ORNITHOLOGY

'Ornithology' (from Greek: ορνισ, ''ornis'', "bird"; and λόγος, ''logos'', "knowledge") is the branch of zoology concerned with the study of birds. Several aspects of the study of ornithology differ from closely related disciplines, possibly due to the high visibility and the aesthetic appeal of birds. Most marked among these is the extent of field studies undertaken by amateur volunteers working within the parameters of strict scientific methodology.

Contents

History

Early ornithology

Scientific ornithology

Popular ornithology

Ornithological techniques

Specimen techniques

Applied ornithology

See also

References

External links

History

:''See also Timeline of ornithology''

Early ornithology

Birds have interested humans since very early times, and stone age drawings of birds are perhaps the oldest indications. Birds were perhaps an important food source for humans and bones of as many as 80 species have been found in excavations of early settlements.
^[1]
The hunting of birds would have required considerable knowledge of their habits. The need for incubation of eggs was known and the practice of artificial incubation of eggs was followed from very early times in China (246 BC) and Egypt (at least 400 BC).^[2] The Egyptians also showed a great deal of knowledge on birds with their use of bird symbols in hieroglyphs, many of which, though stylized are still recognizable. Poultry farming and falconry was both in practice from early times in many parts of the world.
Native cultures in all parts of the world included rich vocabularies for the identification of birds and their use in culture. This native knowledge of birds is still of importance today and especially for its special relevance in conservation. Most of this information is passed on through oral traditions. (See Ethno-ornithology)
Some of these early written records are of ornithological interest and they sometimes provide information on past distributions of many species. For instance Xenophon records the abundance of the Ostrich in Assyria (Anabasis, i. 5). Today the species is restricted to Africa. The ''Vedas'' (1500-800 BC) mention the habit of brood parasitism in the Asian Koel (''Eudynamys scolopacea'').^[3] The early art of China, Japan, Persia and India also show a number of species of birds, some of them illustrated to great accuracy. David Lack wrote in his ''Review of Fine Bird Books, 1700-1900'' (reprinted in ''Enjoying Ornithology'', 1965):
Aristotle in 350 BC in his ''Historia Animalium''^[4] noted the habit of bird migration, moulting, egg laying and life spans. He however also introduced several incorrect concepts, and although he noted that cranes traveled from the steppes of Scythia to the marshes at the headwaters of the Nile, he attributed the disappearance of swallows in winter to hibernation. This belief became so well established that the eminent nineteenth-century American ornithologist, Dr. Elliott Coues, listed in 1878 the titles of no less than 182 papers dealing with the hibernation of swallows.^[5]
The references to birds in early writings are numerous both in prose and poetry.^[6] In the 12th century, Bishop Giraldus Cambrensis (Gerald of Wales) published a book ''Topographia Hiberniae'' in which he noted the folk belief that the Barnacle Goose was born from Goose barnacles.



Early German and French scholars also studied the works of Aristotle and made new studies of birds. The major works included those by Guillaume Rondelet describing his personal observations in the Mediterranean and Pierre Belon who described the fishes and birds that he had met with in France and the Levant. Belon's Book of Birds (1555) is a folio volume with descriptions of some two hundred species. His comparison of the skeleton of humans and birds is considered remarkable.Miall, L. C. 1911. History of Biology. Watts and Co. Scanned version Konrad Gesner wrote the ''Vogelbuch'' and ''Icones avium omnium'' around 1557. Like Gesner, Ulisse Aldrovandi, an encyclopedic naturalist began a 14-volume natural history with three volumes on birds, entitled ''ornithologiae hoc est de avibus historiae libri XII'' which was published from 1599 to 1603. Aldrovandi showed great interest in plants and animals and his works include 3000 drawings of fruits, flowers, plants and animals and they were documented in 363 volumes. His ''Ornithology'' alone covers 2000 pages and in it he covers for instance chickens and poultry techniques extensively.^[7][8]William Turner's ''Historia Avium'' ("History of Birds"), published at Cologne in 1544, was another early ornithological work. He notes that the kite in cities of England would snatch the meat out of the hands of children. In his day the osprey was better known to Englishmen than they liked, for it emptied their fishponds; anglers used to mix their bait with its fat. Turner's work was written in a very different tone and quite unlike the writings of Gilbert White that were made in a more tranquil era.
In the 17th century Francis Willughby (1635-1672) and John Ray (1627-1705) came up with the first major system of bird classification that was based on function and morphology rather than on form or behavior. Willughby's ''Ornithologiae libri tres'' (1676) completed by John Ray is considered to mark the beginning of scientific ornithology. Ray also worked on ''Ornithologia'' which was then published posthumously in 1713 as ''Synopsis methodica avium et piscium''.White, Jeanne A. 1999 Ornithology Collections in the Libraries at Cornell University: A Descriptive Guide [4]
Several ornithological works were also started in the late 1700s in France through the works of Mathurin Jacques Brisson (1723-1806) and Comte de Buffon (1707-1788). Brisson produced a six-volume work ''Ornithologie'' in 1760 and Buffon's include nine volumes on birds ''Histoire naturelle des oiseaux'' (1770-1785) as volumes 16 to 24 of his work on science ''Histoire naturelle générale et particulière'' (1749-1804). Coenraad Jacob Temminck (1778 - 1858) sponsored François Le Vaillant [1753-1824] to collect in Africa and this resulted in Le Vaillant's six-volume ''Histoire naturelle des oiseaux d'Afrique'' (1796-1808). Louis Jean Pierre Vieillot (1748-1831) spent ten years studying North American birds and wrote the ''Histoire naturelle des oiseaux de l'Amerique septentrionale'' (1807-1808?). Vieillot pioneered in the use of life-histories and habits in classification.^[9]

Scientific ornithology

:''See also Ornithology journals, Ornithologists''

Early bird study focused on collectibles such as eggs and nests

It was not until the Victorian era, with the emergence of the gun, the concept of natural history and the collection of natural objects such as bird eggs and skins that ornithology as a specialized science emerged.^[10] This specialization led to the formation in Britain of the British Ornithologists' Union in 1858. In 1859 the members founded its journal ''The Ibis''. The sudden spurt in ornithology was also due in part to colonization. A hundred years later, in 1959, R. E. Moreau noted that ornithology in this period was preoccupied with the geographical distributions of various species of birds.^[11]

A mounted specimen of a Red-footed Falcon.

The bird collectors of the Victorian era observed the variations in bird forms and habits across geographic regions, noting geographic specialties and variations in species that were widespread. The collections of museums and private collectors grew with contributions from various parts of the world. The naming of species with binomials and the organization of birds into groups based on their similarities became the main work of museum specialists. The variations in widespread birds across geographical region caused the introduction of trinomial names.
The search for patterns in the variations of birds was attempted by many. The Galapagos finches were especially influential in the development of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. His contemporary Alfred Russel Wallace also noted these variations and the geographical separations between different forms leading to the study of biogeography.
For Darwin, the problem was how species arose from a common ancestor. He however did not attempt to find rules for delineation of species. The problem of delineating species, the species problem, was tackled by the ornithologist Ernst Mayr.
While the ideas of species, their identities and geographic distribution began to be developed, the focus gradually shifted to the study of ''the living bird'', or studies of the life history of birds. The study of birds in their habitats was particularly advanced in Germany and as early as 1903, had established bird ringing stations. By the 1920s the ''Journal für Ornithologie'' included many papers on the behavior, ecology, anatomy and physiology, many written by Erwin Stresemann. Ornithology in the United States was also restricted to the study of variations, species and geographic distributions, until it was influenced by Stresemann's student Ernst Mayr.^[12] In Britain, some of the earliest ornithological works that used the word ecology appeared in 1915.^[13] ''The Ibis'' however resisted the introduction of these new methods of study and it was not until 1943 that any paper on ecology appeared. The work of David Lack on population ecology was pioneering. The new rigour and quantitative approaches being used ornithology were not acceptable to many. For instance, Claud Ticehurst wrote:
David Lack's studies on population ecology included the mechanism involved in the regulation of population including the evolution of optimal clutch sizes. He concluded that population was regulated primarily by density-dependent controls. This however was based on the underlying paradigm of group selection. Lack also pioneered the use of many new tools for research including the idea of using radar to study bird migration.
The study of imprinting behaviour in ducks and geese by Konrad Lorenz and the studies of instinct in Herring Gulls by Nicolaas Tinbergen, led to the establishment of the field of ethology.
The growth of genetics and the rise of molecular biology saw the new gene-centered view of evolution and the observations on behaviour and life-history were studied and interpreted differently. Birds became models to test hypotheses that could be postulated based on the theory.
The new tools of molecular-biology also led to new approaches to the study of bird systematics. The new molecular phylogenetics approaches were applied to study the evolutionary relationships of birds far more objectively than the the older systematics that relied on subjective judgements in the choice of morphological characteristics to use in the grouping of birds at different levels.
The patterns of biodiversity also became a topic interest. The relationship of the number of species to the area and its application in the study of Island biogeography was pioneered by E. O. Wilson and Robert MacArthur. This area of research led to the development of the field of landscape ecology.

Popular ornithology

The interest in bird study grew in popularity in many parts of the world and it was realized that there was a possibility for amateurs to contribute to professional biology. As early as 1916, Julian Huxley wrote a two part article in the Auk, noting the tensions between amateurs and professionals and suggesting the possibility that the "vast army of bird-lovers and bird-watchers could begin providing the data scientists needed to address the fundamental problems of biology."^[14][15]
The rise of field-guides for the identification of birds was a major innovation. The early guides were large and cumbersome and were mainly focussed on identifying specimens in the hand. The earliest of the new generation of field guides was prepared by Florence Merriam, sister of Clinton Hart Merriam, the mammalogist. This was published in 1887 in a series ''Hints to Audubon Workers:Fifty Birds and How to Know Them'' in Grinnell's ''Audubon Magazine''.
The formation of popular organizations with large member bases grew in many countries, notably the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) in Britain and the Audubon Society in the US. The Audubon Society started in 1885. Both these organization were started with the primary objective of conservation. The RSPB, born in 1889, grew from a small group of women in Croydon who met regularly and called themselves the ''Fur, Fin and Feather Folk'' and who took a pledge 'to refrain from wearing the feathers of any birds not killed for the purpose of food, the Ostrich only exempted.' The organization initially did not allow men as members, avenging a policy of the British Ornithologists' Union to keep out women.
Unlike the RSPB, which was primarily conservation oriented, the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) was started in 1933 with the aim of advancing ornithological study. Members were often involved in collaborative ornithological projects. These projects have resulted in atlases which detail the distribution of bird species across Britain. In the United States, the Breeding Bird Surveys, conducted by the US Geological Survey have also produced atlases with information on breeding densities and changes in the density and distribution over time. Other volunteer collaborative ornithology projects were established in many other parts of the world.

Ornithological techniques

The tools and techniques of ornithology are varied and new inventions and approaches are quickly incorporated. The techniques may be broadly dealt under the categories of those that are applicable to specimens and those that are used in the field, however the classification is imperfect as many of the new non-destructive techniques are readily applicable in both the laboratory and field.

Specimen techniques

Main articles: Bird collections

Bird preservation techniques

The early approaches to bird study involved the collection of eggs. While collecting became a pastime for many amateurs, the labels associated with these egg collections made them unreliable for the serious study of bird breeding. In order to preserve eggs, a tiny hole was pierced and the contents were extracted out. This technique became standard with the invention of the blow drill around 1830. Historic museum collections have however been of value in determining the effect of modern pesticides such as DDT.^[16][17]

Morphometric measurements of birds are important in systematics

The use of bird skins for documenting species has been central to systematic ornithology. Bird skins are prepared by retaining the key bones of the wings, leg and skull along with the skin and feathers. They were treated with arsenic to prevent fungal and insect (mostly Dermestidae) attack. Arsenic being toxic was later replaced by borax. Sportsmen became familiar with these skinning techniques and started sending in their skins to museums, some of them from far away locations. This led to the formation of huge collections of bird skins in Museums in Europe and North America. Many private collections were also held. These became references for comparison of species and the ornithologists at these museums were able to document species from locations that they never visited. Morphometrics of these skins, particularly the lengths of the tarsus, bill, tail and wing became important in bird systematics. These historic skin collections have also been utilized in more recent studies on molecular phylogenetics by the extraction of ancient DNA. The importance of type specimens in the description of species make skin collections a vital resource for systematic ornithology. However, with the rise of molecular techniques, it has now become possible to establish the species status of rare discoveries such as the Bulo Burti Boubou ''Laniarius liberatus'' and the Bugun Liocichla ''Liocichla bugunorum'' using blood, DNA and feather samples as the holotype material.
Other approaches to the preservation of bird material have included the storage of specimens in spirit. Such wet-specimens have special value in physiological and anatomical studies. They also provide better quality of DNA for molecular studies.^[18] Freeze drying of specimens has also been attempted in more recent times. While the technique has advantages in that it preserves stomach contents and anatomy, it may have the same problems as dry skins in that shrinkage can occur leading to errors in morphometrics.^[19]
[20]
Museum bird collections continue to act as a vital shared resource for science and conservation.^[21]

Applied ornithology

Ornithology has many applications in human life and studies aimed at these areas are called applied or economic ornithology.
The role of some species of birds as pests has been well known, particularly in agriculture. Granivorous birds such as the Queleas in Africa have been among the most numerous birds in the world and foraging flocks can cause devastation.^[22] Large flocks of pigeons and starlings in cities have also been considered a nuisance and ornithologists have sought a variety of techniques to solve these problems. Birds have also been of medical importance and their role as carriers of diseases such as Japanese Encephalitis, West Nile Virus and H5N1 has been significant. Bird strikes and the damage they cause in aviation are also of particular importance, due in part to the fatal consequences and the level of economic impact that they have. The Federal Aviation Administration estimates that the problem costs US aviation 600 million dollars annually and has resulted in 195 worldwide deaths since 1988.
Many species of birds have been driven to extinction by human activities. Bird conservation requires specialized knowledge in aspects of biology, ecology and may require the use of very location specific approaches. Ornithologists contribute to conservation biology by studying the ecology of birds in the wild and identifying the key threats and ways of enhancing the survival of species. In some cases this may involve the capture and raising in captivity of critically endangered species. Such ex-situ conservation measures may be followed by re-introduction of the species into the wild.

See also

★ Bird observatory

★ Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology

★ List of ornithological societies

References

1. Nadel, K. D., Ehud Weiss, Orit Simchoni, Alexander Tsatskin, Avinoam Danin, and Mordechai (2004) Stone Age hut in Israel yields world's oldest evidence of bedding. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 101(17):6821-6826 [1]
2. Funk, E. M. and M. R. Irwin 1955. Hatching Operation and Management. John Wiley & sons.
3. Ali, S. (1979), Bird study in India : its history and its importance. ICCR, New Delhi. Azad Memorial Lectures.
4. Aristotle, Historia Animalium. Translated by D'Arcy Thompson
5. Lincoln, Frederick C., Steven R. Peterson, and John L. Zimmerman. 1998. Migration of birds. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. Circular 16. Jamestown, ND: Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Online. [2]
6. Stanford, Frank. The Ornithology of Anglo-Saxon England. From the ''Ða Engliscan Gesiðas Handboc'' [3]
7. Aldrovandi on Chickens: The Ornithology of Ulisse Aldrovandi (66o), vol. 2, Bk xiv, translated and edited by L. R. LIND, University of Oklahoma Press, 1963, pp. xxxvi, 447, illus. Review
8. Ornithologiae, 1599 (Scanned version from Strasbourg University digital library)
9. Jeanne A. White, Hill Collection — 18th c. French authors & artists online
10. Allen, David E. 1994. The naturalist in Britain: a social history. Princeton University Press.
11. Johnson, Kristin (2004) ''The Ibis'': Transformations in a Twentieth Century British Natural History Journal. Journal of the History of Biology 37: 515–555
12. Barrow, Mark V. (1998) A passion for birds: American ornithology after Audubon. Princeton University Press.
13. Alexander, H. G. (1915) A Practical Study of Bird Ecology. British Birds. Vol. VIII, No. 9
14. Huxley, J. 1916. Bird-watching and biological science. The Auk. 33(2):142-161 (part 1) [5]
15. Huxley, J. 1916. Bird-watching and biological science. The Auk. 33(3):256-270 (part 2) [6]
16. Newton, I. 1979. Population ecology of raptors. T. & A. D. Poyser, Berkhamsted.
17. Green, Rhys E. & Jörn P. W. Scharlemann (2003) Egg and skin collections as a resource for long-term ecological studies. Bull. B.O.C. 123A:165–176 [7]
18. Livezey, Bradley C. (2003) Avian spirit collections: attitudes, importance and prospects. Bull. B. O. C. 123A:35-51 [8]
19. Winker, K. 1993. Specimen shrinkage in Tennessee warblers and Traill's flycatchers. J. Field Ornithol. 64(3):331-336
[9]
20. Bjordal, H. 1983. Effects of deep freezing, freeze-drying and skinning on body dimensions of House Sparrows (''Passer domesticus''). Cinclus 6:105-108.
21. Winker, K. 2004. Natural history museums in a postbiodiversity era. Bioscience 54:455-459.
22. Clive C.H. Elliott (2006) Bird population explosions in agroecosystems — the quelea, ''Quelea quelea'', case history. Acta Zoologica Sinica. 52:554-560 [10]

External links

★ ''Ornithologie'' (1773-1792) Francois Nicholas Martinet Digital Edition Smithsonian Digital Libraries

★ List of oldest ornithological organisations in the world

★ History of ornithology in North America

★ History of ornithology in China

★ Hill ornithology collections