INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS

The 'International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights' is a United Nations treaty based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, created in 1966 and entered into force on 23 March 1976.
Because the Universal Declaration of Human Rights contained both first-generation civil and political rights and second-generation economic, social, and cultural rights, it could not garner the international consensus necessary to become a binding treaty.
Particularly, a divide developed between capitalist nations such as the USA, which favored civil and political rights, and communist nations which favored economic, social and cultural rights.
To solve this problem, two binding Covenants were created instead of one:
the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights is monitored by the Human Rights Committee, a group of 18 experts who meet three times a year to consider periodic reports submitted by member States on their compliance with the treaty. Members of the Human Rights Committee are elected by member states, but do not represent any State. The Covenant contains two Optional Protocols. The first optional protocol creates an individual complaints mechanism whereby individuals in member States can submit complaints, known as communications, to be reviewed by the Human Rights Committee.
Its rulings under the first optional protocol have created the most complex jurisprudence in the UN international human rights law system.
The second optional protocol abolishes the death penalty.

Contents

National implementation and effects

New Zealand

United States

Non-states parties

Notes

External links

National implementation and effects

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights currently has 160 States Parties and a further 5 signatories (pending ratification).
A country-by-country list of declarations and reservations made upon ratification, accession or succession can be seen at http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/treaty5_asp.htm.

New Zealand

New Zealand's Parliament implemented the ICCPR in domestic law by passing the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act in 1990.

United States

The United States Senate ratified the ICCPR in 1992, with a number of reservations, understandings, and declarations. In particular, the Senate declared that "the provisions of Article 1 through 27 of the Covenant are not self-executing." 138 Cong. Rec. S4781-84 (1992). The Senate stated that the declaration was meant to "clarify that the Covenant will not create a private cause of action in U.S. Courts." S. Exec. Rep., No. 102-23, at 15 (1992). Where a treaty or covenant is not self-executing, and where Congress has not acted to implement the agreement with legislation, no private right of action is created by ratification. ''Sei Fujii v. State'' 38 Cal.2d 718, 242 P.2d 617 (1952); also see ''Buell v. Mitchell'' 274 F.3d 337 (6th Cir., 2001) (discussing ICCPR's relationship to death penalty cases, citing to other ICCPR cases). Thus while the ICCPR is binding upon the United States as a matter of international law, it does not form part of the domestic law of the nation.

Non-states parties

The majority of states in the world are states parties to the ICCPR. The following states are not states parties as of July 2007:
#Antigua and Barbuda
#Bahamas
#Bhutan
#Brunei
#China^[1]
#Comoros
#Cuba
#Fiji
#Guinea-Bissau^[2]
#Kiribati
#Laos^[3]
#Malaysia
#Marshall Islands
#Micronesia
#Myanmar (Burma)
#Nauru^[4]
#Oman
#Pakistan
#Palau
#Papua New Guinea
#Qatar
#Saint Kitts and Nevis
#Saint Lucia
#Samoa
#São Tomé and Príncipe^[5]
#Saudi Arabia
#Singapore
#Solomon Islands
#Tonga
#United Arab Emirates
#Vanuatu
#Vatican City

Notes

1. Signed on 1998-10-05.
2. Signed on 2000-09-12.
3. Signed on 2000-12-07.
4. Signed on 2001-11-12.
5. Signed on 1995-10-31.

External links

★ Full text of the Covenant

★ Member States with dates of ratification, accession, and succession

★ US Ratification of the ICCPR and its Domestic Implications by William A. Courson

★ article 2 Bimonthly publication highlighting article 2 of the ICCPR