OMEGA CONSTANT
The 'Omega constant' is a mathematical constant defined by
:
It is the value of ''W''(1) where ''W'' is Lambert's W function. The name is derived from the alternate name for Lambert's ''W'' function, the ''Omega function''.
The value of Ω is approximately 0.5671432904097838729999686622 . It has properties that are akin to those of the golden ratio, in that
:
or equivalently,
:
One can calculate Ω iteratively, by starting with an initial guess Ω0, and considering the sequence
:
This sequence will converge towards Ω as ''n''→∞.
Ω can be proven irrational from the fact that e is transcendental; if Ω were rational, then there would exist integers ''p'' and ''q'' such that
:
so that
:
:
and ''e'' would therefore be algebraic of degree ''p''. However ''e'' is transcendental, so Ω must be irrational.
Ω is in fact transcendental as the direct consequence of Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem. If Ω were algebraic, exp(Ω) would be transcendental and so would be exp−1(Ω). But this contradicts the assumption that it was algebraic.
★ Lambert's W function
★
:
It is the value of ''W''(1) where ''W'' is Lambert's W function. The name is derived from the alternate name for Lambert's ''W'' function, the ''Omega function''.
The value of Ω is approximately 0.5671432904097838729999686622 . It has properties that are akin to those of the golden ratio, in that
:
or equivalently,
:
One can calculate Ω iteratively, by starting with an initial guess Ω0, and considering the sequence
:
This sequence will converge towards Ω as ''n''→∞.
| Contents |
| Irrationality and transcendence |
| See also |
| External links |
Irrationality and transcendence
Ω can be proven irrational from the fact that e is transcendental; if Ω were rational, then there would exist integers ''p'' and ''q'' such that
:
so that
:
:
and ''e'' would therefore be algebraic of degree ''p''. However ''e'' is transcendental, so Ω must be irrational.
Ω is in fact transcendental as the direct consequence of Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem. If Ω were algebraic, exp(Ω) would be transcendental and so would be exp−1(Ω). But this contradicts the assumption that it was algebraic.
See also
★ Lambert's W function
External links
★
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
Featured Companies
| Dancing Moon Travel | |
| Alpine Interface Inc. | |
| Travelbugs, LLC | |
| Golf Holidays International |

العربية
ä¸å›½
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिनà¥à¤¦à¥€
Italiano
日本語
Português
РуÑÑкий
Español