العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
EspañolEGALITARIANISM
'Egalitarianism' (derived from the French word 'égal', meaning ''equal'' or ''level'') is a political doctrine that holds that all people should be treated as equals from birth. Generally it applies to being held equal under the law, the church, and society at large. In actual practice, one may be considered an egalitarian in most areas listed above, even if not subscribing to equality in every possible area of individual difference. For example, one might support equal rights in race matters but not in gender issues, or vice versa.
Egalitarian Individualism is an idea espoused most by the stoics. It is the philosophy that each human being is equally worthy of human rights despite one's nation, ethnic group, or gender. This view also forms the basis of much of the eighteenth century philosopher Immanuel Kant's work. Kant states that human beings are equally due the right to be treated morally and ethically. Global regimes and humanitarian aid organizations all function off the idea that individuals, no matter what country or nation they are a part of, deserve to have human rights, and the protection of those human rights. All of these global regimes are heavily affected by the philosophy of Egalitarian Individualism.
The Christian egalitarian view holds that the Bible teaches the fundamental equality of men and women of all racial and ethnic groups, all economic classes, and all age groups, based on the teachings and example of Jesus Christ and the overarching principles of scripture as articulated in . While Bible passages are subject to various interpretations, Christian egalitarians believe that:
:
★ there should be no gender distinction in roles of men and women in the function or leadership of the church, to include ordination of women, or in society in general
:
★ in marriage the wife and husband not only are created equal as female and male, but there is no biblically-prescribed hierarchy giving the husband any authority over the wife.
Ultimately, it holds that all human persons are equal in fundamental worth or moral status. A significant source of this trend of thought is the Christian notion that humankind were created in the living image of God '(Imago Dei)' and that God loves all human beings equally, regardless of their individual differences in gender, race, status, position, etc. Egalitarianism Illustrative of efforts to institutionalize this notion are these excerpts from an organizational ''Statement of Faith'':
:
★ We believe in the equality and essential dignity of men and women of all ethnicities, ages, and classes. We recognize that all persons are made in the image of God and are to reflect that image in the community of believers, in the home, and in society.
:
★ We believe that men and women are to diligently develop and use their God-given gifts for the good of the home, church and society.[1]
'Egalitarianism' is a philosophy of considerable variety or diversity in the many ways it has been applied in society. Other common forms of egalitarianism include economic egalitarianism (also known as material egalitarianism), moral egalitarianism, legal egalitarianism, luck egalitarianism, political egalitarianism, gender egalitarianism, racial equality, and opportunity egalitarianism.
The United States Declaration of Independence includes a kind of moral and legal egalitarianism. Because "all men are created equal," each person is to be treated equally under the law. However, not until much later did U.S. society extend these benefits to slaves, women and other groups. Over time, universal egalitarianism has won wide adherence and is a core component of modern civil rights policies.
At a cultural level, egalitarian theories have developed in sophistication and acceptance during the past two hundred years. Among the notable broadly egalitarian philosophies are Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, and Human Rights, which promote economic, political, and legal egalitarianism, respectively. Several egalitarian ideas enjoy wide support among intellectuals and in the general populations of many countries. Whether any of these ideas have been significantly implemented in practice, however, remains a controversial question. For instance, some argue that modern representative democracy is a realization of political egalitarianism, while others believe that, in reality, most political power still resides in the hands of a ruling class, rather than in the hands of the people.
Different kinds of egalitarianism can sometimes conflict, while in other situations they may be indispensable to each other. For instance, communism is an egalitarian doctrine, according to which everyone is supposed to enjoy material equality. However, because material inequality is pervasive in the current international economy, something must be done to remove it. Since those who enjoy the greatest material wealth are not likely to wish to part with it, some form of coercive mechanism must exist in the transition period before communism. But if the coercive powers of redistribution are vested in some people and not in others, a conflict of interest will take place, and inequalities of political power would emerge. History has shown, in the former Soviet Union for instance, that people who are granted coercive redistributive powers often abuse them. Indeed, those with political power were known to redistribute vastly unequal shares of material resources to themselves, thereby completely confounding the justification for their unequal political status. Therefore, most Marxists now agree that communism can only be achieved if the coercive powers of redistribution needed during the transitional period are vested in a democratic body whose powers are limited by various checks and balances, in order to prevent abuse. In other words, they argue that political egalitarianism is indispensable to material egalitarianism. Meanwhile, other defenders of material egalitarianism have rejected Marxist communism in favor of such views as libertarian socialism or anarchism, which do not necessarily advocate the transitional use of the state as a means of redistribution.
A typical anti-egalitarian view holds that egalitarianism is based primarily upon politically-correct foundations, and that egalitarian philosophies are sure to cause more harm than good to humankind. Anti-egalitarians theorize that because there are clear genetic differences within the population, egalitarianism -- albeit a pleasant way to view the world -- does not have any basis in scientific reality, and is therefore an ideological fallacy.[2]
★ "All men are created equal"
★ Deep ecology
★ Equality of outcome
★ Equal opportunity
★ Inequity aversion
★ Jock Tamson's Bairns
★ Liberalism
★ Liberté, égalité, fraternité
★ Social equality
★ Socialism
★ Tall Poppy Syndrome a pejorative term used in Australia and New Zealand
★ Discrimination
1. Statement of Faith
2. Egalitarianism: Politically Correct, Scientifically Wrong
★ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on ''Egalitarianism''
The Equality Studies Centre
Egalitarian individualism
Egalitarian Individualism is an idea espoused most by the stoics. It is the philosophy that each human being is equally worthy of human rights despite one's nation, ethnic group, or gender. This view also forms the basis of much of the eighteenth century philosopher Immanuel Kant's work. Kant states that human beings are equally due the right to be treated morally and ethically. Global regimes and humanitarian aid organizations all function off the idea that individuals, no matter what country or nation they are a part of, deserve to have human rights, and the protection of those human rights. All of these global regimes are heavily affected by the philosophy of Egalitarian Individualism.
The Christian egalitarian view
Affirmative view
The Christian egalitarian view holds that the Bible teaches the fundamental equality of men and women of all racial and ethnic groups, all economic classes, and all age groups, based on the teachings and example of Jesus Christ and the overarching principles of scripture as articulated in . While Bible passages are subject to various interpretations, Christian egalitarians believe that:
:
★ there should be no gender distinction in roles of men and women in the function or leadership of the church, to include ordination of women, or in society in general
:
★ in marriage the wife and husband not only are created equal as female and male, but there is no biblically-prescribed hierarchy giving the husband any authority over the wife.
Ultimately, it holds that all human persons are equal in fundamental worth or moral status. A significant source of this trend of thought is the Christian notion that humankind were created in the living image of God '(Imago Dei)' and that God loves all human beings equally, regardless of their individual differences in gender, race, status, position, etc. Egalitarianism Illustrative of efforts to institutionalize this notion are these excerpts from an organizational ''Statement of Faith'':
:
★ We believe in the equality and essential dignity of men and women of all ethnicities, ages, and classes. We recognize that all persons are made in the image of God and are to reflect that image in the community of believers, in the home, and in society.
:
★ We believe that men and women are to diligently develop and use their God-given gifts for the good of the home, church and society.[1]
Other applications of Egalitarianism
'Egalitarianism' is a philosophy of considerable variety or diversity in the many ways it has been applied in society. Other common forms of egalitarianism include economic egalitarianism (also known as material egalitarianism), moral egalitarianism, legal egalitarianism, luck egalitarianism, political egalitarianism, gender egalitarianism, racial equality, and opportunity egalitarianism.
Moral and legal egalitarianism
The United States Declaration of Independence includes a kind of moral and legal egalitarianism. Because "all men are created equal," each person is to be treated equally under the law. However, not until much later did U.S. society extend these benefits to slaves, women and other groups. Over time, universal egalitarianism has won wide adherence and is a core component of modern civil rights policies.
Broadly egalitarian philosophies
At a cultural level, egalitarian theories have developed in sophistication and acceptance during the past two hundred years. Among the notable broadly egalitarian philosophies are Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, and Human Rights, which promote economic, political, and legal egalitarianism, respectively. Several egalitarian ideas enjoy wide support among intellectuals and in the general populations of many countries. Whether any of these ideas have been significantly implemented in practice, however, remains a controversial question. For instance, some argue that modern representative democracy is a realization of political egalitarianism, while others believe that, in reality, most political power still resides in the hands of a ruling class, rather than in the hands of the people.
Communism, Marxism
Different kinds of egalitarianism can sometimes conflict, while in other situations they may be indispensable to each other. For instance, communism is an egalitarian doctrine, according to which everyone is supposed to enjoy material equality. However, because material inequality is pervasive in the current international economy, something must be done to remove it. Since those who enjoy the greatest material wealth are not likely to wish to part with it, some form of coercive mechanism must exist in the transition period before communism. But if the coercive powers of redistribution are vested in some people and not in others, a conflict of interest will take place, and inequalities of political power would emerge. History has shown, in the former Soviet Union for instance, that people who are granted coercive redistributive powers often abuse them. Indeed, those with political power were known to redistribute vastly unequal shares of material resources to themselves, thereby completely confounding the justification for their unequal political status. Therefore, most Marxists now agree that communism can only be achieved if the coercive powers of redistribution needed during the transitional period are vested in a democratic body whose powers are limited by various checks and balances, in order to prevent abuse. In other words, they argue that political egalitarianism is indispensable to material egalitarianism. Meanwhile, other defenders of material egalitarianism have rejected Marxist communism in favor of such views as libertarian socialism or anarchism, which do not necessarily advocate the transitional use of the state as a means of redistribution.
Opposing views
A typical anti-egalitarian view holds that egalitarianism is based primarily upon politically-correct foundations, and that egalitarian philosophies are sure to cause more harm than good to humankind. Anti-egalitarians theorize that because there are clear genetic differences within the population, egalitarianism -- albeit a pleasant way to view the world -- does not have any basis in scientific reality, and is therefore an ideological fallacy.[2]
See also
★ "All men are created equal"
★ Deep ecology
★ Equality of outcome
★ Equal opportunity
★ Inequity aversion
★ Jock Tamson's Bairns
★ Liberalism
★ Liberté, égalité, fraternité
★ Social equality
★ Socialism
★ Tall Poppy Syndrome a pejorative term used in Australia and New Zealand
★ Discrimination
References
1. Statement of Faith
2. Egalitarianism: Politically Correct, Scientifically Wrong
★ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on ''Egalitarianism''
External Links
The Equality Studies Centre
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
