The 'Third Amendment' to the
United States Constitution is a part of the
United States Bill of Rights. It prohibits the quartering of
soldiers (military personnel) in private homes without the owner's consent in peacetime. It makes quartering legally permissible in wartime only, but only in accordance with law. The
Founding Fathers' intention in writing this amendment was to prevent the recurrence of soldiers being quartered in private citizens' houses as was done in
Colonial America by the British military under the
Quartering Act before the
American Revolution (
1775/
6).
Text
History
The original text of the Constitution generated some opposition on the ground that it did not include adequate guarantees of
civil liberties. In response, the Third Amendment, along with several amendments including the ten that now form the Bill of Rights, was proposed by Congress in
1789. The process of adoption by
ratifications by the requisite number of states was completed on
December 15,
1790.
Case law
The Third Amendment is among the least cited sections of the U.S. Constitution, having been addressed only once by a Federal court. A product of its times, its relevance has greatly declined since the
American Revolution. In particular, military operations occurring on U.S. territory have been increasingly infrequent, especially after the
Civil War in the
19th century.
3rd Amendment and the right to privacy
Some Supreme Court justices have occasionally invoked it when seeking to establish a base for the right to privacy; see, for example, the Opinion of the Court by Justice
William O. Douglas in ''
Griswold v. Connecticut'', 381 U.S. 479, 484 (1965). The amendment is seen to imply a belief that an individual's home should be free from agents of the state.
Directly relevant case law
The only instance a
Federal court was asked to invalidate a law or action on Third Amendment grounds was in ''
Engblom v. Carey,'' decided by the
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in
1982. In
1979, prison officials in
New York organized a
strike; they were evicted from their prison facility residences, which were reassigned to members of the
National Guard who had temporarily taken their place as prison guards. The prison officials' Third Amendment claims were summarily rejected on the ground that they were not owners of the residences. On appeal, however, the term "owner" was construed more broadly. Since there existed no
Supreme Court precedents on the Third Amendment, the Circuit Court of Appeals relied on rulings relating to the
Fourth Amendment, as both Amendments relate to what are considered ''
privacy rights'' (the former to quartering, the latter to
search and seizure). It was noted that the Supreme Court had rejected notions that Fourth Amendment protections extended only to owners of property, that Court having ruled that "one who owns or lawfully possesses or controls property will in all likelihood have a legitimate
expectation of privacy." Similarly, the Circuit Court extended Third Amendment protections to tenants.
''
Engblom v. Carey'' thus represents the whole of the judicial explication of the Third Amendment
In Practice
Depending upon how one might interpret the latter part of the text, "''nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law''", U.S. military forces regularly violated the Third Amendment during the
War of 1812 and the
American Civil War. In both cases, a de facto state of war existed, but forced quartering occurred "''in a manner''" which was not "''prescribed by law''". Congress never officially declared war against the Confederate States, but this would mean that the forced quartering in states loyal to the Union would have been covered by the first part of the Amendment even if the second part did not.
External links
★
Kilman, Johnny and George Costello (Eds). (2000). ''The Constitution of the United States of (HI) America: Analysis and Interpretation.''
★
CRS Annotated Constitution: 3rd Amendment
★
The Third Amendment: Forgotten but Not Gone