ORGANIC FOOD

'Organic foods' are produced according to certain production standards. For crops, it means they were grown without the use of conventional pesticides, artificial fertilizers, human waste, or sewage sludge, and that they were processed without ionizing radiation or food additives.^[1] For animals, it means they were reared without the routine use of antibiotics and without the use of growth hormones. In most countries, organic produce must not be genetically modified.
Increasingly, organic food production is legally regulated. Currently, the United States, the European Union, Japan and many other countries require producers to obtain organic certification in order to market food as organic.
Historically, organic farms have been relatively small family-run farms^[2] — which is why organic food was once only available in small stores or farmers' markets. Now, organic foods are becoming much more widely available — organic food sales within the United States have grown by 17 to 20 percent a year for the past few years^[3] while sales of conventional food have grown at only about 2 to 3 percent a year. This large growth is predicted to continue, and many companies are jumping into the market.^[4]

Contents

Types of organic food

Fresh food

Processed food

Identifying organic food

Legal definition

Motivations

Environmental impact

Pesticides and farmers

Pesticide residue

Taste

Nutritional value

Sustainability

Cost

Commercialization

History

Modern developments

Related movements

Facts and statistics

See also

References

Further reading

External links

Pesticides and food

Types of organic food

:''See also: Organic farming for information on the production of organic food.''
Organic foods can be either ''fresh'' or ''processed'', based on production methods.

Fresh food

Fresh, "unprocessed" organic food, such as vegetables and fruits are purchased directly from growers, at farmers' markets, from on-farm stands, supermarkets, through speciality food stores, and through community-supported agriculture (CSA) projects. Unprocessed animal products like organic meat, eggs, dairy, are less commonly available in "fresh" form.
In Australia, organic eggs must be from free-range hens, rather than from battery chickensChoice, October 2004.. Animals for the organic market may not be fed growth hormones or drugs such as steroids or antibiotics.

Processed food

Often, within the same supermarket, both organic and conventional versions of products are available, although the price of the organic version is usually higher (see modern developments). Most processed organic food comes from large food conglomerates^[5] producing and marketing products like canned goods, frozen vegetables, prepared dishes and other convenience foods.
Processed organic food usually contains only organic ingredients, or where there are a number of ingredients, at least a minimum percentage of the plant and animal ingredients must be organic (95% in Australia). Any non-organically produced ingredients must still meet requirements. It must be free of artificial food additives, and is often processed with fewer artificial methods, materials and conditions (no chemical ripening, no food irradiation, and no genetically modified ingredients, etc.).
They may also be required to be produced using energy-saving technologies and packaged using recyclable or biodegradable materials when possible.

Identifying organic food

At first, organic food comprised mainly fresh vegetables. Early consumers interested in organic food would look for chemical-free, fresh or minimally processed food. They mostly had to buy directly from growers: "Know your farmer, know your food" was the motto. Personal definitions of what constituted "organic" were developed through firsthand experience: by talking to farmers, seeing farm conditions, and farming activities. Small farms grew vegetables (and raised livestock) using organic farming practices, with or without certification, and the individual consumer monitored.
Consumer demand for organic foods continues to increase, and high volume sales through mass outlets, like supermarkets, is rapidly replacing the direct farmer connection. For supermarket consumers, food production is not easily observable, and product labelling, like "certified organic", is relied on. Government regulations and third-party inspectors are looked to for assurance.
A "certified organic" label is usually the only way for consumers to know that a processed product is "organic".

Legal definition

The National Organic Program (run by the USDA) is in charge of the legal definition of ''organic'' in the United States and does organic certification. It administers the Organic Seal to products and producers that meet strict requirements.

Main articles: Organic certification

To be 'certified organic', products must be grown and manufactured in a manner that adheres to standards set by the country they are sold in:
:Australia: NASAA Organic Standard.
:Britain: Organic Farmers and Growers Organic Standards and the Soil Association
:Canada: Canada Gazette, Government of Canada.
:Japan: JAS Standards.
:United States: National Organic Program (NOP) Standards.
:Sweden: KRAV
In the United States, the Organic Food Production Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C.A. § 6501-22) required that the USDA develop national standards for organic products.^[6] The regulations (7 C.F.R. Part 205) are enforced by the USDA through the National Organic Program under this act. These laws essentially require that any product that claims to be organic must have been manufactured and handled according to specific NOP requirements. A USDA Organic seal identifies products with at least 95% organic ingredients.

Motivations

Main articles: Motivations for organic agriculture

Defining the benefits of organic food has largely been left to word of mouth, occasional media coverage, and the promotional efforts of organic advocates. Even though many large food and beverage corporations, like Kraft Foods, have rapidly moved to acquire significant stake in both fresh and processed organic products,^[7] the specific sales points of "organics" go largely unmentioned on product packaging and in advertising.
These comparisons need to be evaluated with care because neither conventional nor organic farming practices are uniform.

Environmental impact

In several surveys that have looked at smaller studies to build an overall comparison between conventional and organic systems of farming a general agreement on benefits has been built. In these surveys^[8][9] it has been found that:

★ Organic farms do not release synthetic pesticides into the environment — some of which have the potential to harm local wildlife.

★ Organic farms are better than conventional farms at sustaining diverse ecosystems, ''i.e.'', populations of plants and insects, as well as animals.

★ When calculated either per unit area or per unit of yield, organic farms use less energy and produce less waste, ''e.g.'', waste such as packaging materials for chemicals.
See "Organic FAQs" in the journal ''Nature'' for more details.^[10]
One study found a 20% smaller yield from organic farms using 50% less fertilizer and 97% less pesticide.^[11] Studies comparing yields have had mixed results.^[12] Supporters claim that organically managed soil has a higher quality^[13] and higher water retention. This may help increase yields for organic farms in drought years. One study of two organic farming systems and one conventional found that, in one year's severe crop season drought, organic soybean yields were 52% and 96% higher than the conventional system and organic maize yields were 37% higher in one system, but 62% lower in the other.^[14]
Studies are also consistent in showing that organic farms are more energy efficient.^[15]
One study from the Danish Environmental Protection Agency found that, area-for-area, organic farms of potatoes, sugar beet and seed grass produce as little as half the output of conventional farming. ^[16]

Pesticides and farmers

For those who work on farms, there have been many studies on the health effects of pesticide exposure.^[17] Even when pesticides are used correctly, they still end up in the air and bodies of farm workers. Through these studies, organophosphate pesticides have become associated with acute health problems such as abdominal pain, dizziness, headaches, nausea, vomiting, as well as skin and eye problems.^[18] In addition, there have been many other studies that have found pesticide exposure is associated with more severe health problems such as respiratory problems, memory disorders, dermatologic conditions,^[19][20] cancer,^[21] depression, neurologic deficits,^[22][23] miscarriages, and birth defects.^[24] Summaries of peer-reviewed research have examined the link between pesticide exposure and neurological outcomes and cancer in organophosphate-exposed workers.^[25][26]
However, some argue that farmworkers and their families can be protected from the effects of pesticides through the use of genetically-modified crops. Whereas organic farms use no artificial pesticides, genetically-modified crops often require less or no pesticide spraying and reports by think-tanks like the Hudson Institute have shown a reduction in pesticide usage and environmental footprint.^[27][28]
However, genetically-modified crops are the subject of controversy on their own.

Pesticide residue

A study published in 2002 showed that "Organically grown foods consistently had about one-third as many residues as conventionally grown foods."^[29][30]
Monitoring of pesticide residues in the United States is carried out by the Pesticide Data Program (part of USDA, which was was created in 1990. It has since tested over 60 different types of food for over 400 different types of pesticides - with samples collected close to the point of consumption. Their most recent results found in 2005 that:
Several studies corroborate this finding by having found that that while 77 percent of conventional food carries synthetic pesticide residues, only about 25 percent of organic food does.^{[31] [32] [33] [34]}
While the studies by the USDA have shown that conventional food contains more synthetic pesticide residues, studies in Canada show a different picture. Annual and comprehensive Canadian government studies by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency consistently find that only about 10 percent of conventionally farmed food carries any pesticide residues at all. ^{[35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42]}
The Canadian studies are relevant because samples of all foods sold in Canada are included in the annual testings — whether farmed in Canada or in the United States or some other country. (A large amount of food that is sold in Canada is imported from the USA, including about 90 percent of all organic food sold in Canada.)
A study published by the National Research Council in 1993 determined that for infants and children, the major source of exposure to pesticides is through diet.^[43] A recent study in 2006 measured the levels of organophosphorus pesticide exposure in 23 schoolchildren before and after replacing their diet with organic food. In this study it was found that levels of organophosphorus pesticide exposure dropped dramatically and immediately when the children switched to an organic diet.^[44] However, the fact that diet is the major source of pesticide ingestion does not mean that pesticides are ingested at amounts that could ever prove harmful; modern pesticides biodegrade into harmless components in the body; and food residue limits established by law are set specifically with children in mind and consider a child's lifetime ingestion of each pesticide.
Yet, the potential health effects of pesticide residues found in food are virtually nonexistent. Modern analytical chemistry is capable of detecting such small quantities of a substance — even a single molecule — that a "positive" result is meaningless. Many scientists in 1990 thought that such residues are without effect.^[45]
Pesticides are subjected to a battery of tests before they can be approved by the EPA [2] and "residue tolerances" are established above which produce exceeding these tolerances cannot be sold. These tolerances take into account the maximum amount of any pesticide that anyone could ever ingest in an entire lifetime, from all possible food sources, assuming a worst case scenario.
Scientists do know exactly where pesticide go, exactly when and how they break down and where their metabolites go. They conduct numerous metabolism studies — analyzing blood, urine, exhaled breath, fat tissue and so on — for the initial chemical and all metabolites related to each pesticide. In fact, every molecule of a pesticide’s metabolites is tracked to its final destination. Using what is called metabolic analysis, a radioactive label or marker is attached to every molecule of the pesticide before testing. This allows scientists to follow every molecule through the body to see how many leave in feces or in urine, and how many settle in body organs and for how long. Radioactive testing is so stringent that scientists really do know where every molecule of a pesticide and its metabolites ultimately ends up. ^{[46] [47]}
In fact, very few pesticides ever make it all the way through such rigorous testing to approval. Compare prescription medicines — which we ingest deliberately — with pesticides. Only one drug out of every 5,000 makes it all the way from lab to pharmacy. ^{[48] [49]} But after an average 9.1 years of testing, only one active pesticide ingredient is ultimately approved for every 140,000 that are first synthesized. ^[50]
Furthermore Lois Swirsky Gold and Bruce Ames argue :"Whereas public perceptions tend to identify chemicals as being only synthetic and only synthetic chemicals as being toxic, every natural chemical is also toxic at some dose," and have shown that 50% of all natural chemicals in food gave a positive test as a carcinogen when tested in rodents, casting doubt on any link of food residues and cancer risk.^[28]
Author Thomas DeGregori argues that at the heart of the organic food movement are feelings of anti-technology and anti-modern science^[52] and points out that it is modern science, after all, that has increased the life expectancy of many people and helps to feed the world's growing population.
There is controversial data on the health implications of certain pesticides. The herbicide Atrazine, for example, has been shown in some experiments to be a teratogen, even at concentrations as low as 0.1 part per billion, to emasculate male frogs by causing their gonads to produce eggs — effectively turning males into hermaphrodites.^[53] However, Anthony Trewavas and numerous other scientists such Bruce Ames and Lois Swirsky, have put forth that concerns about residues are greatly over-stated and that naturally occurring chemicals offer the same or greater risks.^[54][55]
In fact, weight-for-weight, pesticide residues are less toxic than numerous other chemicals found everywhere, such as salt, caffeine,^[56] or vitamin B6.
Organic farming standards do not allow the use of synthetic pesticides, but they do allow the use of specific pesticides derived from plants. The most common organic pesticides, accepted for restricted use by most organic standards, include Bt, pyrethrum, and rotenone. Some organic pesticides, such as rotenone, have high toxicity to fish and aquatic creatures with some toxicity to mammals including humans. ^[57]
The United States Environmental Protection Agency and state agencies periodically review the licensing of suspect pesticides, but the process of de-listing is slow. One example of this slow process is exemplified by the pesticide Dichlorvos, or DDVP, which as recently as the year 2006 the EPA proposed its continued sale. The EPA has almost banned this pesticide on several occasions since the 1970s, but it never did so despite considerable evidence that suggests DDVP is not only carcinogenic but dangerous to the human nervous system — especially in children.^[58]

Taste

A 2001 study by researchers at Washington State University concluded, under judgement by a panel of tasters, that organic apples were sweeter. Along with taste and sweetness, the texture as well as firmness of the apples were also rated higher than those grown conventionally. These differences are attributed to the greater soil quality resulting from organic farming techniques compared to those of conventional farming.^[59]
A small study looking at processed organic foods, found participants could not differentiate organic and conventional varieties of a rice cakes or vitabrits.

Nutritional value

Some studies have shown higher nutrient levels in organic fruit and vegetables compared with conventionally grown. However, due to the difficulty with designing such experiments, the evidence is not considered conclusive.
Most studies — including a 2002 meta-analysis, which is a review of all past studies on the subject — found no proof that organic food offers greater nutritional values, more consumer safety or any distinguisable difference in taste. ^{[60] [61] [62] [63]}

Sustainability

★ Newer non-organic practices, particularly no-till agriculture, which relies on herbicides to clear the land, offer considerable improvements in energy efficiency. Anthony Trewavas argues that the sustainability of organic agriculture is less than that of conventional agriculture (see Trewavas (2000)^[54][55]).

★ Soil benefits: Trevavas also argues that many of the soil benefits of organic agriculture have been demonstrated to be due to crop rotation, which is not an exclusively organic strategy (see Trewavas (2000) cited above).

★ Land usage: Organic food growers lose a significantly larger portion of their crops to pests, mold, etc, and therefore require significantly higher land usage to generate the same amount of product. One study shows that a crop of organic tomatoes, for example, would use approximately 642% more land than one grown via conventional methods.^[66]

★ Organic farming could deepen world hunger: Virtually all experts, including Greenpeace cofounder Patrick Moore, PhD, ^[67] agree that to feed an expected 9 billion people by 2050, farm output must triple. ^[68] Without greater productivity, that would require 108 percent of Earth’s land area. Higher conventional yields are the answer, stresses Moore. ^[67] By contrast, organic farming offers far less than conventional yields — as much as 50 percent less. ^[16] However, when Badgley et al. conducted a meta-analysis of 293 organic vs. conventional yield comparisons, they found that the ratio of organic yields to conventional yields for the food categories included ranged from 0.988 for meat products to 2.080 for fruits. The authors concluded that not only could organic agriculture support the current global population, but a significantly larger population than now exists, while possibly even reducing the agricultural land base.^[71]

★ Pesticide use: While organic agriculture aims to keep pesticide use to a minimum, it is a common misconception that organic agriculture does not use pesticides. Some pesticides used on organic farms contain the heavy metal copper, which can lead to copper accumulation in the soil. Other pesticides that are approved for use by organic producers include ryania, sabadilla, and rotenone.^[72]The botanical pesticide sabadilla is toxic to honeybees, and according to the California Department of Environmental Protection its mammalian toxicology has not been fully studied.^[73]

★ Toxicity of "organic pesticides": Conventional pesticides must be thoroughly studied before they can be placed on the market ^[50] However, such studies are not required for the pesticides used in organic agriculture .

★ John Kent, Lecturer in Agricultural Protection, from the School of Agriculture at Charles Sturt University in Australia supports the idea that organically grown food is not as sustainable, arguing that while organically grown food certainly has its place in today's free market, the world population could not be fed with pesticide-free agriculture.^[75]

Cost

Critics claim that organic food is more expensive than conventional food and thus too highly priced to be affordable to persons on a lower income. Organic products typically cost 10 to 40% more than similar conventionally produced products.^[76] Processed organic foods vary greatly in price when compared to their conventional counterparts. An Australian study by Choice magazine in 2004 found processed organic foods in supermarkets to be 65% more expensive, but noted this was not consistent. Some products were more than twice the price (such as chocolate), others were similarly priced (jam).
Prices may be higher because organic produce is produced on a smaller scale, and may need to be milled or processed separately.

Commercialization

Organic food began as a small movement with farmers rejecting the use of conventional farming practices. With the market share of Organic food outpacing much of the food industry many big companies have moved into this market. With these large companies, and with the creation of a legal certification framework (2002 in the US), there is worry that the very definition of ''organic food'' will change from what it used to be.^[77]

History

Main articles: History of organic farming

Modern agriculture, utilizing large amounts of artificial chemical inputs, monocultures, and intensive farming methods, is a recent phenomenon. Indeed, one could argue that almost the entire history of agriculture consists of what would be now termed "organic farming".
Rising consumer awareness of organic methods began in the 1950s with the promotion of organic gardening. In the 1960s and 1970s, one effect of a growing grassroots concern with environmental issues was the appearance of more elaborate approaches to organic food, including food-buying co-ops and dedicated organic producers. In the 1970s and 1980s, private sector organic certification and development of regulations at the governmental level began around the world. In the 1990s, formal organic certification began to be legislated in various countries, and this trend continues to today. During the same period, the organic food market experienced a sustained surge in growth, expanding at around 20% a year (exceeding the rest of the food industry by a factor of at least 10). Organic baby food is popular too, sales of which increased 21.6 percent in 2006, while baby food overall has only grown 3.1 percent in the same year.^[78] The first years of the 21st century saw multinational food corporations taking major stakes in the organic market, and this has dramatically increased the variety, availability and falling cost of processed organic food.

Modern developments

The prices for organic food have been, and continue to be, higher than their conventional counterparts. This is because farmers who grow organic food have to meet stricter quality standards to have their products certified organic. More labor is required to achieve this, bringing up the cost.
Since the 1980s there has been a growth trend in supermarkets that carry large volumes of organic food. This includes Whole Foods Market in the US, and Waitrose in the UK. With large volume sales, these retailers have been bringing the price of organic food down.
In the United States the pressure to bring the cost down will vastly increase soon because in 2006, Wal-Mart, the largest grocery retailer, announced plans to increase the amount of organic food available in its stores.^[79] Both conventionally grown and organic versions of certain products will be available, but Wal-Mart intends to keep the price of the organic versions to no more than 10% over the price of the conventionally grown counterparts.
Because of Wal-Mart's size and business practices, their move into selling organic food has some people worried.^[80] Specifically, the increase in demand for organic food will require that more organic produce be imported.^[81] Secondly, the push to lower prices might "virtually guarantee that Wal-Mart's version of cheap organic food is not sustainable".^[82]

Related movements

Various alternative organic standards are emerging. They generally bypass formal certification, which can be expensive and cumbersome, and provide their own definition of organic food. One such, the Authentic Food standard, proposed by leading US organic farmer Eliot Coleman, includes criteria that are incompatible with current agribusiness:
=

★ Fresh fruits and vegetables, milk, eggs and meat products are produced within a 50-mile radius of their place of their final sale.

★ The seed and storage crops (grains, beans, nuts, potatoes, etc.) are produced within a 300-mile radius of their final sale.

★ Only traditional processed foods such as cheese, wine, bread and lactofermented products may claim, "Made with Authentic ingredients."^[83]
Some are also implementing new approaches to defining and buying food. Community-supported agriculture (CSA) is one such approach, that cuts out all the middlemen by having consumers partner with local farmers. CSA members prepurchase "shares" in a season's harvest, and pick up their weekly portions from distribution sites. Thus, consumers provide direct financing for farms, participate in the risks and rewards of annual growing conditions, and participate with farmers in distribution networks.
CSA is one example of "buying locally," which is often valued by both the organic food consumer and producer. Generally speaking, locally-grown seasonal food can be brought to market more quickly than food that has to be transported long distances, and therefore can be better tasting and to some degree more nutritious by virtue of its freshness. Additionally, the act of buying foods that are locally-grown benefits local farmers and other employers. This local food approach is seen as a direct investment in one's own community and a way to reduce economic dependence.
Organic food is also often linked with the fair trade movement, based on the principle that social and environmental sustainability are inextricably interdependent.

Facts and statistics

Organic Seals
United States
JAS organic seal.gif Japan
Germany
Australia
Greece

While organic food accounts for 1–2% of total food sales worldwide, the organic food market is growing rapidly, far ahead of the rest of the food industry, in both developed and developing nations.

★ World organic food sales were US $23 billion in 2002.^[84]

★ The world organic market has been growing by 20% a year since the early 1990s, with future growth estimates ranging from 10-50% annually depending on the country.
In the 'United States', where organic food is federally regulated by the National Organic Program:
:
★ "Organic products are now available in nearly 20,000 natural food stores and 73% of conventional grocery stores, and account for approximately 1-2% of total food sales in the U.S." — Feb 2003^[85]
:
★ Two thirds of organic milk and cream and half of organic cheese and yogurt are sold through conventional supermarkets.^[86]
In the 'European Union', organic food is regulated by the EU-Eco-regulation
:'Austria:'
:
★ The government has created incentives so that within the next few years, 10% of its food will comprise locally grown organic foods.
:'Germany:'
:
★ Baby food is almost exclusively organic, and over 30% of bread baked in Munich is organic.[3]
:'Italy:'
:
★ Existing legislation calls for all school lunches to be organic by 2005.
:'Poland:'
:
★ Since May 2004, products of certified organic farms in Poland are allowed to carry the EU organic farming label, but it is not obligatory. This sign certifies that a given product was produced according to the EU 2092/91 organic farming regulation and therefore can be freely traded and marketed on the whole Common Market. In 2005 already 168,000 ha of land were under organic management. The value of the organic market in Poland is estimated at Eur 50 million (2006). [4]
:'UK:'
:
★ By January 2005, 686,100 ha of land was managed to organic standards. Organic food sales increased from just over £100 million in 1993/94 to £1.21 billion in 2004 (an 11% increase on 2003). [5]
In 'Cuba:'
:
★ After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1990, the government converted the entire country to organic agriculture, and currently organic agriculture is the mainstream and many pesticides are not permitted by law. [6] However, Cuba defines "organic" differently from many countries and encourages genetically engineered crops, particularly those with enhanced nutritional content and vaccines from GMO plants. [7][8]

See also

★ Organic Farming

★ Sustainable agriculture

★ Genetically Modified Food

★ Natural foods

★ Seasonal food

★ Whole foods

★ ''The Future of Food'' (a documentary film about genetically modified food, also with a segment on organic food).

★ Ecological living

★ Community-supported agriculture

★ ''The Real Dirt on Farmer John'' (a documentary film about organic food grown in accordance with biodynamic principles)

References

1. Organic Food Standards and Labels: The Facts
2. Family Farms
3. Organic food sales see healthy growth Hansen, Nanette
4. Warner, Melanie. "What Is Organic? Powerful Players Want a Say". ''New York Times'': Nov. 1, 2005.
5. [1]
6.
Background Information

7. "Corporate Industry Structure: 2005", by Phil Howard, Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, University of California, Santa Cruz.
8. Stolze, M.; Piorr, A.; Häring, A.M. and Dabbert, S. (2000) Environmental impacts of organic farming in Europe. Organic Farming in Europe: Economics and Policy Vol. 6. Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart-Hohenheim.
9. Approaches to assess the environmental impact of organic farming with particular regard to Denmark, , Birgitte, Hansen, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,
10. Organic FAQs, Nelson et.al, , , Nature, April 2004
11. Soil Fertility and Biodiversity in Organic Farming, Mader, et.al., , , Science, 2002
12. Economics of Organic Grain and Soybean Production in the Midwestern United States, Welsh, Rick, , , Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture, 1999
13. Soil organic-matter, effects on soils and crops, Johnston, A. E., , , Soil Use Management, 1986
14. The performance of organic and conventional cropping systems in an extreme climate year, Lotter, D. W., Seidel, R. & Liebhardt W., , , American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 2003
15. Sustainability of three apple production systems, Reganold et.al, , , Nature, April 2001
16. The Bichel Committee. 1999. Report from the main committee. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Conclusions and recommendations of the Committee: 8.7.1 Total phase-out. Report not available in print but posted online at: http://www.mst.dk/udgiv/Publications/1998/87-7909-445-7/html/kap08_eng.htm#8.7.1. [Excerpt] “A total abolition of pesticide use would result in an average drop in farming yields of between 10% and 25%, at the farm level; the smallest losses would occur in cattle farming. On farms that have a large proportion of special crops, such as potatoes, sugar beet and seed grass, the production losses in terms of quantity would be closer to 50%. These crops would probably be ousted by other crops.”
17.
Studying Health Outcomes in Farmworker Populations Exposed to Pesticides, Linda A. McCauley, et.al., , , Environmental Health Perspectives, 2006
18. Ecobichon DJ. 1996. Toxic effects of pesticides. In: Casarett and Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons (Klaassen CD, Doull J, eds). 5th ed. New York:MacMillan, 643–689.
19.
An exploratory analysis of occupational skin disease among Latino migrant and seasonal farmworkers in North Carolina, Arcury TA, Quandt SA, Mellen BG, , , Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 2003
20. Skin reactions to pesticides, O'Malley MA, , , Occupational Medicine, 1997
21. Pesticides and childhood cancers, Daniels JL, Olshan AF, Savitz DA., , , Environmental Health Perspectives, 1997
22. Neurobehavioral performance and work experience in Florida farmworkers, Kamel F, et.al., , , Environmental Health Perspectives, 2003
23.
Pesticides and risk of Parkinson disease: a population-based case-control study, Firestone JA, Smith-Weller T, Franklin G, Swanson P, Longsteth WT, Checkoway H., , , Archives of Neurology, 2005
24. Maternal occupation in agriculture and risk of limb defects in Washington State, 1980–1993, Engel LS, O'Meara ES, Schwartz SM., , , Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 2000

Health hazards of farming, Cordes DH, Rea DF., , , American Family Physician, 1988

Pesticide-related illness among migrant farm workers in the United States, Das R, Steege A, Baron S, Beckman J, Harrison R, , , International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2001

Exposures of children to organophosphate pesticides and their potential adverse health effects, Eskenazi B, Bradman A, Castorina R., , , Environmental Health Perspectives, 1999

Pesticide exposure and women's health, Garcia AM, , , American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 2003

Pesticide-related health problems and farmworkers, Moses M., , , American Association of Occupational Health Nurses, 1989

Parental occupation and birth outcome in an agricultural community, Schwartz DA, Newsum LA, Heifetz RM., , , Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 1986

Pesticide illness, farm practices, and neurological symptoms among farm residents in Colorado, Stallones L, Beseler C., , , Environ Res, 2002

Health symptoms and exposure to organophosphate pesticides in farmworkers, Strong, LL, Thompson B, Coronado GD, Griffith WC, Vigoren EM, Islas I., , , American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 2004

Occupation related pesticide exposure and cancer of the prostate: a meta-analysis, Van Maele-Fabry G, Willems JL., , , Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2003
25. Health effects of chronic pesticide exposure: cancer and neurotoxicity, Alavanja MC, Hoppin JA, Kamel F., , , Annual Review of Public Health, 2004
26. Association of pesticide exposure with neurological dysfunction and disease, Kamel F, Hoppin JA, , , Environmental Health Perspectives, 2004
27. Biotech Can Feed the World
28.
29. Pesticide residues in conventional, IPM-grown and organic foods: Insights from three U.S. data sets., , Brian, Baker, Food Additives and Contaminants,
30. Consumers Union Research Team Shows: Organic Foods Really DO Have Less Pesticides
31. Consumers Union. December 15, 1997. Are organic foods as good as they’re grown? A landmark consumer reports study. Consumers Union Press Release. “One-quarter of the organic produce samples that Consumer Reports tested had some pesticide residues on them, compared with 77 percent of the conventional samples.”
32. Consumers Union. January, 1998. Greener Greens: The Truth About Organic Food. Consumer Reports 63(1): pages 12-18.
33. Baker et al. May, 2002. Pesticide residues in conventional, IPM-grown and organic foods: Insights from three U.S. data sets. Summary: Analysis and Results: Frequency of Positive Samples. Food Additives and Contaminants: volume 19, No. 5, pages 427-446. “Frequency of Positive Samples: Organically grown samples consistently had far smaller percentages with residues: 23, 6.5 and 27 percent in the USDA, DPR and CU data, respectively.”
34. Environmental Science & Technology Online. January 11, 2006. Organic vegetables not pesticide-free. Science News.
35. Canadian Cancer Society. Website: http://www.cancer.ca/ccs/internet/standard/0,3182,3172_372059_266317_langId-en,00.html
36. Canadian Parliamentary Standing Committee on the Environment and Sustainable Development. May, 2000. Pesticides: Making the Right Choices. Appendix 8.3, Table 2: Total Number of Pesticides Without Detectable Residues (W.D.R.). http://www.parl.gc.ca/InfoComDoc/36/2/ENVI/Studies/Reports/envi01-e.html
37. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Food Safety Directorate, Food Microbiology and Chemical Evaluation. 2005. Report On Pesticides, Agricultural Chemicals, Environmental Pollutants and Other Impurities in Agri-Food Commodities of Plant Origin: Fresh Fruit and Vegetables, 2004–2005. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/microchem/resid/2004-2005/plaveg_ffe.shtml
38. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Food Safety Directorate, Food Microbiology and Chemical Evaluation. 2005. Report On Pesticides, Agricultural Chemicals, Environmental Pollutants and Other Impurities in Agri-Food Commodities of Plant Origin: Processed Fruit and Vegetables, 2004–2005. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/microchem/resid/2004-2005/plaveg_ptimpe.shtml
39. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Food Safety Directorate, Food Microbiology and Chemical Evaluation. 2004. Report On Pesticides, Agricultural Chemicals, Environmental Pollutants and Other Impurities in Agri-Food Commodities of Plant Origin: Fresh Fruit and Vegetables, 2003–2004. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/microchem/resid/2003-2004/plaveg_e.shtml#frefra
40. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Food Safety Directorate, Food Microbiology and Chemical Evaluation. 2004. Report On Pesticides, Agricultural Chemicals, Environmental Pollutants and Other Impurities in Agri-Food Commodities of Plant Origin: Processed Fruit and Vegetables, 2003–2004. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/microchem/resid/2003-2004/plaveg_pte.shtml
41. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Food Safety Directorate, Food Microbiology and Chemical Evaluation. 2005. Report On Pesticides, Agricultural Chemicals, Veterinary Drugs, Environmental Pollutants and Other Impurities in Agri-Food Commodities of Animal Origin, 2005–2005. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/microchem/resid/2004-2005/anima_e.shtml#dailai
42. Canadian Food Inspection Agency. 2003. Report on Pesticides Residues in Baby Food 2002 – 2003. Infant and Junior Baby Food Chemical Residues Project.
43. Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children, , , National Research Council, National Academies Press, 1993, ISBN 0-309-04875-3
44. Organic Diets Significantly Lower Children’s Dietary Exposure to Organophosphorus Pesticides, Lu, Chensheng, et al., , , Environmental Health Perspectives, 2006
45. Chem-News October 1990
46. Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 111, Number 16, December 2003.
47. Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.inchem.org/documents/jmpr/jmpmono/2002pr14.htm#1.2.6.2
48. http://www.ppdi.com/corporate/faq/about_drug_development/home.htm
49. http://www.immunetrics.com/tech.htm
50. Phillips McDougall. April 2003. The Cost of New Agrochemical Product Discovery, Development and Registration in 1995 and 2000, Final Report. A Consultancy Study for Crop Life America and the European Crop Protection Association
51.
52. DeGregori, Thomas R. (2004). Origins of the Organic Agriculture Debate. Iowa State Press, Ames, Iowa, 211 p. ISBN 0-8138-0513-9
53. Atrazine-Induced Hermaphroditism at 0.1 ppb in American Leopard Frogs, Tyrone Hayes, Kelly Haston, Mable Tsui, Anhthu Hoang, Cathryn Haeffele, and Aaron Vonk, , , Environmental Health Perspectives, 2003
54. Urban myths of organic farming, , Anthony, Trewavas, Nature,
55. A critical assessment of organic farming-and-food assertions with particular respect to the UK and the potential environmental benefits of no-till agriculture, , Anthony, Trewavas, Crop Protection,
56. Pesticides in Perspective
57. Pesticide Information Profiles: Rotenone. June, 1996. Pesticide Information Project of Cooperative Extension Offices of Cornell University, Oregon State University, the University of Idaho, and the University of California at Davis and the Institute for Environmental Toxicology, Michigan State University. http://extoxnet.orst.edu/pips/rotenone.htm
58. Slow-Acting: After 25 years the EPA still won't ban a risky pesticide, Raeburn, Paul, , , Scientific American, 2006
59. Washington Apple Study Finds Organic Growing Is Best, Green, Emily, , , Nature, 2001
60. Bourn D, Prescott J. January 2002. A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science Nutrition. 42(1): 1-34.
61. Williams, C. M. February 2002. Nutritional quality of organic food: shades of grey or shades of green? Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 61(1): 19-24
62. Canadian Produce Marketing Association (CPMA). Organically Grown Produce: Does organic produce taste better? & Is organic produce more nutritious?
63. Sir John Krebs. June 5, 2003. Is organic food better for you? Speech given by the then-chair of the Food Standards Agency (UK), Sir John Krebs, to the Cheltenham Science Fair on June 5, 2005. Posted on the Food Standards Agency website: http://www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/2003/jun/cheltenham
64. Urban myths of organic farming, , Anthony, Trewavas, Nature,
65. A critical assessment of organic farming-and-food assertions with particular respect to the UK and the potential environmental benefits of no-till agriculture, , Anthony, Trewavas, Crop Protection,
66. Organic farming 'no better for the environment'
67. Patrick Moore, PhD, Chairman, Greenspirit Strategies Ltd., 305 - 873 Beatty Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6B 2M6
68. Joe Fattorini. The Herald (UK). January 3, 2006. Why we must all give up organic in 2006. http://www.theherald.co.uk/features/53522-print.shtml
69. Patrick Moore, PhD, Chairman, Greenspirit Strategies Ltd., 305 - 873 Beatty Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6B 2M6
70. The Bichel Committee. 1999. Report from the main committee. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Conclusions and recommendations of the Committee: 8.7.1 Total phase-out. Report not available in print but posted online at: http://www.mst.dk/udgiv/Publications/1998/87-7909-445-7/html/kap08_eng.htm#8.7.1. [Excerpt] “A total abolition of pesticide use would result in an average drop in farming yields of between 10% and 25%, at the farm level; the smallest losses would occur in cattle farming. On farms that have a large proportion of special crops, such as potatoes, sugar beet and seed grass, the production losses in terms of quantity would be closer to 50%. These crops would probably be ousted by other crops.”
71. Organic farming and the global food supply, , Catherine, Badgley, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems,
72. Organic Pest Control
73. http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/toxsums/pdfs/521.pdf
74. Phillips McDougall. April 2003. The Cost of New Agrochemical Product Discovery, Development and Registration in 1995 and 2000, Final Report. A Consultancy Study for Crop Life America and the European Crop Protection Association
75. Pesticides in Agriculture
76. Winter, CK and SF Davis, 2006 "Organic Foods" Journal of Food Science 71(9):R117-R124.
77. Shapin, Steven. "Paradise Sold." ''The New Yorker,'' May 15, 2006.
78. Wary Parents Stir Organic Baby Foods AGOVINO, THERESA
79. Wal-Mart Eyes Organic Foods Melanie Warner
80. Wal-mart's organic bomb Scheuer, Kif
81. Wal-Mart's Organic Offensive Pallavi Gogoi
82. Mass Natural: With Wal-Mart going organic, where will organic go? Michael Pollan
83. "Authentic Food — Authentic Farming", by Eliot Coleman, ''Mother Earth News''.
84. The Global Market for Organic Food & Drink
85. Organic Agriculture: Gaining Ground Catherine Greene and Carolyn Dimitri
86. Market Trends: Organic Lessons Dryer, Jerry

Further reading

On Organics


★ Green Living, Environmental Magazine, , , Penguin Group (USA), 2005, ISBN 0-452-28574-7

★ This Organic Life: Confessions of a Suburban Homesteader, Gussow, Joan Dye, , , Chelsea Green Publishing, 2002, ISBN 1-931498-24-5

★ Dead Daisies Make Me Crazy: Garden Solutions without Chemical Pollution, Nancarrow, Loren; Taylor, Janet Hogan, , , Ten Speed Press, 2000, ISBN 1-58008-156-8

★ Resource-Conserving Agriculture Increases Yields in Developing Countries, Pretty, J. N., et al., , , Environmental Science and Technology, 2006

★ The Apple Grower: A Guide for the Organic Orchardist, Phillips, Michael, , , Chelsea Green Publishing, 1998, ISBN 1-890132-04-7

★ How to Get Your Lawn & Garden Off Drugs: A Basic Guide to Pesticide-Free Gardening in North America, Rubin, Carole, , , Harbour Publishing Company, 2003, ISBN 1-55017-320-0

★ Organic Farms Reap Many Benefits, Stokstad, Erik, , , Science, May 2002



On Conventional vs Organic Farming


★ Agrarian Dreams: The Paradox of Organic Farming in California, Guthman, Julie, , , University of California Press, 2004, ISBN 0-520-24095-2

★ Pesticide residues in food and drinking water, Hamilton, Denis; Crossley, Stephen (editors), , , J. Wiley, 2004, ISBN 0-471-48991-3

★ Pesticides: problems, improvements, alternatives, Hond, Frank et.al., , , Blackwell Science, 2003, ISBN 0-632-05659-2

★ Pesticide, veterinary and other residues in food, Watson, David H. (editor), , , Woodhead Publishing, 2004, ISBN 1-85573-734-5

★ Our Children's Toxic Legacy: How Science and Law Fail to Protect Us from Pesticides, Wargo, John, , , Yale University Press, 1998, ISBN 0-300-07446-8

★

External links

★

Pesticides and food

★ Extensive Press Release on Pesticides from the Ontario College of Family Physicians

★ Pesticide and Food (pdf) Brochure from Nutrition.gov

★ Pesticide Residue Limits on Food from the Environmental Protection Agency

★ Pesticides in Food from the Northeast Organic Farming Association

★ [9] from Testimony to the FDA on Ranking Possible Toxic Hazards of Dietary Supplements Compared to Other Natural and Synthetic Substances

★ [10] from the Center for Global Food Issues on Background Information on High-yield Modern Agriculture

★ [11] from Drs. Bruce Ames and Lois Swisky-Gold, The Environmental Cancer Disraction, on natural versus synthetic chemicals

★ [12] from the American Council on Science and Health, on toxins in our food