Discover

(Redirected from Loanwords)

A 'loanword' (or ''loan word'') is a word directly taken into one language from another with little or no translation. By contrast, a calque or loan translation is a related concept whereby it is the meaning or idiom that is borrowed rather than the lexical item itself. The word ''loanword'' is itself a calque of the German ''Lehnwort''.[1] Loanwords can also be called "borrowings". (Technically, neither "loan" nor "borrow" is correct, since the receiving language almost never returns the words. More accurate terminology would be "clone" (in the horticultural sense) and "adopt".)

Contents

Classes of borrowed words

Classification of Borrowings

Beyond words

Loanwords in English

Affixes

Other languages

Reborrowing

Literature

References

See also

External links

Classes of borrowed words

Certain classes of words are more commonly borrowed than others, usually words for exotic concepts or ideas. What is "exotic" varies from language to language. Thus, English names for creatures not native to Great Britain are almost always loanwords, and most of the technical vocabulary referring to classical music is borrowed from Italian.
By contrast, function words such as pronouns, numbers, and words referring to universal concepts, are usually not borrowed, but have been in some cases.

Classification of Borrowings

The studies by Werner Betz (1949, 1959), Einar Haugen (1950, also 1956), and Uriel Weinreich (1953) are regarded as the classical theoretical works on loan influence^[1]. The basic theoretical statements all depart from Betz’s nomenclature. Duckworth (1977) enlarges Betz’s scheme by the type “partial substitution” and supplements the system with English terms^[2]:
# 'importation'
## 'foreign word' = non-integrated word from a foreign language, e.g. E ''café'' (from French); Sp. ''whisk(e)y'' (from English); E ''weltanschauung'' (< G ''Weltanschauung''); It. ''mouse'' ‘computer device’ (< E ''mouse'' ‘rodent; computer device’);
## 'loan word' = integrated word from a foreign language, e.g. E ''music'' (from French); Sp. ''güisqui'' (from English);
# 'partial substitution': composite words, in which one part is borrowed, another one substituted, e.g. OE ''Saturnes dæg'' ‘Saturday’ (< Lat. ''Saturnis dies''), G ''Showgeschäft'' ‘literally: show-business’ (< E ''show business''), G ''Live-Sendung'' ‘literally: live-broadcast’ (< E ''live broadcast'')
# 'substitution'
## 'loan coinage'
### 'loan formation'
#### 'loan translation' = translation of the elements of the foreign word, e.g. OE ''Monan dæg'' ‘Monday’ (< Lat. ''Lunae dies''), Fr. ''gratte-ciel'' and Sp. ''rasca·cielos'' ‘both literally: scrape-sky’ (< E ''skyscraper''), E ''world view'' (< G ''Welt·anschauung''), AmSp. ''manzana de Adán'' (< E ''Adam’s apple''; vs. EurSp. ''nuez [de la garganta]'' ‘literally: nut [of the throat]’);
#### 'loan rendering' = translation of part of the elements of the foreign word, e.g. E ''brother·hood'' (< Lat. ''frater·nitas'' [= Lat. ''frater'' ‘brother’ + suffix]), G ''Wolken·kratzer'' ‘literally: clouds-scraper’ (< E ''sky·scraper'');
### 'loan creation' coinage independent of the foreign word, but created out of the desire to replace a foreign word, e.g. E ''brandy'' (< Fr. ''cognac'');
## 'loan meaning' = indigenous word to which the meaning of the foreign word is transferred, e.g. OE ''cniht'' ‘servant + disciple of Jesus’ (< Lat. ''discipulus'' ‘student, disciple of Jesus’), OE ''heofon'' ‘sky, abode of the gods + Christian heaven’ (< Lat. ''caelum'' ‘sky, abode of the gods, Christian heaven’), G ''Maus'' and Fr ''souris'' ‘rodent + computer device’ (< E ''mouse'' ‘rodent, computer device’).
On the basis of an importation-substitution distinction, Haugen (1950: 214f.) distinguishes three basic groups of borrowings: “(1) ''Loanwords'' show morphemic importation without substitution. [. . .]. (2) ''Loanblends'' show morphemic substitution as well as importation. [. . .]. (3) ''Loanshifts'' show morphemic substitution without importation”. Haugen has later refined (1956) his model in a review of Gneuss’s (1955) book on Old English loan coinages, whose classification, in turn, is the one by Betz (1949) again.
Weinreich (1953: 47ff.) differentiates between two mechanisms of lexical interference, namely those initiated by simple words and those initiated by compound words and phrases. Weinreich (1953: 47) defines ''simple words'' “from the point of view of the bilinguals who perform the transfer, rather than that of the descriptive linguist. Accordingly, the category ‘simple’ words also includes compounds that are transferred in unanalysed form”. After this general classification, Weinreich then resorts to Betz’s (1949) terminology.
Models that try to integrate borrowing in an overall classification of vocabulary change, or onomasiological change, have recently been proposed by Peter Koch (2002) and Joachim Grzega (2003, 2004).

Beyond words

Idiomatic expressions and phrases, sometimes translated word-for-word, can be borrowed, usually from a language that has "prestige" at the time. Often, a borrowed idiom is used as a euphemism for a less polite term in the original language. In English, this has usually been Latinisms from the Latin language and Gallicisms from French. If the phrase is translated word-for-word, it is known as a calque.

Loanwords in English

English has many loanwords. In 1973, a computerised survey of about 80,000 words in the old Shorter Oxford Dictionary (3rd edition) was published in Ordered Profusion by Thomas Finkenstaedt and Dieter Wolff. Their estimates for the origin of English words were as follows:

★ French, including Old French and early Anglo-French: 28.3%

★ Latin, including modern scientific and technical Latin: 28.24%

★ Germanic languages, including Old and Middle English: 25%

★ Greek: 5.32%

★ No etymology given or unknown: 4.03%

★ Derived from proper names: 3.28%

★ All other languages contributed less than 1%
However, if the frequency of use of words is considered, words from Old and Middle English occupy the vast majority.
The reasons for English's vast borrowing include:

★ (to a relatively small extent) the existence of other languages native to Britain;

★ the invasion of England by the Vikings and the Normans;

★ its modern importance;

★ its being a scientific language;

★ its development as a trade language in the 18th century; and

★ the flexibility of its syllable structure.
This lack of restrictions makes it comparatively easy for the English language to incorporate new words. Compare this with Japanese, where the English word "club" (itself originally from Old Norse) was turned into "kurabu" because of Japanese's inflexible syllable structure. However, the English pronunciations of loanwords often differ from the original pronunciations to such a degree that a native speaker of the language it was borrowed from is not able to recognize it as a loanword when spoken.
English often borrows words from the cultures and languages of the British Colonies. For example there are at least 20 words from Hindi, including syce/sais, dinghy, chutney, pundit, wallah, pajama/pyjamas, bungalow and jodhpur. Other examples include trek, aardvark, laager and veld from Afrikaans, shirang, amok (Malay) and sjambok (Malay via Afrikaans).
English also aquires loanwords in which foreign sounds are part of the foreign pronunciation. For example, the Hawaiian word ''aā'' is used by geologists to specify lava that is relatively thick, chunky, and rough. The Hawaiian spelling indicates the two glottal stops in the word, but the usual English pronunciation, , does not contain the glottal stop. In addition, the English spelling usually removes the okina and macron diacrtic^[3].

Affixes

The majority of English affixes, such as "un-", "-ing", and "-ly", were present in older forms in Old English. However, a few English affixes are borrowed. For example, the agentive suffix -er, which is very prolific, is borrowed ultimately from Latin. The verbal suffix '-ize' comes (via, Old French, via Latin) ultimately from Ancient Greek and is used liberally in America, often to the chagrin of the British (e.g. 'democratize').

Other languages

Direct loans, expressions translated word-by-word, or even grammatical constructions and orthographical conventions from English are called anglicisms. Similarly, loans from Swedish - like the word smörgåsbord - are called sveticisms or svecisms. In French, the result of perceived over-use of English loanwords and expressions is called franglais. English loanwords in French include 'le weekend', 'le job' (in France) or 'la job' (in Canada) and 'le biftek' (beefsteak). This has so outraged French purists that various French institutions spend much time and energy to keep the language pure. Denglish is English influence on German. Another popular term is Spanglish, the English influence on the Spanish language and Dunglish the English influence on the Dutch language.
During the Ottoman period, Turkish literature became heavily influenced by Persian and Arabic borrowings. During more than 600 years of the Ottoman Empire, the literary and official language of the empire was a mixture of Turkish, Persian, and Arabic, which is now called Ottoman Turkish, considerably differing from the everyday spoken Turkish of the time. Many Turkish, Persian and Arabic words were also loaned to other languages of the empire, such as Bulgarian and Serbian. After the empire fell in World War I and the Republic of Turkey was founded, the Turkish language underwent an extensive language reform led by the newly founded Turkish Language Association, during which many loanwords were replaced with equivalent words derived from Turkic roots. The language reform was a part of the ongoing cultural reform of the time, in turn a part in the broader framework of Atatürk's Reforms, and included the introduction of the new Turkish alphabet. Turkish also has many loanwords derived from French, such as ''pantalon'' for 'trousers' and ''komik'' for 'funny' (from Fr. ''comique''), all of them pronounced very similarly (except for the French pronunciation of the letter 'r').
The Italian government has recently expressed its displeasure over the borrowing of English words and syntax in Italian. English words are often used where they are more convenient than a longer Italian expression, as in "computer" for ''elaboratore elettronico'' or "week-end" for ''finesettimana''; but also where equally convenient Italian words already exist, as in "fashion" for ''moda'' and "meeting" for ''conferenza''.

Reborrowing

Main articles: Reborrowing

It is possible for a word to travel from one language to another and then back to the original language in a different form, a process called ''reborrowing''. A specific example of this is the French "le biftek", which is borrowed from the English "beefsteak", while the English "beef" is originally from the French "le bœuf".

Literature

★ Betz, Werner (1949): ''Deutsch und Lateinisch: Die Lehnbildungen der althochdeutschen Benediktinerregel''. Bonn: Bouvier.

★ Betz, Werner (1959): “Lehnwörter und Lehnprägungen im Vor- und Frühdeutschen”. In: Maurer, Friedrich / Stroh, Friedrich (eds.): ''Deutsche Wortgeschichte''. 2nd ed. Berlin: Schmidt, vol. 1, 127-147.

★ Cannon, Garland (1999): “Problems in studying loans”, ''Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society'' 25, 326-336.

★ Duckworth, David (1977): “Zur terminologischen und systematischen Grundlage der Forschung auf dem Gebiet der englisch-deutschen Interferenz: Kritische Übersicht und neuer Vorschlag”. In: Kolb, Herbert / Lauffer, Hartmut (eds.) (1977): Sprachliche Interferenz: Festschrift für Werner Betz zum 65. Geburtstag. Tübingen: Niemeyer, p. 36-56.

★ Gneuss, Helmut (1955): ''Lehnbildungen und Lehnbedeutungen im Altenglischen''. Berlin: Schmidt.

★ Grzega, Joachim (2003): “Borrowing as a Word-Finding Process in Cognitive Historical Onomasiology”, ''Onomasiology Online'' 4, 22-42.

★ Grzega, Joachim (2004): ''Bezeichnungswandel: Wie, Warum, Wozu?'' Heidelberg: Winter.

★ Haugen, Einar (1950): “The analysic of linguistic borrowing”. ''Language'' 26, 210-231.

★ Haugen, Einar (1956): “Review of Gneuss 1955”. ''Language'' 32, 761-766.

★ Koch, Peter (2002): “Lexical Typology from a Cognitive and Linguistic Point of View”. In: Cruse, D. Alan et al. (eds.): ''Lexicology: An International on the Nature and Structure of Words and Vocabularies/Lexikologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wörtern und Wortschätzen''. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1142-1178.

★ Oksaar, Els (1996): “The history of contact linguistics as a discipline”. In: Goebl, Hans et al. (eds.): ''Kontaktlinguistik/contact linguistics/linguistique de contact: ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung/an international handbook of contemporary research/manuel international des recherches contemporaines''. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1-12.

★ Stanforth, Anthony W. (2002): “Effects of language contact on the vocabulary: an overview”. In: Cruse, D. Alan et al. (eds.) (2002): Lexikologie: ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wörtern und Wortschätzen/Lexicology: an international handbook on the nature and structure of words and vocabularies. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, p. 805-813.

★ Weinreich, Uriel (1953): ''Languages in contact: findings and problems''. The Hague: Mouton.

References

1. Cf. the two survey articles by Oksaar (1996: 4f.), Stanforth (2002) and Grzega (2003, 2004).
2. The following comments and examples are taken from Grzega, Joachim (2004), ''Bezeichnungswandel: Wie, Warum, Wozu?'', Heidelberg: Winter, p. 139, and Grzega, Joachim (2003), “Borrowing as a Word-Finding Process in Cognitive Historical Onomasiology”, ''Onomasiology Online'' 4: 22-42.
3.

See also

★ Lists of English words of international origin

★ List of replaced loanwords in Turkish

★ Semantic loan

★ Sino-Japanese

★ Sino-Korean

★ Sino-Vietnamese

External links

★ Discussion on how loan words exacerbate Future Shock (Streaming audio & mp3)