HAWAIIAN SOVEREIGNTY MOVEMENT

Native Hawaiians gather at ʻIolani Palace on August 12, 1998, to remember the centennial anniversary of the American annexation of Hawaii. The royal guard raise ''Ka Hae Hawaii'', the flag of Hawaii.

The 'Hawaiian sovereignty movement' is comprised of organizations and individuals seeking some form of sovereignty for Hawai'i. Generally, the movement's focus is on self-determination and self-governance for people of whole or part Native Hawaiians ancestry, or in some cases more broadly some definition of "Hawaiian nationals" regardless of race or ethnicity. In some instances the focus also includes redress from the United States for the 1893 overthrow of Queen Lili'uokalani, and for what is seen as a prolonged military occupation beginning in 1898 with the annexation of the Republic of Hawaii to the United States, and continuing until the present day. The movement generally views both the overthrow and annexation as illegal, and holds the the U.S. government responsible for these actions. The historical and legal basis for these claims is one of considerable dispute.PDF file (592 KB): Hawaii Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand 49-page document by Bruce Fein, a lawyer working with activists opposed to the Hawaiian sovereignty movement, attacking the Apology Resolution and S.147 (the Akaka bill). While the groups that comprise the movement share these common concerns, their views on how such goals should be achieved vary greatly, ranging from the establishment of some form of "Nation within a Nation" government (similar to the government of some Indian tribes) such as proposed in the Akaka Bill, to reparations from the U.S. government for historical grievances and an end to American military presence, to outright independence from the United States.
The Hawaiian Sovereignty Movement largely overlaps with the Aloha Aina (literally: "love of the land") movement in Hawaii, which advocates for such issues as demilitarization, ecological concerns, indigenous recognition, and cultural site protection[1][2]. The recent period of activism began with the "Hawaiian Renaissance" of the 1970s, after a long underground period following the 1900 Organic Act and the transformation of the political organizations Aloha Aina and Hui Kalaiaina into the Home Rule Party. Modern day participants associated with the Aloha Aina movement generally advocate the anti-annexation sentiment held prior to 1900 by most native Hawaiian political organizations.

What form of sovereignty?

Groups and organizations

ALOHA

Office of Hawaiian Affairs

Ka Lahui

Nation of Hawai'i

Ka Pakaukau: Kekuni Blaisdell

Poka Laenui (Hayden Burgess)

Hawaiian Kingdom: David Keanu Sai

Militia of Molokai

Responses to the sovereignty movement

Apologies

Backlash

History of resistance

Hawaiian sovereignty activists and advocates

Opponents of Hawaiian sovereignty

What form of sovereignty?

Although there are many efforts ongoing to achieve some form of sovereignty, the process of defining and achieving it is difficult. Proposed solutions range from complete independence from the United States to "nation-within-a-nation" (similar to the status of Native American tribes but based purely on ancestry) status as proposed by the Akaka Bill. Among those who advocate for complete independence, proposals range from a reinstatement of the multi-racial monarchy based on ancestral ties pre-1893 regardless of ethnicity, to constitutional democracies with tiered citizenship based on native ancestry, to governments exclusively controlled by those with some ancestry pre-1778. All major groups propose giving at least limited voting power to non-natives. The Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) already exists as a state-sponsored commission but is regarded as ineffective; one highly controversial "nation-within-a-nation" proposal has been repeatedly brought to the U.S. Senate (see Akaka Bill) by U.S. Senator Daniel Akaka.
Most, but not all, formal sovereignty proposals focus on short-range, interim governmental structures, recognizing that given Hawaii's profound economic and political integration into the United States, to have any hope of success or support, any long-term solution must be developed incrementally with the approval of the United Nations. As most groups are focused on some manner of international legal solution, many (but not all) proposed structures are based on the kingdom that existed in 1893, the logical basis being that the undoing of the illegalities of the 1893 invasion might legally necessitate a return to the pre-overthrow government that existed before 1893. Many groups do include some long-range ideas in their proposals, but it can be said that the immediate focus of the sovereignty movement is generally upon the immediate problem of overcoming what they see as American occupation and/or colonization of the islands.

Groups and organizations

ALOHA

ALOHA or Aboriginal Lands of Hawaiian Ancestry may have been organized in 1969 or 1972. According to Rich Budnick's book ''Hawaii's Forgotten History'', the group was established by Louisa Rice in 1969. Charlie Maxwell claims that it was first organized in the summer of 1972. [3]
On July 27, 1973, the then President of ALOHA, Charlie Maxwell, sought reparations from the U.S. government for the government and crown lands claimed by the Republic of Hawaii in 1894, transferred to the U.S. government in 1900, and then transferred back to the State of Hawaii in 1959. He specifically demanded the return of Kahoolawe, saying, "Our kupuna [elders] saw it first." He informed the Maui County Council in late 1973 that his organization's "primary objective [was] to seek land or money reparations from the United States Congress".
It is unclear if ALOHA is still an active organization.

Office of Hawaiian Affairs

Of the groups in the current Hawaiian sovereignty movement, the best funded is the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA). OHA was created in 1978 by the State of Hawaii Constitutional Convention. OHA's stated purpose was to represent the interests of Native Hawaiians in the administration of the Hawaiian Homelands and the Ceded Lands — land formerly belonging to the Hawaiian government and crown that were ceded to the United States as public lands when the islands were annexed in 1898. When the Territory of Hawaii became a state in 1959, these lands were passed to the new state. The act transferring them ordered that they be administered for five public purposes:
# The support of public education
# The betterment of the conditions of native Hawaiians as defined in the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act of 1920
# The development of farm and home ownership
# The making of public improvements
# The provision of lands for public use
Because there was strong sentiment that the second purpose had been largely ignored, part of OHA's charter was to address this issue. Originally, OHA trustees were to be elected only by Native Hawaiians, but in 2000 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in ''Rice v. Cayetano'' that this restriction was unconstitutionally race-based. As a result, OHA trustees are now elected by all registered voters in the state.
The OHA Board of Trustees has historically been known for factional infighting that some believe hamper its mission for helping Native Hawaiians.^[1]

Ka Lahui

Ka Lahui Hawaii was formed in 1987 as a grassroots initiative for Hawaiian sovereignty. The Trask sisters, attorney and U.N. Representative Mililani Trask and University of Hawaii professor Haunani-Kay Trask, were prominent in the effort. Native Hawaiians, as well as non-Native Hawaiians, may sign up as citizens of Ka Lahui. One of the group's goals is to bargain with the United States government for recognition, land, and restitution, while lobbying at the United Nations for decolonization relief. Their model shares some similarity to certain Indian reservations of the U.S. continent, which have increasingly become self-governing. Many thousands of Native Hawaiians, along with many non-natives, have signed up as members. Ka Lahui has attracted many critics; many of these critics question the degree to which Ka Lahui citizens actually participated in the affairs of the group after signing their name.
Ka Lahui opposes the "Akaka Bill" proposed by Senator Daniel Akaka that recognizes Native Hawaiians as a ''first nation'' on par with Native Americans and Alaskan tribes, as the group (along with most other sovereignty organizations) sees it as a poor compromise, and believes that the ramifications in terms of international law outweigh the bill's benefits.

Nation of Hawai'i

The Nation of Hawaii made the news in 1993 when its members occupied Kaupo Beach, near Makapuu, Oahu (they had occupied the area surrounding the Makapuu lighthouse in 1989). Dennis Pu‘uhonua "Bumpy" Kanahele was a primary leader of the occupation, as well as the leader of the group overall. A descendant of the Kamehamehas, Bumpy was given the title "Head of State" of the Nation of Hawaii in order to gain international recognition for Hawaiian sovereignty. The group ceased their occupation in exchange for the return of ceded lands in the adjacent community of Waimānalo, where they established a village, cultural center, and puuhonua (place of refuge). The group nearly lost its land several times, due both to sentiment fostered by activists opposing the Hawaiian sovereignty movement, and questions regarding rent and liability insurance. As of 2006, however, it is still home to at least forty people.
Kanahele made headlines again in 1995 when his group gave sanctuary to Nathan Brown, a Native Hawaiian activist who had refused to pay federal taxes in protest of the illegitimacy of the U.S. presence in Hawaii. Kanahele was arrested, convicted, and sentenced to eight months in federal prison, along with a probation period in which he was barred from the puuhonua and from participation in his sovereignty efforts.
Following his release from prison, Kanahele became involved in more specific aspects of nationhood, such as the development of independent banking systems, and the cultivation of relationships with other nations. He holds the seat on the International Indian Treaty Council (IITC) formerly held by sovereignty pioneer Kawaipuna Prejean, and has worked closely with Hawaii's current governor, Linda Lingle.

Ka Pakaukau: Kekuni Blaisdell

Dr. Richard Kekuni Akana Blaisdell is a medical doctor and professor of medicine who strongly advocates for the total independence for Hawaii. The position of Dr. Blaisdell's group, Ka Pakaukau, is that Hawaii does not need to secede from the U.S., for the U.S. has the moral obligation to "return what it has stolen" and to remove its "occupying forces" (i.e. the U.S. military) from Hawaiian lands. Blaisdell advocates putting continual non-violent pressure on the U.S. military to vacate Hawaii. He also feels that the military has an unmet obligation to clean up the pollution it has left in areas such as Pearl Harbor and Kaho'olawe. Blaisdell has travelled numerous times to the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland to advocate for international recognition of Hawaii as a rightful independent nation under illegal colonial occupation, and to lobby for international assistance with the process of decolonization.
In 1993, Blaisdell convened Ka Hookolokolonui Kanaka Maoli, the "People's International Tribunal", which brought indigenous leaders from around the world to Hawaii to put the U.S. Government on trial for the theft of Hawaii's sovereignty, and other related violations of international law. The tribunal found the U.S. guilty, and published its findings in a lengthy document filed with the U.N. Committees on Human Rights and Indigenous Affairs.

Poka Laenui (Hayden Burgess)

Hayden Burgess now goes by the Hawaiian name Poka Laenui and heads the Institute for the Advancement of Hawaiian Affairs. A lawyer, Laenui argues that because the "U.S. armed invasion and overthrow" [4] of the Hawaiian monarchy was illegal, the current government of the state is illegal, and that residents owe it no fealty or taxes. He advocates a process of decolonization, resulting in a totally independent government that would include all non-Hawaiians living in Hawaii. He uses other island nations who are achieving decolonization throughout the Pacific as his primary model.
Laenui has regularly analyzed Hawaii's historical, political, and economic situation on his talk shows, which air on radio and on community-access cable channel Ōlelo TV.

Hawaiian Kingdom: David Keanu Sai

Another leader who seeks to expose what is seen as the prolonged occupation of Hawaii by the United States is David Keanu Sai. Trained as a U.S. military officer, Sai uses the title of Chairman of the Acting Council of Regency of the Hawaiian Kingdom. Sai has done extensive historical research, especially on the treaties between Hawaii and other nations, and military occupation and the laws of war. Sai is currently a doctoral candidate in political science at the University of Hawaii, where he founded the Hawaiian Society of Law and Politics, which publishes the ''Hawaiian Journal of Law and Politics''.
Sai co-founded a Hawaiian title company, Perfect Title, which stated that all land transactions since the overthrow of the monarchy were invalid if superseded by legitimate pre-existing claims; some clients refused to make mortgage payments and lost their property. In 1997, the offices of Perfect Title were raided, and the company was barred from filing any documents with the state Bureau of Conveyances for 5 years, effectively shutting the company down. A jury on December 1, 1999, unanimously found Mr. Sai guilty of attempted theft of title to a house (value approximately $300,000) for his role as an accessory to a man and woman who used his Perfect Title services to attempt to invalidate a foreclosure on their house. For his felony conviction, David Keanu Sai was sentenced to 5 years probation and a $200 fine on March 7, 2000. His appeal was denied by the Hawaii Supreme Court on July 20, 2004.
Sai claimed to represent the Hawaiian Kingdom in a case brought before the World Court's Permanent Court of Arbitration at the Hague, in the Netherlands (Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom; ''Honolulu Weekly'' item) in December of 2000. Although the arbitration was agreed to by Lance Paul Larsen and David Keanu Sai, with Larsen suing Sai for not protecting his rights as a Hawaiian Kingdom subject, his actual goal was to have U.S. rule in Hawaii declared in breach of mutual treaty obligations and international law. The arbiters of the case affirmed that there was no dispute they could decide upon, because the United States was not a party to the arbitration. As stated in the award from the arbitration panel, ''in the absence of the United States of America, the Tribunal can neither decide that Hawaii is not part of the USA, nor proceed on the assumption that it is not. To take either course would be to disregard a principle which goes to heart of the arbitral function in international law.''.

Militia of Molokai

Small movement based on the island of Molokai. It is a pro-gun rights, pro-Hawaiian sovereignty group, that claims to be protecting Constitutional rights (esspecially Second Amendement rights) and fighting against the "American police state." It encourages a calling to arms for the Hawaiian people, and is largely opposed to the current governer of the state.
It publishes a weekly newspaper, called the Molokai Advertiser^[2], on the island of Hawaii, which is mostly composed of various propoganda for their cause.

Responses to the sovereignty movement

Apologies

Due to efforts by the various Hawaiian sovereignty movements and other Native-Hawaiian activist groups, the United States government and the state government of Hawaii have issued official apologies in recent years.
Some with a different perspective of the historical record (see "Opposition" below) sharply disagree with these apologies, questioning the accuracy and validity of the case made for them.
The U.S. government apologizes:

President Bill Clinton signed United States Public Law 103-150, apologizing on behalf of the American people for its role in the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy.

★ On November 15, 1993, President of the United States Bill Clinton signed an Apology Resolution, admitting that the U.S. was at fault in supplying military assistance to the "conspirators" who overthrew the government of Queen Liliuokalani.
Hawaiian governors apologize:

★ "The recovery of Hawaiian self-determination is not only an issue for Hawaii, but for America. Let all of us, Hawaiian and non-Hawaiian, work toward a common goal. Let us resolve to advance a plan for Hawaiian sovereignty." —Governor Benjamin J. Cayetano, 1998

★ "This is a historical issue, based on a relationship between an independent government and the United States of America, and what has happened since and the steps that we need to take to make things right." —Governor Linda Lingle, 2003

Backlash

There has also been something of a backlash against the concept of ancestry-based sovereignty, which critics maintain is tantamount to racial exclusion. In 1996, in ''Rice v. Cayetano'', one Big Island rancher sued to win the right to vote in OHA elections, asserting that every Hawaiian citizen regardless of racial background should be able to vote for a state office, and that limiting the vote to Native Hawaiians only was racist. In 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in his favor and OHA elections are now open to all registered voters. Many Native Hawaiian groups now fear that other programs exclusively for Native Hawaiian ancestry may be in danger.
Although the Apology Resolution passed 65 to 34 in the U.S. Senate and by a two-thirds voice vote in the House, and without much public notice outside Hawaii, the Akaka Bill has generated a higher profile for the issues involved. Sovereignty groups believe the clauses in the Apology Resolution are factual and accurately represent Hawaiian history, and have used it as evidence to support their positions.^[3] An organized opposition now challenges the accuracy of historical claims and constitutionality of legislation they view as racially exclusive.

History of resistance

Liliuokalani's own response to her overthrow changed over the years. Although at first she worked to effect a counter-revolution, eventually she reconciled herself to the course Hawaii had taken. Opponents of the Hawaiian sovereignty movements see this as ex post facto justification for the overthrow, whereas sovereignty advocates dismiss this as a purely personal position taken by the ex-Queen that does not bear on their legal assertions.
:''The best thing for [Native Hawaiians] that could have happened was to belong to the United States.'' - written in the 1903 autobiography of Senator George Hoar (R. Mass.), attributed to Liliuokalani.
:''Tho' for a moment it cost me a pang of pain for my people it was only momentary, for the present has a hope for the future of my people.'' - former Queen Liliuokalani in her diary, Sunday, September 2, 1900; from a photostatic copy in the Hawaii State Archives (See DeSoto Brown's article in the Honolulu Weekly, June 4-10, 2003, Page 4)
Although there was some controversy as to the accuracy of the second quote, research done by DeSoto Brown of the Bishop Museum, who was originally doubtful, was able to prove its authenticity. A further discussion of the two articles written by DeSoto Brown have been discussed on the Honolulu Advertiser discussion boards.

Hawaiian sovereignty activists and advocates

★ Keoni Agard

★ S. Haunani Apoliona (current chair of OHA)

★ Francis A. Boyle (professor of international law, University of Illinois [5])

★ Bu Laia, comedian

★ Scott Crawford [6]

★ Lynette Hiilani Cruz

★ George Helm (musician) and Kimo Mitchell (both d. 1977)

★ Israel Kamakawiwoole (musician; d. 1997)

★ Lilikala Kameeleihiwa

★ Dennis "Bumpy" Kanahele (descendant of Kamehameha the Great)

★ J. Kehaulani Kauanui, Ph.D.

★ Poka Laenui, aka Hayden Burgess

★ Rev. Charles Kauluwehi Maxwell Sr.

★ Jon Osorio (scholar and musician)

★ Rev. Kaleo Patterson

★ Kawaipuna Prejean (d. 1992)

★ Noenoe K. Silva (political scientist, University of Hawaii at Manoa [7])

★ Vicky Holt Takamine

★ Haunani-Kay Trask

★ Mililani Trask

Opponents of Hawaiian sovereignty

★ Earl Arakaki

★ H. William Burgess

★ Patricia Carroll

★ Robert M. Chapman

★ Brian L. Clarke

★ Kenneth R. Conklin

★ Bruce Fein

★ John Goemans

★ Rubellite Kawena Kinney Johnson (descendant of Kamehameha the Great, named a "Living Treasure Of Hawai'i" in 1983 by the Honpa Hongwanji Mission of Hawaii)

★ Grant Jones

★ Richard O. Rowland

★ Thurston Twigg-Smith

★ Malia Zimmerman

References

1. Pat Omandam, "OHA: Fact & Friction" (''Honolulu Star-Bulletin'', May 3, 1996). http://starbulletin.com/96/05/03/news/story1.html
2. http://molokaiadvertiser-news.com/
3. Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom Transcript, heard before the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague, citing the Apology Resolution

External links

Primary Sources

★ morganreport.org Online images and transcriptions of the entire Morgan Report (which contradicted the Blount Report, the basis for the '93 Apology Resolution)

★ historic Hawaiian-language newspapersUlukau: Hawaiian Electronic Library: Hoʻolaupaʻi - Hawaiian Nupepa Collection

★ Hui Aloha Aina Anti-Annexation Petitions, 1897-1898

This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.

psst.. try this: add to faves

	Bora Bora Lagoon Resort & Spa
	Destination Greece
	JRD Travel Company
	Golf Holidays International
	MarysTravelSpot
	Grenada Board of Tourism
	Hotel Villa St Pierre
	Travelonly - Dave Corless
	Heavenly Paradise Getaways
	Dancing Moon Travel

HAWAIIAN SOVEREIGNTY MOVEMENT

What form of sovereignty?

Groups and organizations

ALOHA

Office of Hawaiian Affairs

Ka Lahui

Nation of Hawai'i

Ka Pakaukau: Kekuni Blaisdell

Poka Laenui (Hayden Burgess)

Hawaiian Kingdom: David Keanu Sai

Militia of Molokai

Responses to the sovereignty movement

Apologies

Backlash

History of resistance

Hawaiian sovereignty activists and advocates

Opponents of Hawaiian sovereignty

See also

Further reading

References

External links

Politics

Media

Opposition

Primary Sources

Photo Galleries »

Customer Service

Most Popular

Useful

Find