العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
EspañolFEDERAL ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN
(Redirected from Federal assault weapons ban)
The 'Federal Assault Weapons Ban' ('AWB') was a provision of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, a federal law of the United States that included a prohibition on the sale of semi-automatic "assault weapons" manufactured after the date of the ban's enactment. The ten-year ban was passed by Congress on September 13, 1994 and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton the same day. The ban expired on September 13, 2004, as part of the law's sunset provision.
Definition of assault weapon
★ Note: there are differing definitions of Assault Weapon that are listed at the Wikipedia page assault weapon. This page refers to the usage in the United States under the previous and proposed Assault Weapon Bans.
The term "assault weapon" in the context of civilian rifles has been attributed to gun-control activist Josh Sugarmann. The term ''assault weapon'' refers to semi-automatic firearms (that is, firearms that, when fired, automatically eject the spent casing and load the next round into the chamber, ready to fire again) that were developed from earlier fully-automatic weapons. By former U.S. law, and the law remaining in some states still, the legal term ''assault weapon'' includes certain specific semi-automatic firearm models by name (e.g., Colt AR-15,H&K G36E, TEC-9, all AK-47s, and Uzis) and other semi-automatic firearms because they possess a minimum set of features from the following list of features:
:Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
:
★ Large capacity ammunition magazines
:
★ Folding or telescoping stock
:
★ Conspicuous pistol grip
:
★ Bayonet mount
:
★ Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
:
★ Grenade launcher
:Semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
:
★ Magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip
:
★ Threaded barrel to attach barrel extender, flash suppressor, handgrip, or silencer
:
★ Barrel shroud that can be used as a hand-hold
:
★ Unloaded weight of 50 oz or more
:
★ A semi-automatic version of an automatic firearm
:Semi-automatic shotguns with two or more of the following:
:
★ Folding or telescoping stock
:
★ Pistol grip
:
★ Fixed capacity of more than 5 rounds
:
★ Detachable magazine
The earlier term assault rifle, refers to rifles that are select-fire (that is, rifles that are capable of either semi-automatic or fully-automatic fire), firing intermediate-power rounds (such as the 5.56x45 mm NATO, or 7.62x39 mm), which along with fully automatic pistols, provided the pre-cursor for the term "assault weapon."
(''Fully automatic'', such as describing a machine gun, means that a firearm can fire multiple rounds with a single pull of the trigger and will continue to fire as long as the trigger is depressed and ammunition remains in the magazine. In contrast, the term ''assault weapon'' as used in civilian and U.S. legal usage refers to a ''semi-automatic'' weapon that fires one shot for each trigger pull, the same as any other semi-automatic hunting rifle, or semi-automatic household handgun, all of which automatically load another round of ammunition that can be fired with each subsequent trigger pull until the attached magazine is empty. Note: a double-action revolver also fires one shot for each trigger pull but is not considered "semi-automatic" since the force of pulling the trigger brings the next round ready rather than the recoil of the last cartridge.)
The Federal Assault Weapons Ban was only a small part (title XI, subtitle A) of the 'Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act'.
The act created a definition of "assault weapons" and subjected firearms that met that definition to regulation. Nineteen models of firearms were defined by name as being "assault weapons". Various semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns were classified as "assault weapons" due to having various combinations of features.
The act addressed only semi-automatic firearms, that is, firearms that fire one shot each time the trigger is pulled. Neither the AWB nor its expiration changed the legal status of fully automatic firearms, which fire more than one round with a single trigger-pull; these had long been regulated by the National Firearms Act of 1934.
The act separately defined and banned "large capacity ammunition feeding devices", which generally applied to magazines with capacities of greater than ten rounds.
During the period in which the AWB was in effect, it was illegal to manufacture any firearm that met the law's definition of an "assault weapon" or "large capacity ammunition feeding device", except for export or for sale to a government or law enforcement agency. Possession of illegally imported or manufactured firearms was outlawed as well, but the law did not ban the possession or sale of pre-existing "assault weapons" or "large capacity ammunition feeding devices". This provision for "pre-ban" weapons created a higher price point in the market for such items, which lasted until the ban's sunset.
Two events involving military-style semi-automatic rifles in the late 1980s and the early 1990s were used as examples by proponents for the ban's enactment. These incidents included:
★ The January 17, 1989, schoolyard shooting in Stockton, California, in which the murderer killed five children and wounded 30 others before shooting himself (also known as Stockton massacre); a semi-automatic version of the AK-47 was used in the murders.
★ The January 25, 1993, murder of two people in front of Central Intelligence Agency headquarters in Langley, Virginia, by Mir Aimal Kansi; using another semi-automatic version of the AK-47.
On March 2, 2004, with 'sunset' of the ban on the horizon, assault weapon ban supporter Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) attached a ten-year extension to the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban to the Senate's Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. With the Feinstein amendment, the bill was voted down 8-90. This rider was widely hailed by Democrats as the only viable chance for a renewal of the AWB before its expiration.
President George W. Bush had promised to sign a renewal of the ban provided that Congress passed such legislation and Bush was criticized by ban supporters for not doing enough to encourage the House and Senate to pass renewal legislation. The expiration came in 2004.
Opponents of the ban claimed that its expiration has seen little if any increase in crime, while Senator Feinstein claimed the ban was effective because "It was drying up supply and driving up prices. The number of those guns used in crimes dropped because they were less available."Was assault-weapon ban a dud?
However, "The whole time that the American public thought there was an assault weapons ban, there never really was one", the law was so porous.
AWB advocates and opponents alike stated that the AWB allowed firearms manufacturers to make minor changes to make their affected firearms legal. They described the features affected by the ban as "cosmetic," though for different reasons.[1][2] Supporters pointed to the ability to fire a large capacity magazine without the need to reload as frequently; the ability to fire from the hip with a pistol grip; and greatly reduced chances for detection when using a silencer in the perpetration of a crime (silencers were already regulated by federal law prior to the AWB); and felt that the final wording of the bill watered down the legislation making the ban much less effective. Opponents claimed that the features did not increase the likelihood of criminal use or function, and pointed out that the features banned had little record of impact in past criminal use.
Once certain combinations of features were banned, manufactures complied with the law by removing just enough of those features from their products to make them legal, by one point of view, or, by other point of view, they complied exactly with what the law required. For example, the AB-10 was a post-ban version of the TEC-9, with barrel threading, and barrel shroud removed; the XM-15 was a legal AR-15 without barrel threading, or a bayonet mounting lug; post-ban semi-automatic AK-47s were also sold without folding stocks, bayonet lugs, and with standard or "thumbhole" stocks instead of pistol-grips. As the production of large-capacity magazines for civilians had also been prohibited, manufacturers sold their post-ban firearms either with newly-manufactured magazines with capacities of ten rounds or less, or with pre-ban manufactured high-capacity magazines, to meet changing legal requirements.
The BATF technology branch determined in 1994 that muzzle brakes were not impacted by the AWB, and that muzzle brakes on threaded barrels were not an assault weapon feature, so long as they were welded or soldered in place.
The law prohibited manufacturing and sale to civilians of detachable magazines with a capacity to hold more than ten rounds. mThis prompted the importation of large quantities of pre-1994 manufactured magazines from other countries. Former Warsaw Pact countries had a huge surplus of AK-47 magazines of various capacities, that could fit a variety of both pre-ban and post-ban AK-47 variants. There was also a large number of pre-1994 American-made magazines as well.
With the ten-round limit on magazine capacity in effect and some form of concealed carry of firearms legal in over 38 states, manufacturers had an added incentive to design smaller frames at or below the ten-round capacity, thus replacing the previously popular 9mm and .45 "high capacity" pistols. Since they could no longer sell the popular 14 and even 18 round magazines continuing to market the large frames designed for such made little sense. Glock introduced their 10-round capacity 9mm semi-automatic pistol, the Glock 26, in August 1994, in apparent anticipation of the legislation. In 1995, the Kahr Arms company was founded which debuted their ultra-compact 9mm pistol, the K-9. Smith and Wesson redesigned their small, "J-frame" .38 Special five-round revolvers to accommodate the powerful .357 Magnum cartridge, introducing the new models in 1996. In the years that followed, all manufacturers of pistols and revolvers followed suit, developing a large array of concealable ten-round pistols in various calibers, including 9mm, 10mm, .40 S&W, .357 Magnum, and .45 ACP.
In March 2004, Kristen Rand, the legislative director of the VPC, criticized the soon to expire ban by stating "The 1994 law in theory banned AK-47s, MAC-10s, UZIs, AR-15s and other assault weapons. Yet the gun industry easily found ways around the law and most of these weapons are now sold in post-ban models virtually identical to the guns Congress sought to ban in 1994."[3]
New York's version of the law is very similar to the Federal version, but New York's version does not have a sunset provision. According to the laws of the State of New York, a magazine with a capacity of more than 10 rounds manufactured after September 14, 1994 cannot be legally possessed by anyone other than a law enforcement officer. A provision of the Federal law required the date of manufacture to be stamped on every newly manufactured "large capacity" magazine. Because that requirement is no longer in effect, the New York magazine ban becomes potentially unenforceable except with respect to those magazines manufactured during the ban and marked according to federal regulations then in effect.
NYS Penal Law § 265.02(6) makes it a class D felony to possess "a large capacity ammunition feeding device," which is defined in Penal Law § 265.00(23) as "a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device, manufactured after September thirteenth, nineteen hundred ninety-four, that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than ten rounds of ammunition." Possession of unmarked "large capacity" magazines made after the sunset of the federal ban thus subject New Yorkers to felony charges. Police and prosecutors may be able to determine actual manufacture dates of seized magazines from information not generally available to consumers, such as the dates of magazine design changes and parts assembly numbers. The New York ban thus leaves possessors of unmarked post-ban magazines at risk of felony charges since they may not know the magazines were manufactured post-sunset and not pre-ban.
During the period of the federal ban, ATF would issue rulings as to whether attachment of a given muzzle device on a post-ban rifle was permissible because it acted only as a brake, or impermissible because it acted as a flash suppressor. As with magazines, the New York regulatory scheme implicitly relied upon such federal regulatory determinations for enforcement of the state's ban. With the sunset of the federal ban, ATF is no longer concerned with classifying muzzle devices. New York residents now may acquire or modify rifles attaching what they believe to be muzzle brakes, but which at some point New York police or prosecutors may deem to be flash suppressors, resulting in arrest or prosecution for unwitting possession of a banned rifle. [''See'' NYS Penal Law § 265.00(22) defining "Assault Weapon" to include "a semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least two of the following characteristics . . . (iv) a flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor." There is no definition of "flash suppressor" in § 265.00, which contains all definitions for the ban, thus leaving grounds for arrest and prosecution uncertain until what is or is not a "flash suppressor" is resolved by state courts or clarified by statute.]
The states of Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and California have enacted similar bans.
An informal survey by the International Association of Chiefs of Police of about 20 departments revealed that since 2004 all of the agencies have either added weapons to officers' patrol units or have replaced existing weaponry with military-style arms to counter an arms race occurring with criminals. Ron Stucker, criminal investigations chief of the Orange County Sheriff's Department in Florida, says deputies are now "frequently" encountering assault weapons in local robberies and during simple traffic stops.[4]
An unpublished 2004 study commissioned by the DOJ found that "Assault weapons (AW) were used in only a small fraction of gun crimes prior to the ban: about 2% according to most studies and no more than 8%. Most of the assault weapons used in crime are assault pistols rather than assault rifles. Large capacity magazines (LCM) are used in crime much more often than and accounted for 14% to 26% of guns used in crime prior to the ban... The ban’s impact on gun violence is likely to be small at best, and perhaps too small for reliable measurement...Nonetheless, reducing criminal use of assault weapons and especially large capacity magazines could have nontrivial effects on gunshot victimizations. The few available studies suggest that attacks with semiautomatics – including AWs and other semiautomatics equipped with large capacity magazines – result in more shots fired, more persons hit, and more wounds inflicted per victim than do attacks with other firearms."[5]
A 1999 preliminary study commissioned by the US Department of Justice done on the Assault Weapons Ban found that the "limited [study] time frame weakens the ability of statistical tests to discern impacts that may be meaningful from a policy perspective", therefore the ban’s "short-term impact on gun violence has been uncertain, due perhaps to the continuing availability of grandfathered assault weapons, close substitute guns and large capacity magazines, and the relative rarity with which the banned weapons were used in gun violence even before the ban"[6]
The Violence Policy Center blames technicalities. "Soon after its passage in 1994, the gun industry made a mockery of the federal assault weapons ban, manufacturing 'post-ban' assault weapons with only slight, cosmetic differences from their banned counterparts. By another point of view, manufacturers responded precisely to the changing legal requirements, making and selling exactly what was permitted. The VPC estimates that more than one million assault weapons have been manufactured since the ban's passage in 1994."[2]
The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence examined the impact of the Assault Weapons Ban in a 2004 report entitled On Target: The Impact of the 1994 Federal Assault Weapon Act.[8] The report looked at 1.4 million guns involved in crime and determined that "since the law’s enactment ... assault weapons have made up only 1.61% of the guns ATF has traced to crime — a drop of 66% from the pre-ban rate" and that the Act prevented 60,000 assault weapon crimes over its 10-year period.
In 2001, Koper and Roth of the Jerry Lee Center of Criminology, University of Pennsylvania, published a peer-reviewed paper called ''The Impact of the 1994 Federal Assault Weapon Ban on Gun Violence Outcomes: An Assessment of Multiple Outcome Measures and Some Lessons for Policy Evaluation''. They found that:
In February 2007 a bill, H.R. 1022, sponsored by Representative Carolyn McCarthy of New York was introduced that would reinstitute and expand the ban on assault weapons. It reduces the number of requirements for a firearm to be classified as an assault weapon from two to one. It additionally includes, in ''H.R. 1022 Section L'', the expansion of the legal term ''assault weapon'' to any
The Bill was referred to the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security on March 19, 2007. As of September 4, 2007, 56 co-sponsors have signed on to the bill.
★ Firearm case law
★ Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act
★ Gun (Firearm) laws in the United States (by state)
★ National Firearms Act
★ Gun Control Act of 1968
★ Gun politics in the United States
★ 101 California Street Shootings
★ Carolyn McCarthy
★ ''The Long Island Incident''
1. Finally, the end of a sad era -- Clinton Gun Ban stricken from books! ''National Rifle Association''
2. Violence Policy Center Issues Statement on Expiration of Federal Assault Weapons Ban ''Violence Policy Center''
3. Senate-Passed Assault Weapons "Ban" Will Do Little to Keep Assault Weapons Off Our Streets, Violence Policy Center (VPC) Warns ''Violence Policy Center''
4. usatoday.com
5. An Updated Assessment of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban: Impacts on Gun Markets and Gun Violence, 1994-2003 ''National Institute of Justice''
6. Impacts of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban: 1994-96 ''National Institute of Justice''
7. Violence Policy Center Issues Statement on Expiration of Federal Assault Weapons Ban ''Violence Policy Center''
8. On Target: The Impact of the 1994 Federal Assault Weapon Act ''Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence''
9. http://www.springerlink.com/content/kv8610023463x574/
The 'Federal Assault Weapons Ban' ('AWB') was a provision of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, a federal law of the United States that included a prohibition on the sale of semi-automatic "assault weapons" manufactured after the date of the ban's enactment. The ten-year ban was passed by Congress on September 13, 1994 and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton the same day. The ban expired on September 13, 2004, as part of the law's sunset provision.
Definition of assault weapon
★
★ Note: there are differing definitions of Assault Weapon that are listed at the Wikipedia page assault weapon. This page refers to the usage in the United States under the previous and proposed Assault Weapon Bans.
A semi-automatic AK-47 assault weapon.
I Intratec TEC-9 with 32-round magazine; a pistol version of an assault weapon.
The term "assault weapon" in the context of civilian rifles has been attributed to gun-control activist Josh Sugarmann. The term ''assault weapon'' refers to semi-automatic firearms (that is, firearms that, when fired, automatically eject the spent casing and load the next round into the chamber, ready to fire again) that were developed from earlier fully-automatic weapons. By former U.S. law, and the law remaining in some states still, the legal term ''assault weapon'' includes certain specific semi-automatic firearm models by name (e.g., Colt AR-15,H&K G36E, TEC-9, all AK-47s, and Uzis) and other semi-automatic firearms because they possess a minimum set of features from the following list of features:
:Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
:
★ Large capacity ammunition magazines
:
★ Folding or telescoping stock
:
★ Conspicuous pistol grip
:
★ Bayonet mount
:
★ Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
:
★ Grenade launcher
:Semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
:
★ Magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip
:
★ Threaded barrel to attach barrel extender, flash suppressor, handgrip, or silencer
:
★ Barrel shroud that can be used as a hand-hold
:
★ Unloaded weight of 50 oz or more
:
★ A semi-automatic version of an automatic firearm
:Semi-automatic shotguns with two or more of the following:
:
★ Folding or telescoping stock
:
★ Pistol grip
:
★ Fixed capacity of more than 5 rounds
:
★ Detachable magazine
The earlier term assault rifle, refers to rifles that are select-fire (that is, rifles that are capable of either semi-automatic or fully-automatic fire), firing intermediate-power rounds (such as the 5.56x45 mm NATO, or 7.62x39 mm), which along with fully automatic pistols, provided the pre-cursor for the term "assault weapon."
(''Fully automatic'', such as describing a machine gun, means that a firearm can fire multiple rounds with a single pull of the trigger and will continue to fire as long as the trigger is depressed and ammunition remains in the magazine. In contrast, the term ''assault weapon'' as used in civilian and U.S. legal usage refers to a ''semi-automatic'' weapon that fires one shot for each trigger pull, the same as any other semi-automatic hunting rifle, or semi-automatic household handgun, all of which automatically load another round of ammunition that can be fired with each subsequent trigger pull until the attached magazine is empty. Note: a double-action revolver also fires one shot for each trigger pull but is not considered "semi-automatic" since the force of pulling the trigger brings the next round ready rather than the recoil of the last cartridge.)
Provisions of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban
The Federal Assault Weapons Ban was only a small part (title XI, subtitle A) of the 'Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act'.
The act created a definition of "assault weapons" and subjected firearms that met that definition to regulation. Nineteen models of firearms were defined by name as being "assault weapons". Various semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns were classified as "assault weapons" due to having various combinations of features.
The act addressed only semi-automatic firearms, that is, firearms that fire one shot each time the trigger is pulled. Neither the AWB nor its expiration changed the legal status of fully automatic firearms, which fire more than one round with a single trigger-pull; these had long been regulated by the National Firearms Act of 1934.
The act separately defined and banned "large capacity ammunition feeding devices", which generally applied to magazines with capacities of greater than ten rounds.
During the period in which the AWB was in effect, it was illegal to manufacture any firearm that met the law's definition of an "assault weapon" or "large capacity ammunition feeding device", except for export or for sale to a government or law enforcement agency. Possession of illegally imported or manufactured firearms was outlawed as well, but the law did not ban the possession or sale of pre-existing "assault weapons" or "large capacity ammunition feeding devices". This provision for "pre-ban" weapons created a higher price point in the market for such items, which lasted until the ban's sunset.
Two events involving military-style semi-automatic rifles in the late 1980s and the early 1990s were used as examples by proponents for the ban's enactment. These incidents included:
★ The January 17, 1989, schoolyard shooting in Stockton, California, in which the murderer killed five children and wounded 30 others before shooting himself (also known as Stockton massacre); a semi-automatic version of the AK-47 was used in the murders.
★ The January 25, 1993, murder of two people in front of Central Intelligence Agency headquarters in Langley, Virginia, by Mir Aimal Kansi; using another semi-automatic version of the AK-47.
Expiration of the ban
On March 2, 2004, with 'sunset' of the ban on the horizon, assault weapon ban supporter Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) attached a ten-year extension to the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban to the Senate's Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. With the Feinstein amendment, the bill was voted down 8-90. This rider was widely hailed by Democrats as the only viable chance for a renewal of the AWB before its expiration.
President George W. Bush had promised to sign a renewal of the ban provided that Congress passed such legislation and Bush was criticized by ban supporters for not doing enough to encourage the House and Senate to pass renewal legislation. The expiration came in 2004.
Opponents of the ban claimed that its expiration has seen little if any increase in crime, while Senator Feinstein claimed the ban was effective because "It was drying up supply and driving up prices. The number of those guns used in crimes dropped because they were less available."Was assault-weapon ban a dud?
However, "The whole time that the American public thought there was an assault weapons ban, there never really was one", the law was so porous.
Compliance and avoidance
AWB advocates and opponents alike stated that the AWB allowed firearms manufacturers to make minor changes to make their affected firearms legal. They described the features affected by the ban as "cosmetic," though for different reasons.[1][2] Supporters pointed to the ability to fire a large capacity magazine without the need to reload as frequently; the ability to fire from the hip with a pistol grip; and greatly reduced chances for detection when using a silencer in the perpetration of a crime (silencers were already regulated by federal law prior to the AWB); and felt that the final wording of the bill watered down the legislation making the ban much less effective. Opponents claimed that the features did not increase the likelihood of criminal use or function, and pointed out that the features banned had little record of impact in past criminal use.
Once certain combinations of features were banned, manufactures complied with the law by removing just enough of those features from their products to make them legal, by one point of view, or, by other point of view, they complied exactly with what the law required. For example, the AB-10 was a post-ban version of the TEC-9, with barrel threading, and barrel shroud removed; the XM-15 was a legal AR-15 without barrel threading, or a bayonet mounting lug; post-ban semi-automatic AK-47s were also sold without folding stocks, bayonet lugs, and with standard or "thumbhole" stocks instead of pistol-grips. As the production of large-capacity magazines for civilians had also been prohibited, manufacturers sold their post-ban firearms either with newly-manufactured magazines with capacities of ten rounds or less, or with pre-ban manufactured high-capacity magazines, to meet changing legal requirements.
The BATF technology branch determined in 1994 that muzzle brakes were not impacted by the AWB, and that muzzle brakes on threaded barrels were not an assault weapon feature, so long as they were welded or soldered in place.
The law prohibited manufacturing and sale to civilians of detachable magazines with a capacity to hold more than ten rounds. mThis prompted the importation of large quantities of pre-1994 manufactured magazines from other countries. Former Warsaw Pact countries had a huge surplus of AK-47 magazines of various capacities, that could fit a variety of both pre-ban and post-ban AK-47 variants. There was also a large number of pre-1994 American-made magazines as well.
With the ten-round limit on magazine capacity in effect and some form of concealed carry of firearms legal in over 38 states, manufacturers had an added incentive to design smaller frames at or below the ten-round capacity, thus replacing the previously popular 9mm and .45 "high capacity" pistols. Since they could no longer sell the popular 14 and even 18 round magazines continuing to market the large frames designed for such made little sense. Glock introduced their 10-round capacity 9mm semi-automatic pistol, the Glock 26, in August 1994, in apparent anticipation of the legislation. In 1995, the Kahr Arms company was founded which debuted their ultra-compact 9mm pistol, the K-9. Smith and Wesson redesigned their small, "J-frame" .38 Special five-round revolvers to accommodate the powerful .357 Magnum cartridge, introducing the new models in 1996. In the years that followed, all manufacturers of pistols and revolvers followed suit, developing a large array of concealable ten-round pistols in various calibers, including 9mm, 10mm, .40 S&W, .357 Magnum, and .45 ACP.
In March 2004, Kristen Rand, the legislative director of the VPC, criticized the soon to expire ban by stating "The 1994 law in theory banned AK-47s, MAC-10s, UZIs, AR-15s and other assault weapons. Yet the gun industry easily found ways around the law and most of these weapons are now sold in post-ban models virtually identical to the guns Congress sought to ban in 1994."[3]
Assault weapons ban in New York politics
New York's version of the law is very similar to the Federal version, but New York's version does not have a sunset provision. According to the laws of the State of New York, a magazine with a capacity of more than 10 rounds manufactured after September 14, 1994 cannot be legally possessed by anyone other than a law enforcement officer. A provision of the Federal law required the date of manufacture to be stamped on every newly manufactured "large capacity" magazine. Because that requirement is no longer in effect, the New York magazine ban becomes potentially unenforceable except with respect to those magazines manufactured during the ban and marked according to federal regulations then in effect.
NYS Penal Law § 265.02(6) makes it a class D felony to possess "a large capacity ammunition feeding device," which is defined in Penal Law § 265.00(23) as "a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device, manufactured after September thirteenth, nineteen hundred ninety-four, that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than ten rounds of ammunition." Possession of unmarked "large capacity" magazines made after the sunset of the federal ban thus subject New Yorkers to felony charges. Police and prosecutors may be able to determine actual manufacture dates of seized magazines from information not generally available to consumers, such as the dates of magazine design changes and parts assembly numbers. The New York ban thus leaves possessors of unmarked post-ban magazines at risk of felony charges since they may not know the magazines were manufactured post-sunset and not pre-ban.
During the period of the federal ban, ATF would issue rulings as to whether attachment of a given muzzle device on a post-ban rifle was permissible because it acted only as a brake, or impermissible because it acted as a flash suppressor. As with magazines, the New York regulatory scheme implicitly relied upon such federal regulatory determinations for enforcement of the state's ban. With the sunset of the federal ban, ATF is no longer concerned with classifying muzzle devices. New York residents now may acquire or modify rifles attaching what they believe to be muzzle brakes, but which at some point New York police or prosecutors may deem to be flash suppressors, resulting in arrest or prosecution for unwitting possession of a banned rifle. [''See'' NYS Penal Law § 265.00(22) defining "Assault Weapon" to include "a semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least two of the following characteristics . . . (iv) a flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor." There is no definition of "flash suppressor" in § 265.00, which contains all definitions for the ban, thus leaving grounds for arrest and prosecution uncertain until what is or is not a "flash suppressor" is resolved by state courts or clarified by statute.]
Assault weapons bans in other States
The states of Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and California have enacted similar bans.
Impact on crime
An informal survey by the International Association of Chiefs of Police of about 20 departments revealed that since 2004 all of the agencies have either added weapons to officers' patrol units or have replaced existing weaponry with military-style arms to counter an arms race occurring with criminals. Ron Stucker, criminal investigations chief of the Orange County Sheriff's Department in Florida, says deputies are now "frequently" encountering assault weapons in local robberies and during simple traffic stops.[4]
One of the types of weapons prohibited with a larger magazine as shown, but permitted by using a smaller 10 capacity magazine. Used with the larger 15 round magazine in the Virginia Tech massacre
An unpublished 2004 study commissioned by the DOJ found that "Assault weapons (AW) were used in only a small fraction of gun crimes prior to the ban: about 2% according to most studies and no more than 8%. Most of the assault weapons used in crime are assault pistols rather than assault rifles. Large capacity magazines (LCM) are used in crime much more often than and accounted for 14% to 26% of guns used in crime prior to the ban... The ban’s impact on gun violence is likely to be small at best, and perhaps too small for reliable measurement...Nonetheless, reducing criminal use of assault weapons and especially large capacity magazines could have nontrivial effects on gunshot victimizations. The few available studies suggest that attacks with semiautomatics – including AWs and other semiautomatics equipped with large capacity magazines – result in more shots fired, more persons hit, and more wounds inflicted per victim than do attacks with other firearms."[5]
A 1999 preliminary study commissioned by the US Department of Justice done on the Assault Weapons Ban found that the "limited [study] time frame weakens the ability of statistical tests to discern impacts that may be meaningful from a policy perspective", therefore the ban’s "short-term impact on gun violence has been uncertain, due perhaps to the continuing availability of grandfathered assault weapons, close substitute guns and large capacity magazines, and the relative rarity with which the banned weapons were used in gun violence even before the ban"[6]
The Violence Policy Center blames technicalities. "Soon after its passage in 1994, the gun industry made a mockery of the federal assault weapons ban, manufacturing 'post-ban' assault weapons with only slight, cosmetic differences from their banned counterparts. By another point of view, manufacturers responded precisely to the changing legal requirements, making and selling exactly what was permitted. The VPC estimates that more than one million assault weapons have been manufactured since the ban's passage in 1994."[2]
The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence examined the impact of the Assault Weapons Ban in a 2004 report entitled On Target: The Impact of the 1994 Federal Assault Weapon Act.[8] The report looked at 1.4 million guns involved in crime and determined that "since the law’s enactment ... assault weapons have made up only 1.61% of the guns ATF has traced to crime — a drop of 66% from the pre-ban rate" and that the Act prevented 60,000 assault weapon crimes over its 10-year period.
In 2001, Koper and Roth of the Jerry Lee Center of Criminology, University of Pennsylvania, published a peer-reviewed paper called ''The Impact of the 1994 Federal Assault Weapon Ban on Gun Violence Outcomes: An Assessment of Multiple Outcome Measures and Some Lessons for Policy Evaluation''. They found that:
"The ban may have contributed to a reduction in gun homicides, but a statistical power analysis of our model indicated that any likely impact from the ban will be very difficult to detect statistically for several more years. We found no evidence of reductions in multiple-victim gun homicides or multiple-gunshot wound victimizations. The findings should be treated cautiously due to the methodological difficulties of making a short-term assessment of the ban and because the ban's long-term effects could differ from the short-term impacts revealed by this study."[9]
Assault Weapons Ban 2007 bill
In February 2007 a bill, H.R. 1022, sponsored by Representative Carolyn McCarthy of New York was introduced that would reinstitute and expand the ban on assault weapons. It reduces the number of requirements for a firearm to be classified as an assault weapon from two to one. It additionally includes, in ''H.R. 1022 Section L'', the expansion of the legal term ''assault weapon'' to any
"... semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General. In making the determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event."
The Bill was referred to the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security on March 19, 2007. As of September 4, 2007, 56 co-sponsors have signed on to the bill.
See also
★ Firearm case law
★ Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act
★ Gun (Firearm) laws in the United States (by state)
★ National Firearms Act
★ Gun Control Act of 1968
★ Gun politics in the United States
★ 101 California Street Shootings
★ Carolyn McCarthy
★ ''The Long Island Incident''
References
1. Finally, the end of a sad era -- Clinton Gun Ban stricken from books! ''National Rifle Association''
2. Violence Policy Center Issues Statement on Expiration of Federal Assault Weapons Ban ''Violence Policy Center''
3. Senate-Passed Assault Weapons "Ban" Will Do Little to Keep Assault Weapons Off Our Streets, Violence Policy Center (VPC) Warns ''Violence Policy Center''
4. usatoday.com
5. An Updated Assessment of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban: Impacts on Gun Markets and Gun Violence, 1994-2003 ''National Institute of Justice''
6. Impacts of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban: 1994-96 ''National Institute of Justice''
7. Violence Policy Center Issues Statement on Expiration of Federal Assault Weapons Ban ''Violence Policy Center''
8. On Target: The Impact of the 1994 Federal Assault Weapon Act ''Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence''
9. http://www.springerlink.com/content/kv8610023463x574/
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
