العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
EspañolINTEL CORE 2
The 'Core 2' brand refers to a range of Intel's consumer dual-core and quad-core (2x2) 64-bit x86 CPUs based on the Intel Core microarchitecture, which derived from the 32-bit dual-core Yonah laptop processor. (Note: ''The Yonah comprised two interconnected cores — from the Pentium M branded microprocessor — coupled as a single die silicon chip or IC''.) The 2x2 "quad-core" (dual-die dual-core[1]) comprised two separate dual-core dies next to each other in one CPU package. The Core 2 relegated the Pentium brand to a lower-end market, and reunified the laptop and desktop CPU lines separated by the ''Pentium M'' and Pentium 4 brands.
The 'Core 2' brand was introduced on July 27, 2006[2] comprising up to 2007[3] the 'Duo' (dual-core), 'Quad' (quad-core), and 'Extreme' (dual- or quad-core CPUs for enthusiasts) branches. The ''Core 2'' branded CPUs include: "Conroe" and "Allendale" (dual-core for higher- and lower-end desktops), "Merom" (dual-core for laptops), "Kentsfield" (quad-core for desktops), and their variants named "Penryn" (dual-core for laptops), "Wolfdale" (dual-core for desktops) and "Yorkfield" (quad-core for desktops). (Note: ''For the "Woodcrest", "Clovertown", and "Tigerton" CPUs for servers and workstations see the Xeon brand''[4].)
Unlike the preceding NetBurst architecture of the Pentium 4 or Pentium D branded CPUs, the Core architecture returned to lower clock speeds, and improved processor's usage of both available clock cycles and power. That translated into more efficient decoding stages, execution units, caches, and buses, etc, reducing the Core 2 CPU's power consumption, while enhancing their processing capacity. With a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of up to only 65 W, the Core 2 dual-core Conroe consumed only half the power of less capable, but also dual-core Pentium D branded desktop chips[5] with a TDP of up to 130 W[6] (a high TDP requires additional cooling that can be noisy or expensive).
Intel Core 2 processors feature the 64-bit x86-64 instruction set, Virtualization Technology (except T5500 or lower end E4x00), Execute Disable Bit, and SSE3. Core 2 also introduced SSSE3, Trusted Execution Technology, Enhanced SpeedStep, and Active Management Technology (iAMT2).
Typically for CPUs, the Core 2 Duo E4000/E6000, Core 2 Quad Q6600, Core 2 Extreme dual-core X6800, and quad-core QX6700 and QX6800 CPUs were affected by bugs, but apparently minor.[7]
Current processor cores
Core 2 Duo brand logo
Core 2 Quad brand logo
Core 2 Extreme brand logo
Conroe
The first Intel Core 2 Duo branded processor cores, code-named 'Conroe' (Intel product code 80557) were launched on July 27, 2006 at Fragapalooza, a yearly gaming event in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. These processors were fabricated on 300 mm wafers using a 65 nm manufacturing process, and intended for the desktops, as a replacement of the Pentium 4 and Pentium D branded CPUs. Intel has claimed that Conroe provides 40% more performance at 40% less power compared to the Pentium D. All Conroe processors are manufactured with 4 MB L2 cache; however, due to manufacturing defects or possibly for marketing purposes, the E6300 and E6400 versions based on this core have half their cache disabled, leaving them with only 2 MB of usable L2 cache.
The lower end E6300 (1.86 GHz) and E6400 (2.13 GHz), both with a 1066 MT/s FSB, were released on July 27, 2006. Traditionally, CPUs of the same family with less cache simply have the unavailable cache disabled, since this allows parts that fail quality control to be sold at a lower rating. As yields improve, they may be replaced with versions that only have the cache amount needed on the die, to bring down manufacturing cost. At launch time, Intel's prices for the Core 2 Duo E6300 and E6400 processors were US$183 and US$224 each in quantities of 1000. Conroe CPUs have improved capabilities over previous models with similar processor speeds. According to reviews, the larger 4 MB L2 cache vs. the smaller 2 MB L2 cache at the same frequency and FSB can provide a 0–9% performance gain with certain applications and 0–16% performance gain with certain games.[8][9]
The higher end Conroe processors are labeled as the E6600 and E6700 Core 2 Duo models, with the E6600 clocked at 2.4 GHz and the E6700 clocked at 2.67 GHz. The family has a 1066 MT/s front side bus, 4 MB shared L2 cache, and 65 watts TDP. These processors have been tested against AMD's current top performing processors (Athlon 64 FX Series), which were, until this latest Intel release, the fastest CPUs available. Conroe chips also experience much lower heat output compared to their predecessors — a benefit of the new 65 nm technology. At launch time, Intel's prices for the Core 2 Duo E6600 and E6700 processors were US$316 and US$530, respectively, each in quantities of 1000.
E6320 and E6420 Conroe CPUs at 1.86 and 2.13 GHz respectively were launched on April 22, 2007 featuring a full 4 MB of cache and are considered Conroes.
Intel released four additional Core 2 Duo Processors on July 22, 2007. The release coincided with that of the Intel Bearlake (x3x) chipsets. The new processors are named Core 2 Duo E6540, E6550, E6750, and E6850. Processors with a number ending in "50" have a 1333 MT/s FSB. The processors all have 4 MiB of L2 cache. Their clock frequency is similar to that of the already released processors with the same first two digits (E6600, E6700, X6800).[10] An additional model, the E6540, was launched with specifications similar to the E6550 but lacking Intel Trusted Execution Technology and vPro support. These processors are slated to compete with AMD's ''Stars'' processor line and are therefore priced below corresponding processors with a 1066 MT/s FSB. Intel Processor Price List
Conroe XE
The Core 2 Extreme was officially released on July 29, 2006. However some retailers appeared to have released it on July 13, 2006, though at a higher premium. The less powerful E6x00 models of Core 2 Duo were scheduled for simultaneous release with the X6800, which are both available at this time. It is powered by the 'Conroe XE' core and replaces the dual-core Pentium Extreme Edition processors. Core 2 Extreme has a clock speed of 2.93 GHz and a 1066 MT/s FSB, although it was initially expected to be released with a 3.33 GHz and 1333 MT/s. The TDP for this family is 75–80 watts. At full load the X6800 does not exceed 45 °C (113 °F), and with SpeedStep enabled the average temperature of the CPU when idle is essentially that of the ambient atmosphere.[11]
At launch time, Intel's price for the Core 2 Extreme X6800 was US$999 each in quantities of 1000. Like the desktop Core 2 Duo, it has 4 MiB of shared L2 cache available. This means that the only major difference between the regular Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme is the clock speed and unlocked multiplier, usual advantages of the "Extreme Edition." The unlocked upward multiplier is of use to enthusiasts which allow the user to set the clockspeed higher than shipping frequency without modifying the FSB unlike mainstream Core 2 Duo models which are downward unlocked only.
Allendale
There was contention as to whether the previously-available low-end Core 2 Duo desktop processors (E6300, at 1.86 GHz and E6400, at 2.13 GHz, both with 2 MiB L2 cache) are specimens of the 'Allendale' core. Prior to Q1 2007, all E6300 and E6400 processors released were ''Conroe'' (4 MiB L2 cache) cores with half their L2 cache disabled. The Allendale core, manufactured with 2 MiB L2 cache in total, offers a smaller die size and therefore greater yields.
Quoted from The Tech Report:
You'll find plenty of sources that will tell you the code name for these 2 MB Core 2 Duo processors is "Allendale," but Intel says otherwise. These CPUs are still code-named "Conroe," which makes sense since they're the same physical chips with half of their L2 cache disabled. Intel may well be cooking up a chip code-named Allendale with 2 MB of L2 cache natively, but this is not that chip.[12]
Another difference between the premium E6000 series (Conroe core) or (Allendale core) and the E4000 series (Allendale core) is the front side bus clock rating. The E4000 series are rated to run on a quad-pumped 200 MHz front side bus ("800 MT/s") while the E6000 series are rated to run on a quad-pumped 266 MHz front side bus ("1066 MT/s"). The E4000 series also lack support for Intel VT-x instructions.
The currently available Core 2 Duo E4300 only uses an ''Allendale'' core, released on January 21, 2007. The ''Allendale'' processors use a smaller mask with only 2 MiB of cache, thereby increasing the number of chips per wafer. ''Allendale'' processors are produced in the LGA775 form factor, on the 65 nm process node. It is unclear and a matter of contention whether the E6300 and E6400 models are still ''Conroe'' processors with half their L2 cache disabled or ''Allendale'' processors. It is possible that the E6300 and E6400 models can be both ''Allendale'' and ''Conroe'', differentiated by the L2 and B2 steppings respectively.
Initial list price per processor in quantities of one thousand for the E4300 was US$163. A standard OEM price was US$175, or US$189 for a retail package. Price cuts were enacted on April 22, 2007, when the E4400 was released at $133 and the E4300 dropped to $113. Allendale processors with half their L2 cache disabled were released in mid-June 2007 under the Pentium Dual-Core brand name.
On July 22, 2007, an E4500 Allendale was launched, phasing out the E4300 model. This was accompanied by a price cut for the E4400 model.
Merom
'Merom', the first mobile version of the Core 2, was officially released on July 27, 2006 but quietly began shipping to PC manufacturers in mid-July alongside Conroe.[13][14] Merom is Intel's premier line of mobile processors, with largely the same features as Conroe, but with more emphasis on low power consumption to enhance notebook battery life. Merom-based Core 2 Duo provides 20% more performance yet maintains the same battery life as the Yonah-based Core Duo. Merom is the first Intel mobile processor to feature Intel 64 architecture.
The first version of Merom is "drop-in" compatible with Napa platform for Core Duo, requiring at most a motherboard BIOS update. It has a similar thermal envelope of 34 W and the same 667 MT/s FSB rate.[15] Merom features 4 MiB L2 cache (T5xxx models have only 2 MiB L2 cache).
A second wave of Merom processors featuring an 800 MT/s FSB and using the new Socket P was launched on May 9, 2007.[16] These chips are part of Santa Rosa platform.[17] Low voltage versions were also released on May 9, 2007.
''Merom'' (מרום) is the Hebrew word for a higher plane of existence or a level of heaven, ''BaMerom'' (במרום) means "in the heavens". The name was chosen by the Intel team in Haifa, Israel, who designed this processor.
See the Merom section of "List of Intel Core 2 microprocessors" for a list of Merom processors.
Merom XE
The Core 2 Extreme Mobile processor, based on the 'Merom XE' core, is a laptop CPU designed for ultra-high end laptops. It was released in two models, the X7900 and the X7800. These feature an 800 MHz FSB. The X7800, introduced on July 16, 2007,[18] is clocked at 2.6 GHz and costs around $851 for OEMs. The processor features a 44 W TDP and requires the new Intel Centrino (Santa Rosa) platform. The X7900, introduced on August 22, 2007, is clocked at 2.8 GHz.
The X7900 processor is currently used in the top-end iMacs, released in August 2007.
Kentsfield
The 'Kentsfield' was the first Intel desktop quad core (dual-die dual-core[1]) CPU branded as Core 2 (and Xeon for lower-end servers and workstations) released on November 2, 2006. The top-of-the-line Kentsfields were Core 2 'Extreme' models numbered QX6xx0, while the mainstream ones branded Core 2 'Quad' were numbered Q6xx0. All of them featured two 4 MB L2 caches. The mainstream Core 2 Quad Q6600, clocked at 2.4 GHz, was launched on January 8, 2007 at US$851 (reduced to US$530 on April 7, 2007, and to US$266 on July 22, 2007). July 22, 2007 marked the release of the next Core 2: Quad Q6700 and Extreme QX6850 Kentsfields at US$530 and US$999 respectively, and also price reduction of Core 2: Quad Q6600 and Extreme QX6800 Kentsfields to US$266 and US$999 respectively.[20]
Kentsfield, like the Pentium D branded CPUs, comprised two separate silicon dies[21]. The same dual-core die with the Core architecture could be found alone in every Core 2's dual-core only CPU. Hence, the max. power consumption (TDP) of the Kensfield (QX6800 - 130 watts,[22] QX6700 - 130 W,[23] Q6600 - 95 W[24]) was a double of its similarly clocked Core 2 Duo counterpart. For example, the QX6700 consisted of two E6700 chips connected together by a 1066 MT/s FSB on one MCM, resulting in lower costs but less bandwidth to the northbridge. The Kentsfield was one socket processor sitting in a LGA775 socket, as well as Core 2 Duo (AMD Quad FX consisted of two dual-core processors in two separate sockets on one motherboard with a 2 x 125 W[25] = 250 W TDP).
The quad-core CPU, including the Kentsfield, processes very well with multi-threaded applications (typical for video editing, ray-tracing, or rendering), where its processing ability may approach double that of each of its halves. Each Kentsfield's half comprised an equally clocked dual-core CPU on a separate die. Both ''dies'' were in one package similarly to the Pentium D branded processors. A quad-core CPU (as a two-die set in particular), however, can rarely double the processing ability of each of its constituent halves (e.g. the Kentsfield rarely doubles the ability of the Conroe), due to a loss of performance resulting from connecting them (i.e. sharing the narrow memory bandwidth, and operating system overhead of handling twice as many cores and threads).
Single or dual-threaded applications alone, including many games, do not benefit from the second pair of cores of a quad-core CPU over an equally clocked dual-core CPU. For example, the quad-core Extreme QX6700 (Kentsfield) did not process those applications faster than the older dual-core Extreme X6800 (Conroe XE core), because its FSB's speed was the same, and it was clocked slightly slower. Nevertheless, a simultaneous running of several processor-intensive single/dual-threaded applications on the quad-core CPU is generally much faster then on equally clocked dual-core CPU. The quad-core CPU is useful also to run both the client and server processes of a game without noticeable lag in either thread, as each instance (up to four) could be running on a different core. Furthermore, ''multi-threaded'' games (see Crysis and Gears of War) benefit from the ''quad-core CPUs''[26], because - as Cervat Yerli of Crytek said - ''four cores will make for better frame rates and gameplay as audio, physics and AI as well as other things are all offloaded to separate cores''.
Kentsfield XE
The first ''Kentsfield'', named Core 2 Extreme QX6700 (product code 80562) and clocked at 2.67 GHz, was released on November 2, 2006 at US$999.[27][28][29][30][31] January 4, 2008 marks its discontinuation.[32] It was the first x86 quad-core processor ever, featured the 'Kentsfield XE' core, and complemented the Core 2 Extreme X6800 dual-core processor based on the Conroe XE core. The CPUs with the ''Kentsfield XE'' core had the highest and unlocked multipliers like their Extreme predecessors.
The Core 2 Extreme QX6800 clocked at 2.93 GHz — a new top ''Kentsfield XE'' — was released on April 8, 2007 at an exceptional US$1,199. It had a 130 W TDP thermal envelope, and was intended for high end OEM-only systems.[22]
The Core 2 Extreme QX6850 clocked at 3.0 GHz was launched on July 22, 2007 at US$999 — a typical price for an Intel top CPU (branded Extreme). It featured a faster 1.33 GHz FSB. Simultaneously, the formerly available Extreme QX6700 was relaunched at a US$530 as the Core 2 Quad Q6700 clocked at 2.66 GHz, but consuming less power than the Extreme QX6700. Also, the price for the 2.4 GHz Quad Q6600 was dropped to a US$266.
Future processors
Penryn
The successor to the Merom core currently used for the Core 2 Duo T5000/T7000 series mobile processors, code-named 'Penryn', will debut on the 45 nanometer process which will also be used for the Conroe sequel, Wolfdale (see below). Many details about Penryn appeared at the April 2007 Intel Developer Forum. Its successor is expected to be Nehalem.
Important advances[34] include the addition of new instructions (including SSE4, also known as Penryn New Instructions) and new fabrication materials (most significantly a hafnium-based dielectric).
Penryn is intended to be paired with a new chipset, Bearlake,[35] which will include an increase in bus speed (connection to the northbridge, etc.) for certain models to 1333 MT/s and will include support for DDR3 SDRAM; Intel believes[36] that DDR3 is particularly useful in the power- and heat-constrained environments within mobile equipment.
Penryn will also be released in a quad-core version for desktop replacement notebooks.
Wolfdale and Yorkfield
'Wolfdale' will be the desktop version of Penryn, with two cores sharing 6 MiB of L2 cache and 1333 MHz FSB. 'Yorkfield' will be the 45 nm successor to the Kentsfield processor, and will use a design similar to that of its predecessor: two chips in one package with two sets of shared L2 cache.[37] The lowest clocked model will have a total of 6 MB L2 cache, while all other models will have a total of 12 MB L2 cache. This chip will also have a 1333 MHz FSB. These processors are expected to become available in late 2007 or early 2008, and the platform will support DDR3. At the Intel Developer Forum 2007 a Yorkfield processor was compared with a Kentsfield processor.[38][39]
Successors
Even further, the latest known codenames for future processors (perhaps based on a new post-Core microarchitecture) are Nehalem and Sandy Bridge (formerly known as Gesher), and little is known about either of them. Nehalem will be a 45 nm process debuting in 2008, followed by a 32 nm shrink codenamed Westmere (Nehalem-C), and Sandy Bridge will be 32 nm with a new microarchitecture debuting in 2010, provided that Intel stays on target with its roadmap.[40] In 2011, Intel will launch its first processor based on a 22 nm process. Based on Intel's cycle alternating new architectures and die shrinks every two years, it is currently assumed that this will be a shrink of Sandy Bridge.[41]
System requirements
Motherboard compatibility
Conroe, Conroe XE and Allendale all use Socket LGA775; however, not every motherboard is compatible with these processors.
Supporting chipsets are:
★ Intel: 865PE/G/GV/G, 945P/PL/G/GZ/GC, P65P/G, 975X, P/G/Q965, Q963, 946GZ/PL; X3x, P3x, G3x, Q3x
★ NVIDIA: nForce4 Ultra/SLI X16 for Intel, nForce 570/590 SLI for Intel and nForce 650i Ultra/650i SLI/680i LT SLI/680i SLI.
★ VIA: P4M800, P4M800PRO, P4M890, P4M900, PT880 Pro/Ultra, PT890.
★ SiS: 662, 671, 671fx, 672, 672fx
★ ATI: Radeon Xpress 200 and CrossFire Xpress 3200 for Intel
: ''See also: List of Intel chipsets''
Although a motherboard may have the required chipset to support Conroe, some motherboards based on the above mentioned chipsets do not support Conroe. This is because all Conroe-based processors require a new power delivery feature set specified in Voltage Regulator-Down (VRD) 11.0. This requirement is a result of Conroe's significantly lower power consumption, compared to the Pentium 4/D CPUs it is replacing. A motherboard that has both a supporting chipset and VRD 11 supports Conroe processors, but even then some boards will need an updated BIOS to recognize Conroe's FID (Frequency ID) and VID (Voltage ID).
DDR2 memory modules
Unlike the previous Pentium 4 and Pentium D design, the Core 2 technology sees a greater benefit from memory running synchronously with the Front Side Bus (FSB). This means that for the Conroe CPUs with FSB of 1066 MT/s, the ideal memory speed is PC2-8500. While expensive DDR2 memory models with tighter timings do improve performance, the difference in real world games and applications is negligible.[42]
Optimally, the memory bandwidth afforded should match the bandwidth of the FSB closely. The AGTL+ PSB used by all NetBurst processors as well as current and medium-term (pre-QuickPath) Core 2 processors provide a 64-bit data path. Current chipsets provide for two DDR or two DDR2 channels.
| Processor Model | DDR or DDR2 rating | Memory channels | Bandwidth |
|---|---|---|---|
| T5200 | PC2-4200 (DDR2-533) | Single channel | 4.267 GB/s |
| T5''n''00 and T7''n''00 | PC2-5300 (DDR2-667) | Single channel | 5.333 GB/s |
| Socket P T7''n''00 | PC2-3200 (DDR2-400) | Dual channel | 6.400 GB/s |
| PC2-6400 (DDR2-800) | Single channel | 6.400 GB/s | |
| E4''n''00/Pentium E21''n''0/Celeron 4''n''0 | PC3200 (DDR400) or PC2-3200 (DDR2-400) | Dual channel | 6.400 GB/s |
| PC2-6400 (DDR2-800) | Single channel and dual channel | 6.400 GB/s | |
| E6''n''00, E6''n''20, X6''n''00, Q6''n''00 and QX6''n''00 | PC2-4200 (DDR2-533) | Dual channel | 8.533 GB/s |
| PC3-8500 (DDR3-1066) | Single channel | 8.533 GB/s | |
| E6''n''50 | PC2-5300 (DDR2-667) | Dual channel | 10.667 GB/s |
| PC3-10600 (DDR3-1333) | Single channel | 10.667 GB/s |
On jobs requiring large amounts of memory access, the quad-core Core 2 processors can benefit significantly[43] from using a PC2-8500 memory, which runs exactly twice as fast as the FSB; this is not an officially supported configuration, but a number of motherboards offer it.
The Core 2 processor does not require the use of DDR2. While the Intel 975X and P965 chipsets require this memory, some motherboards and chipsets support both the Core 2 and DDR memory. When using DDR memory, performance may be reduced because of the lower available memory bandwidth.
Chip bugs
The Core 2 Memory management unit (MMU) does not operate as previously specified or implemented in previous generations of x86 hardware. This may cause problems, many of them serious security and stability issues, with existing operating system software. Intel's documentation states that their programming manuals will be updated "in the coming months" with information on recommended methods of managing the Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) for Core 2 to avoid issues, and admits that, "in rare instances, improper TLB invalidation may result in unpredictable system behavior, such as hangs or incorrect data."[44]
Among the issues noted:
★ Write-protect or non-execute bit for a page table entry is ignored.
★ Floating point instruction non-coherencies.
★ Allowed memory corruptions outside of the range of permitted writing for a process by running common instruction sequences.
Intel errata AI65, AI79, AI43, AI39, AI90, AI99 are said to be particularly serious.
Among those who have noted the errata to be particularly serious are OpenBSD's Theo de Raadt[1] and DragonFly BSD's Matthew Dillon[2]. Taking a contrasting view was Linus Torvalds, calling the issue "totally insignificant", adding, "The biggest problem is that Intel should just have documented the TLB behavior better."[3]
Pricing
The pricing for various models of Core 2, in lots of 1000 to OEMs, at the time the processors were released, can be found in the list of Intel Core 2 microprocessors. It should be noted that these prices are what it costs system builders such as Dell and HP to stock Core 2 processors. There are no set MSRPs for Core 2 CPUs in the retail channel — prices at retailers are usually very close to the aforementioned prices, but are dependent on what the supplier is charging to stock these CPUs as well as supply and demand.
Nomenclature and abbreviations
With the release of the new Core 2 processor, the abbreviation 'C2' has come into common use, as well variants 'C2D' (the present Core 2 Duo), and 'C2Q', 'C2E' to refer to the Core 2 Quad and Core 2 Extreme processors respectively. 'C2QX' stands for the Extreme-Editions of the Quad (QX6700 or QX6800).
See also
★ List of Intel Core 2 microprocessors
★ List of future Intel Core 2 microprocessors
★ Intel Core
References
1. Intel Clovertowns step up, reduce power
2. Intel Unveils World's Best Processor
3. Intel to unify product naming scheme
4. Intel Unleashes New Server Processors That Deliver World-Class Performance And Power Efficiency
5. The 65 nm Pentium D 900's Coming Out Party: Test Setup
6. The 65 nm Pentium D 900's Coming Out Party: Thermal Design Power Overview
7. Analysis: How serious are the bugs in Intel's Core 2 Duo?
8. Core 2 Duo: 2 or 4 MB cache?
9. Intel's Core 2 Duo processors
10. "Conroe" Refresh Details Unveiled
11. Game
12.
Cool and Cheap Screamers from Intel and AMD
13. Intel's Core 2 Duo chips arrive early
14. Intel second quarter 2006 earnings release; see page 3
15. Spring IDF 2006: Merom and Ultra Mobile PCs
16. Intel Forecasts "Santa Rosa" for May 2007.
17. Intel 2006 Mobile CPU Roadmap Update
18. Intel Takes Popular Laptops to 'Extreme' with First-Ever Extreme Edition Mobile Processor; Adds New Desktop Chip
19. Intel Clovertowns step up, reduce power
20. Intel Q3's Prices Revealed: 70% off to Intel C2Q Q6600
21. Intel Kentsfield Preview
22. Overindulge Yourself with QX6800: Not Your Plain Vanilla System!
23. Intel quad-core QX6700 reaches system builders
24. Intel pushes Q6600 quad-core CPU into 95 watt systems
25. AMD's Quad FX platform: AMD decides to socket to 'em
26. Crysis - Confirmed Runs Best on Quad Core and 64 Bit OS
27. Intel's Core 2 Extreme QX6700: The Multi-core Era Begins
28. Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700
29. "Kentsfield" to Debut at 2.66 GHz
30. The Quad Squad
31. Intel "Kentsfield" Named Core 2 Quad
32. Intel already phasing out first quad-core CPU
33. Overindulge Yourself with QX6800: Not Your Plain Vanilla System!
34. Report on Penryn Series Improvements.
35. Intel to ship 'Bearlake' chipsets as 3x series?
36. DDR3 advances make it a "must have" for Mobile Memory
37. Second-Generation Quad-Core Chip from Intel to Come in Q3 2007.
38. IDF kickoff: Going after AMD, and beyond
39. Intel won't launch 45 nm desktop CPUs until 2008?
40. Intel Life After "Conroe"
41. Life With "Penryn"
42. Intel Core 2: Is high speed memory worth its price?
43. Benchmarks of four Prime95 processes on a quad-core
44. Intel® CoreTM2 Extreme Processor X6800 and Intel® CoreTM2 Duo Desktop Processor E6000 and E4000 Sequence, page 58 Intel.com 070704
External links
★ Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor Numbers
★ Intel Penryn Architecture and Performance Preview
★ Intel Centrino Duo Mobile Technology papers
★ Basic Guide to Over Clock Intel Core 2 Duo
News reports on the Core 2 product launch
★ Intel Core Microarchitecture
★ Intel's press release announcing Core 2
★ Intel's Core 2 page
★ Announcing Intel Core 2 Duo
★ The second coming of Intel's Core Duo
★ Intel to launch nine 45nm CPUs in November
Reviews
★ Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 quad-core CPU review
★ Core 2 Extreme (Kentsfield) Quad Core CPU Review
★ Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 Quad Core - Launch Review
★ Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 - Product Review
★ Review of E6700 model with info for Linux and BSD users
★ Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 Quad Core
★ Core 2 Duo & Core 2 Extreme
★ Intel's Core 2 Duo processors
★ Core 2 Duo: A Changing of the Guards
★ Contemporary Dual-Core Desktop Processors Shootout
★ Core 2 Duo & Extreme Processors Performance Analysis
★ Intel Core 2 Performance, Overclocking, Power Usage
★ Core 2 Gaming Performance
★ Intel's Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme processors
★ Intel's Core 2 Extreme & Core 2 Duo: The Empire Strikes Back
★ Intel Conroe Core 2 Duo/Extreme Processors
★ Game Over? Core 2 Duo Knocks Out Athlon 64
★ Intel Core 2 Duo - Test
★ Intel Core 2 Duo- Which Offers the Best Bang for the Buck?
★ Intel's Core 2 Quadro Kentsfield: Four Cores on a Rampage
★ Core 2 Quad Q6600 Review
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
