express displeasure with the host country. In both cases, lower-level employees still remain to actually do the business of diplomacy.
Diplomats as a Guarantee
In the Ottoman Empire, the diplomats of Persia and other states were seen as a guarantee of good behavior. If a nation broke a treaty or if their nationals misbehaved the diplomats would be punished. Diplomats were thus used as an enforcement mechanism on treaties and international law. To ensure that punishing a diplomat mattered rulers insisted on high-ranking figures. This tradition is seen by supporters of Iran as a legal basis of the 1979
Iranian hostage crisis. In imitation of alleged previous practices supporters of the
Iranian Revolution attempted to punish the United States for its alleged misdeeds by holding their diplomats hostage. Diplomats as a guarantee were also employed sometimes in pre-modern Europe and other parts of Asia.
Diplomacy and espionage
Diplomacy is closely linked to espionage or gathering of intelligence. Embassies are bases for both diplomats and spies, and some diplomats are essentially openly-acknowledged spies. For instance, the job of
military attachés includes learning as much as possible about the military of the nation to which they are assigned. They do not try to hide this role and, as such, are only invited to events allowed by their hosts, such as military parades or
air shows. There are also deep-cover spies operating in many embassies. These individuals are given fake positions at the embassy, but their main task is to illegally gather intelligence, usually by coordinating spy rings of locals or other spies. For the most part, spies operating out of embassies gather little intelligence themselves and their identities tend to be known by the opposition. If discovered, these diplomats can be expelled from an embassy, but for the most part
counter-intelligence agencies prefer to keep these agents ''in situ'' and under close monitoring.
The information gathered by spies plays an increasingly important role in diplomacy. Arms-control treaties would be impossible without the power of
reconnaissance satellites and agents to monitor compliance. Information gleaned from espionage is useful in almost all forms of diplomacy, everything from trade agreements to border disputes.
Diplomatic resolution of problems
Various processes and procedures have evolved over time for handling diplomatic issues and disputes.
Arbitration and mediations
''For more information, see ''
Nations sometimes resort to international arbitration when faced with a specific question or point of contention in need of resolution. For most of history, there were no official or formal procedures for such proceedings. They were generally accepted to abide by general principles and protocols related to
international law and justice.
Sometimes these took the form of formal arbitrations and mediations. In such cases a commission of diplomats might be convened to hear all sides of an issue, and to come some sort of ruling based on international law.
In the modern era, much of this work is often by carried out by the
International Court of Justice at
the Hague, or other formal commissions, agencies and tribunals, working under the
United Nations.
Below are some examples.
★
Hay-Herbert Treaty Enacted after the United States and Britain submitted a dispute to international mediation about the US-Canadian border.
Conferences
Other times, resolutions were sought through the convening of international conferences. In such cases, there are fewer ground rules, and fewer formal applications of international law. However, participants are expected to guide themselves through principles of international fairness, logic, and protocol.
Some examples of these formal conferences are:
★
Congress of Vienna (1815) - After
Napoleon was defeated, there were many diplomatic questions waiting to be resolved. This included the shape of the map of
Europe, the disposition of political and
nationalist claims of various ethnic groups and nationalities wishing to have some political autonomy, and the resolution of various claims by various European powers.
★ The
Congress of Berlin (June 13 - July 13, 1878) was a meeting of the European Great Powers' and the Ottoman Empire's leading statesmen in Berlin in 1878. In the wake of the Russo-Turkish War, 1877–78, the meeting's aim was to reorganize conditions in the Balkans.
Negotiations
Sometimes nations convene official negotiation processes to settle an issue or dispute between several nations which are parties to a dispute. These are similar to the conferences mentioned above, as there are technically no established rules or procedures. However, there are general principles and precedents which help define a course for such proceedings.
Some examples are
★
Camp David accord Convened in 1978 by President Jimmy Carter of the United States, at Camp David to reach an agreement between Prime Minister Mechaem Begin of Israel and President Anwar Sadat of Egypt. After weeks of negotiation, agreement was reached and the accords were signed, later leading directly to the
Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty of 1979.
★
Treaty of Portsmouth Enacted after President
Theodore Roosevelt brought together the delegates from
Russia and
Japan, to settle the
Russo-Japanese War. Roosevelt's personal intervention settled the conflict, and caused him to win the
Nobel peace prize.
Diplomatic recognition
Diplomatic recognition is an important factor in determining whether a nation is an independent state. Receiving recognition is often difficult, even for countries which are fully sovereign. For many decades after becoming independent, even many of the closest allies of the
Dutch Republic refused to grant it full recognition. Today there are
a number of independent entities without widespread diplomatic recognition, most notably the
Republic of China on Taiwan. Since the 1970s, most nations have stopped officially recognizing the ROC's existence on Taiwan, at the insistence of the
People's Republic of China. Currently, the United States and other nations maintain informal relations through de facto embassies, with names such as the
American Institute in Taiwan. Similarly, Taiwan's de facto embassies abroad are known by names such as the
Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office. This was not always the case, with the US maintaining official diplomatic ties with the ROC, recognizing it as the sole and legitimate government of all of China until 1979, when these relations were broken off as a condition for establishing official relations with Communist China.
The
Palestinian Authority has its own diplomatic service, however Palestinian representatives in most Western countries are not accorded diplomatic immunity, and their missions are referred to as Delegations General.
Other unrecognized countries include
Abkhazia,
Transnistria,
Somaliland,
Nagorno Karabakh, and the
Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. Lacking the economic and political importance of Taiwan, these nations tend to be much more diplomatically isolated.
Though used as a factor in judging sovereignty, Article 3 of the
Montevideo Convention states, "The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by other states."
Informal diplomacy
Informal diplomacy (sometimes called Track II diplomacy) has been used for centuries to communicate between powers. Most diplomats work to recruit figures in other nations who might be able to give informal access to a country's leadership. In some situations, such as between the
United States and the People's Republic of China a large amount of diplomacy is done through semi-formal channels using
interlocutors such as academic members of
thinktanks. This occurs in situations where governments wish to express intentions or to suggest methods of resolving a diplomatic situation, but do not wish to express a formal position.
Track II diplomacy is a specific kind of informal diplomacy, in which non-officials (academic scholars, retired civil and military officials, public figures, social activists) engage in dialogue, with the aim of conflict resolution, or confidence-building. Sometimes governments may fund such Track II exchanges. Sometimes the exchanges may have no connection at all with governments, or may even act in defiance of governments; such exchanges are called Track III.
Cultural diplomacy
Cultural diplomacy is a part of diplomacy. It alludes to a new way of making diplomacy by involving new non governmental and non professional actors in the making of diplomacy. In the frame of globalization, culture plays a major role in the definition of identity and in the relations between people. Joseph Nye points out the importance of having a ''soft power'' besides a ''hard power''. When classical diplomacy fails, a better knowledge can help bridging the gap between different cultures.
Cultural diplomacy becomes a subject of academic studies based on historical essays on the United States, Europe, and the Cold War.
See also
★
Commercial diplomacy
★
Cowboy diplomacy
★
Diplomacy Monitor, a tool for tracking Internet-based
public diplomacy
★
Diplomatic mission
★
Diplomatic passport
★
Diplomatic rank
★
Diplomatic law
★
Economic diplomacy
★
Foreign minister
★
Foreign policy
★
Foreign policy analysis
★
Foreign policy doctrine
★
Gunboat diplomacy
★
Intercultural competence
★
International relations
★
Multilateralism
★
Peace treaty
★
Ping Pong Diplomacy
★
Protocol
★
Public diplomacy
★
Secret diplomacy
★
Shuttle diplomacy
★
Track II diplomacy
★
Transformational Diplomacy
References
★ ''A Guide to Diplomatic Practice'' by Sir
Ernest Satow, Longmans, Green & Co. London & New York, 1917. A standard reference work used in many embassies across the world (though not British ones). Now in its fifth edition (1998) ISBN 0-582-50109-1
★ ''Diplomacy: Theory & Practice'', 3rd edition, by GR Berridge, Palgrave, Basingstoke, 2005, ISBN 1-4039-9311-4
★ ''Journey to Become a Diplomat: With a Guide to Careers in World Affairs'' by George Cunningham, FPA Global Vision Books 2005, ISBN 0-87124-212-5
★ ''Inside a U.S. Embassy: How the Foreign Service Works for America'' by Shawn Dorman (Editor), American Foreign Service Association, Second edition February 2003, ISBN 0-9649488-2-6
★ ''Foreign Ministries: Managing Diplomatic Networks and Optimizing Value'' by Kishan S. Rana and Jovan Kurbalija (Editors), DiploFoundation, Paperback 2007, ISBN 978-99932-53-16-7
★ ''The 21st Century Ambassador: Plenipotentiary to Chief Executive'' by Kishan S Rana, DiploFoundation, Paperback 2004, ISBN 99909-55-18-2
★ ''Intercultural Communication and Diplomacy'' by Hannah Slavik (Editor), DiploFoundation, Paperback 2004, ISBN 99932-53-08-1
Diplomatic Training Institutions
★
International Forum on Diplomatic Training (gateway to diplomatic training academies and institutes)
★
International School of Geneva
★
Geneva School of Diplomacy and International Relations
★
United Nations International School of Hanoi
★
United Nations International School
★
University for Peace
★
Vienna International School
★
Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies
★
Royal United Services Institute
★
School of International Service
External links
★
Embassies & Consulates Search Directory
★
The United Nations
★
U.S. Dept. of State Foreign Affairs Handbook - Using Diplomatic Notes
★ American diplomats describe their careers in
Frontline Diplomacy: The Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection of the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, a site at the
Library of Congress.
★
European Foreign Policy Council Think-tank for strategic development, coordination and processing of the EU foreign policy
★
DiploFoundation A non-profit organisation specialized in online diplomatic training, research in international relations, diplomacy and internet governance
★
Diplomacy of Small States. An international conference dealing with the issues of foreign policy, negotiation tactics, diplomatic missions, crisis and humanitarian diplomacy of small states. See also conference
discussion papers.
★
Modern Diplomacy Reviewed A collection of articles analyzing modern diplomacy from various angles: diplomatic analogy, impact of internet on diplomacy, diplomatic tools and methods, diplomatic representation, good governance, public diplomacy
★ Books written by diplomats
[1]
★
Diplomatic Dictionary
★ Diplomacy Quotes
[2]
العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español
