العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
EspañolNAHOM
'Nahom' is a place referenced in the Book of Mormon () as one of the stops on the Old World segment of Lehi's journey. This location is referred to as the place where Ishmael is laid to rest. It was also at this location that the path of Lehi's journey changed from a southern to an eastern direction before continuing toward the coast and the land () Bountiful. (''See Archaeology and the Book of Mormon.'')
Some archaeologists believe that they have located the site of Nahom as a settlement and tribal area known anciently and still today as NHM. Critics doubt the link between Nahom and NHM, as well as having other criticisms.
In , Lehi receives the Liahona and his group departs from the Valley of Lemuel. After traveling for four days in "nearly a south-southeast direction" they make camp in a place they name "Shazer." They continue to travel in the "same direction" for "many days" with the Liahona as a guide (). Verses 34 and 35 read:
:''And it came to pass that Ishmael died, and was buried in the place which was called Nahom.''
:''And it came to pass that the daughters of Ishmael did mourn exceedingly, because of the loss of their father, and because of their afflictions in the wilderness; and they did murmur against my father, because he had brought them out of the land of Jerusalem, saying: Our father is dead; yea, and we have wandered much in the wilderness, and we have suffered much affliction, hunger, thirst, and fatigue; and after all these sufferings we must perish in the wilderness with hunger.''
In the next four verses, the dissenters plot to kill Lehi and Nephi, but the threat is not carried out. The next verse reports that Lehi's group has resumed their journey and changed the direction of their travel "eastward" ().
LDS scholars have proposed locations for Nahom based on archaeological evidences. Others give reasons for which the proposed locations do not match the archaeological evidences and descriptions given in the ''Book of Mormon''.
Some scholars believe that Lehi's group followed the ancient frankincense trails in the northern part of Yemen at times during the initial leg of their journey .[1] The location of NHM is near the main junction of these ancient trails at a point where the trails veer to the east.[2]
According to the Book of Mormon, prior to their arrival at Nahom, the travelers had been moving in a "south-southeast" direction (). It was at this location "Nahom" that the Book of Mormon states that the travelers made a significant change in direction "eastward" before continuing their journey toward the coast.[3] The location of NHM and the eastward change in direction have been used by LDS scholars to assist in determining a plausible location for the coastal location referred to by Nephi as Bountiful.
In 1976, it was originally speculated by Lynn Hilton that Nahom might correlate with the location of the village of Al Qunfudhah in Saudi Arabia . In 1978 Ross T. Christensen noted the existence of a location in Yemen called "Nehhm" on an early map produced by Carsten Niebuhr as the result of a scientific expedition sent out by King Frederick V of Denmark . After doing extensive research over several years at the site in Yemen, the location of Nahom was associated with the existing location and tribal name NHM (usually vocalised as NIHM or NEHEM or NAHM) by Warren and Michaela Aston in 1994 . LDS scholars now consider the location and tribal area of NHM in the Jawf Valley in Yemen to be the only plausible location for the place referred to as Nahom in the Book of Mormon. This conclusion was significantly reinforced by the 1999 discovery of three inscribed altars bearing the name at this location.
LDS Scholars consider NHM to be one of the locations in the Arabian peninsula that they believe confirms Book of Mormon historicity in the Old World . Givens states that the discovery of the altars "may thus be said to constitute the first actual archaeological evidence for the historicity of the Book of Mormon." This conclusion is based upon archaeological evidence and inscriptions recently found on altars at a specific location in Yemen which appear to correlate with the "place called Nahom" described in the book of 1 Nephi ,. Nahom is one of only a very few locations mentioned in the Book of Mormon that the text implies had been named prior to contact with the Lehite travelers, in contrast to Lehi's normal application of the Middle Eastern practice of naming locations after family members .
Although the actual location of NHM is plausible when compared to Lehi's purported route and change of direction on the Arabian peninsula, some non-LDS authors have suggested a variety of reasons why Nahom and NHM may not represent the same location .
The Bar'an temple in Marib (70 miles east of San'a in Yemen) was excavated by a German archaeological team led by Burkhard Vogt. Before excavation began, all that was visible at the Bar'an site were six columns projecting above the sand. The temple structure and many of the altars were found to be well preserved by the sand and desert climate . One of the artifacts discovered at this location was an inscribed altar which has been dated to the seventh or sixth centuries BC. According to the inscription, the altar was donated to the temple by "Bi‘athtar, son of Sawad, son of Naw‘an, the Nihmite" . The first altar discovered was removed from the Bar'an site and placed in a traveling exhibit which began touring Europe in October 1997. Since that time, two additional altars bearing the same inscription mentioning ''NHM'' have been identified at the same temple site .
Each of the altars is constructed of solid limestone. All three contain a dedication inscription, which is carved around all four sides of the altars in the South Arabian script of that period, and each bears the name of their donor: Bi'athar . The first altar was dated to between the seventh and sixth centuries B.C by French researcher Christian Robin . Since Naw'um of the tribe of Nihm was the grandfather of Bi'athar, it is estimated that the Nihm tribal name must be at least two generations older than the altars themselves .
Vowels in Hebrew are spoken but not written.[4] Therefore, roots in Semitic languages such as Hebrew or Arabic utilize only the consonants and not the vowels .[5] Some of the variant names based upon the Semitic root NHM found in both Arabic and Hebrew texts are ''Nahum'', ''Naham'', ''Nihm'', ''Nehem'' and ''Nahm'' . The root NHM has different meanings. The South Arabian root NHM is related to stone cutting. The Hebrew root NHM is found repeatedly in the Bible and relates to sorrow, hunger, consoling, and mourning .[6] Scholars consider this root appropriate when used to refer to a place of burial and the expression of mourning . This theory is corroborated by a huge area of ancient burial tombs at 'Alam, Ruwayk, and Jidran about 25 miles north of Marib that were examined by a French team at approximately the same time that the Bar'an excavation was completed. This burial complex is the largest such burial area known anywhere in Arabia .
The name NHM denotes both a tribal region and a location in the southern part of Arabia . In 1763 a German surveyor and mapmaker named Carsten Niebuhr produced a map which contained the place name "Nehhm" at a location approximately twenty-five miles northeast of the Yemen capital Sana'a . In 1792 Robert Heron published a two-volume translation of Niebuhr’s first work titled ''Niebuhr’s Travels through Arabia and Other Countries in the East'' . There is no evidence, however, that Joseph Smith had access to these materials before the publication of the Book of Mormon .[7]
Known criticisms include the following :
★ The fact that the Book of Mormon does not explicitly mention contact with outsiders during Lehi's journey.
★ It is suggested that the pronunciation of NHM is unknown and may not relate to Nahom at all.
★ It has been suggested that Joseph Smith simply created the name ''Nahom'' as a variant of the Biblical names Naham (1 Chron. 4:19), Nehum (Ne. 7:7) and Nahum (Na. 1:1), although this fails to account for the plausible placement of the actual location of NHM relative to the description of Lehi's journey in the Book of Mormon narrative.
Critics state that Joseph Smith could have learned about the existence and location of NHM from existing 19th century sources. Libraries available to Joseph Smith would have been the Manchester Public Library and the library at Dartmouth College, at neither of which Smith was a member. Of the books dealing with the ancient Near East that were available in the Manchester library before 1830, LDS scholars suggest that none of these would have given Smith good information on ancient Arabia, and that they would have provided him with inaccurate information even if he had been able to gain access to them . When Smith was five years old, his family moved to Lebanon, New Hampshire and lived there from 1811 to late in 1813, just down the road from Dartmouth College. The Dartmouth library acquired a copy of Robert Heron’s translation of Niebuhr’s work (which had information regarding NHM), but not until 1937. Therefore, this information was not available in its library during the time that the Smith family lived in the town of Lebanon .[8]
Some have said that the link between Nahom (or Nehhm, as spelled in Niebuhr's work) and NHM is invalid because the vowels between the names ''Nahom'' and ''Nehhm'' do not match .[9] Others indicate that modern vowel variance is to be expected because Hebrew does not have written vowels.[4] The current pronunciation of the location and tribal area is said to be ''Nihm'' rather than ''Nahom''. Some critics state that the time from Ishmael's death to now is not long enough to account for the change in pronunciation , although scholars indicate that historical variation in root pronunciation (possibly due to Arabic influence) may allow for this change .[11]
1. Reynolds states: "Nibley and others note that this simple travel account fits well with what is now known of the ancient trade routes that carried frankincense from Oman and Yemen northward to the Mediterranean markets."
2. The Authorship of the Book of Mormon
3. Nahom and the "Eastward" Turn, , , , Journal of Book of Mormon Studies,
4. Introduction to Hebrew Vowels
5. Roper states: "In Semitic languages such as Hebrew or Arabic, it is the consonants and not the vowels that have lexical value. The vowels have nothing to do with the meaning of the root. Thus it makes little difference whether the name is spelled Nehem, Nehm, Nihm, Nahm, or Naham—the root is the same."
6. Referring to the root for Naham, Damrosch states " It appears twenty-five times in the narrative books of the Bible, and in every case it is associated with death. In family settings, it is applied in instances involving the death of an immediate family member (parent, sibling, or child); in national settings, it has to do with the survival or impending extermination of an entire people. At heart, ''naham'' means "to mourn," to come to terms with a death."
7. Roper states that "no American geographical sources published before 1830 mention the site Nahom, although we now know that it is an authentic ancient place name, which occurs only once in the entire region, and that in a location consistent with Nephi's description. Joseph Smith could not have learned about Nahom from early nineteenth-century sources."
8. It should also be noted that the Smith family moved from here when Joseph was only 7.
9. The Tanners state that "only three of the five letters in Nehhm agree with the spelling Nahom. The second letter in Nehhm is e rather than a, and the fourth letter is h instead of o. The variant spellings of Nehem, Nehm, Nihm, Nahm and Naham, do not really help to solve the problem.”
10. Introduction to Hebrew Vowels
11. "The exact equivalency of the root letters cannot be assured. It is probable that the term Nahom was spelled with the rasped or fricative Hebrew letter for 'h' (het or chet) whereas the name Nihm, both in modern Arabic and in the ancient Sabaean dialect, is spelled with a softer, less audible h sound." See G. Lankester Harding, An Index and Concordance of Pre-Islamic Arabian Names and Inscriptions (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1971), 81, 602.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
★
Some archaeologists believe that they have located the site of Nahom as a settlement and tribal area known anciently and still today as NHM. Critics doubt the link between Nahom and NHM, as well as having other criticisms.
Nahom in the Book of Mormon
In , Lehi receives the Liahona and his group departs from the Valley of Lemuel. After traveling for four days in "nearly a south-southeast direction" they make camp in a place they name "Shazer." They continue to travel in the "same direction" for "many days" with the Liahona as a guide (). Verses 34 and 35 read:
:''And it came to pass that Ishmael died, and was buried in the place which was called Nahom.''
:''And it came to pass that the daughters of Ishmael did mourn exceedingly, because of the loss of their father, and because of their afflictions in the wilderness; and they did murmur against my father, because he had brought them out of the land of Jerusalem, saying: Our father is dead; yea, and we have wandered much in the wilderness, and we have suffered much affliction, hunger, thirst, and fatigue; and after all these sufferings we must perish in the wilderness with hunger.''
In the next four verses, the dissenters plot to kill Lehi and Nephi, but the threat is not carried out. The next verse reports that Lehi's group has resumed their journey and changed the direction of their travel "eastward" ().
Nahom in archaeology
LDS scholars have proposed locations for Nahom based on archaeological evidences. Others give reasons for which the proposed locations do not match the archaeological evidences and descriptions given in the ''Book of Mormon''.
Ancient frankincense trails
Some scholars believe that Lehi's group followed the ancient frankincense trails in the northern part of Yemen at times during the initial leg of their journey .[1] The location of NHM is near the main junction of these ancient trails at a point where the trails veer to the east.[2]
According to the Book of Mormon, prior to their arrival at Nahom, the travelers had been moving in a "south-southeast" direction (). It was at this location "Nahom" that the Book of Mormon states that the travelers made a significant change in direction "eastward" before continuing their journey toward the coast.[3] The location of NHM and the eastward change in direction have been used by LDS scholars to assist in determining a plausible location for the coastal location referred to by Nephi as Bountiful.
Proposed location of Nahom
In 1976, it was originally speculated by Lynn Hilton that Nahom might correlate with the location of the village of Al Qunfudhah in Saudi Arabia . In 1978 Ross T. Christensen noted the existence of a location in Yemen called "Nehhm" on an early map produced by Carsten Niebuhr as the result of a scientific expedition sent out by King Frederick V of Denmark . After doing extensive research over several years at the site in Yemen, the location of Nahom was associated with the existing location and tribal name NHM (usually vocalised as NIHM or NEHEM or NAHM) by Warren and Michaela Aston in 1994 . LDS scholars now consider the location and tribal area of NHM in the Jawf Valley in Yemen to be the only plausible location for the place referred to as Nahom in the Book of Mormon. This conclusion was significantly reinforced by the 1999 discovery of three inscribed altars bearing the name at this location.
LDS Scholars consider NHM to be one of the locations in the Arabian peninsula that they believe confirms Book of Mormon historicity in the Old World . Givens states that the discovery of the altars "may thus be said to constitute the first actual archaeological evidence for the historicity of the Book of Mormon." This conclusion is based upon archaeological evidence and inscriptions recently found on altars at a specific location in Yemen which appear to correlate with the "place called Nahom" described in the book of 1 Nephi ,. Nahom is one of only a very few locations mentioned in the Book of Mormon that the text implies had been named prior to contact with the Lehite travelers, in contrast to Lehi's normal application of the Middle Eastern practice of naming locations after family members .
Although the actual location of NHM is plausible when compared to Lehi's purported route and change of direction on the Arabian peninsula, some non-LDS authors have suggested a variety of reasons why Nahom and NHM may not represent the same location .
Altars
The Bar'an temple in Marib (70 miles east of San'a in Yemen) was excavated by a German archaeological team led by Burkhard Vogt. Before excavation began, all that was visible at the Bar'an site were six columns projecting above the sand. The temple structure and many of the altars were found to be well preserved by the sand and desert climate . One of the artifacts discovered at this location was an inscribed altar which has been dated to the seventh or sixth centuries BC. According to the inscription, the altar was donated to the temple by "Bi‘athtar, son of Sawad, son of Naw‘an, the Nihmite" . The first altar discovered was removed from the Bar'an site and placed in a traveling exhibit which began touring Europe in October 1997. Since that time, two additional altars bearing the same inscription mentioning ''NHM'' have been identified at the same temple site .
Each of the altars is constructed of solid limestone. All three contain a dedication inscription, which is carved around all four sides of the altars in the South Arabian script of that period, and each bears the name of their donor: Bi'athar . The first altar was dated to between the seventh and sixth centuries B.C by French researcher Christian Robin . Since Naw'um of the tribe of Nihm was the grandfather of Bi'athar, it is estimated that the Nihm tribal name must be at least two generations older than the altars themselves .
Nahom and linguistics
Meaning of the name NHM
Vowels in Hebrew are spoken but not written.[4] Therefore, roots in Semitic languages such as Hebrew or Arabic utilize only the consonants and not the vowels .[5] Some of the variant names based upon the Semitic root NHM found in both Arabic and Hebrew texts are ''Nahum'', ''Naham'', ''Nihm'', ''Nehem'' and ''Nahm'' . The root NHM has different meanings. The South Arabian root NHM is related to stone cutting. The Hebrew root NHM is found repeatedly in the Bible and relates to sorrow, hunger, consoling, and mourning .[6] Scholars consider this root appropriate when used to refer to a place of burial and the expression of mourning . This theory is corroborated by a huge area of ancient burial tombs at 'Alam, Ruwayk, and Jidran about 25 miles north of Marib that were examined by a French team at approximately the same time that the Bar'an excavation was completed. This burial complex is the largest such burial area known anywhere in Arabia .
Early references to NHM
The name NHM denotes both a tribal region and a location in the southern part of Arabia . In 1763 a German surveyor and mapmaker named Carsten Niebuhr produced a map which contained the place name "Nehhm" at a location approximately twenty-five miles northeast of the Yemen capital Sana'a . In 1792 Robert Heron published a two-volume translation of Niebuhr’s first work titled ''Niebuhr’s Travels through Arabia and Other Countries in the East'' . There is no evidence, however, that Joseph Smith had access to these materials before the publication of the Book of Mormon .[7]
Link between Nahom and NHM
Criticisms of connection
Known criticisms include the following :
★ The fact that the Book of Mormon does not explicitly mention contact with outsiders during Lehi's journey.
★ It is suggested that the pronunciation of NHM is unknown and may not relate to Nahom at all.
★ It has been suggested that Joseph Smith simply created the name ''Nahom'' as a variant of the Biblical names Naham (1 Chron. 4:19), Nehum (Ne. 7:7) and Nahum (Na. 1:1), although this fails to account for the plausible placement of the actual location of NHM relative to the description of Lehi's journey in the Book of Mormon narrative.
Availability of information on NHM to Joseph Smith
Critics state that Joseph Smith could have learned about the existence and location of NHM from existing 19th century sources. Libraries available to Joseph Smith would have been the Manchester Public Library and the library at Dartmouth College, at neither of which Smith was a member. Of the books dealing with the ancient Near East that were available in the Manchester library before 1830, LDS scholars suggest that none of these would have given Smith good information on ancient Arabia, and that they would have provided him with inaccurate information even if he had been able to gain access to them . When Smith was five years old, his family moved to Lebanon, New Hampshire and lived there from 1811 to late in 1813, just down the road from Dartmouth College. The Dartmouth library acquired a copy of Robert Heron’s translation of Niebuhr’s work (which had information regarding NHM), but not until 1937. Therefore, this information was not available in its library during the time that the Smith family lived in the town of Lebanon .[8]
Vowel variance and pronunciation
Some have said that the link between Nahom (or Nehhm, as spelled in Niebuhr's work) and NHM is invalid because the vowels between the names ''Nahom'' and ''Nehhm'' do not match .[9] Others indicate that modern vowel variance is to be expected because Hebrew does not have written vowels.[4] The current pronunciation of the location and tribal area is said to be ''Nihm'' rather than ''Nahom''. Some critics state that the time from Ishmael's death to now is not long enough to account for the change in pronunciation , although scholars indicate that historical variation in root pronunciation (possibly due to Arabic influence) may allow for this change .[11]
Notes
1. Reynolds states: "Nibley and others note that this simple travel account fits well with what is now known of the ancient trade routes that carried frankincense from Oman and Yemen northward to the Mediterranean markets."
2. The Authorship of the Book of Mormon
3. Nahom and the "Eastward" Turn, , , , Journal of Book of Mormon Studies,
4. Introduction to Hebrew Vowels
5. Roper states: "In Semitic languages such as Hebrew or Arabic, it is the consonants and not the vowels that have lexical value. The vowels have nothing to do with the meaning of the root. Thus it makes little difference whether the name is spelled Nehem, Nehm, Nihm, Nahm, or Naham—the root is the same."
6. Referring to the root for Naham, Damrosch states " It appears twenty-five times in the narrative books of the Bible, and in every case it is associated with death. In family settings, it is applied in instances involving the death of an immediate family member (parent, sibling, or child); in national settings, it has to do with the survival or impending extermination of an entire people. At heart, ''naham'' means "to mourn," to come to terms with a death."
7. Roper states that "no American geographical sources published before 1830 mention the site Nahom, although we now know that it is an authentic ancient place name, which occurs only once in the entire region, and that in a location consistent with Nephi's description. Joseph Smith could not have learned about Nahom from early nineteenth-century sources."
8. It should also be noted that the Smith family moved from here when Joseph was only 7.
9. The Tanners state that "only three of the five letters in Nehhm agree with the spelling Nahom. The second letter in Nehhm is e rather than a, and the fourth letter is h instead of o. The variant spellings of Nehem, Nehm, Nihm, Nahm and Naham, do not really help to solve the problem.”
10. Introduction to Hebrew Vowels
11. "The exact equivalency of the root letters cannot be assured. It is probable that the term Nahom was spelled with the rasped or fricative Hebrew letter for 'h' (het or chet) whereas the name Nihm, both in modern Arabic and in the ancient Sabaean dialect, is spelled with a softer, less audible h sound." See G. Lankester Harding, An Index and Concordance of Pre-Islamic Arabian Names and Inscriptions (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1971), 81, 602.
References
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
#.
See also
★
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
