العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
EspañolERU ILúVATAR
(Redirected from Ilúvatar)
'Eru Ilúvatar' is the Elvish name for God in the legendarium of J.R.R. Tolkien. He is the single omnipotent creator, but has delegated most actions within Eä to the Ainur, including the shaping of Arda (the Earth) itself. Eru is an important figure in Tolkien's ''Silmarillion'' but is not mentioned by name in Tolkien's most famous works, ''The Hobbit'' and ''The Lord of the Rings'' (he is alluded to as "the One" in the part of ''The Lord of the Rings'', Appendix A that speaks of the downfall of Númenor).
The Eldar (cf. Elves) and the Edain (cf. Men) were created by Eru. In The Silmarillion both are synonymously referred to as the Children of Ilúvatar. The Dwarves were "adopted" by Eru in the sense that they were created by Aulë but given sapience by Eru. Animals and plants were fashioned by Manwë and Varda after themes set out by Eru in the Music of the Ainur, Manwë asked Eru to give them sapience, as in the case of Huan, or the Eagles in ''The Lord of the Rings'' and ''The Hobbit''. There is a case to be made that the Eagles of Manwë are actually Maiar. Also, since Huan was initially a Hound of Oromë and was able to overcome Sauron (himself a Maia), it is possible that he too was one of the Maiar. Another possibility is that Huan's sentience represents the limits of the gifts of the Valar to creatures, endowing them with purpose and cleverness that may nevertheless be something other than true sapience in the sense of independent existence before Eru. Melkor was able to instil some semblance of free will into his mockeries of Eru Ilúvatar's creations (Orcs, Dragons, Trolls). While Orcs were possibly ruined Elves, and thus possibly derived from the initial Children of Ilúvatar, the other races mentioned — particularly dragons — seem to lack this correspondence, or any particular connection with the Music of the Ainur.
Eru is the sole being to possess the Flame Imperishable, and hence the only being in Tolkien's world able to truly create independent life. All beings not created directly by Eru, (e.g. Dwarves), still need to be blessed by Eru through the Flame Imperishable in order to be more than mere puppets of their creator. Melkor desired the Flame Imperishable and long sought for it in vain, but failing to find it because it was within Eru himself, Melkor could only twist that which had already been given life.
Tolkien understood Eru not as a fictional deity but as a name in a fictional language for the actual monotheistic God of Christian faith, although in a fictional context. A clear explanation of this appears in a draft of a letter that Tolkien wrote in 1954 to Peter Hastings, manager of the Newman Bookshop (a Catholic bookshop in Oxford). In the letter, Tolkien, a devout Catholic, defended the non-orthodox portrayal of God (Eru) in his writing as rightly within the scope of his legendarium, as an exploration of the infinite "potential variety" of God (''The Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien'', No. 153).
Regarding the possibility of reincarnation of Elves, Hastings had written:
:''God has not used that device in any of the creations of which we have knowledge, and it seems to me to be stepping beyond the position of a sub-creator to produce it as an actual working thing, because a sub-creator, when dealing with the relations between creator and created, should use those channels which he knows the creator to have used already.''
Tolkien's reply contains an explanation of his view of the relation of (divine) Creation to (human) sub-creation:
:''We differ entirely about the nature of the relation of sub-creation to Creation. I should have said that liberation "from the channels the creator is known to have used already" is the fundamental function of "sub-creation", a tribute to the infinity of His potential variety [...] I am not a metaphysician; but I should have thought it a curious metaphysic — there is not one but many, indeed potentially innumerable ones — that declared the channels known (in such a finite corner as we have any inkling of) to have been used, are the only possible ones, or efficacious, or possibly acceptable to and by Him!''
Hastings had also criticised the description of Tom Bombadil by Goldberry: ''"He is"'', saying that this seemed to imply that Bombadil was God.
Tolkien replied to this:
:''As for Tom Bombadil, I really do think you are being too serious, besides missing the point. [...] You rather remind me of a Protestant relation who to me objected to the (modern) Catholic habit of calling priests Father, because the name father belonged only to the First Person.''
The title ''the Father of All'' is thought by some to be borrowed from the god Odin in Norse mythology (the name itself is probably based on the Old Norse ''Alfóðr'', a name for Odin), though the New Testament also refers to God as the ''one God and Father of all''. Tolkien, as a Catholic and with an interest in northern European mythologies, was probably influenced by both sources. As Tolkien was also professionally and personally interested in Finnish mythology, the name "Ilúvatar" may be also influenced by "Ilmatar", 'Maid of Air', one of the primal spirits of creation mentioned in the ''Kalevala''.
In earlier versions of the legendarium, the name Ilúvatar meant "Father for Always" (in ''The Book of Lost Tales'', published as the first two volumes of ''The History of Middle-earth''), then "Sky-father", but these etymologies were dropped in favour of the newer meaning in later revisions. Ilúvatar was also the only name of God used in earlier versions — the name Eru first appeared in "The Annals of Aman", published in ''Morgoth's Ring'', the tenth volume of ''The History of Middle-earth''.
'Eru Ilúvatar' is the Elvish name for God in the legendarium of J.R.R. Tolkien. He is the single omnipotent creator, but has delegated most actions within Eä to the Ainur, including the shaping of Arda (the Earth) itself. Eru is an important figure in Tolkien's ''Silmarillion'' but is not mentioned by name in Tolkien's most famous works, ''The Hobbit'' and ''The Lord of the Rings'' (he is alluded to as "the One" in the part of ''The Lord of the Rings'', Appendix A that speaks of the downfall of Númenor).
| Contents |
| Eru as Creator |
| Tolkien on Eru |
| Inspiration and development |
| Footnotes |
Eru as Creator
The Eldar (cf. Elves) and the Edain (cf. Men) were created by Eru. In The Silmarillion both are synonymously referred to as the Children of Ilúvatar. The Dwarves were "adopted" by Eru in the sense that they were created by Aulë but given sapience by Eru. Animals and plants were fashioned by Manwë and Varda after themes set out by Eru in the Music of the Ainur, Manwë asked Eru to give them sapience, as in the case of Huan, or the Eagles in ''The Lord of the Rings'' and ''The Hobbit''. There is a case to be made that the Eagles of Manwë are actually Maiar. Also, since Huan was initially a Hound of Oromë and was able to overcome Sauron (himself a Maia), it is possible that he too was one of the Maiar. Another possibility is that Huan's sentience represents the limits of the gifts of the Valar to creatures, endowing them with purpose and cleverness that may nevertheless be something other than true sapience in the sense of independent existence before Eru. Melkor was able to instil some semblance of free will into his mockeries of Eru Ilúvatar's creations (Orcs, Dragons, Trolls). While Orcs were possibly ruined Elves, and thus possibly derived from the initial Children of Ilúvatar, the other races mentioned — particularly dragons — seem to lack this correspondence, or any particular connection with the Music of the Ainur.
Eru is the sole being to possess the Flame Imperishable, and hence the only being in Tolkien's world able to truly create independent life. All beings not created directly by Eru, (e.g. Dwarves), still need to be blessed by Eru through the Flame Imperishable in order to be more than mere puppets of their creator. Melkor desired the Flame Imperishable and long sought for it in vain, but failing to find it because it was within Eru himself, Melkor could only twist that which had already been given life.
Tolkien on Eru
Tolkien understood Eru not as a fictional deity but as a name in a fictional language for the actual monotheistic God of Christian faith, although in a fictional context. A clear explanation of this appears in a draft of a letter that Tolkien wrote in 1954 to Peter Hastings, manager of the Newman Bookshop (a Catholic bookshop in Oxford). In the letter, Tolkien, a devout Catholic, defended the non-orthodox portrayal of God (Eru) in his writing as rightly within the scope of his legendarium, as an exploration of the infinite "potential variety" of God (''The Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien'', No. 153).
Regarding the possibility of reincarnation of Elves, Hastings had written:
:''God has not used that device in any of the creations of which we have knowledge, and it seems to me to be stepping beyond the position of a sub-creator to produce it as an actual working thing, because a sub-creator, when dealing with the relations between creator and created, should use those channels which he knows the creator to have used already.''
Tolkien's reply contains an explanation of his view of the relation of (divine) Creation to (human) sub-creation:
:''We differ entirely about the nature of the relation of sub-creation to Creation. I should have said that liberation "from the channels the creator is known to have used already" is the fundamental function of "sub-creation", a tribute to the infinity of His potential variety [...] I am not a metaphysician; but I should have thought it a curious metaphysic — there is not one but many, indeed potentially innumerable ones — that declared the channels known (in such a finite corner as we have any inkling of) to have been used, are the only possible ones, or efficacious, or possibly acceptable to and by Him!''
Hastings had also criticised the description of Tom Bombadil by Goldberry: ''"He is"'', saying that this seemed to imply that Bombadil was God.
Tolkien replied to this:
:''As for Tom Bombadil, I really do think you are being too serious, besides missing the point. [...] You rather remind me of a Protestant relation who to me objected to the (modern) Catholic habit of calling priests Father, because the name father belonged only to the First Person.''
Inspiration and development
The title ''the Father of All'' is thought by some to be borrowed from the god Odin in Norse mythology (the name itself is probably based on the Old Norse ''Alfóðr'', a name for Odin), though the New Testament also refers to God as the ''one God and Father of all''. Tolkien, as a Catholic and with an interest in northern European mythologies, was probably influenced by both sources. As Tolkien was also professionally and personally interested in Finnish mythology, the name "Ilúvatar" may be also influenced by "Ilmatar", 'Maid of Air', one of the primal spirits of creation mentioned in the ''Kalevala''.
In earlier versions of the legendarium, the name Ilúvatar meant "Father for Always" (in ''The Book of Lost Tales'', published as the first two volumes of ''The History of Middle-earth''), then "Sky-father", but these etymologies were dropped in favour of the newer meaning in later revisions. Ilúvatar was also the only name of God used in earlier versions — the name Eru first appeared in "The Annals of Aman", published in ''Morgoth's Ring'', the tenth volume of ''The History of Middle-earth''.
Footnotes
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
