MONOMORPHISM

In the context of abstract algebra or universal algebra, a 'monomorphism' is simply an injective homomorphism.
In the more general setting of category theory, a 'monomorphism' (also called a 'monic morphism' or a 'mono') is a left-cancellative morphism, that is, a map $fcolon\; X\; o\; Y$ such that
: $f\; circ\; g\_1\; =\; f\; circ\; g\_2\; implies\; g\_1\; =\; g\_2$ for all morphisms $g\_1,\; g\_2\; colon\; Z\; o\; X$.
:
Monomorphisms are a categorical generalization of injective functions; in some categories the notions coincide, but monomorphisms are more general, as in the examples below.
The dual of a monomorphism is an epimorphism (i.e. a monomorphism in a category ''C'' is an epimorphism in the dual category ''C''^op).

Contents

Terminology

Relation to invertibility

Examples

Related concepts

See also

References

Terminology

The companion terms ''monomorphism'' and ''epimorphism'' were originally introduced by Bourbaki; Bourbaki uses ''monomorphism'' as shorthand for an injective function. Early category theorists believed that the correct generalization of injectivity to the context of categories was the property given above. While this is not exactly true for monic maps, it is very close, so this has caused little trouble, unlike the case of epimorphisms. Saunders Mac Lane attempted to make a distinction between what he called ''monomorphisms'', which were maps in a concrete category whose underlying maps of sets were injective, and ''monic maps'', which are monomorphisms in the categorical sense of the word. This distinction never came into general use.

Relation to invertibility

Left invertible maps are necessarily monic:
if ''l'' is a left inverse for ''f'' (meaning $lf=id\_X$), then ''f'' is monic, as
: $f\; circ\; g\_1\; =\; f\; circ\; g\_2\; implies\; lfg\_1\; =\; lfg\_2\; implies\; g\_1\; =\; g\_2$
A left invertible map is called a 'split mono'.
A map $fcolon\; X\; o\; Y$ is monic if and only if the induced map
$f\_$
★ colon operatorname{Hom}(Z,X) ooperatorname{Hom}(Z,Y)
is injective for all ''Z''.

Examples

Every morphism in a concrete category whose underlying function is injective is a monomorphism. In the category of sets, the converse also holds so the monomorphisms are exactly the injective morphisms. The converse also holds in most naturally occurring categories of algebras because of the existence of a free object on one generator. In particular, it is true in the categories of groups and rings, and in any abelian category.
It is not true in general, however, that all monomorphisms must be injective in other categories. For example, in the category 'Div' of divisible abelian groups and group homomorphisms between them there are monomorphisms that are not injective: consider the quotient map ''q'' : 'Q' → 'Q'/'Z'. This is clearly not an injective map; nevertheless, it is a monomorphism in this category. To see this, note that if ''q'' o ''f'' = ''q'' o ''g'' for some morphisms ''f'',''g'' : ''G'' → 'Q' where ''G'' is some divisible abelian group then ''q'' o ''h'' = 0 where ''h'' = ''f'' - ''g'' (this makes sense as this is an additive category). This implies that ''h''(''x'') is an integer if ''x'' ∈ ''G''. If ''h''(''x'') is not 0 then, for instance,
:
ight) = rac{1}{4}
so that
:
ight)
eq 0,
contradicting ''q'' o ''h'' = 0, so ''h''(''x'') = 0 and ''q'' is therefore a monomorphism.

Related concepts

There are also useful concepts of 'regular monomorphism', 'strong monomorphism', and 'extremal monomorphism'. A regular monomorphism equalizes some parallel pair of morphisms. An extremal monomorphism is a monomorphism that cannot be nontrivially factored through an epimorphism: Precisely, if ''m''=''g'' o ''e'' with ''e'' an epimorphism, then ''e'' is an isomorphism. A strong monomorphism satisfies a certain lifting property with respect to commutative squares involving an epimorphism.

See also

★ injective function

★ epimorphism

★ isomorphism

★ subobject

References

★ Francis Borceaux (1994), ''Handbook of Categorical Algebra 1'', Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-44178-1.

★ George Bergman (1998), ''An Invitation to General Algebra and Universal Constructions'', Henry Helson Publisher, Berkeley. ISBN 0-9655211-4-1.

★ Jaap van Oosten, Basic Category Theory