NANNY STATE
'Nanny state' is a derogatory term that refers to state protectionism, economic interventionism, or regulatory policies, and the perception that these policies are becoming institutionalized as common practice. This term is primarily in use in the United States, Canada, Australia, and the UK.
Its usage varies by political context, but in general it is used in reference to policies where the state is characterized as being excessive in its desire to protect ("nanny"), govern or control particular aspects of society.
Which particular aspects are considered or claimed to be ''excessively protected'' depends on usage. Political usage of the term confines itself in accordance with scope, referring to:
★ national economic and social policies (regulation and intervention) that affect large and state-favored businesses, or
★ international trade policies that favor native corporate industries (protectionism).
For example, politically conservative groups in the United States (especially paleoconservatives that support the free market and capitalism) have used the term in objection to what it claims is excessive in their desire to protect consumers, through state regulations of business, or otherwise social aspects which have an impact upon business, and have appeal as populist causes.
Liberals on the other hand have used the term to describe the state as being excessive in its protections of businesses and the business class —protections ostensibly made against the public good, and the good of consumers. This usage applies to the international context as well, where the "public good" is used to refer to people in general, and where the state is viewed as being excessive in its protection of native business over foreign (rival) businesses.
The term "Nanny State" was probably coined by the Conservative British MP Iain Macleod who wrote "what I like to call the nanny state . . ." in his column "Quoodle" in the December 3, 1965 edition of ''The Spectator''.
American foreign policy critic Noam Chomsky regularly uses the term "nanny state" to refer to U.S. protectionist policy.
Policies such as bans on smoking in public places, high taxes on junk food, bans on recreational drug use, excessive gun control, a legal drinking age or legal smoking age that is higher than the age of majority, political correctness, censorship, and content regulation are seen by their opponents as an example of a functioning nanny state. Such actions are said to operate on the assumption that the state (or, more often, one of its local authorities) has a duty to protect the citizenry from their own harmful behavior, and that it knows best what constitutes harmful behavior.
A separate category of decisions claimed to represent a nanny state are those which emerge from extreme application of public health, risk management of health and safety policies. Examples have included the proposed felling of mature horse chestnut trees by Norwich City Council in case children slipped on fallen chestnuts,[1] or Tewkesbury's Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership delaying providing napkins with crime prevention information to elderly people receiving home delivered meals from the local council, until a risk assessment of the dangers of choking could be carried out. The European Commission has also been criticized as acting like a nanny state by banning mercury in barometers as of June 2007.[2]
Conservatives and libertarians tend to use the term to oppose new government regulations, although many traditional conservatives may also advocate paternalism, which some liberals and socialists regard as being much the same as a nanny state. A common criticism of nanny state policies is that they are less concerned with the welfare of citizens than with preventing litigation.
The British Labour Party politician Margaret Hodge is perhaps the best known defender of the nanny state, saying at a speech to the Institute for Public Policy Research on 26 November, 2004, that "''some may call it the nanny state but I call it a force for good''".
The city state of Singapore has a reputation as a nanny state, owing to the considerable number of government regulations and restrictions on its citizens' lives. Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew, the architect of the modern Singapore, has observed that "if Singapore is a nanny state, then I am proud to have fostered one."
In Texas hold 'em poker, several pundits have labeled Pocket Queens (one with a red suit, one with a black suit) as the ''Nanny State'' hand. Though the origins of the nickname are ambiguous, it has become acceptable jargon within the poker realm.
★ Night watchman state
1. World Conker Championships 2003
2. Barometer makers lose battle over mercury M. Banks
★ Mother Nation - Opposite value to Nanny State promoted by Progressive Conservatives
★ Nanny Knows Best - Anti-nanny state blog
★ Guardian Society article defending the nanny state
★ ''The Conservative Nanny State'' by Dean Baker (May 2006)
★ News and articles from NannyState.net
★ ''Nanny State: How Food Fascists, Teetotaling Do-Gooders, Priggish Moralists, and other Boneheaded Bureaucrats are Turning America into a Nation of Children '' By David Harsanyi
★ Nanny State - A comical glance at the Nanny State
| Contents |
| Overview |
| Various uses of term |
| Singapore |
| In poker |
| See also |
| References |
| Resources |
| External links |
Overview
Its usage varies by political context, but in general it is used in reference to policies where the state is characterized as being excessive in its desire to protect ("nanny"), govern or control particular aspects of society.
Which particular aspects are considered or claimed to be ''excessively protected'' depends on usage. Political usage of the term confines itself in accordance with scope, referring to:
★ national economic and social policies (regulation and intervention) that affect large and state-favored businesses, or
★ international trade policies that favor native corporate industries (protectionism).
For example, politically conservative groups in the United States (especially paleoconservatives that support the free market and capitalism) have used the term in objection to what it claims is excessive in their desire to protect consumers, through state regulations of business, or otherwise social aspects which have an impact upon business, and have appeal as populist causes.
Liberals on the other hand have used the term to describe the state as being excessive in its protections of businesses and the business class —protections ostensibly made against the public good, and the good of consumers. This usage applies to the international context as well, where the "public good" is used to refer to people in general, and where the state is viewed as being excessive in its protection of native business over foreign (rival) businesses.
The term "Nanny State" was probably coined by the Conservative British MP Iain Macleod who wrote "what I like to call the nanny state . . ." in his column "Quoodle" in the December 3, 1965 edition of ''The Spectator''.
American foreign policy critic Noam Chomsky regularly uses the term "nanny state" to refer to U.S. protectionist policy.
Various uses of term
Policies such as bans on smoking in public places, high taxes on junk food, bans on recreational drug use, excessive gun control, a legal drinking age or legal smoking age that is higher than the age of majority, political correctness, censorship, and content regulation are seen by their opponents as an example of a functioning nanny state. Such actions are said to operate on the assumption that the state (or, more often, one of its local authorities) has a duty to protect the citizenry from their own harmful behavior, and that it knows best what constitutes harmful behavior.
A separate category of decisions claimed to represent a nanny state are those which emerge from extreme application of public health, risk management of health and safety policies. Examples have included the proposed felling of mature horse chestnut trees by Norwich City Council in case children slipped on fallen chestnuts,[1] or Tewkesbury's Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership delaying providing napkins with crime prevention information to elderly people receiving home delivered meals from the local council, until a risk assessment of the dangers of choking could be carried out. The European Commission has also been criticized as acting like a nanny state by banning mercury in barometers as of June 2007.[2]
Conservatives and libertarians tend to use the term to oppose new government regulations, although many traditional conservatives may also advocate paternalism, which some liberals and socialists regard as being much the same as a nanny state. A common criticism of nanny state policies is that they are less concerned with the welfare of citizens than with preventing litigation.
The British Labour Party politician Margaret Hodge is perhaps the best known defender of the nanny state, saying at a speech to the Institute for Public Policy Research on 26 November, 2004, that "''some may call it the nanny state but I call it a force for good''".
Singapore
The city state of Singapore has a reputation as a nanny state, owing to the considerable number of government regulations and restrictions on its citizens' lives. Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew, the architect of the modern Singapore, has observed that "if Singapore is a nanny state, then I am proud to have fostered one."
In poker
In Texas hold 'em poker, several pundits have labeled Pocket Queens (one with a red suit, one with a black suit) as the ''Nanny State'' hand. Though the origins of the nickname are ambiguous, it has become acceptable jargon within the poker realm.
See also
★ Night watchman state
References
1. World Conker Championships 2003
2. Barometer makers lose battle over mercury M. Banks
Resources
★ Mother Nation - Opposite value to Nanny State promoted by Progressive Conservatives
★ Nanny Knows Best - Anti-nanny state blog
★ Guardian Society article defending the nanny state
★ ''The Conservative Nanny State'' by Dean Baker (May 2006)
★ News and articles from NannyState.net
★ ''Nanny State: How Food Fascists, Teetotaling Do-Gooders, Priggish Moralists, and other Boneheaded Bureaucrats are Turning America into a Nation of Children '' By David Harsanyi
External links
★ Nanny State - A comical glance at the Nanny State
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves

العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español