ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES

The 'United States economy' has the world's largest gross domestic product (GDP), $13.21 trillion in 2006. ^[1] It is a mixed economy where corporations and other private firms make the majority of microeconomic decisions while being regulated by the government.
The US economy maintains a high per capita GDP, which although not the world's highest, compares favorably to that of all other major economies. The US has seen somewhat slower GDP growth rate, a low unemployment rate, and high levels of research and development investment. However, some observers question whether U.S growth is merely borrowed. Economic concerns include national debt, high external debt, high unfunded entitlement liabilities, high mortgage debt, high corporate debt, a low savings rate, and a large current account (trade) deficit. Some observers are also concerned by rising economic disparaties as well as the high cost and uneven availability of health care services.
As of 2006, the gross external debt was nearly USD $10 trillion or 79% of GDP,^[2] (see List of countries by external debt).^[3] The gross public debt is 65% of GDP (also known as national debt and refers to what is owned by the combined public sector to both domestic and foreign creditors; see List of countries by public debt and global debt). The national debt includes the amount of the cumulative government deficits and interest.

Contents

History

Basic elements of the U.S. economy

Stabilization and growth

Regulation and control

Economic regulation

Social regulations

Direct services

Direct assistance

National debt

External debt: Liabilities to foreigners

International trade

US exports of goods in 2004 by country

US imports in 2004 by country

Private income

International comparison

Poverty

Income inequality

Other statistics

See also

US related topics

References

Other references

External links

History

Main articles: Economic history of the United States


With President Warren G. Harding's post–World War I "Return to Normalcy", the United States enjoyed a period of great prosperity during the 1920s. The stock market grew by leaps and bounds, fueled by the inflationary policies of the Federal Reserve. However, the Great Depression ended that period. President Franklin D. Roosevelt introduced an array of social programs and Public works, known collectively as the New Deal. The New Deal included a new social safety net involving relief programs like the Works Progress Administration (WPA) and the Social Security system. In 1941, the U.S. entered World War II. The homefront saw enormous prosperity, as labor shortages brought millions of housewives, students, farmers and African Americans into the labor force. Millions moved to industrial centers in the North and West. Military spending accounted for over 40% of GDP at the peak, driving debt up to record levels.
The post–World War II years were a time of great prosperity in the United States. The economy remained stable until the 1970s, when the U.S. suffered stagflation. Richard Nixon took the United States off the Bretton Woods system, and further government attempts to revive the economy failed. As the decade progressed, the situation worsened. In November 1980, Robert G. Anderson wrote, "the death knell is finally sounding for the Keynesian Revolution." Ronald Reagan was elected President in 1980, and was of the opinion that "government is not the solution to our problem, government ''is'' the problem." Reagan advocated a program of 'supply-side economics', and in 1981 Congress cut taxes and spending, and reduced regulations. Unfortunately as one might expect, cutting spending proved more difficult than cutting taxes, so there was a substantial increase of public debt. Although the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) declined by 2% in 1982, it proceeded to rebound, and by 1988 had enjoyed a total of 31% growth since Reagan's election. But economic policy did not correspond readily with any particular theory. The massive fiscal deficits of the Reagan era, like those of the later presidency of George W. Bush, had a predictable "Keynesian stimulus." On the other hand, in Reagan's first term, the Federal Reserve, trying to contain the stagflation of the 1970s that was linked in part to increases in the price of oil, raised interest rates to record levels, leading to a brief spike of the worst unemployment since the Great Depression.
In spite of the monetarist trend at the federal reserve, Keynesian income stabilization and redistribution programs, such as unemployment insurance and social security, have remained in effect, even though two decades of only partial minimum wage increases, adjusting for inflation, have left the lowest paid sector of the work force struggling to keep up. In sum, monetarists have been unable to dislodge the great "Keynesian institutions" of social security, unemployment insurance, Medicaid, and welfare payments, even though efforts have been made to curtail all of these programs (most notably welfare). These programs greatly exceed even military spending in the overall impact on the economy, a situation very different from the concluding years of World War II and into the 1950s, when Keynesian deficits were seen by some left-wing critics (e.g., Baran, Sweezy) as the economic policy of a nation that desperately needed military expenditure to keep unemployment down.
Notwithstanding the normative monetarist and "anti-big-government" themes associated with his Republican Party, President George W. Bush and both houses of the Republican-controlled Congress pushed through a massive expansion of the Medicaid entitlement program by extending coverage to prescription drugs. However the bulk of income redistribution and stabilization programs date from the New Deal of President Franklin Roosevelt and the Great Society of President Lyndon Johnson. Under Bill Clinton's eight years of presidency, the GDP expanded by 38%. By the end of his tenure the United States had a Gross National Income (GNI) of $9.7 trillion,^[4] and the lowest unemployment rates in 30 years. A recession began during 2000 in connection to the end of the dot-com bubble. Throughout, housing starts and purchases remained high, and the economy as of 2005 is considered by many to be strong in general.

Basic elements of the U.S. economy

The economy of the United States is large and complicated, but there remain certain features that are easily identifiable. A central feature of the US economy is freedom in economic decision-making, for both the individual and corporation, the latter being considered under the law as a legal person for both historical and practical reasons. ^[5] This is enhanced by relatively low levels of regulation, taxation and government involvement,^[6] as well as a court system that generally protects property rights and enforces contracts. A large population, a large land area, numerous natural resources, a stable government and a highly developed system of post-secondary education are almost universally regarded as substantial contributors to US economic performance.
The first ingredient of a nation's economic system is its natural resources. The United States is rich in mineral resources and fertile farm soil, and it is fortunate to have a moderate climate. It also has extensive coastlines on both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, as well as on the Gulf of Mexico. Rivers flow from far within the continent, and the Great Lakes—five large, inland lakes along the U.S. border with Canada—provide additional shipping access. These extensive waterways have helped shape the country's economic growth over the years and helped bind America's 50 individual states together in a single economic unit.
The second ingredient is labor. The number of available workers and, more importantly, their productivity help determine the health of an economy. Throughout its history, the United States has experienced steady growth in the labor force, and that, in turn, has helped fuel almost constant economic expansion. Until shortly after World War I, most workers were immigrants from Europe, their immediate descendants, or African Americans who were mostly slaves taken from Africa, or slave descendants. Beginning in the early 20th century, many Latin Americans immigrated; followed by large numbers of Asians following removal of nation-origin based immigration quotas. The promise of high wages brings many highly skilled workers from around the world to the United States.
Labor mobility has also been important to the capacity of the American economy to adapt to changing conditions. When immigrants flooded labor markets on the East Coast, many workers moved inland, often to farmland waiting to be tilled. Similarly, economic opportunities in industrial, northern cities attracted black Americans from southern farms in the first half of the 20th century.
Third, there is manufacturing and investment. In the United States, the corporation has emerged as an association of owners, known as stockholders, who form a business enterprise governed by a complex set of rules and customs. Brought on by the process of mass production, corporations such as General Electric have been instrumental in shaping the United States. Through the stock market, American banks and investors have grown their economy by investing and withdrawing capital from profitable corporations. Today in the era of globalization American investors and corporations have influence all over the world. The American government has also been instrumental in investing in the economy, in areas such as providing cheap electricity (such as the Hoover Dam), and military contracts in times of war.
While consumers and producers make most decisions that mold the economy, government activities have a powerful effect on the U.S. economy in at least four areas. Strong government regulation in the U.S. economy started in the early 1900s with the rise of the progressive movement; prior to this the government promoted economic growth through protective tariffs and subsidies to industry, built infrastructure, and established banking policies, including the gold standard, to encourage savings and investment in productive enterprises.

Stabilization and growth

The federal government attempts to guide the overall pace of economic activity, attempting to maintain steady growth, high levels of employment, and price stability. At its disposal, the government uses powerful tools to forward a growth and stability agenda. Adjusting spending and tax rates (fiscal policy) or managing the money supply and controlling the use of credit (monetary policy), it can slow down or speed up the economy's rate of growth—in the process, affecting the level of prices and employment.
For many years following the Great Depression of the 1930s, recessions—periods of slow economic growth and high unemployment—were viewed as the greatest of economic threats. When the danger of recession appeared most serious, government sought to strengthen the economy by spending heavily itself or cutting taxes so that consumers would spend more, and by fostering rapid growth in the money supply, which also encouraged more spending. In the 1970s, major price increases, particularly for energy, created a strong fear of inflation—increases in the overall level of prices. As a result, government leaders came to concentrate more on controlling inflation than on combating recession by limiting spending, resisting tax cuts, and reining in growth in the money supply.
Ideas about the best tools for stabilizing the economy changed substantially between the 1960s and the 1990s. In the 1960s, government had great faith in fiscal policy—manipulation of government revenues to influence the economy. Since spending and taxes are controlled by the president and the U.S. Congress, these elected officials played a leading role in directing the economy. A period of high inflation, high unemployment, and huge government deficits weakened confidence in fiscal policy as a tool for regulating the overall pace of economic activity. Instead, monetary policy—controlling the nation's money supply through such devices as interest rates—assumed growing prominence. Monetary policy is directed by the nation's central bank, known as the Federal Reserve Board, with considerable independence from the president and the Congress.
Since the stagflation of the 1970s, the U.S. economy has been characterized by somewhat slower growth. In 1985, the U.S. began its growing trade deficit with China. In recent years, the primary economic concerns have centered around: high national debt ($9 trillion), high corporate debt ($9 trillion), high mortgage debt (over $10 trillion as of 2005 year-end), high unfunded Medicare liability ($30 trillion), high unfunded Social Security liability ($12 trillion), high external debt (amount owed to foreign lenders) and a deterioration of the US net international investment position,^[7] high trade deficits, and a rise in illegal immigration. In 2006, the U.S economy had its lowest saving rate since 1933.^[8] These serious issues have raised concerns among economists and unfunded liabilites mentioned as a serious problem facing the United States in the President's 2006 State of the Union address.^[9]
However, on the positive side the US economy maintains a high GDP, a reasonably high GDP growth rate and a low unemployment rate, and is still an attraction to immigrants worldwide.

Regulation and control

The U.S. federal government regulates private enterprise in numerous ways. Regulation falls into two general categories.

Economic regulation

Some efforts seek, either directly or indirectly, to control prices. Traditionally, the government has sought to prevent monopolies such as electric utilities from raising prices beyond the level that would ensure them reasonable profits. At times, the government has extended economic control to other kinds of industries as well. In the years following the Great Depression, it devised a complex system to stabilize prices for agricultural goods, which tend to fluctuate wildly in response to rapidly changing supply and demand. A number of other industries—trucking and, later, airlines—successfully sought regulation themselves to limit what they considered as harmful price cutting.
Another form of economic regulation, antitrust law, seeks to strengthen market forces so that direct regulation is unnecessary. The government—and, sometimes, private parties—have used antitrust law to prohibit practices or mergers that would unduly limit competition.
In 1933, Congress created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) which presently guarantees checking and savings deposits in member banks up to $100,000 per depositor to prevent bank failures. This was in response to the widespread bank runs of the early 1930s during the Great Depression.

Social regulations

Since the 1970s, government has also exercised control over private companies to achieve social goals, such as protecting the public's health and safety or maintaining a clean and healthy environment. For example, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration protects workers from hazards they may encounter at their workplace and the United States Environmental Protection Agency seeks to control water and air pollution. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration tightly regulates what drugs may reach the market.
Such agencies draw heavy criticism from conservatives, who question the agencies' efficiency and necessity.
American attitudes about regulation changed substantially during the final three decades of the 20th century. Beginning in the 1970s, policy makers grew increasingly concerned that economic regulation protected inefficient companies at the expense of consumers in industries such as airlines and trucking. At the same time, technological changes spawned new competitors in some industries, such as telecommunications, that once were considered natural monopolies. Both developments led to a succession of laws easing regulation.
While leaders of America's two most influential political parties generally favored economic deregulation during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, there was less agreement concerning regulations designed to achieve social goals. Social regulation had assumed growing importance in the years following the Depression and World War II, and again in the 1960s and 1970s. But during the presidency of Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, the government relaxed rules intended to protect workers, consumers, and the environment, arguing that regulation interfered with free enterprise, increased the costs of doing business, and thus contributed to inflation. Still, many Americans continued to voice concerns about specific events or trends, prompting the government to issue new regulations in some areas, including environmental protection. As of March 2005, it is estimated that compliance with government regulation costs the U.S. economy $1.4 trillion a year.^[10]
Some citizens, meanwhile, have turned to the courts when they feel their elected officials are not addressing certain issues quickly or strongly enough. For instance, in the 1990s, individuals, and eventually government itself, sued tobacco companies over the health risks of cigarette smoking. A large financial settlement provided states with long-term payments to cover medical costs to treat smoking-related illnesses. The money is mostly spent (or will be spent, as checks are often written in anticipation of payments) for other purposes.

Direct services

Each level of government provides many direct services. The federal government, for example, is responsible for national defense, backs research that often leads to the development of new products, conducts space exploration, and runs numerous programs designed to help workers develop workplace skills and find jobs. Government spending has a significant effect on local and regional economies—and even on the overall pace of economic activity.
State governments, meanwhile, are responsible for the construction and maintenance of most highways. State, county, or city governments play the leading role in financing and operating public schools. Local governments are primarily responsible for police and fire protection. Government spending in each of these areas can also affect local and regional economies, although federal decisions generally have the greatest economic impact
Overall, federal, state, and local spending accounted for almost 28 percent of gross domestic product in 1998.^[11]

Direct assistance

Government also provides many kinds of help to businesses and individuals. It offers low-interest loans and technical assistance to small businesses, and it provides loans to help students attend college. Government-sponsored enterprises buy home mortgages from lenders and turn them into securities that can be bought and sold by investors, thereby encouraging home lending. Government also actively promotes exports and seeks to prevent foreign countries from maintaining trade barriers that restrict imports.
Government supports individuals who cannot or will not adequately care for themselves. Social Security, which is financed by a tax on employers and employees, accounts for the largest portion of Americans' retirement income. The Medicare program pays for many of the medical costs of the elderly. The Medicaid program finances medical care for low-income families. In many states, government maintains institutions for the mentally ill or people with severe disabilities. The federal government provides food stamps to help poor families obtain food, and the federal and state governments jointly provide welfare grants to support low-income parents with children.
Many of these programs, including Social Security, trace their roots to the "New Deal" programs of Franklin D. Roosevelt, who served as the U.S. president from 1933 to 1945. Key to Roosevelt's reforms was a belief that poverty usually resulted from social and economic causes rather than from failed personal morals. This view repudiated a common notion whose roots lay in New England Puritanism that success was a sign of God's favor and failure a sign of God's displeasure. This was an important transformation in American social and economic thought. Even today, however, echoes of the older notions are still heard in debates around certain issues, especially welfare.
Many other assistance programs for individuals and families, including Medicare and Medicaid, were begun in the 1960s during President Lyndon Johnson's (1963–1969) "War on Poverty." Although some of these programs encountered financial difficulties in the 1990s and various reforms were proposed, they continued to have strong support from both of the United States' major political parties. Critics argued, however, that providing welfare to unemployed but healthy individuals actually created dependency rather than solving problems. Welfare reform legislation (PRWORA) pass in 1996 under President Bill Clinton (1993–2001) and a Republican Congress requires people to work, job search, enter training, or receive education as a condition of receiving benefits and imposes Federal limits on how long individuals may receive payments (states may adopt stronger limits).

National debt

Main articles: United States public debt

The national debt, also known as the U.S. public debt (part of which is the gross federal debt), is the overall collective sum of yearly budget deficit owed by all branches of the United States government, plus interest. The economic significance of this debt and its potential ramifications for future generations of Americans are controversial issues in the United States.
The borrowing cap debt ceiling as of 2005 stood at $8.18 trillion. ^[12]. In March 2006, Congress raised that ceiling an additional $0.79 trillion to $8.97 trillion.^[13] Congress has used this method to deal with an encroaching debt ceiling in previous years, as the federal borrowing limit was raised in 2002 and 2003.^[14]
While the U.S. national debt is the world's largest in absolute size, a more accurate measure is that of its size relative to the nation's GDP. When the national debt is put into this perspective it appears considerably less today than in past years, particularly during World War II. By this measure, it is also considerably less than those of other industrialized nations such as Japan and roughly equivalent to those of several Western European nations.^[15]

External debt: Liabilities to foreigners

U.S. liabilities to foreigners are estimated at $10.4 trillion in 2005.^[16] This is a gross figure, because the liabilities from foreigners to the U.S. have not been subtracted. The U.S. ''Net International Investment Position (NIIP)''^[17] deteriorated to a negative $2.5 trillion at the end of 2006^[18], or about minus 19% of GDP.
This figure rises as long as the US maintains an imbalance in trade, specifically, when the value of imports substantially outweighs the value of exports. It should be noted that this external debt does not, for the most part, represent lending to Americans or the American government, nor is it consumer debt owed to non-US creditors. Rather, the external debt is an accounting entry that largely represents US domestic assets purchased with trade dollars and owned overseas, largely by US trading partners.^[19]
For countries like the United States, a large "external debt" is created when the value of foreign assets (debt and equity) held by domestic residents is less than the value of domestic assets held by foreigners. In simple terms, as foreigners buy property in the US, this adds to the external debt. When this occurs in greater amounts than Americans buying property overseas, nations like the United States are said to be ''debtor nations'', but this is not conventional debt like a loan obtained from a bank.^[20] However, foreigners also purchase U.S. debt instruments, such as government bonds, this is a form of conventional debt.
If the external debt represents foreign ownership of domestic assets, the result is that rental income, stock dividends, capital gains and other investment income is received by foreign invester, rather than by US residents. On the other hand, when US debt is held by overseas investors, they receive interest and principal repayments. As the trade imbalance puts extra dollars in hands outside of the US, these dollars may be used to invest in new assets (foreign direct investment, such as new plants) or be used to buy existing US assets such as stocks, real estate and bonds. With a mounting trade deficit, the income from these assets increasingly transfers overseas.
Of major concern is that the size of the NIIP (or net external debt), as it is quite a bit larger than most national economies. Fueled by the sizeable trade deficit, the external debt is so large that many wonder if the trade situation can be sustained for the long term. Complicating the matter is that many of America's trading partners, such as China, depend much of their entire economy on exports, and especially exports to America. Many controversies exist about the current trade and external debt situation, and it is arguable whether anyone understands how these dynamics will play out in an historically unprecedented floating exchange rate system. While various aspects of the U.S. economic profile have precedents in the situations of other countries (notably government debt as a percentage of GDP), the sheer size of the US and world economy create uncertainty about the future.

International trade

The United States is the most significant nation in the world when it comes to international trade. For decades, it has led the world in imports while simultaneously remaining as one of the top three exporters of the world.
As the major epicenter of world trade, the United States enjoys leverage that many other nations do not. For one, since it is the world's leading consumer, it is the number one customer of companies all around the world. Many businesses compete for a share of the United States market. In addition, the United States occasionally uses its economic leverage to impose economic sanctions in different regions of the world.
The U.S. is a member of several international trade organizations. The purpose of joining these organizations is to come to agreement with other nations on trade issues, although there is some disagreement among U.S. citizens as to whether or not the U.S. government should be making these trade agreements in the first place.
Since it is the world's leading importer, there are many U.S. dollars in circulation all around the planet. The stable U.S. economy and fairly sound monetary policy has led to faith in the U.S. dollar as the world's most stable currency, although that may be changing in recent times.
In order to fund the national debt (also known as public debt), the United States relies on selling U.S. treasury bonds to people both inside and outside the country, and in recent times the latter have become increasingly important. Much of the money generated for the treasury bonds came from U.S. dollars which were used to purchase imports in the United States.

US exports of goods in 2004 by country

(note: does not include exports of services)
'Nation'	'millions of dollars'	'percentage'	'cumulative percentage'
Canada	189101	23.1192%	23.1192%
Mexico	110775	13.5432%	36.6624%
Japan	54400	6.6509%	43.3133%
United Kingdom	35960	4.3964%	47.7097%
China	34721	4.2449%	51.9546%
Germany	31381	3.8366%	55.7912%
Korea	26333	3.2194%	59.0106%
Netherlands	24286	2.9692%	61.9798%
Taiwan	21731	2.6568%	64.6366%
France	21240	2.5968%	67.2334%
Singapore	19601	2.3964%	69.6298%
Belgium	16877	2.0634%	71.6931%
Hong Kong	15809	1.9328%	73.6259%
Australia	14271	1.7448%	75.3707%
Brazil	13863	1.6949%	77.0655%
Malaysia	10897	1.3323%	78.3978%
Italy	10711	1.3095%	79.7073%
Switzerland	9268	1.1331%	80.8404%
Israel	9198	1.1245%	81.9649%
Ireland	8166	0.9984%	82.9633%
Philippines	7072	0.8646%	83.8279%
Spain	6641	0.8119%	84.6398%
Thailand	6363	0.7779%	85.4177%
India	6095	0.7452%	86.1629%
Saudi Arabia	5245	0.6412%	86.8042%
Venezuela	4782	0.5846%	87.3888%
Colombia	4504	0.5507%	87.9394%
Dominican Republic	4343	0.5310%	88.4704%
United Arab Emirates	4064	0.4969%	88.9673%
Chile	3625	0.4432%	89.4105%
Argentina	3386	0.4140%	89.8244%
Turkey	3361	0.4109%	90.2353%
Costa Rica	3304	0.4039%	90.6393%
Sweden	3265	0.3992%	91.0385%
Republic of South Africa	3172	0.3878%	91.4263%
Egypt	3105	0.3796%	91.8059%
Others	67023	8.19%	100%
'Total Exports of Goods:'	817939

US imports in 2004 by country

US imports of goods by country (does not include imports of services)

Country	Millions of dollars	Percentage	Total percentage
Canada	255928	17.41401%	17.41401%
China	196699	13.38392%	30.79793%
Mexico	155843	10.60397%	41.40190%
Japan	129595	8.81798%	50.21988%
Germany	77236	5.25534%	55.47522%
United Kingdom	46402	3.15731%	58.63253%
Korea	46163	3.14105%	61.77359%
Taiwan	34617	2.35543%	64.12902%
France	31814	2.16471%	66.29373%
Malaysia	28185	1.91778%	68.21151%
Italy	28089	1.91125%	70.12276%
Ireland	27442	1.86723%	71.98998%
Venezuela	24962	1.69848%	73.68846%
Brazil	21157	1.43958%	75.12804%
Saudi Arabia	20924	1.42372%	76.55176%
Thailand	17577	1.19599%	77.74775%
Nigeria	16246	1.10542%	78.85317%
India	15562	1.05888%	79.91205%
Singapore	15306	1.04146%	80.95351%
Israel	14527	0.98846%	81.94196%
Sweden	12687	0.86326%	82.80522%
Netherlands	12605	0.85768%	83.66290%
Belgium	12448	0.84699%	84.50989%
Russia	11847	0.80610%	85.31599%
Switzerland	11643	0.79222%	86.10821%
Indonesia	10811	0.73561%	86.84382%
Hong Kong	9314	0.63375%	87.47757%
Philippines	9144	0.62218%	88.09975%
Iraq	8514	0.57931%	88.67907%
Australia	7544	0.51331%	89.19238%
Spain	7476	0.50869%	89.70107%
Algeria	7409	0.50413%	90.20520%
Colombia	7290	0.49603%	90.70123%
Norway	6532	0.44445%	91.14568%
Republic of South Africa	5944	0.40445%	91.55013%
Trinidad and Tobago	5854	0.39832%	91.94845%
Austria	5797	0.39444%	92.34289%
Vietnam	5276	0.35899%	92.70188%
Turkey	4935	0.33579%	93.03767%
Chile	4734	0.32211%	93.35979%
Dominican Republic	4528	0.30810%	93.66789%
Angola	4521	0.30762%	93.97551%
Ecuador	4285	0.29156%	94.26707%
Finland	3892	0.26482%	94.53189%
Denmark	3878	0.26387%	94.79576%
Argentina	3745	0.25482%	95.05058%
Peru	3700	0.25176%	95.30234%
Honduras	3641	0.24774%	95.55008%
Costa Rica	3333	0.22679%	95.77687%
Kuwait	3231	0.21985%	95.99671%
Guatemala	3155	0.21467%	96.21139%
New Zealand	2967	0.20188%	96.41327%
Pakistan	2874	0.19555%	96.60882%
Hungary	2574	0.17514%	96.78397%
Gabon	2467	0.16786%	96.95183%
Bangladesh	2302	0.15663%	97.10846%
Portugal	2243	0.15262%	97.26108%
El Salvador	2053	0.13969%	97.40077%
Sri Lanka (Ceylon)	1957	0.13316%	97.53393%
Poland	1829	0.12445%	97.65838%
Aruba	1776	0.12084%	97.77922%
Czech Republic	1761	0.11982%	97.89905%
Cambodia (Kampuchea)	1498	0.10193%	98.00098%
Macao	1487	0.10118%	98.10216%
Egypt	1330	0.09050%	98.19265%
Slovakia	1213	0.08254%	98.27519%
Equatorial Guinea	1170	0.07961%	98.35480%
United Arab Emirates	1142	0.07770%	98.43250%
Jordan	1093	0.07437%	98.50687%
Nicaragua	990	0.06736%	98.57423%
Congo	858	0.05838%	98.63262%
Romania	852	0.05797%	98.69059%
Ukraine	850	0.05784%	98.74842%
Chad	756	0.05144%	98.79986%
Greece	723	0.04919%	98.84906%
Ivory Coast	715	0.04865%	98.89771%
Bahamas	637	0.04334%	98.94105%
Uruguay	580	0.03946%	98.98052%
Kazakhstan	538	0.03661%	99.01712%
Morocco	515	0.03504%	99.05217%
Slovenia	512	0.03484%	99.08700%
Bulgaria	507	0.03450%	99.12150%
Lithuania	482	0.03280%	99.15430%
Madagascar	469	0.03191%	99.18621%
Lesotho	467	0.03178%	99.21799%
Netherlands Antilles	444	0.03021%	99.24820%
Oman	418	0.02844%	99.27664%
Brunei	406	0.02763%	99.30426%
Bahrain	405	0.02756%	99.33182%
Estonia	394	0.02681%	99.35863%
Qatar	387	0.02633%	99.38496%
Malta and Gozo	383	0.02606%	99.41102%
Haiti	371	0.02524%	99.43627%
Latvia	365	0.02484%	99.46110%
Kenya	352	0.02395%	99.48505%
Belarus	336	0.02286%	99.50792%
Libya	328	0.02232%	99.53023%
Jamaica	320	0.02177%	99.55201%
Panama	316	0.02150%	99.57351%
Cameroon	308	0.02096%	99.59447%
Luxembourg	292	0.01987%	99.61433%
Croatia	291	0.01980%	99.63413%
Liechtenstein	286	0.01946%	99.65359%
Iceland	274	0.01864%	99.67224%
Mauritius	270	0.01837%	99.69061%
Syria	268	0.01824%	99.70885%
Bolivia	261	0.01776%	99.72660%
Mongolia	239	0.01626%	99.74287%
Namibia	238	0.01619%	99.75906%
Fiji	213	0.01449%	99.77355%
Tunisia	209	0.01422%	99.78778%
Swaziland	199	0.01354%	99.80132%
Iran	151	0.01027%	99.81159%
Ghana	145	0.00987%	99.82146%
Nepal	143	0.00973%	99.83119%
Suriname	141	0.00959%	99.84078%
Zaire	124	0.00844%	99.84922%
Guyana	123	0.00837%	99.85759%
Belize	107	0.00728%	99.86487%
Yugoslavia (Serbia/Montenegro)	92	0.00626%	99.87113%
Uzbekistan	88	0.00599%	99.87712%
Liberia	84	0.00572%	99.88283%
Maldive Islands	83	0.00565%	99.88848%
Turkmenistan	81	0.00551%	99.89399%
Georgia	78	0.00531%	99.89930%
Republic of Macedonia	78	0.00531%	99.90460%
Zimbabwe (Rhodesia)	76	0.00517%	99.90978%
Lebanon	74	0.00504%	99.91481%
Botswana	73	0.00497%	99.91978%
French Polynesia	67	0.00456%	99.92434%
Guinea	64	0.00435%	99.92869%
Yemen (Sana)	61	0.00415%	99.93284%
Malawi	61	0.00415%	99.93699%
Paraguay	59	0.00401%	99.94101%
Papua New Guinea	54	0.00367%	99.94468%
Moldova	49	0.00333%	99.94802%
Armenia	46	0.00313%	99.95115%
Saint Kitts and Nevis	42	0.00286%	99.95400%
Ethiopia	41	0.00279%	99.95679%
Azerbaijan	38	0.00259%	99.95938%
Barbados	37	0.00252%	99.96190%
Zambia	32	0.00218%	99.96407%
Guinea-Bissau	27	0.00184%	99.96591%
Niger	27	0.00184%	99.96775%
Cyprus	26	0.00177%	99.96952%
Uganda	26	0.00177%	99.97129%
Afghanistan	25	0.00170%	99.97299%
Bermuda	25	0.00170%	99.97469%
Tanzania	24	0.00163%	99.97632%
Monaco	23	0.00156%	99.97789%
New Caledonia	19	0.00129%	99.97918%
British Virgin Islands	17	0.00116%	99.98034%
Comoros	17	0.00116%	99.98149%
Cayman Islands	15	0.00102%	99.98251%
Greenland	15	0.00102%	99.98353%
St Lucia	14	0.00095%	99.98449%
Marshall Islands	12	0.00082%	99.98530%
Federal States of Micronesia	11	0.00075%	99.98605%
Sierra Leone	11	0.00075%	99.98680%
Albania	11	0.00075%	99.98755%
Bosnia-Hercegovina	11	0.00075%	99.98830%
Kyrgyzstan	11	0.00075%	99.98905%
Mozambique	11	0.00075%	99.98979%
Central African Republic	9	0.00061%	99.99041%
Falkland Islands	7	0.00048%	99.99088%
Mauritania	7	0.00048%	99.99136%
Turks and Caicos Islands	7	0.00048%	99.99183%
Faroe Islands	7	0.00048%	99.99231%
Tajikistan	7	0.00048%	99.99279%
Seychelles	6	0.00041%	99.99320%
Western Samoa	5	0.00034%	99.99354%
Rwanda	5	0.00034%	99.99388%
St Helena	5	0.00034%	99.99422%
Tonga	5	0.00034%	99.99456%
Grenada	5	0.00034%	99.99490%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	4	0.00027%	99.99517%
Mali	4	0.00027%	99.99544%
Antigua and Barbuda	4	0.00027%	99.99571%
Tokelau	4	0.00027%	99.99599%
Cape Verde	4	0.00027%	99.99626%
Cook Islands	4	0.00027%	99.99653%
Sudan	4	0.00027%	99.99680%
Solomon Islands	3	0.00020%	99.99701%
Laos	3	0.00020%	99.99721%
Guadeloupe	3	0.00020%	99.99741%
Burundi	3	0.00020%	99.99762%
Dominica	3	0.00020%	99.99782%
Norfolk Island	3	0.00020%	99.99803%
Senegal	3	0.00020%	99.99823%
Kiribati (Gilbert Islands)	2	0.00014%	99.99837%
Benin	2	0.00014%	99.99850%
Reunion	2	0.00014%	99.99864%
Togo	2	0.00014%	99.99878%
Martinique	2	0.00014%	99.99891%
Vanuatu (New Hebrides)	2	0.00014%	99.99905%
San Marino	2	0.00014%	99.99918%
Gibraltar	1	0.00007%	99.99925%
Andorra	1	0.00007%	99.99932%
Cocos (Keeling) Islands	1	0.00007%	99.99939%
Somalia	1	0.00007%	99.99946%
British Indian Ocean Territory	1	0.00007%	99.99952%
Pitcairn Island	1	0.00007%	99.99959%
Burkina (Upper Volta)	1	0.00007%	99.99966%
St Pierre and Miquelon	1	0.00007%	99.99973%
Anguilla	1	0.00007%	99.99980%
Christmas Island	1	0.00007%	99.99986%
Korea, North	1	0.00007%	99.99993%
Djibouti	1	0.00007%	100.00000%
'Total Imports: '	1,469,667

Private income

Main articles: Household income in the United States, Personal income in the United States

International comparison

Poverty

:''Main article: Poverty in the United States''
There is significant disagreement about poverty in the United States, particularly over how poverty ought to be defined. Using radically different definitions, two major groups of advocates have claimed variously that (a) the United States has eliminated poverty over the last century^[21]; or (b) it has such a severe poverty crisis that it ought to devote significantly more resources to the problem.
The two preceding definitions of poverty are very different because one group defines poverty as a lack of basic resources. Even with over 300 million people, The United States has a very low number of people who lack basic necessities (e.g., food, shelter, clothing). The other group argues that income inequality is providing the richest 10% with a much better standard of living than the poorest 10%.
Much of the debate about poverty comes from groups who either support welfare programs and government regulation of the market or a market which is regulation free and not bound by a big social safety net. Measures of poverty can be either absolute or relative. Absolute poverty is defined in real dollar values, whereas relative poverty is a comparison of the highest to the lowest standard of living at a particular time period.

Income inequality

The United Nations Development Programme Report 2006 ranks income distribution in the United States as tied for 73rd most equal out of 126 countries, as measured by the Gini coefficient. The richest 10% make 15.9 times as much as the poorest 10%, and the richest 20% make 8.4 times as much as the poorest 20%. (See List of countries by income equality.)

Other statistics

'Industrial production growth rate:'
3.2% (2005 est.)
'Electricity:'

★ ''production:'' 3.979 trillion kWh (2004)

★ ''consumption:'' 3.717 trillion kWh (2004)

★ ''exports:'' 22.9 billion kWh (2004)

★ ''imports:'' 34.21 billion kWh (2004)
'Electricity - production by source:'

★ ''fossil fuel:'' 71.6%

★ ''hydro:'' 5.6%

★ ''nuclear:'' 20.6%

★ ''other:'' 2.3% (2001)
'Oil:'

★ ''production:'' 7.61 million barrel/day (2005 est.)

★ ''consumption:'' 20.03 million barrel/day (2003 est.)

★ ''exports:'' 1.048 million barrel/day (2004 est.)

★ ''imports:'' 13.15 million barrel/day (2004 est.)

★ ''net imports:'' 12.097 million barrel/day (2004 est.)

★ ''proved reserves:'' 22.45 billion barrel (1 January 2002)
'Natural gas:'

★ ''production:'' 531.1 billion cu m (2004 est.)

★ ''consumption:'' 635.1 billion cu m (2004 est.)

★ ''exports:'' 24.18 billion cu m (2004 est.)

★ ''imports:'' 120.6 billion cu m (2004 est.)

★ ''proved reserves:'' 5.451 trillion cu m (1 January 2005 est.)
'Agriculture - products:'
wheat, corn, other grains, fruits, vegetables, cotton; beef, pork, poultry, dairy products; forest products; fish
'Exports - commodities:'
capital goods, automobiles, industrial supplies and raw materials, consumer goods, agricultural products
'Imports - commodities:'
crude oil and refined petroleum products, machinery, automobiles, consumer goods, industrial raw materials, food and beverages
'Historic exchange rates: '
:

	Jan 2007	Jan 2006	Jan 2005	Jan 2004	Jan 2003	Jan 2002	2001 ★	2000 ★	1999 ★	1998	1997
British pounds per U.S. dollar	.5104	.5812	.5209	.5600	.6212	0.6981	0.6944	0.6596	0.6180	0.6037	0.6106
Canadian dollars per U.S. dollar	1.165	1.164	1.204	1.293	1.576	1.600	1.548	1.485	1.485	1.483	1.384
French francs per U.S. dollar	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5.65	5.899	5.836
Italian lire per U.S. dollar	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,668.7	1,763.2	1,703.1
Japanese yen per U.S. dollar	119.0	118.1	102.5	107.2	118.7	132.6	121.5	107.7	113.9	130.9	120.9
German deutsche marks per U.S. dollar	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1.69	1.969	1.734
Euros per US dollar	.7577	.8444	.7387	.7939	.9534	1.128	1.062	.9947	.8557	-	-
Note: financial institutions in France, Italy, Germany, and eight other European countries started using the euro on 1 January 1999, with the euro replacing the local currency for all transactions in 2002. Their 1999 figures are for January.
★ January 1 exchange rates

See also

★ Household income in the United States

★ Personal income in the United States

★ Affluence in the United States

★ American Dream

★ Balance of payments

★ Economy of Puerto Rico

★ American trade

★ List of United States companies

★ National debt by U.S. presidential terms - Includes federal spending and GDP

★ Economic history of the United States

US related topics

References

1. Rank Order - GDP (purchasing power parity)
2. United States Department of the Treasury
3. CIA World Factbook 2007
4. United States Data Profile
5. http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/country.cfm?ID=Unitedstates
6. http://members.forbes.com/global/2006/0522/032.html
7. Bivens, Ph.D., L. Josh (December 14, 2004). Debt and the dollar ''Economic Policy Institute''
8. Associated Press (January 30, 2006).US savings rate hits lowest level since 1933''MSNBC''. Retrieved on May 6, 2007.
9. Cauchon, Dennis and John Waggoner (October 3, 2004).The Looming National Benefit Crisis. ''USA Today''
10. [4]
11. U.S. Budget 2001
12. MSNBC
13. Bloomberg
14. Washington Post 29 December 2005
15. [5]
16. [6]
17. [7]
18. http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/international/intinv/2007/intinv06.htm
19. http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/Issuebrief203
20. http://internationalecon.com/v1.0/Finance/ch5/5c100.html
21. [8]

Other references

★ Bureau of Economic Analysis Historical Gross Domestic Product Estimates

★ [ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/lf/aat1.txt US Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population, 1940 to date]

External links

★ CIA - The World Factbook - United States

★ Outline of the U.S. Economy

★ Bureau of Economic Analysis: Selected NIPA tables (Lots of U.S. economic data)

★ U.S. Economic Calendar

★ U.S. Census Bureau

★ U.S. Dept of Labor - Bureau of Labor Statistics

★ U.S. Dept of Commerce - Bureau of Economic Analysis

★ FRB: Z.1 Release-- Flow of Funds Accounts of the United States, Release Dates

★ OECD's United States country Web site and OECD Economic Survey of the United States

★ U.S. Energy Information Administration

★ National Bureau of Economic Research (USA) Economics material from the organization that declares Recessions and Recoveries.

★ The American Consumer Institute

★ Bureau of Labor Statistics–from the American Labor Department

★ US Department of Commerce Economics Statistics

★ The Heritage Foundation: Understanding Poverty in America

★ The Possible Collapse of the American Economy at 2007

★ GDP growth viz Savings rate since 1985 Comparing GDP growth rate with the Savings rate since 1985

★ Gross Domestic Product Growth - USA

★ Unemployment Rate - USA

★ Consumer Price Index - USA

★ The U.S. Economy Sucks, Right Guys? Map comparing the GDP of each state to a foreign country