LASER SAFETY

A laser is a light source that can be dangerous to the people exposed to it. Even low power lasers can be hazardous to eyesight. A person exposed to laser radiation (especially invisible radiation) may be unaware that damage is occurring. Some lasers are so powerful that even the diffuse reflection from a surface can be hazardous to the eye. Laser radiation predominantly causes eye injury via thermal effects on the retina. A transient increase of only 10 °C can destroy retinal photoreceptors.

The coherence, the low divergence angle of laser light and the focusing mechanism of the eye means that laser light can be concentrated into an extremely small spot on the retina. If the laser is sufficiently powerful, permanent damage can occur within a fraction of a second, faster than the blink of an eye. Sufficiently powerful visible to near infrared laser radiation (400-1400 nm) will penetrate the eyeball and may cause heating of the retina, whereas exposure to laser radiation with wavelengths less than 400 nm and greater than 1400 nm are largely absorbed by the cornea and lens, leading to the development of cataracts or burn injuries.^[1]
Infrared and ultraviolet lasers are particularly hazardous, since the body's protective "blink reflex" response only operates if the light is visible. For example, some people exposed to high power Nd:YAG laser emitting invisible 1064 nm radiation, may not feel pain or notice immediate damage to their eye sight. A pop or click noise emanating from the eyeball may be the only indication that retinal damage has occurred i.e. the retina was heated to over 100 °C resulting in localized explosive boiling accompanied by the immediate creation of a permanent blind spot.^[2]
Since 1990 there have been 400 incidences of lasers directed at aircraft within the United States, laser/aviation safety concerns have led to an inquiry at the US congress.^[3] Exposure to hand held laser light under such circumstances may seem trivial given the brevity of exposure, the large distances involved and beam spread of up to several metres. However, laser exposure may pose a dangerous distraction such as flash blindness. If this occurs during a critical moment in aircraft operation the aircraft may be endangered. In addition, some 18 to 35% of the population possess the autosomal dominant genetic trait Photic Sneeze,^[4] that causes the affected individual to experience an involuntary sneezing fit when exposed to a sudden flash of light. Some observers believe that the danger is greatly exaggerated, at least for small hand held lasers.^[5]

Contents

Maximum permissible exposure

Classification

Revised system

class 1

class 1M

class 2

class 2M

class 3R

class 3B

class 4

Old system

class I

class II

class IIa

class IIIa

class IIIb

class IV

Protective eyewear

Regulations

Guidelines

Laser pointers

Non-beam hazards – electrical and other

See also

External links

References

Maximum permissible exposure

The ''maximum permissible exposure'' (MPE) is the highest power or energy density (in J/cm² or W/cm²) of a light source that is considered safe, i.e. that has a negligible probability for creating a damage. Typically it is set at 10% of the dose that has a 50% chance of creating damage^[6]
under worst-case conditions. The MPE is measured at the cornea of the human eye or at the skin, for a given wavelength and exposure time.
A calculation of the MPE takes into account the various ways laser light can act upon the eye. For example, deep-ultraviolet light causes accumulating damage, even at very low powers. Infrared light with a wavelength longer than about 1400 nm is absorbed by the transparent parts of the eye before it reaches the retina, which means that the MPE for these wavelengths is higher than for visible light. In addition to the wavelength and exposure time, the MPE takes into account the spatial distribution of the light (from a laser or otherwise). Collimated laser beams are especially dangerous at relatively low powers because the eye lens focuses the light onto a tiny spot on the retina. Light sources with a smaller degree of spatial coherence than a well-collimated laser beam lead to a distribution of the light over a larger area on the retina. For such sources, the MPE is higher than for collimated laser beams. In the MPE calculation, the worst-case scenario is assumed in which the eye lens focuses the light into the smallest possible spot size on the retina for the particular wavelength and the pupil is fully open. Although the MPE is specified as power or energy per unit surface, it is based the power or energy that can pass through a fully open pupil (0.39 cm²) for visible and near-infrared wavelengths. This is relevant for laser beams that have a cross-section smaller than 0.39 cm². The IEC-60825-1 standard specifies how the MPE can be calculated.^[7]

Classification

Lasers have been classified by wavelength and maximum output power into four classes and a few subclasses since the early 1970s. The classifications categorize lasers according to their ability to produce damage in exposed people, from class 1 (no hazard during normal use) to class 4 (severe hazard for eyes and skin). There are two classification systems, the "old system" used before 2002, and the "revised system" being phased in since 2002. The latter reflects the greater knowledge of lasers that has been accumulated since the original classification system was devised, and permits certain types of lasers to be recognized as having a lower hazard than was implied by their placement in the original classification system. The revised system is part of the revised IEC 60825 standard. From 2007, the revised system is also incorporated into the US-oriented ANSI Laser Safety Standard (ANSI Z136.1). Since 2007, labeling according to the revised system is accepted by the FDA on laser products imported into the US. The old and revised systems can be distinguished by the 1M, 2M and 3R classes used only in the revised system and the 2A and 3B classes used only in the old system. Class numbers were designated using Roman numerals (I–IV) in the US under the old system and Arabic numerals (1–4) in the EU. The revised system uses Arabic numerals (1–4) in all jurisdictions.
The classification of a laser is related to the maximum permissible emissions (MPE) above, as a maximum power (in W) or energy (in J) that can be emitted in a specified wavelength range and exposure time. For infrared wavelengths above 4 μm, it is specified as a maximum power density (in W/m²).

Revised system

class 1

A class 1 laser is safe under all conditions of normal use. This means the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) cannot be exceeded. This class includes high-power lasers within an enclosure that prevents exposure to the radiation and that cannot be opened without shutting down the laser. For example, a continuous laser at 600 nm can emit up to 0.39 mW, but for shorter wavelengths, the maximum emission is lower because of the potential of those wavelengths to generate photochemical damage. The maximum emission is also related to the pulse duration in the case of pulsed lasers and the degree of spatial coherence.

class 1M

A Class 1M laser is safe for all conditions of use except when passed through magnifying optics such as microscopes and telescopes. Class 1M lasers produce large-diameter beams, or beams that are divergent. The MPE for a Class 1M laser cannot normally be exceeded unless focusing or imaging optics are used to narrow the beam. If the beam is refocused, the hazard of Class 1M lasers may be increased and the product class may be changed. A laser can be classified as Class 1M if the total output power is below class 3B but the power that can pass through the pupil of the eye is within Class 1.

class 2

A Class 2 laser is safe because the blink reflex will limit the exposure to no more than 0.25 seconds. It only applies to visible-light lasers (400–700 nm). Class-2 lasers are limited to 1 mW continuous wave, or more if the emission time is less than 0.25 seconds or if the light is not spatially coherent. Intentional suppression of the blink reflex could lead to eye injury. Many laser pointers are class 2.

class 2M

A Class 2M laser is safe because of the blink reflex if not viewed through optical instruments. As with class 1M, this applies to laser beams with a large diameter or large divergence, for which the amount of light passing through the pupil cannot exceed the limits for class 2.

class 3R

A Class 3R laser is considered safe if handled carefully, with restricted beam viewing. With a class 3R laser, the MPE can be exceeded, but with a low risk of injury. Visible continuous lasers in Class 3R are limited to 5 mW. For other wavelengths and for pulsed lasers, other limits apply.

class 3B

A Class 3B laser is hazardous if the eye is exposed directly, but diffuse reflections such as from paper or other matte surfaces are not harmful. Continuous lasers in the wavelength range from 315 nm to far infrared are limited to 0.5 W. For pulsed lasers between 400 and 700 nm, the limit is 30 mJ. Other limits apply to other wavelengths and to ultrashort pulsed lasers. Protective eyewear is typically required where direct viewing of a class 3B laser beam may occur.

class 4

Class 4 lasers include all lasers with beam power greater than class 3B. In addition to posing significant eye hazards, with potentially devastating and permanent eye damage as a result of direct beam viewing, diffuse reflections are also harmful to the eyes within the distance called the Nominal Hazard Zone. Class 4 lasers are also able to cut or burn skin. In addition, these lasers may ignite combustible materials, and thus represent a fire risk.

Old system

The safety classes in the "old system" of classification were established in the United States through consensus standards (ANSI Z136.1) and Federal and state regulations. The international classification described in consensus standards such as IEC 825 (later IEC 60825) was based on the same concepts but presented with designations slightly different from the US classification.
This classification system is only slightly altered from the original system developed in the early 1970s. It is still used by US laser product safety regulations. The laser powers mentioned are typical values. Classification is also dependent on the wavelength and on whether the laser is pulsed or continuous.

class I

Inherently safe; no possibility of eye damage. This can be either because of a low output power (in which case eye damage is impossible even after hours of exposure), or due to an enclosure preventing user access to the laser beam during normal operation, such as in CD players or laser printers.

class II

The blink reflex of the human eye (aversion response) will prevent eye damage, unless the person deliberately stares into the beam for an extended period. Output power may be up to 1 mW. This class includes only lasers that emit visible light. Some laser pointers are in this category.

class IIa

A region in the low-power end of Class II where the laser requires in excess of 1000 seconds of continuous viewing to produce a burn to the retina. Supermarket laser scanners are in this subclass.

class IIIa

Lasers in this class are mostly dangerous in combination with optical instruments which change the beam diameter or power density. Output power may not exceed 1–5 mW. Beam power density may not exceed 2.5 mW/square cm. Many laser sights for firearms and laser pointers are in this category.

class IIIb

Lasers in this class may cause damage if the beam enters the eye directly. This generally applies to lasers powered from 5–500 mW. Lasers in this category can cause permanent eye damage with exposures of 1/100th of a second or less depending on the strength of the laser. A diffuse reflection is generally not hazardous but specular reflections can be just as dangerous as direct exposures. Protective eyewear is recommended when direct beam viewing of Class IIIb lasers may occur. Lasers at the high power end of this class may also present a fire hazard and can lightly burn skin.

class IV

Lasers in this class have output powers of more than 500 mW in the beam and may cause severe, permanent damage to eye or skin without being magnified by optics of eye or instrumentation. These are cutting, etching and surgical lasers. Diffuse reflections of the laser beam can be hazardous to skin or eye within the Nominal Hazard Zone.

Protective eyewear

Protective eyewear in the form of spectacles or goggles with appropriately filtering optics can protect the eyes from the reflected or scattered laser light with a hazardous beam power, as well as from direct exposure to a laser beam. Eyewear must be selected for the specific type of laser, to block or attenuate in the appropriate wavelength range. For example, eyewear absorbing 532 nm typically has an orange appearance, transmitting wavelengths larger than 550 nm. Such eyewear would be useless as protection against a laser emitting at 800 nm. Eyewear is rated for optical density (OD), which is the base-10 logarithm of the attenuation factor by which the optical filter reduces beam power. For example, eyewear with OD 3 will reduce the beam power in the specified wavelegnth range by a factor of 1000. In addition to an optical density sufficient to reduce beam power to below the maximum permissible exposure (see above), laser eyewear used where direct beam exposure is possible should be able to withstand a direct hit from the laser beam without breaking. In the European Community, manufacturers are required by European norm EN 207 to specify the maximum power rating rather than the optical density.
In an environment with potential exposure to laser beams, suitable eye protection is recommended for beams of Class 3B and Class 4.
In the U.S., guidance for the use of protective eyewear, and other elements of safe laser use, is given in the ANSI Z136 series of standards. They are:
:ANSI Z136.1 - Safe Use of Lasers
:ANSI Z136.2 - Safe Use of Lasers in Optical Fiber Communication Systems Utilizing Laser Diode and LED Sources
:ANSI Z136.3 - Safe Use of Lasers in Health Care Facilities
:ANSI Z136.5 - Safe Use of Lasers in Educational Institutions
:ANSI Z136.6 - Safe Use of Lasers Outdoors

Regulations

In the European Community, eye protection requirements are specified in European norm EN 207. In addition to EN 207, European norm EN 208 specifies requirements for goggles for use during beam alignment. These transmit a portion of the laser light, permitting the operator to see where the beam is, and do not provide complete protection against a direct laser beam hit. Finally, European norm EN 60825 specifies optical densities in extreme situations.
The FDA requires all class IIIb and class IV lasers offered in commerce in the US to have five standard safety features: a key switch, a safety interlock dongle, a power indicator, an aperture shutter, and an emission delay (normally two to three seconds).

Guidelines

The use of eye protection when operating lasers of classes IIIb/IIIB and IV in a manner that may result in eye exposure in excess of the MPE is strongly recommended, and is required in the workplace by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. It is common in scientific research, however, for operators to ignore this guidance and remove their eye protection during certain procedures, or even to avoid wearing it altogether. Some find the use of safety glasses over a long time to be uncomfortable, and in many types of optical experiments it is also inconvenient. For example in spectroscopy, the experimental arrangement is constantly being modified and fine-tuned. This requires knowledge of beam location, which is often most simply achieved with the naked eye, although other detection methods are available. In this situation, many scientists assign a higher priority to convenience and comfort than to safety and regulatory compliance, and routinely breach the laser safety regulations. Sometimes it is perceived as unavoidable when working with, for example, an RGB laser, which would require very careful selection of the Optical Density of protective eyewear or the use of completely black goggles.
Although not everybody agrees, most scientists involved with lasers agree on the following guidelines.

★ Everyone who touches a laser should be aware of the risks. This awareness is not just a matter of time spent with lasers; to the contrary, long-term dealing with invisible risks (such as from infrared laser beams) tends to reduce risk awareness, rather than to sharpen it.

★ Many experimentalists feel quite secure when dealing with an experiment carried out on an optical table, where all laser beams travel in the horizontal plane only, and all beams are stopped at the edges of the table. Experimentalists make sure never to put their eyes at the level of the horizontal plane where the beams are, in case a reflected beam leaves the table. This guideline reduces but does not eliminate the risk. Remaining hazards include:

★
★ In a non-trivial optical setup, it is very hard to ensure that all mirrors, filters, and lenses are strictly kept in a vertical position at all times, particularly when the setup is constantly modified.

★
★ Accidental upward reflections can be caused by watches and jewelry. Even if those are banned, operators often use metallic tools (like screwdrivers), which can redirect a beam. Note that stray reflections are usually unnoticed until an accident occurs.

★
★ When picking up something from the floor, closing the eye may not give sufficient protection against multi-watt laser beams, as the eye's lid is partially transparent, particularly for infrared light. Closing both eyes when kneeling becomes second nature and automatic for workers in such fields.

★
★ Nobody can guarantee that all these hazards can be safely avoided without wearing protecting glasses, when infrared laser beams with non-negligible powers are used. Working without glasses under these circumstances means trading safety for convenience. This is commonplace, but not safe, and for this reason not permitted by any official safety regulations.

★ Adequate eye protection is required for everyone in the room, not just the one who tweaks an experiment.

★ High-intensity beam paths (say, above 200 mW) that are not frequently modified should be guided through black tubes. For ultraviolet beams, this is necessary even for much lower power levels due to the risk of skin cancer. When modifying and aligning the beam it is often sufficient to drastically reduce the energy level of the beam, restoring it after alignment is complete.

★ Particular care is required when optical elements such as mirrors are inserted, removed or repositioned. Beam alignment is a particularly hazardous procedure because the beam path is being intentionally changed and the beam may strike a reflective surface such as a metallic post. Spray painting potentially reflective elements in matte black is preferred.
Dangerous work methods have been encouraged (but not justified) by factors which include:

★ the inconvenience of obtaining adequate eye protection (particularly when working with multiple wavelengths);

★ inconvenient or uncomfortable safety devices;

★ irrational or uninformed risk assessment;

★ safety regulations perceived as nonsensical; and

★ a lack of general safety knowledge.

Laser pointers

In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the risks posed by so called laser pointers and laser pens. Laser pointers in the US are class IIIa or less, <5 mW. While in the UK, laser pointers are nominally limited to <1mW. However, most laser pointers in the UK are class IIIa, in disregard of local laws.
Van Norren et al. (1998)^[8] could not find a single example in the medical literature of a <1mW class II laser causing eyesight damage. Mainster et al. (2003)^[9] provide one case, an 11 year old child who temporarily damaged her eyesight by holding an approximately 5mW red laser pointer close the eye and staring into the beam for 10 seconds, she experienced scotoma but fully recovered after 3 months. Luttrulla & Hallisey (1999) describe a similar case, a 34 year old male who stared into the beam of a class IIIa red laser for 30 to 60 seconds, causing temporary central scotoma and visual field loss. His eyesight fully recovered within 2 days, at the time of his eye exam. An intravenous fundus flourescein angiogram, a technique used by ophthalmologists to visualise the retina of the eye in fine detail, identified subtle discoloration of the fovea.
Thus, it appears that brief 0.25 second exposure to a <5 mW laser does not pose a threat to eye health. Apart from an aggressive act, briefly (0.25 second) shining a <5mW laser at another persons eye from a distance of several metres, will not affect their vision. On the other hand there is a potential for injury if a person deliberately stares into a beam of a class IIIa laser for few seconds or more at close range. Even if injury occurs, most people will fully recover their vision. With regard to green lasers, the safe exposure time may be less. These conclusions must be qualified with recent theoretical observations that certain prescription medications may interact with some wavelengths of laser light, causing increased sensitivity (phototoxicity).
The best course of action is to inform the victim of a laser pointer "attack" that medical science presently expresses the belief that brief exposure to a <5mW laser, although annoying, cannot harm eyesight. Claims of Injury from laser pointers, in particular if the claim is embellished with descriptions of eye pain, headaches and nausea, are likely to be false, mis-informed, or based more on concern than physical effects.
Beyond the question of physical injury to the eye from a laser pointer, several other undesirable effects are possible. These include short-lived flash blindness if the beam is encountered in darkened surroundings, as when driving at night. This may result in momentary loss of vehicular control. Lasers pointed at aircraft are a hazard to aviation. A police officer seeing a red dot painted on his chest may conclude that a sniper is targeting him and take unnecessarily aggressive action. ^[10] In addition, the startle reflex exhibited by some exposed unexpectedly to laser light of this sort as been reported to have resulted in cases of self-injury or loss of control. For these and similar reasons, the US Food and Drug Administration has advised that laser pointers are not toys and should not be used by minors except under the direct supervision of an adult.

Non-beam hazards – electrical and other

For the main article on general electrical safety, see High-voltage hazards.
A discussion of laser safety would not be complete without mention of non-beam hazards that are often associated with use of laser systems. Many lasers are high voltage devices, typically 400 V upward for a small 5 mJ pulsed laser, and exceeding many kilovolts in higher powered lasers. This, coupled with high pressure water for cooling the laser and other associated electrical equipment can create a greater hazard than the laser beam itself.
Electric equipment should generally be installed at least 250 mm / 10 inches above the floor to reduce electric risk in the case of flooding. Optical tables, lasers, and other equipment should be well grounded. Enclosure interlocks should be respected and special precautions taken during troubleshooting.
In addition to the electrical hazards, lasers may create chemical, mechanical, and other hazards specific to particular installations. Chemical hazards may include materials intrinsic to the laser, such as beryllium oxide in argon ion laser tubes, halogens in excimer lasers, organic dyes dissolved in toxic or flammable solvents in dye lasers, and heavy metal vapors and asbestos insulation in helium cadmium lasers. They may also include materials released during laser processing, such as metal fumes from cutting or surface treatments of metals or the complex mix of decomposition products produced in the high energy plasma of a laser cutting plastics.
Mechanical hazards may include moving parts in vacuum and presssure pumps; implosion or explosion of flashlamps, plasma tubes, water jackets, and gas handling equipment.
High temperatures and fire hazards may also result from the operation of high-powered Class IIIB or any Class IV Laser.
In commercial laser systems, hazard mitigations such as the presence of fusible plugs, thermal interrupters, and pressure relief valves reduce the hazard of, for example, a steam explosion arising from an obstructed water cooling jacket. Interlocks, shutters, and warning lights are often critical elements of modern commercial installations. In older lasers, experimental and hobby systems, and those removed from other equipment (OEM units) special care must be taken to anticipate and reduce the consequences of misuse as well as various failure modes.

See also

★ Lasers and aviation safety

★ Audience scanning -- use of lasers in light shows, where they are deliberately directed into the audience to create special effects

External links

★ Laser safety fact sheet (University of Kentucky)

★ U.S. Navy Laser Safety Website

★ OSHA Technical Manual Section III, Chapter 6, Laser Safety

★ Laser safety resources (Vanderbilt Environmental Health & Safety)

★ OSHA Web Page on Laser Hazards

References

1. Laser Safety and the Eye: Hidden Hazards and Practical Pearls Osama Bader and Harvey Lui
2. A traumatic macular hole secondary to a high-energy Nd:YAG laser, Chuang LH, Lai CC, Yang KJ, Chen TL, Ku WC, , , Ophthalmic Surg Lasers, 2001
3. Lasers Aimed at Aircraft Cockpits: Background and Possible Options to Address the Threat to Aviation Safety and Security, Bart Elias, , , CRS Report for Congress, 2005
4. The photic sneeze reflex as a risk factor to combat pilots, Breitenbach RA, Swisher PK, Kim MK, Patel BS, , , Mil. Med., 1993
5. Lasers Aimed At Airliners: Overreaction? Doug Ritter
6. Handbook on Industrial Laser Safety K. Schröder, Ed.
7. Safety of laser products - Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements, , , , International Electrotechnical Commission, 2007,
8.
★ van Norren D., Keunen J.E., Vos J.J., 1998. The laser pointer: no demonstrated danger to the eyes. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 142(36):1979-82
9. Mainster, M.A., Stuck, B.E. & Brown, J., Jr 2004. Assessment of alleged retinal laser injuries. Arch Ophthalmol, 122, 1210-1217
10. "Man reaches for laser, shot dead." Orlando Sentinel, February 6 2005