(Redirected from Trivalent)
In
chemistry, 'valence', also known as ''valency'' or ''valency number'', is a measure of the number of
chemical bonds formed by the
atoms of a given
element. Over the last century, the concept of valence evolved into a range of approaches for describing the chemical bond, including
Lewis structures (1916),
valence bond theory (1927),
molecular orbitals (1928),
valence shell electron pair repulsion theory (1958) and all the advanced methods of
quantum chemistry.
History
The
etymology of the word "valence" is from 1425, meaning "extract, preparation," from Latin ''valentia'' "strength, capacity," and the chemical meaning referring to the "combining power of an element" is recorded from 1884, from German ''Valenz''.
[1]
In 1789,
William Higgins published views on what he called combinations of "ultimate" particles, which foreshadowed the concept of
valency bonds.
[ A Short History of Chemistry, , J.R., Partington, Dover Publications, Inc, 1989, ISBN 0-486-65977-1 ] If, for example, according to Higgins, the force between the ultimate particle of oxygen and the ultimate particle of nitrogen were 6, then the strength of the force would be divided accordingly, and similarly for the other combinations of ultimate particles:
The exact inception, however, of the theory of chemical valencies can be traced to an 1852 paper by
Edward Frankland, in which he combined the older theories of
free radicals and “type theory” with thoughts on
chemical affinity to show that certain elements have the tendency to combine with other elements to form compounds containing 3, i.e. in the three atom groups (e.g. ''NO
3, NH
3, NI
3,'' etc.) or 5, i.e. in the five atom groups (e.g. ''NO
5, NH
4O, PO
5,'' etc.), equivalents of the attached elements. It is in this manner, according to Franklin, that their affinities are best satisfied. Following these examples and postulates, Franklin declares how obvious it is that:
[2]
This “combining power” was afterwards called quantivalence or valency (and valence by American chemists).
Overview
The concept was developed in the middle of the nineteenth century in an attempt to rationalize the
formulae of different
chemical compounds. In 1919,
Irving Langmuir, borrowed the term to explain
Gilbert N. Lewis's
cubical atom model by stating that "the number of pairs of
electrons which any given atom shares with the adjacent atoms is called the ''covalence'' of that atom." The prefix ''co-'', e.g. co-author, means ''together, jointly, associated in action, partnered to a lesser degree, '' etc.,; thus a co-valent bond, essentially, means that the atoms share valence. Hence, if an atom, for example, had a +1 valence, meaning it was missing an electron, and another a -1 valence, meaning it had an extra electron, then a bond between these two atoms would result because they would be complementing or sharing their out of balance valence tendencies. Subsequently, it is now more common to speak of
covalent bonds rather than "valence", which has fallen out of use in higher level work with the advances in the theory of chemical bonding, but is still widely used in elementary studies where it provides a heuristic introduction to the subject.
"Number of bonds" definition
The number of bonds formed by a given element was originally thought to be a fixed chemical property and in fact, in many cases, this is a good approximation. For example, in many of their compounds,
carbon forms four bonds,
oxygen two and
hydrogen one. However it soon became apparent that, for many elements, the valence could vary between different compounds. One of the first examples to be identified was
phosphorus, which sometimes behaves as if it has a valence of three and sometimes as if it has a valence of five. One method around this problem is to specify the valence for each individual compound: although it removes much of the generality of the concept, this approach has given rise to the idea of
oxidation numbers (used in
Stock nomenclature) and to
lambda notation in the
IUPAC nomenclature of inorganic chemistry.
IUPAC definition
The
International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) has made several attempts to arrive at an unambiguous definition of valence. The current version, adopted in 1994,:
:''The maximum number of univalent atoms (originally
hydrogen or
chlorine atoms) that may combine with an atom of the element under consideration, or with a fragment, or for which an atom of this element can be substituted.''
This definition reimposes a unique valence for each element at the expense of neglecting, in many cases, a large part of its chemistry.
The mention of hydrogen and chlorine is for historic reasons, although both in practice mostly form compounds in which their atoms form a single bond. Exceptions in the case of hydrogen include the ion [HF
2]
− and the various boron hydrides such as
diborane: these are examples of
three-center two-electron bonds. Chlorine forms a number of
fluorides—
ClF,
ClF3 and
ClF5—and its valence according to the IUPAC definition is hence five.
Fluorine is the element for which the largest number of atoms combine with atoms of other elements: it is univalent in all compounds except the ion [H
2F]
+. In fact, the IUPAC definition can only be resolved by fixing the valences of hydrogen and fluorine as one, a convention which has been followed here.
Valences of the elements
Valences for the majority of elements are based on the highest known fluoride.
Other criticisms of the concept of valence
★ The valence of an element is not always equal to its highest
oxidation state: exceptions include
ruthenium,
osmium and
xenon, which have valences of six (hexafluorides) but which form compounds with oxygen in the +8 oxidation state, and chlorine, which has a valence of five but a highest oxidation state of +7 (in
perchlorates).
★ The concept of "combination" cannot be equated with the number of bonds formed by an atom. In
lithium fluoride (which has the
NaCl structure), each
lithium atom is surrounded by six fluorine atoms, whereas the valence of lithium is universally taken to be one, as the formula LiF would suggest.
See also
★
Chemical affinity
References
1. Valence - Online Etymology Dictionary.
2. Franklin, E. (1852). Phil. Trans., vol. cxlii, 417.
# ''Pure Appl. Chem.'' '66': 1175 (1994).
# http://www.webelements.com/ (accessed
2006-02-20).
# In the gas phase, LiF does indeed exist as discrete diatomic molecules as the valences would suggest:
External links
★ from the
IUPAC ''
Gold Book''