PETRODOLLAR WARFARE


The phrase 'petrodollar warfare' refers to a hypothesis that a hidden, driving force of United States foreign policy over recent decades has been the status of the United States dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency and as the currency in which oil is priced. The term was coined by William R. Clark, who has written a book with the same title. The phrase ''oil currency wars'' is sometimes used with the same meaning.
Supporters of this hypothesis believe that the value of the U.S. dollar is determined by the fact that many key commodities (particularly oil and natural gas) are denominated in dollars. They believe that if the denomination changes to another currency, such as the euro, many countries would sell dollars and cause the banks to shift their reserves because they would no longer need dollars to buy oil and gas. This would weaken the dollar relative to the euro (see supply and demand). The core of the hypothesis is that U.S. administrations are greatly motivated by fear of the consequences of a weaker dollar, particularly higher oil prices. This motivation is seen as underlying and explaining many aspects of U.S. foreign policy, including the ongoing Iraq War.
This view is controversial. The petrodollar warfare hypothesis has been described as a conspiracy theory. Opponents dispute virtually every economic claim underpinning the hypothesis, including the theory's emphasis on the dollar denomination of commodities and the physical location of the major oil exchanges, the claim that the U.S. finances its current-account deficit by printing dollars, and so on. Opponents also sometimes point out that the Bush administration has repeatedly called for China to stop propping up the dollar by holding very large dollar reserves, a stance seemingly at odds with the administration's supposed overriding interest in maintaining a strong dollar.

Contents
Background
Project Censored Awards in 2004 and 2006
See also
Further reading
Links
Background
Pro views
Critical views

Background


Oil sales throughout the world are denominated in United States dollars (USD). Because most countries rely on oil imports, they are forced to maintain large stockpiles of dollars in order to continue imports. This causes demand for USDs to remain high, regardless of economic conditions in the United States. This allows the US government to gain revenues through seignorage and by issuing bonds at lower interest rates than they otherwise would be able to. As a result the U.S. government can run higher budget deficits at a more sustainable level than can most other countries.
It also means that the price of oil is more stable in the U.S. than anywhere else, since importers do not need to worry about exchange rate fluctuations. Since the U.S. imports a great deal of oil, its markets are heavily reliant on oil and its derivative products (jet fuel, diesel fuel, gasoline, etc.) for their energy needs. The price of oil can be an important political factor; American administrations are quite sensitive to the price of oil.
Political enemies of the United States therefore have some interest in seeing oil denominated in euros or other currencies. The EU could also theoretically accrue the same benefits if the Euro replaced the dollar. However, the European economy could also be seriously damaged if the Euro were to appreciate a lot against the dollar or other world currencies.
In 2000, Iraq converted all its oil transactions under the Oil for Food program to euros. When U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003, it returned oil sales from the euro to the USD.
Iran planned to open an oil bourse denominated in euros. It was planned to open on March 20 2006, but the opening was postponed indefinitely.
Proponents of this theory fear that it will give added reason for the U.S. to topple the Iranian regime as a means to close the bourse and revert Iran's oil transaction currency to USDs.
In mid-2006 Venezuela indicated support of Iran's decision to offer global oil trade in the euro currency. (See: “Venezuela Backs Plan to Sell Oil in Euros” Associated Press, June 1, 2006) [1]
Skeptics of the theory, for example Robert Looney, believe that the actual likelihood of a switch to denominating oil sales in Euros is unlikely. Most countries do not establish the denomination of their sales directly, relying instead on market based price markers such as West Texas Intermediate, North Sea Brent, or Dubai Crude. As a result they have limited ability to influence the denomination of sales one way or the other. A large number of traders would have to agree to a change in denomination before a change occurred.
Whether a falling dollar would actually hurt the American economy is disputed. A weaker dollar would lead to increased U.S. exports and decreased imports, which would decrease the U.S. trade deficit and benefit American manufacturers. On the other hand, imports would become more expensive for the U.S. across the board. Of particular concern is America's dependence on foreign oil. Many economists feel that the recent rise in oil prices is at least partially tied to the fall of the US dollar relative to most currencies. Since oil is priced in dollars, sellers have increased prices to compensate for their "real" loss of income. Economists generally agree that higher oil prices pose a risk of inflation, recession, or both. Inflation would almost certainly rise if the dollar were to depreciate heavily.
At least one U.S. Representative, Republican Ron Paul of Texas, has made very strong statements advancing similar views, using the phrase “dollar hegemony” to describe U.S. policy and proposing related reforms.[2] Many editorialists and bloggers have supported the theory.

Project Censored Awards in 2004 and 2006


The topic of oil currency warfare under the title ''U.S. Dollar vs. the Euro: Another Reason for the Invasion of Iraq'' won a 2003 Project Censored award in 2004.
"Iran’s New Oil Trade System Challenges U.S. Currency" won a 2006 Project Censored award in
[3].
These two essays were written by the author of the book ''Petrodollar Warfare'', William Clark.

See also



Petrodollar

Iranian oil bourse

Petroeuro

Petroruble

Petrodollar recycling

Peak oil

Oil reserves

Dollar hegemony

Further reading



Clark, William R.: ''Petrodollar Warfare : Oil, Iraq and the Future of the Dollar'', New Society Publishers, 2005, ISBN 0-86571-514-9

The Top 25 Censored Stories: U.S. Dollar vs. the Euro: Another Reason for the Invasion of Iraq, , Phillips, Peter, Seven Stories Press, 2003,

★ Engdahl, F. William, ''A New American Century? Iraq and the hidden euro-dollar wars'', Current Concerns, No 4, June 2003

Engdahl, F. William: ''A Century of War: Anglo-American oil politics and the New World Order'', Pluto Press, 2004, ISBN 0-7453-2309 X

Links


Background


How much longer can the dollar reign supreme? by Linda Heard. ''The Guardian'' (Australia), July 6, 2006. This article discusses exchange rates and the dollar's slowly declining role as the dominant reserve currency.

Don't worry about the euro by Paul Krugman. April 27, 1998. Krugman claims concerns about the dollar's reserve currency status are overblown. This column pre-dates the current debate by several years.

Norwegian Bourse Director wants oil bourse - priced in euros by Laila Bakken and Petter Halvorsen, NRK.no, December 27, 2005

Brinkmanship of Energy Geopolitics by Mathew Maavak, Panoptic World, March 3, 2006
Pro views


[4] Hysteria Over Iran and a New Cold War with Russia: Peak Oil, Petrocurrencies, and the Emerging Multi-Polar World, by William Clark, December 30, 2006

The Attack on the U.S. Dollar and Energy Needs by Alan Caruba. March 19, 2006. An editorial.

The Rise of the Petroeuro by Dan Adleman. ''The Republic of East Vancouver'', July 20, 2006.

Petrodollar Warfare by Ryan McGreal, "Raise the Hammer", January 27, 2006. A review of William Clark's book.

Talk in congress: The End of Dollar Hegemony by Congressman Ron Paul, February 15, 2006

Petrodollar Warfare Interview (audio) with William R. Clark and Jim Puplava of the Financial Sense Newshour.

Petrodollar Warfare: Dollars, Euros and the Upcoming Iranian Oil Bourse by William R. Clark. Media Monitors Network, August 5, 2005.

Petrodollar or Petroeuro? A new source of global conflict by Cóilín Nunan, Feasta Review no. 2

Battle Plans for Iran by Mike Whitney, OpEdNews, January 31, 2006.

US Paper Money and Iran's Oil Bourse an abstract of a speech by Congressman Ron Paul, February 17, 2006.

Where will oil trade: New York? London? Tehran? by NeonTetra. Sandcastle in the tide Blog, February 27, 2006.

Petrodollars and Nuclear Weapons Proliferation: Understanding the Planned Assault on Iran, Centre for Research on Globalization, February 10, 2006.

The Real Reasons for the Upcoming War With Iraq: A Macroeconomic and Geostrategic Analysis of the Unspoken Truth, Essay by William R. Clark, January 2004.

U.S. Dollar vs. the Euro: Another Reason for the Invasion of Iraq by Project Censored.

Iran’s Oil Exchange threatens the Greenback by Mike Whitney, OpEdNews, January 23, 2006.

The Proposed Iranian Oil Bourse by Krassimir Petrov. Informationclearinghouse.info, January 19, 2006.

Oil, Geopolitics, and the Coming War with Iran by Michael T. Klare. Tom Dispatch, April 11, 2005.

History of Oil video by Robert Newman.

The beginning of the end for petrodollar by Bulent Gokay, 15 March, 2006.

Cost, abuse and danger of the dollar by Rudo de Ruijter, Mathaba News, March 7, 2007.
Critical views


Petroeuros: A Threat to U.S. Interests in the Gulf? by R. Looney, Middle East Policy, 11, (2004), 1, pp. 26-37

Strange ideas about the Iranian oil bourse by James D. Hamilton, Econbrowser, January 20, 2006

What the Iran 'nuclear issue' is really about by Chris Cook, ''Asia Times Online'', January 21, 2006

Why Iran's oil bourse can't break the buck by F. William Engdahl, ''Asia Times Online'', March 10, 2006

This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.

psst.. try this: add to faves