PERMISSIVE FREE SOFTWARE LICENCES
(Redirected from Permissive free software licence)
'Permissive free software licences' are free software licences for a copyrighted work that offer many of the same freedoms as releasing a work to the public domain. In contrast, copyleft licences like the GNU General Public License require copies and derivatives of the source code to be made available on terms no more restrictive than those of the original licence.
Well-known examples of permissive licences include the MIT License and the BSD licenses.
Computer Associates Int'l v. Altai used the term "public domain" to refer to works that have become widely shared and distributed under permission, rather than work that was deliberately put into the public domain. However, such licences are not actually equivalent to releasing a work into the public domain, so such a term can be considered a misnomer. But, because permissive free software licences essentially retain no rights apart from attribution of the copyright owner, the copyright holders would lose very little in terms of rights if a court held that the works were actually in the public domain.
Some permissive free software licences contain clauses that require advertising materials to credit to the copyright holder. Licences with an advertising clause include the 4-clause BSD license, the PHP License, and the OpenSSL Licence.
Licences with the advertising clause are incompatible with the GNU General Public License.
Examples of permissive free software licences without advertising clauses are the MIT License, the 3-clause BSD license the Zlib License, and all versions of the Apache License except 1.0.
★ Free software licence
★ List of FSF approved software licences
★ List of OSI approved software licences
'Permissive free software licences' are free software licences for a copyrighted work that offer many of the same freedoms as releasing a work to the public domain. In contrast, copyleft licences like the GNU General Public License require copies and derivatives of the source code to be made available on terms no more restrictive than those of the original licence.
Well-known examples of permissive licences include the MIT License and the BSD licenses.
| Contents |
| Comparison to public domain |
| GPL compatibility |
| See also |
Comparison to public domain
Computer Associates Int'l v. Altai used the term "public domain" to refer to works that have become widely shared and distributed under permission, rather than work that was deliberately put into the public domain. However, such licences are not actually equivalent to releasing a work into the public domain, so such a term can be considered a misnomer. But, because permissive free software licences essentially retain no rights apart from attribution of the copyright owner, the copyright holders would lose very little in terms of rights if a court held that the works were actually in the public domain.
GPL compatibility
Some permissive free software licences contain clauses that require advertising materials to credit to the copyright holder. Licences with an advertising clause include the 4-clause BSD license, the PHP License, and the OpenSSL Licence.
Licences with the advertising clause are incompatible with the GNU General Public License.
Examples of permissive free software licences without advertising clauses are the MIT License, the 3-clause BSD license the Zlib License, and all versions of the Apache License except 1.0.
See also
★ Free software licence
★ List of FSF approved software licences
★ List of OSI approved software licences
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
Featured Companies
| Dancing Moon Travel | |
| Selloffvacations.com Oakville |
Newest Companies
Permissive free software licences Travel Deals

العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español