Discover

The 'noosphere' can be seen as the "sphere of human thought" being derived from the Greek νους ("nous") meaning "mind" in the style of "atmosphere" and "biosphere". In the original theory of Vernadsky, the noosphere is the third in a succession of phases of development of the Earth, after the geosphere (inanimate matter) and the biosphere (biological life). Just as the emergence of life fundamentally transformed the geosphere, the emergence of human cognition fundamentally transforms the biosphere. In contrast to the conceptions of the Gaia theorists, or the promoters of cyberspace, Vernadsky's noosphere emerges at the point where humankind, through the mastery of nuclear processes, begins to create resources through the transmutation of elements.
The word is also sometimes used to refer to a transhuman consciousness emerging from the interactions of human minds. This is the view proposed by the theologian Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, who added that the noosphere is evolving towards an ever greater integration, culminating in the Omega Point—which he saw as the ultimate goal of history. The noosphere concept of 'unification' was elaborated in popular science fiction by Julian May in the Galactic Milieu Series.

Contents

History of concept

Other uses

See also

References

External links

History of concept

One of the original aspects of the nöosphere concept deals with evolution. Henri Bergson (1907) was one of the first to propose that evolution is 'creative' and cannot necessarily be explained solely by Darwinian natural selection. ''L'évolution créatrice'' is upheld, according to Bergson, by a constant vital force that animates life and fundamentally connects mind and body, an idea opposing the dualism of René Descartes. In 1923, C. Lloyd Morgan took this work further, elaborating on an 'emergent evolution' that could explain increasing complexity (including the evolution of mind). Morgan found that many of the most interesting changes in living things have been largely discontinuous with past evolution, and therefore did not necessarily take place through a gradual process of natural selection. Rather, evolution experiences jumps in complexity (such as the emergence of a self-reflective universe, or nöosphere). Finally, the complexification of human cultures, particularly language, facilitated a quickening of evolution in which cultural evolution occurs more rapidly than biological evolution. Recent understanding of human ecosystems and of human impact on the biosphere have led to a link between the notion of sustainability with the "co-evolution" [Norgaard, 1994] and harmonization of cultural and biological evolution.
The resulting political system has been referred to as a noocracy.
American integral theorist Ken Wilber deals with this third evolution of the nöosphere. In his work, ''Sex Ecology, Spirituality'' (1995), he builds many of his arguments on the emergence of the noosphere and the continued emergence of further evolutionary structures.
History of this expression:

★ Henry Bergson's ''L'évolution créatrice'' (1907)

★ E. LeRoy's ''Les origines humaines et l'évolution de l'intelligence'' (1928)

★ Vladimir I. Vernadsky (1863-1945)

★ Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881-1955)

Other uses

The software used at PlanetMath is named "Noösphere".

See also

★ ''Blood Music'' (science fiction novel about "noocytes")

★ Manuel DeLanda

★ Gilles Deleuze

★ Collective unconscious

★ Mordekhay Nesiyahu

★ Emergy Synthesis

★ Buckminster Fuller

★ Global brain

★ Gerald Heard

★ Hazel Henderson

★ Human Instrumentality Project, a fictional concept in ''Neon Genesis Evangelion''

★ Ideosphere

★ Infosphere

★ Carl Jung

★ Memetics

★ Noetic

★ Technological singularity

★ Universal evolution

★ Arthur M. Young

★ Ken Wilber

★ Serial Experiment Lain

References

★ Paul R. Samson and David Pitt (eds.)(1999), ''The Biosphere and Noosphere Reader: Global Environment, Society and Change''. ISBN 0-415-16644-6

★ "The Quest for a Unified Theory of Information", ''World Futures'', Volumes 49 (3-4) & 50 (1-4) 1997, Special Issue

★ Raymond, Eric (2000), "Homesteading the Noosphere", available online.

★ Norgaard, R. B. (1994). ''Development betrayed: the end of progress and a coevolutionary revisioning of the future''. London; New York, Routledge. ISBN 0-415-06862-2

External links

★ http://noosphere.cc/

★ http://lawoftime.org/research/engineering.html Noosphere II: Planetary Engineering Project

★ http://noosphere.princeton.edu/ Global Consciousness project at Princeton

★ http://transhumanism.org/index.php/WTA/declaration/

★ http://www.odeo.com/channel/105280 "Just Say Yes to the Noosphere", a Podcast from Stanford Law School

★ Omega Point Institute Noosphere, Global Thought, Future Studies

★ Noosphere and Homo Noeticus