
A fanciful representation of Flavius Josephus, in an engraving in
William Whiston's translation of his works
'Josephus' (
37 – sometime after
100 CE),
[1] who became known, in his capacity as a
Roman citizen, as 'Titus Flavius Josephus',
[2] was a
1st-century Jewish historian and apologist of priestly and royal ancestry who survived and recorded the
Destruction of Jerusalem in
70. His works give an important insight into first-century
Judaism.
Life
Josephus, who introduced himself in
Greek as "Iosepos (Ιώσηπος), son of Matthias, an ethnic
Hebrew, a priest from
Jerusalem",
[3] fought the Romans in the
First Jewish-Roman War of
66-
73 as a Jewish military leader in
Galilee. After the Jewish garrison of
Yodfat was taken under siege, the Romans invaded, killed thousands, and the remaining survivors who had managed to elude the forces committed suicide. However, in circumstances that are somewhat unclear, Josephus and one of his soldiers surrendered to the Roman forces invading Galilee in July
67. He became a prisoner and provided the Romans with intelligence on the ongoing revolt. The Roman forces were led by Flavius
Vespasian and his son
Titus, both subsequently
Roman emperors. In
69, Josephus was released (cf. ''War'' IV.622-629) and according to Josephus's own account, he appears to have played some role as a negotiator with the defenders in the
Siege of Jerusalem in
70.
In
71, he arrived in Rome in the entourage of Titus, becoming a Roman citizen and
Flavian dynasty client (hence he is often referred to as Flavius Josephus - see below). In addition to Roman citizenship he was granted accommodation in conquered
Judea, and a decent, if not extravagant, pension. It was while in Rome, and under Flavian patronage, that Josephus wrote all of his known works.
Although he only ever calls himself "Josephus", he appears to have taken the Roman
nomen Flavius and
praenomen Titus from his patrons.
[4] This was standard for new citizens.
Josephus's first wife perished together with his parents in Jerusalem during the siege and
Vespasian arranged for him to marry a Jewish woman who had been captured by the Romans. This woman left Josephus, and around
70, he married a Jewish woman from
Alexandria by whom he had three male children. Only one, Flavius Hyrcanus, survived childhood. Josephus later divorced his third wife and around
75, married his fourth wife, a Jewish girl from Crete, from a distinguished family. This last marriage produced two sons, Flavius Justus and Simonides Agrippa.
Josephus's life is beset with ambiguity. For his critics, he never satisfactorily explained his actions during the Jewish war — why he failed to commit suicide in Galilee in 67 with some of his compatriots, and why, after his capture, he cooperated with the Roman invaders. Historian
E. Mary Smallwood wrote:
(Josephus) was conceited, not only about his own learning but also about the opinions held of him as commander both by the Galileans and by the Romans; he was guilty of shocking duplicity at Jotapata, saving himself by sacrifice of his companions; he was too naive to see how he stood condemned out of his own mouth for his conduct, and yet no words were too harsh when he was blackening his opponents; and after landing, however involuntarily, in the Roman camp, he turned his captivity to his own advantage, and benefitted for the rest of his days from his change of side.[5]
However, his critics ignore the fact that
Simon Bar Giora and
John of Giscala, both extreme zealots and great opponents of Josephus, who stayed in Jerusalem and led the war against Rome in its final stage, in a moment of truth, preferred life over suicide and humbly surrendered to the Romans. At any rate, those who have viewed Josephus as a traitor and informer have questioned his credibility as a historian — dismissing his works as Roman propaganda or as a personal
apologetic, aimed at rehabilitating his reputation in history. More recently, commentators have reassessed previously-held views of Josephus. As
P.J. O'Rourke quipped,
Reason dictates we should hate this man. But it's hard to get angry at Josephus. What, after all, did he do? A few soldiers were tricked into suicide. Some demoralizing claptrap was shouted at a beleaguered army. A wife was distressed... all of which pale by comparison to what the good men did. For it was the loyal, the idealistic and the brave who did the real damage. The devout and patriotic leaders of Jerusalem sacrificed tens of thousands of lives to the cause of freedom. Vespasian and Titus sacrificed tens of thousands of more to the cause of civil order. Even Agrippa II, the Roman client king of Judea who did all he could to prevent the war, ended by supervising the destruction of half a dozen of his cities and the sale of their inhabitants into slavery. How much better for everyone if all the principal figures of the region had been slithering filth like Josephus.[6]
Josephus was unquestionably an important apologist in the Roman world for the Jewish people and culture, particularly at a time of conflict and tension. He always remained, in his own eyes, a loyal and law-observant Jew. He went out of his way both to commend Judaism to educated
gentiles, and to insist on its compatibility with cultured
Graeco-Roman thought. He constantly contended for the antiquity of
Jewish culture, presenting its people as civilised, devout and philosophical.
Eusebius reports that a statue of Josephus was erected in Rome.
[7]
Significance to scholarship
The works of Josephus provide crucial information about the First Jewish-Roman War. They are also important literary source material for understanding the context of the
Dead Sea Scrolls and post-
Second Temple Judaism. Josephan scholarship in the
19th and early
20th century became focused on Josephus' relationship to the sect of the
Pharisees. He was consistently portrayed as a member of the sect, but nevertheless viewed as a villainous traitor to his own nation - a view which became known as the classical concept of Josephus. In the mid 20th century, this view was challenged by a new generation of scholars who formulated the modern concept of Josephus, still considering him a Pharisee but restoring his reputation in part as patriot and a historian of some standing. Recent scholarship since 1990 has sought to move scholarly perceptions forward by demonstrating that Josephus was not a Pharisee but an orthodox Aristocrat-Priest who became part of the Temple establishment as a matter of deference and not willing association (Cf. Steve Mason, Todd Beall, and Ernst Gerlach).
Josephus offers information about individuals, groups, customs and geographical places. His writings provide a significant, extra-biblical account of the post-exilic period of the
Maccabees, the
Hasmonean dynasty and the rise of
Herod the Great. He makes references to the
Sadducees, Jewish
High Priests of the time, Pharisees and
Essenes, the
Herodian Temple,
Quirinius' census and the
Zealots, and to such figures as
Pontius Pilate,
Herod the Great,
Agrippa I and
Agrippa II,
John the Baptist,
James the brother of Jesus, and a
disputed reference to
Jesus. He is an important source for studies of immediate post-Temple Judaism (and, thus, the context of
early Christianity).
A careful reading of Josephus' writings allowed
Ehud Netzer, an archaeologist from Hebrew University, to confirm the location of Herod's Tomb after a fruitless search of 35 years - on top of tunnels and water pools at a flattened desert site, halfway up the hill to the
Herodium, 12 kilometers south of Jerusalem - exactly where it should be according to Josephus writings.
For many years, the works of Josephus were printed only in an imperfect Latin translation from the original Greek. It was only in 1544 that a version of the Greek text was made available, edited by the Dutch humanist
Arnoldus Arlenius. This edition formed the basis of the 1732 English translation by
William Whiston which was enormously popular in the English speaking world and which is currently available online for free download by
Project Gutenberg. Later editions of the Greek text include that of
Benedikt Niese, who made a detailed examination of all the available manuscripts, mainly from France and Spain. This was the version used by H. St J. Thackeray for the
Loeb Classical Library edition widely used today.
Works
List of works
★ (c.
75) ''
War of the Jews'', or ''
Jewish War'', or ''
Jewish Wars'', or ''
History of the Jewish War'' (commonly abbreviated ''JW'', ''BJ'' or ''War'')
★ (date unknown) ''
Josephus's Discourse to the Greeks concerning Hades'' (spurious; adaptation of "Against Plato, on the Cause of the Universe" by
Hippolytus of Rome)
★ (c.
94) ''
Antiquities of the Jews'', or ''
Jewish Antiquities'', or ''Antiquities of the Jews/Jewish Archeology'' (frequently abbreviated ''AJ'', ''
AotJ'' or ''Ant.'' or ''Antiq.'')
★ (c.
97) ''
Flavius Josephus Against Apion'', or ''
Against Apion'', or ''
Contra Apionem'', or ''
Against the Greeks, on the antiquity of the Jewish people'' (usually abbreviated ''CA'')
★ (c.
99) ''
The Life of Flavius Josephus'', or ''
Autobiography of Flavius Josephus'' (abbreviated ''Life'' or ''Vita'')
''The Jewish War''
Main articles: The Wars of the Jews
His first work in Rome was an account of the Jewish War, addressed to certain "upper barbarians" – usually thought to be the Jewish community in
Mesopotamia – in his "paternal tongue" (''War'' I.3), arguably the Western
Aramaic language. He then wrote a seven-volume account in
Greek known to us as the ''
Jewish War'' (
Latin ''Bellum Iudaicum''). It starts with the period of the
Maccabees and concludes with accounts of the fall of
Jerusalem, the Roman victory celebrations in Rome, the mopping-up operations, Roman military operations elsewhere in the Empire and the uprising in
Cyrene. Together with the account in his ''Life'' of some of the same events, it also provides the reader with an overview of Josephus' own part in the events since his return to Jerusalem from a brief visit to Rome in the early
60s (''Life'' 13-17).
Rome cannot have been an easy place for a Jew in the wake of the suppression of the Jewish revolt. Josephus would have witnessed the marches of Titus' triumphant legions leading their Jewish captives, and carrying trophies of despoiled treasure from the
Temple in Jerusalem. He would have experienced the popular presentation of the Jews as a bellicose and misanthropic people.
It was against this background that Josephus wrote his ''War'', and although often dismissed as pro-Roman propaganda (perhaps hardly surprising given where his patronage was coming from), he claims to be writing to counter anti-Judean accounts. He disputes the claim that the Jews serve a defeated god and are naturally hostile to Roman civilization. Rather, he blames the Jewish War on what he calls "unrepresentative and
over-zealous fanatics" among the Jews, who led the masses away from their natural aristocratic leaders (like him), with disastrous results. He also blames some of the governors of Judea, but these he presents as atypical Romans: corrupt and incompetent administrators. Thus, according to Josephus, the traditional Jew was, should be, and can be, a loyal and peace-loving citizen. Jews can, and historically have, accepted Rome's hegemony precisely because of their faith that God himself gives empires their power.
''Jewish Antiquities''
The next literary work by Josephus is his twenty-one volume ''
Antiquities of the Jews'', completed in the last year of the emperor Flavius
Domitian (between 1.9.
93 and 14.3.94, cf. AJ X.267). He claims that interested persons have pressed him to give a fuller account of the Jewish culture and constitution. Here, in expounding Jewish history, law and custom, he is entering into many philosophical debates current in Rome at that time. Again he offers an ''apologia'' for the antiquity and universal significance of the Jewish people.
Beginning with the story of
Creation, he outlines Jewish history.
Abraham taught
science to the
Egyptians, who in turn taught the
Greeks.
Moses set up a senatorial priestly aristocracy, which like that of Rome resisted monarchy. The great figures of the
biblical stories are presented as ideal philosopher-leaders. There is again an autobiographical appendix defending Josephus' own conduct at the end of the war when he cooperated with the Roman forces.
''Against Apion''
Josephus' ''
Against Apion'' is a final two-volume defence of Judaism as
classical religion and
philosophy, stressing its antiquity against what Josephus claimed was the relatively more recent traditions of the Greeks. Some anti-Judean allegations ascribed by Josephus to the Greek writer
Apion, and myths accredited to
Manetho are also exposed.
Literature about Josephus
★ ''The Josephus Trilogy'', a novel by
Lion Feuchtwanger
★
★ ''Der jüdische Krieg'' (''Josephus''), 1932
★
★ ''Die Söhne'' (''The Jews of Rome''), 1935
★
★ ''Der Tag wird kommen'' (''The day will come'', ''Josephus and the Emperor''), 1942
★ '' Flavius Josephus Eyewitness to Rome's first-century conquest of Judea'', Mireille Hadas-lebel , Macmillan 1993, Simon and Schuster 2001
★ ''The 2000 Year Old Middle East Policy Expert'', Give War A Chance,
P J O'Rourke[8]
See also
★
Josephus on Jesus
★
Josippon
★
Josephus problem - a mathematical problem named after Josephus.
References
★ ''The Works of Josephus, Complete and Unabridged New Updated Edition'' Translated by William Whiston, A.M., Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, Inc., 1987. ISBN 0-913573-86-8 (Hardcover). ISBN 1-56563-167-6 (Paperback).
★ O'Rourke, P.J. ''Give War a Chance.'' Vintage, 1993.
★ Per Bilde. ''Flavius Josephus between Jerusalem and Rome: his Life, his Works and their Importance''. Sheffield, 1998.
★ Shaye J.D. Cohen. "Josephus in Galilee and Rome. His Vita and development as a historian." ''Columbia Studies in the Classical tradition'' 8 (1979 Leiden).
★ Louis Feldman. "Flavius Josephus revisited. The man, his writings, and his significance." ''Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt'' 21.2 (1984).
Footnotes
1. Flavius Josephus, Louis H. Feldman, Steve Mason, , , Brill Academic Publishers, 1999,
2. Josephus refers to himself in his Greek works as ''Jōsēpos Matthiou pais'' (Josephus the son of Matthais). Although Josephus also spoke Aramaic and most probably also Hebrew, no extant sources record his name in these languages. However, his Hebrew/Aramaic name has gone down in Jewish history as 'יוסף בן מתתיהו' ('Yosef ben Matityahu') and thus he is commonly known in Israel today.
3. Jewish War'' I.3
4. Attested by the third century Church theologian Origen (''Comm. Matt.'' 10.17).
5. Josephus, Flavius, ''The Jewish War'', tr. G.A. Williamson, introduction by E. Mary Smallwood. New York, Penguin, 1981, p. 24
6. O'Rourke 104.
7. ''Hist. eccl.'' 3.9.2
8. O'Rourke, P.J. ''Give War a Chance.'' Vintage, 1993.
External links
★
Resources > Second Temple and Talmudic Era > Flavius Josephus The Jewish History Resource Center - Project of the Dinur Center for Research in Jewish History, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
★
The Works of Flavius Josephus Translated by William Whiston
★
★
Flavius Josephus, Judaea and Rome: A Question of Context
★
Scholarship on Josephus at York University
★
Flavius Josephus at livius.org
★
Josephus Flavius at Jewish Virtual Library
★
Josephus at Early Jewish Writings
★
The Flavius Josephus Home Page at Josephus.org