OUTLAWRIES BILL

The 'Outlawries Bill' (or, by its long title, 'A Bill for the more effectual preventing clandestine Outlawries') is customarily introduced in the United Kingdom's House of Commons at the start of each session of Parliament.
The bill is read after the Queen's Speech, after the Commons have returned to their chamber, but before any debate on the contents of the Speech. No Member of Parliament presents it, nor has it ever been ordered to be printed, and it is not intended to make any further progress. However, it bears symbolic import; by not discussing the contents of the Queen's speech, the Commons is demonstrating that it can debate on whatever it chooses, and set its own business.
The practice of reading a bill before debating the Speech dates back to at least the 16th century. Various bills were used for the purpose—originally they were just normal bills and could progress to a second reading. The Outlawries Bill was first introduced in the 1727 session and has been used every year thereafter (except for 1741 and 1742).
John Wilkes interrupted the reading of the bill in 1763, to complain about his imprisonment, but the Speaker required the bill to be dealt with first. In 1794, Richard Sheridan used the reading of the bill to raise the subject of the suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act.
The equivalent bill used by the House of Lords is the Select Vestries Bill.
Before the Commons procedure became established, two Outlawry Acts were passed into English law: the Outlawry Act 1331 and the Avoidance of Secret Outlawries Act 1588 (neither of which is still in force).

Contents

Content

Meaning

Other Commonwealth Countries

External links

Content

This is the content of the bill as introduced during the reign of Queen Victoria; blank spaces indicate missing details such as dates or penalties.
;'A Bill for the more effectual preventing clandestine Outlawries.'
For the more effectual preventing Clandestine Outlawries in Personal Actions, Be it Enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same.
That if after the          any attorney Solicitor or other person who shall prosecute any person or persons to Outlawry in any action personal wherein no Writ or Exegerit shall be awarded shall make default to send or deliver the Writ of Proclamation to the Sheriff of the proper County where the Defendant shall be dwelling at the time of awarding the Exegerit (the place of such dwelling being known), every such Attorney Solicitor or other person aforesaid making such default being lawfully convicted shall for every such offence forfeit         ; and if the Sheriff (the Writ of Proclamation being duly delivered to him) shall refuse or neglect before the Return of the Writ to make          Proclamations according to the directions of the Act made in the thirty-first year of the reign of Queen Elizabeth for the avoiding of privy and secret Outlawries in actions personal, every such Sheriff being lawfully convicted shall for every such refusal or neglect forfeit
        .

Meaning

Main articles: Outlaw

'Outlawry' was a formal judgment that a person was an outlaw, or literally "outside the law". This is different from the modern usage of "outlaw", i.e., a criminal who is evading custody.
In the common law of England, a judgment of outlawry was one of the harshest penalties in the legal system, since the outlaw could not use the legal system to protect them if needed, e.g. from mob justice. To be declared an outlaw was to suffer a form of civil death. The outlaw was debarred from all civilized society. No one was allowed to give him food, shelter, or any other sort of support — to do so was to commit the crime of aiding and abetting, and to be in danger of the ban oneself. An outlaw might be killed with impunity; and it was not only lawful but meritorious to kill a thief flying from justice — to do so was not murder. Because the outlaw has defied civil society, that society was quit of any obligations to the outlaw —outlaws had no civil rights, could not sue in any court on any cause of action, though they were themselves personally liable.
A "clandestine outlawry", presumably, would be a secret judgment of outlawry, unbeknownst to the defendant; in English common law, that could have happened if a civil or criminal defendant failed to answer a summons. Since statutes of limitations made such judgments incontestable after a period of time, a clandestine outlawry could have lead to an inappropriate denial of justice if a legal wrong (even murder) had been committed against that person later on.
The text of the bill, in that context, appears to provide unnamed criminal penalties for plaintiff's solicitors who seek and obtain secret default judgments of outlawry in certain civil actions. It also provides unnamed penalties for sheriffs who do 'not' properly serve such a default judgment on the defendant; though that may seem counterintuitive to some, service of a judgment gives the defendant the legal opportunity to contest it, and in any event means it is no longer "clandestine" (secret).
In the context of criminal law, outlawry faded not so much by legal changes as by the greater population density of the country, which made it harder for wanted fugitives to evade capture; and by the international adoption of extradition pacts. In the civil context, outlawry became obsolescent in civil procedure by reforms that no longer required summoned defendants to appear and plead. Still, the possibility of being declared an outlaw for derelictions of civil duty continued to exist in English law until 1879 and in Scots law until the late 1940s.

Other Commonwealth Countries

In Canada, a similar ''pro forma'' bill is introduced in the House of Commons. It is traditionally entitled ''An Act respecting the Administration of Oaths of Office''.

External links

★ Parliament's article about the Bill (PDF)

★ A-Z of Parliament (BBC)