العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
EspañolNOBEL PRIZE IN ECONOMICS
(Redirected from Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences)
The 'Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel' (Swedish: ''Sveriges Riksbanks pris i ekonomisk vetenskap till Alfred Nobels minne'') is a prize awarded each year for outstanding intellectual contributions in the field of economics. It is commonly referred to unofficially as the 'Nobel Prize in Economics' and has been referred to in popular culture, public media, scholarly works and encyclopedias as the "Nobel Prize in Economics", or more rarely as the "Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences."
The award was established by the Sveriges Riksbank (the world's oldest central bank) at its 300th anniversary in 1968. The prize is awarded by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in accordance with the same principles as those for the original five Nobel Prizes.[1] Although it was not one of the awards established in the will of Alfred Nobel, the economics laureates receive their diploma and gold medal from the Monarch of Sweden at the same December 10 ceremony in Stockholm as the Nobel laureates in physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, and literature. The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded in Oslo, Norway. The amount of money awarded to the economics laureates is also equal to that of the other prizes.
The economics laureates, as with the laureates in chemistry and physics, are chosen by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Nominations of about one hundred living persons are made each year by qualified nominators and are received by a five to eight member committee, which then submits its choice of winners to the Nobel Assembly for its final approval. As with the other prizes, no more than three people can share the prize for a given year and they must be living at the time the prize is awarded. The final award is presented in Stockholm, accompanied by a cash prize of 10 million Kronor (1 million euro).
In February 1995, it was decided that the economics prize be essentially defined as a prize in social sciences, opening the economics prize to great contributions in fields like political science, psychology, and sociology. Also, the Economics Prize Committee was changed to require two non-economists to decide the prize each year, whereas previously the prize committee had consisted of five economists.
The prestige of the prize derives in part from its association with the awards created by Alfred Nobel's will, an association which has often been a source of controversy. Among the most vocal critics of the economics prize is the Swedish human rights lawyer Peter Nobel, who is a great-grandnephew of Alfred Nobel. Peter Nobel sees the economics prize as merely a "PR coup by economists".[2][3][4]
Swedish economist Gunnar Myrdal and former Swedish minister of finance Kjell-Olof Feldt have also advocated that the prize should be abolished. In the case of at least the former, however, this objection was based on his opinion that the prize awarded to liberal economists Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek was undeserved - not that economics itself did not qualify as a science. Friedrich Hayek stated he would "have decidedly advised against it" if he had been asked about the establishment of the prize.[5] Hazel Henderson, the futurist and author, argues that the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economical Sciences is an embarrassment which is diminishing the value of all other Nobel Prizes. She also argues that the theories of economists were largely unprovable hypotheses and therefore the theories cannot be compared with hard sciences such as Physics or Chemistry.[6][7]
This controversy may now be less relevant. The rise of experimental economics and empirical testing of many of the underlying theories of economics has countered some objections that economics should count as a science. Also, some of the Nobel Prize recipients were notable mathematicians or social scientists in other fields and this may, in effect, "import" additional credibility to economics and the Nobel Prize for economics.
In the television series ''The West Wing'', the fictional US president Josiah Bartlet is a Nobel laureate in economics.
1. An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics, , Brian, Snowdon, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2002,
2. Nobel descendant slams Economics prize
3. Cloud hovers over Nobel economics prize
4. The Cuckoo's Egg in the Nobel Prize Nest
5. The not so noble Nobel Prize
6. Abolish the Nobel in Economics, Many Scientists Agree
7. The ‘Nobel prize’ that isn’t
8. All Nobel Laureates in Chemistry
★ Laureates at the Nobel Foundation
★ Winners of the Prize in Economics
★ History of the prize and its controversy
★ Nobel Prize in Economics in Azeri
The 'Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel' (Swedish: ''Sveriges Riksbanks pris i ekonomisk vetenskap till Alfred Nobels minne'') is a prize awarded each year for outstanding intellectual contributions in the field of economics. It is commonly referred to unofficially as the 'Nobel Prize in Economics' and has been referred to in popular culture, public media, scholarly works and encyclopedias as the "Nobel Prize in Economics", or more rarely as the "Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences."
The award was established by the Sveriges Riksbank (the world's oldest central bank) at its 300th anniversary in 1968. The prize is awarded by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in accordance with the same principles as those for the original five Nobel Prizes.[1] Although it was not one of the awards established in the will of Alfred Nobel, the economics laureates receive their diploma and gold medal from the Monarch of Sweden at the same December 10 ceremony in Stockholm as the Nobel laureates in physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, and literature. The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded in Oslo, Norway. The amount of money awarded to the economics laureates is also equal to that of the other prizes.
| Contents |
| Award process |
| Controversies and criticisms |
| Laureates |
| In popular culture |
| References |
| External links |
Award process
The economics laureates, as with the laureates in chemistry and physics, are chosen by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Nominations of about one hundred living persons are made each year by qualified nominators and are received by a five to eight member committee, which then submits its choice of winners to the Nobel Assembly for its final approval. As with the other prizes, no more than three people can share the prize for a given year and they must be living at the time the prize is awarded. The final award is presented in Stockholm, accompanied by a cash prize of 10 million Kronor (1 million euro).
In February 1995, it was decided that the economics prize be essentially defined as a prize in social sciences, opening the economics prize to great contributions in fields like political science, psychology, and sociology. Also, the Economics Prize Committee was changed to require two non-economists to decide the prize each year, whereas previously the prize committee had consisted of five economists.
Controversies and criticisms
The prestige of the prize derives in part from its association with the awards created by Alfred Nobel's will, an association which has often been a source of controversy. Among the most vocal critics of the economics prize is the Swedish human rights lawyer Peter Nobel, who is a great-grandnephew of Alfred Nobel. Peter Nobel sees the economics prize as merely a "PR coup by economists".[2][3][4]
Swedish economist Gunnar Myrdal and former Swedish minister of finance Kjell-Olof Feldt have also advocated that the prize should be abolished. In the case of at least the former, however, this objection was based on his opinion that the prize awarded to liberal economists Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek was undeserved - not that economics itself did not qualify as a science. Friedrich Hayek stated he would "have decidedly advised against it" if he had been asked about the establishment of the prize.[5] Hazel Henderson, the futurist and author, argues that the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economical Sciences is an embarrassment which is diminishing the value of all other Nobel Prizes. She also argues that the theories of economists were largely unprovable hypotheses and therefore the theories cannot be compared with hard sciences such as Physics or Chemistry.[6][7]
This controversy may now be less relevant. The rise of experimental economics and empirical testing of many of the underlying theories of economics has countered some objections that economics should count as a science. Also, some of the Nobel Prize recipients were notable mathematicians or social scientists in other fields and this may, in effect, "import" additional credibility to economics and the Nobel Prize for economics.
Laureates
| Year | Name | Country [8] | Topics |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1969 | Ragnar Anton Kittil Frisch Jan Tinbergen | | for having developed and applied dynamic models for the analysis of economic processes |
| 1970 | Paul Samuelson | for the scientific work through which he has developed static and dynamic economic theory and actively contributed to raising the level of analysis in economic science | |
| 1971 | Simon Kuznets | for his empirically founded interpretation of economic growth which has led to new and deepened insight into the economic and social structure and process of development | |
| 1972 | John Hicks Kenneth Arrow | | for their pioneering contributions to general economic equilibrium theory and welfare theory |
| 1973 | Wassily Leontief | for the development of the input-output method and for its application to important economic problems. | |
| 1974 | Gunnar Myrdal Friedrich Hayek | | for their pioneering work in the theory of money and economic fluctuations and for their penetrating analysis of the interdependence of economic, social and institutional phenomena |
| 1975 | Leonid Kantorovich Tjalling Koopmans | | for their contributions to the theory of optimum allocation of resources |
| 1976 | Milton Friedman | for his achievements in the fields of consumption analysis, monetary history and theory and for his demonstration of the complexity of stabilization policy | |
| 1977 | Bertil Ohlin James Meade | | for their pathbreaking contribution to the theory of international trade and international capital movements |
| 1978 | Herbert Simon | for his pioneering research into the decision-making process within economic organizations | |
| 1979 | Theodore Schultz Arthur Lewis | | for their pioneering research into economic development research with particular consideration of the problems of developing countries |
| 1980 | Lawrence Klein | for the creation of econometric models and the application to the analysis of economic fluctuations and economic policies | |
| 1981 | James Tobin | for his analysis of financial markets and their relations to expenditure decisions, employment, production and prices | |
| 1982 | George Stigler | for his seminal studies of industrial structures, functioning of markets and causes and effects of public regulation | |
| 1983 | Gérard Debreu | for having incorporated new analytical methods into economic theory and for his rigorous reformulation of the theory of general equilibrium | |
| 1984 | Richard Stone | for having made fundamental contributions to the development of systems of national accounts and hence greatly improved the basis for empirical economic analysis | |
| 1985 | Franco Modigliani | for his pioneering analyses of saving and of financial markets | |
| 1986 | James Buchanan Jr. | for his development of the contractual and constitutional bases for the theory of economic and political decision-making | |
| 1987 | Robert Solow | for his contributions to the theory of economic growth | |
| 1988 | Maurice Allais | for his pioneering contributions to the theory of markets and efficient utilization of resources | |
| 1989 | Trygve Haavelmo | for his clarification of the probability theory foundations of econometrics and his analyses of simultaneous economic structures | |
| 1990 | Harry Markowitz Merton Miller William Sharpe | for their pioneering work in the theory of financial economics | |
| 1991 | Ronald Coase | for his discovery and clarification of the significance of transaction costs and property rights for the institutional structure and functioning of the economy | |
| 1992 | Gary Becker | for having extended the domain of microeconomic analysis to a wide range of human behaviour and interaction, including nonmarket behaviour | |
| 1993 | Robert Fogel Douglass North | for having renewed research in economic history by applying economic theory and quantitative methods in order to explain economic and institutional change | |
| 1994 | John Harsanyi John Forbes Nash Reinhard Selten | | for their pioneering analysis of equilibria in the theory of non-cooperative games |
| 1995 | Robert Lucas Jr. | for having developed and applied the hypothesis of rational expectations, and thereby having transformed macroeconomic analysis and deepened our understanding of economic policy | |
| 1996 | James Mirrlees William Vickrey | | for their fundamental contributions to the economic theory of incentives under asymmetric information |
| 1997 | Robert C. Merton Myron Scholes | for a new method to determine the value of derivatives | |
| 1998 | Amartya Sen | for his contributions to welfare economics | |
| 1999 | Robert Mundell | for his analysis of monetary and fiscal policy under different exchange rate regimes and his analysis of optimum currency areas | |
| 2000 | James Heckman | for his development of theory and methods for analyzing selective samples | |
| Daniel McFadden | for his development of theory and methods for analyzing discrete choice | ||
| 2001 | George A. Akerlof Michael Spence Joseph E. Stiglitz | for their analyses of markets with asymmetric information. | |
| 2002 | Daniel Kahneman | | for having integrated insights from psychological research into economic science, especially concerning human judgment and decision-making under uncertainty |
| Vernon L. Smith | for having established laboratory experiments as a tool in empirical economic analysis, especially in the study of alternative market mechanisms | ||
| 2003 | Robert F. Engle Clive W. J. Granger | | for methods of analyzing economic time series with time-varying volatility or common trends |
| 2004 | Finn E. Kydland Edward C. Prescott | | for their contributions to dynamic macroeconomics: the time consistency of economic policy and the driving forces behind business cycles |
| 2005 | Robert J. Aumann Thomas Schelling | | for having enhanced our understanding of conflict and cooperation through game-theory analysis |
| 2006 | Edmund Phelps | for his analysis of intertemporal tradeoffs in macroeconomic policy |
In popular culture
In the television series ''The West Wing'', the fictional US president Josiah Bartlet is a Nobel laureate in economics.
References
1. An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics, , Brian, Snowdon, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2002,
2. Nobel descendant slams Economics prize
3. Cloud hovers over Nobel economics prize
4. The Cuckoo's Egg in the Nobel Prize Nest
5. The not so noble Nobel Prize
6. Abolish the Nobel in Economics, Many Scientists Agree
7. The ‘Nobel prize’ that isn’t
8. All Nobel Laureates in Chemistry
External links
★ Laureates at the Nobel Foundation
★ Winners of the Prize in Economics
★ History of the prize and its controversy
★ Nobel Prize in Economics in Azeri
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
