MAI SYSTEMS CORP. V. PEAK COMPUTER, INC.
'MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.', 991 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1993), is a case in United States law that addresses the question of whether or not loading a program into RAM makes a copy of the software and can be restricted by copyright.
Peak performed routine maintenance and made emergency repairs. When providing maintenance or making emergency repairs, Peak usually booted the MAI computer, causing the MAI operating system to be loaded in RAM. MAI also alleged that Peak ran MAI's diagnostic software during Peak's service calls.
MAI contended that Peak's use of the MAI operating system constituted copyright infringement; the federal court agreed and prohibited Peak from continuing this work. The court determined that a copy of a program made into RAM was "sufficiently permanent or stable to permit it to be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated for a period of more than transitory duration." The court further found that even though section 117 allows copies to utilize the software to be made without permission of the copyright holder by the 'owner' of the copy of software, Peak Computer was not the owner of the software and thus was guilty of copyright infringement.
NB: The US Copyright section 117 was amended in 1998 to allow the exception of making copies of software to repair machines.
★ Court Ruling
Peak performed routine maintenance and made emergency repairs. When providing maintenance or making emergency repairs, Peak usually booted the MAI computer, causing the MAI operating system to be loaded in RAM. MAI also alleged that Peak ran MAI's diagnostic software during Peak's service calls.
MAI contended that Peak's use of the MAI operating system constituted copyright infringement; the federal court agreed and prohibited Peak from continuing this work. The court determined that a copy of a program made into RAM was "sufficiently permanent or stable to permit it to be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated for a period of more than transitory duration." The court further found that even though section 117 allows copies to utilize the software to be made without permission of the copyright holder by the 'owner' of the copy of software, Peak Computer was not the owner of the software and thus was guilty of copyright infringement.
NB: The US Copyright section 117 was amended in 1998 to allow the exception of making copies of software to repair machines.
| Contents |
| External links |
External links
★ Court Ruling
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
Featured Companies
| Uniglobe Alliance Travel Ltd | |
| Vacation By V |
Newest Companies
MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc. Features
| 12 Fun Things to Do When Visiting Peru, Land of the Inca |

العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español