SERRE DUALITY
In algebraic geometry, a branch of mathematics, 'Serre duality' is a duality present on non-singular projective algebraic varieties ''V'' of dimension ''n'' (and in greater generality) for vector bundles and the more general coherent sheaves. It shows that a cohomology group ''H''''i'' is the dual space of another one, ''H''''n''−''i''. If the variety is defined over the complex numbers, this is therefore quite distinct from Poincaré duality, which relates ''H''''i'' to ''H''2''n''−''i'' because as a manifold ''V'' has dimension 2''n''.
The case of algebraic curves was already implicit in the Riemann-Roch theorem. For a curve ''C'' the coherent groups ''H''''i'' vanish for ''i'' > 1; but ''H''1 does enter implicitly. In fact, the basic relation of the theorem involves ''L''(''D'') and ''L''(''K''−''D''), where ''D'' is a divisor and ''K'' is a divisor of the canonical class. After Serre we recognise ''l''(''K''−''D'') as the dimension of ''H''1(''D''), where now ''D'' means the line bundle determined by the divisor ''D''. That is, Serre duality in this case relates groups ''H''0(''D'') and ''H''1(''KD''
★ ), and we are reading off dimensions (notation: ''K'' is the canonical line bundle, ''D''
★ is the dual line bundle, and juxtaposition is the tensor product of line bundles).
In this formulation the theorem can be rearranged to read as a calculation of the Euler characteristic of a sheaf
:''h''0(''D'') − ''h''1(''D''),
in terms of the genus of the curve, which is
:''h''1(''C'',''O''''C''),
and the degree of ''D''. It is this expression that can be generalised to higher dimensions.
Serre duality of curves is therefore something very classical; but it has an interesting light to cast. For example, in Riemann surface theory, the deformation theory of complex structures is studied classically by means of quadratic differentials (namely sections of ''L''(''K''2)). The deformation theory of Kunihiko Kodaira and D. C. Spencer identifies deformations via ''H''1(''T''), where ''T'' is the tangent bundle sheaf ''K''
★ . The duality shows why these approaches coincide.
The origin of the theory lies in Serre's earlier work on several complex variables. In the generalisation of Alexander Grothendieck, Serre duality becomes a part of coherent duality in a much broader setting. While the role of ''K'' above in general Serre duality is played by the determinant line bundle of the cotangent bundle, when ''V'' is a manifold, in full generality ''K'' cannot merely be a ''single'' sheaf in the absence of some hypothesis of non-singularity on ''V''. The formulation in full generality uses a derived category and Ext functors, to allow for the fact that ''K'' is now represented by a chain complex of sheaves. Nevertheless, the statement of the theorem is recognisably Serre's.
The case of algebraic curves was already implicit in the Riemann-Roch theorem. For a curve ''C'' the coherent groups ''H''''i'' vanish for ''i'' > 1; but ''H''1 does enter implicitly. In fact, the basic relation of the theorem involves ''L''(''D'') and ''L''(''K''−''D''), where ''D'' is a divisor and ''K'' is a divisor of the canonical class. After Serre we recognise ''l''(''K''−''D'') as the dimension of ''H''1(''D''), where now ''D'' means the line bundle determined by the divisor ''D''. That is, Serre duality in this case relates groups ''H''0(''D'') and ''H''1(''KD''
★ ), and we are reading off dimensions (notation: ''K'' is the canonical line bundle, ''D''
★ is the dual line bundle, and juxtaposition is the tensor product of line bundles).
In this formulation the theorem can be rearranged to read as a calculation of the Euler characteristic of a sheaf
:''h''0(''D'') − ''h''1(''D''),
in terms of the genus of the curve, which is
:''h''1(''C'',''O''''C''),
and the degree of ''D''. It is this expression that can be generalised to higher dimensions.
Serre duality of curves is therefore something very classical; but it has an interesting light to cast. For example, in Riemann surface theory, the deformation theory of complex structures is studied classically by means of quadratic differentials (namely sections of ''L''(''K''2)). The deformation theory of Kunihiko Kodaira and D. C. Spencer identifies deformations via ''H''1(''T''), where ''T'' is the tangent bundle sheaf ''K''
★ . The duality shows why these approaches coincide.
The origin of the theory lies in Serre's earlier work on several complex variables. In the generalisation of Alexander Grothendieck, Serre duality becomes a part of coherent duality in a much broader setting. While the role of ''K'' above in general Serre duality is played by the determinant line bundle of the cotangent bundle, when ''V'' is a manifold, in full generality ''K'' cannot merely be a ''single'' sheaf in the absence of some hypothesis of non-singularity on ''V''. The formulation in full generality uses a derived category and Ext functors, to allow for the fact that ''K'' is now represented by a chain complex of sheaves. Nevertheless, the statement of the theorem is recognisably Serre's.
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
Featured Companies
| Dancing Moon Travel | |
| Alpine Interface Inc. | |
| Travelbugs, LLC | |
| Golf Holidays International |

العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español