REFLEXIVE RELATION
In set theory, a binary relation can have, among other properties, 'reflexivity' or 'irreflexivity'.
At least in this context, ''(binary) relation'' (on ''X'') always means a relation on ''X''×''X'', or in other words from a set ''X'' into itself.
★ A 'reflexive' relation ''R'' on set ''X'' is one where for all ''a'' in ''X'', ''a'' is ''R''-related to itself. In mathematical notation, this is:
:.
★ An 'irreflexive' (or 'aliorelative') relation ''R'' is one where for all ''a'' in ''X'', ''a'' is never ''R''-related to itself. In mathematical notation, this is:
:.
The 'reflexive closure' ''R'' = is defined as ''R'' = = {(''x'', ''x'') | ''x'' ∈ ''X''} ∪ ''R'', i.e., the smallest reflexive relation over ''X'' containing ''R''. This can be seen to be equal to the intersection of all reflexive relations containing ''R''.
The 'reflexive reduction' of a binary relation R on a set is the irreflexive relation R' with xR'y iff xRy for all x≠y.
'Note:' A common misconception is that a relationship is always either reflexive or irreflexive. Irreflexivity is a stronger condition than failure of reflexivity, so a binary relation may be reflexive, irreflexive, or neither. The strict inequalities "less than" and "greater than" are irreflexive relations whereas the inequalities "less than or equal to" and "greater than or equal to" are reflexive. However, if we define a relation ''R'' on the integers such that ''a R b'' iff ''a = -b'', then it is neither reflexive nor irreflexive, because 0 is related to itself.
A transitive irreflexive relation is an asymmetric relation and a strict partial order, while a transitive reflexive relation is only a preorder. Thus on a finite set there are more of the latter than of the former.
Some authors, such as Quine (1951), use the term 'totally reflexive' for this property, and use the term ''relexive'' for the weaker property
:
Preorder - A reflexive relation that is also transitive. Special cases of preorders such as partial orders and equivalence relations are, therefore, also reflexive.
'Examples of reflexive relations include:'
★ "is equal to" (equality)
★ "is a subset of" (set inclusion)
★ "divides" (divisibility)
★ "is greater/less than or equal to":
::::::
'Examples of irreflexive relations include:'
★ "is not equal to"
★ "is coprime to"
★ "is greater than":
::::::
★ Lidl, R. and Pilz, G. (1998). ''Applied abstract algebra'', Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-98290-6
★ Levy, A. (1979) ''Basic Set Theory'', Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag. Reprinted 2002, Dover. ISBN 0-486-42079-5
★ Quine, W. V. (1951). ''Mathematical Logic'', Revised Edition. Reprinted 2003, Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-55451-5
At least in this context, ''(binary) relation'' (on ''X'') always means a relation on ''X''×''X'', or in other words from a set ''X'' into itself.
★ A 'reflexive' relation ''R'' on set ''X'' is one where for all ''a'' in ''X'', ''a'' is ''R''-related to itself. In mathematical notation, this is:
:.
★ An 'irreflexive' (or 'aliorelative') relation ''R'' is one where for all ''a'' in ''X'', ''a'' is never ''R''-related to itself. In mathematical notation, this is:
:.
The 'reflexive closure' ''R'' = is defined as ''R'' = = {(''x'', ''x'') | ''x'' ∈ ''X''} ∪ ''R'', i.e., the smallest reflexive relation over ''X'' containing ''R''. This can be seen to be equal to the intersection of all reflexive relations containing ''R''.
The 'reflexive reduction' of a binary relation R on a set is the irreflexive relation R' with xR'y iff xRy for all x≠y.
'Note:' A common misconception is that a relationship is always either reflexive or irreflexive. Irreflexivity is a stronger condition than failure of reflexivity, so a binary relation may be reflexive, irreflexive, or neither. The strict inequalities "less than" and "greater than" are irreflexive relations whereas the inequalities "less than or equal to" and "greater than or equal to" are reflexive. However, if we define a relation ''R'' on the integers such that ''a R b'' iff ''a = -b'', then it is neither reflexive nor irreflexive, because 0 is related to itself.
A transitive irreflexive relation is an asymmetric relation and a strict partial order, while a transitive reflexive relation is only a preorder. Thus on a finite set there are more of the latter than of the former.
Some authors, such as Quine (1951), use the term 'totally reflexive' for this property, and use the term ''relexive'' for the weaker property
:
| Contents |
| Properties containing the reflexive property |
| Examples |
| Number of reflexive relations |
| References |
Properties containing the reflexive property
Preorder - A reflexive relation that is also transitive. Special cases of preorders such as partial orders and equivalence relations are, therefore, also reflexive.
Examples
'Examples of reflexive relations include:'
★ "is equal to" (equality)
★ "is a subset of" (set inclusion)
★ "divides" (divisibility)
★ "is greater/less than or equal to":
::::::
'Examples of irreflexive relations include:'
★ "is not equal to"
★ "is coprime to"
★ "is greater than":
::::::
Number of reflexive relations
References
★ Lidl, R. and Pilz, G. (1998). ''Applied abstract algebra'', Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-98290-6
★ Levy, A. (1979) ''Basic Set Theory'', Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag. Reprinted 2002, Dover. ISBN 0-486-42079-5
★ Quine, W. V. (1951). ''Mathematical Logic'', Revised Edition. Reprinted 2003, Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-55451-5
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves

العربية
ä¸å›½
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिनà¥à¤¦à¥€
Italiano
日本語
Português
РуÑÑкий
Español