Although
nanotechnology is a relatively recent development in scientific research, the development of its central concepts happened over a longer period of time.
Pre-Nanotechnology
Humans have unwittingly employed nanotechnology for thousands of years, for example in making steel and in vulcanizing rubber. Both of these processes rely on the properties of
stochastically-formed atomic ensembles mere nanometers in size, and are distinguished from
chemistry in that they don't rely on the properties of individual molecules. But the development of the body of concepts now subsumed under the term nanotechnology has been slower.
The first mention of some of the distinguishing concepts in nanotechnology (but predating use of that name) was in 1867 by
James Clerk Maxwell when he proposed as a thought experiment a tiny entity known as
Maxwell's Demon able to handle individual molecules.
In the 1920s,
Irving Langmuir and
Katharine B. Blodgett introduced the concept of a
monolayer, a layer of material one molecule thick. Langmuir won a
Nobel Prize in chemistry for his work.
Conceptual origins
The topic of nanotechnology was again touched upon by "
There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom," a talk given by physicist
Richard Feynman at an
American Physical Society meeting at
Caltech on
December 29,
1959. Feynman described a process by which the ability to manipulate individual atoms and molecules might be developed, using one set of precise tools to build and operate another proportionally smaller set, so on down to the needed scale. In the course of this, he noted, scaling issues would arise from the changing magnitude of various physical phenomena: gravity would become less important, surface tension and
Van der Waals attraction would become more important, etc. This basic idea appears feasible, and
exponential assembly enhances it with
parallelism to produce a useful quantity of end products. At the meeting, Feynman announced two challenges, and he offered a prize a $1000 for the first individuals to solve the each one. The first challenge involved the construction of a
nanomotor, which, to Feynman's surprise, was achieved by November of 1960 by
William McLellan. The second challenge involved the possibility of scaling down letters small enough so as to be able to fit the entire
Encyclopedia Britannica on the head of a pin; this prize was claimed in 1985 by
Tom Newman.
[1]
In 1965
Gordon Moore observed that silicon transistors were undergoing a continual process of scaling downward, an observation which was later codified as
Moore's law. Since his observation transistor minimum feature sizes have decreased from 10 micrometers to the 45-65 nm range in
2007; one minimum feature is thus roughly 180 silicon atoms long
The term "nanotechnology" was first defined by
Tokyo Science University,
Norio Taniguchi in a
1974 paper (N. Taniguchi, "On the Basic Concept of 'Nano-Technology'," Proc. Intl. Conf. Prod. Eng. Tokyo, Part II, Japan Society of Precision Engineering, 1974.) as follows: "'Nano-technology' mainly consists of the processing of, separation, consolidation, and deformation of materials by one atom or one molecule." Since that time the definition of nanotechnology has generally been extended upward in size to include features as large as 100 nm. Additionally, the idea that nanotechnology embraces structures exhibiting
quantum mechanical aspects, such as
quantum dots, has been thrown into the definition.
Also in 1974 the process of
atomic layer deposition, for depositing uniform thin films one atomic layer at a time, was developed and patented by
Dr. Tuomo Suntola and co-workers in Finland.
In the 1980s the idea of nanotechnology as
deterministic, rather than
stochastic, handling of individual atoms and molecules was conceptually explored in depth by
Dr. K. Eric Drexler, who promoted the technological significance of nano-scale phenomena and devices through speeches and the books and ''
Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing, and Computation,'' (ISBN 0-471-57518-6). Drexler's vision of nanotechnology is often called "molecular nanotechnology" (MNT) or "molecular manufacturing," and Drexler at one point proposed the term "zettatech" which never became popular.
Experimental advances
Nanotechnology and
nanoscience got a boost in the early 1980s with two major developments: the birth of
cluster science and the invention of the
scanning tunneling microscope (STM). This development led to the discovery of
fullerenes in 1985 and the structural assignment of
carbon nanotubes a few years later. In another development, the synthesis and properties of semiconductor
nanocrystals were studied. This led to a fast increasing number of
semiconductor nanoparticles of
quantum dots.
In the early 1990s Huffman and Kraetschmer (U. Arizona) discovered how to synthesize and purify large quantities of fullerenes. This opened the door to their characterization and functionalization by hundreds of investigators in government and industrial laboraories. Shortly after, rubidium doped C60 was found to be a mid temperature (Tc = 32 K) superconductor. At a meeting of the Materials Research Society meeting in 1992, Dr. T. Ebbesen (NEC) described to a spellbound audience his discovery and characterization od carbon nanotubes. This event sent those in attendance and others downwind of his presentation into their laboratories to reproduce and push those discoveries forward. Using the same or similar tools as those used by Huffman and Kratschmere, hundreds of researchers further developed the field of nanotube-based nanotechnology.
At present in
2007 the practice of nanotechnology embraces both stochastic approaches (in which, for example,
supramolecular chemistry creates waterproof pants) and deterministic approaches wherein single molecules (created by stochastic chemistry) are manipulated on substrate surfaces (created by stochastic deposition methods) by deterministic methods comprising nudging them with
STM or
AFM probes and causing simple binding or cleavage reactions to occur. The dream of a complex, deterministic molecular nanotechnology remains elusive. Since the mid 1990s, thousands of surface scientists and thin film technocrats have latched on to the nanotechnology bandwagon and redefined their disciplines as nanotechnology. This has caused much confusion in the field and has spawned thousands of "nano"-papers on the peer reviewed literature. Most of these reports are extensions of the more ordinary research done in the parent fields.
For the future, some means has to be found for MNT design evolution at the nanoscale which mimics the process of biological evolution at the molecular scale. Biological evolution proceeds by random variation in ensemble averages of organisms combined with culling of the less-successful variants and reproduction of the more-successful variants, and macroscale engineering design also proceeds by a process of design evolution from simplicity to complexity as set forth somewhat satirically by
John Gall: "A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. . . . A complex system designed from scratch never works and can not be patched up to make it work. You have to start over, beginning with a system that works."
Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design, W. W. Norton; Reissue edition (September 19, 1996)
comprising random molecular variation and deterministic reproduction/extinction.
References
1. Gribbin, John. "Richard Feynman: A Life in Science" Dutton 1997, pg 170.