Member Login
Username:Password:
or Sign up here
Discover

UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL APPORTIONMENT


The allocation among states of the 435 seats in the United States House of Representatives changes each decade following the decennial United States Census. Each state is apportioned a number of seats based upon its population. This number also determines the state's number of electors in presidential elections, which equals the size of their congressional delegation (House plus Senate).
Reapportionment occurs every year ending in "1", the year after the decennial census. After seats have been reapportioned, each state determines the boundaries of Congressional districts within the state โ€” geographical areas of approximately equal population โ€” a process called redistricting.

Contents
House size
Apportionment methods
The Equal Proportions Method
State congressional delegation size
1789โ€“1910
1920-present
Notes
See also
External links

House size


Ratio of representation in the House, 1789โ€“1923
Years Source Constituents per Representative
1789โ€“1793 U.S. Constitution 30,000
1793โ€“1803 U.S. Census of 179030,000
1803โ€“1813 U.S. Census of 180033,000
1813โ€“1823 U.S. Census of 181035,000
1823โ€“1833 U.S. Census of 182040,000
1833โ€“1843 U.S. Census of 183047,700
1843โ€“1853 U.S. Census of 184070,680
1853โ€“1863 U.S. Census of 185093,425
1863โ€“1873 U.S. Census of 1860127,381
1873โ€“1883 U.S. Census of 1870131,425
1883โ€“1893 U.S. Census of 1880151,912
1893โ€“1903 U.S. Census of 1890173,901
1903โ€“1913 U.S. Census of 1900194,182
1913โ€“1923 U.S. Census of 1910212,407

The United States Constitution requires that
:''The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one Representative'' (Article I, Section 2, Paragraph 3)
Prior to the twentieth century, the number of representatives increased every decade as more states joined the union, and the population increased.
In 1911, Public Law 62-5 set the membership of the U.S. House at 433; with the subsequent admission of Arizona and New Mexico as states, membership increased to 435, where it has remained (except for a brief period from 1959 to 1963 following the admission of Alaska and Hawaii, during which House membership was 437). If the ratio as specified by the Constitution of one representative for every 30,000 people were maintained today, the House of Representatives would have about 10,000 members. Instead, today one member represents about 650,000 people, which varies by state.
Proposals have been made to add voting representation for the District of Columbia, now represented only by a non-voting delegate, who is not counted as one of the 435 House representatives. A recent bill, the District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2007, if passed, would resolve the issue by permanently increasing House membership to 437. One of the new members would be from the District of Columbia; the other would be from the next state in line to receive another House seat (as described below), presently Utah. The political appeal of this plan lies in its balancing of a new, presumably Democratic seat (D.C.) with a new likely Republican seat (Utah).

Apportionment methods


Apart from the fact that the number of delegates is at least 1 for each state, as required by the Constitution, a state's number of representatives is in principle proportional to population (thus equalizing the size of congressional districts nationwide). No method of calculating this desired result, however, has been found perfectly satisfactory in practice. Five distinct methods have been used since the adoption of the Constitution, all of them susceptible to mathematical paradoxes.
The Equal Proportions Method

The Equal Proportions method is the apportionment methodology currently used.
In this method, as a first step, each state is automatically guaranteed at least one seat in Congress. That means there are a total of 385 seats left to hand out.
The remaining seats are handed out one at a time, to the state that "deserves" another seat the most. Thus, the 51st seat always goes to the largest state (currently California).
The apportionment method uses a mathematical formula to express the priority ordering of states for an additional seat. For instance, in the example above, California has already received a second seat and thus "deserves" a third one less.
The formula used by the method of equal proportions is
:A= rac{P}{sqrt{n(n+1)}}
where ''P'' is the population of the state, and ''n'' is the number of seats it currently has. An equivalent, recursive definition is
:A_{n}=(A_{n-1})( rac{n}{n+2})^{- rac{1}{2}}
where ''n'' is still the number of seats the state has, and for ''n'' = 1, ''A'' is explicitly defined as
:A_{1}= rac{P}{sqrt{2}}
A sequential definition may likewise be given where the ''n'' = 1 case is defined as above, but the formula is
:A_{n+1}=(A_{n})( rac{n-1}{n+1})^{- rac{1}{2}}
When all states have 1 seat, the largest value of ''A'' corresponds to the largest state. But now that California has 2 seats, its priority value decreases, and it has to take a step back in line. The 52nd seat goes to Texas, the 2nd largest state, but the 53rd goes back to California, and so on until all the seats have been handed out. Each time a state gets a seat, its priority drops and another state comes to the top of the list.
The Census 2000 Ranking of Priority Values[1] shows the order in which seats 51โ€“435 were apportioned after the 2000 Census, with additional listings for the next five priorities. North Carolina was allocated the final (435th) seat. Utah (priority list 436) missed a fourth seat by only 857 residents. Legal action by Utah to amend the results, citing irregularities in the North Carolina count and undercounting of Utah's overseas missionary population (suggested to be as many as 14,000), was unsuccessful. However, Utah may still get a fourth seat if the District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2007 is passed.

State congressional delegation size


1789โ€“1910

  1789 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910
Alabama โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 3 5 7 7 6 8 8 9 10 10
Arizona โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1''
Arkansas โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7
California โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''2'' 2 3 4 6 7 8 11
Colorado โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 1 2 3 4
Connecticut ''5'' 7 7 7 6 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 5 5
Delaware ''1'' 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Florida โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 1 1 2 2 2 3 4
Georgia ''3'' 2 4 6 7 9 8 8 7 9 10 11 11 12
Idaho โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 1 1 2
Illinois โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 1 3 7 9 14 19 20 22 25 27
Indiana โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 3 7 10 11 11 13 13 13 13 13
Iowa โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 2 6 9 11 11 11 11
Kansas โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” 1 3 7 8 8 8
Kentucky โ€” 2 6 10 12 13 10 10 9 10 11 11 11 11
Louisiana โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 3 3 4 4 5 6 6 6 7 8
Maine โ€” โ€” โ€” ''7''[2] 7 8 7 6 5 5 4 4 4 4
Maryland ''6'' 8 9 9 9 8 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 6
Massachusetts ''8'' 14 17 13[2] 13 12 10 11 10 11 12 13 14 16
Michigan โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 3 4 6 9 11 12 12 13
Minnesota โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 2 3 5 7 9 10
Mississippi โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 1 2 4 5 5 6 7 7 8 8
Missouri โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” 1 2 5 7 9 13 14 15 16 16
  1789 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910
Montana โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 1 1 2
Nebraska โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 1 3 6 6 6
Nevada โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 1 1 1 1 1
New Hampshire ''3'' 4 5 6 6 5 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 2
New Jersey ''4'' 5 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 7 7 8 10 12
New Mexico โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1''
New York ''6'' 10 17 27 34 40 34 33 31 33 34 34 37 43
North Carolina ''5'' 10 12 13 13 13 9 8 7 8 9 9 10 10
North Dakota โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 1 2 3
Ohio โ€” โ€” ''1'' 6 14 19 21 21 19 20 21 21 21 22
Oklahoma โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''5'' 8
Oregon โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 1 1 1 2 2 3
Pennsylvania ''8'' 13 18 23 26 28 24 25 24 27 28 30 32 36
Rhode Island ''1'' 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3
South Carolina ''5'' 6 8 9 9 9 7 6 4 5 7 7 7 7
South Dakota โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''2'' 2 2 3
Tennessee โ€” 1 3 6 9 13 11 10 8 10 10 10 10 10
Texas โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''2'' 2 4 6 11 13 16 18
Utah โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 1 2
Vermont โ€” 2 4 6 5 5 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 2
Virginia ''10'' 19 22 23 22 21 15 13 11 9[4] 10 10 10 10
Washington โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 2 3 5
West Virginia โ€” โ€” โ€” - โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” 3[4] 4 4 5 6
Wisconsin โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''2'' 3 6 8 9 10 11 11
Wyoming โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 1 1 1
  1789 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910
Total: 65 106 142 186 213 242 232 237 243 293 332 357 391 435

1920-present

  1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Alabama 10 9 9 9 8 7 7 7 7
Alaska โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 1 1 1 1 1
Arizona 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 8
Arkansas 7 7 7 6 4 4 4 4 4
California 11 20 23 30 38 43 45 52 53
Colorado 4 4 4 4 4 5 6 6 7
Connecticut 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5
Delaware 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Florida 4 5 6 8 12 15 19 23 25
Georgia 12 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 13
Hawaii โ€” โ€” โ€” ''1'' 2 2 2 2 2
Idaho 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Illinois 27 27 26 25 24 24 22 20 19
Indiana 13 12 11 11 11 11 10 10 9
Iowa 11 9 8 8 7 6 6 5 5
Kansas 8 7 6 6 5 5 5 4 4
Kentucky 11 9 9 8 7 7 7 6 6
Louisiana 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7
Maine 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2
Maryland 6 6 6 7 8 8 8 8 8
Massachusetts 16 15 14 14 12 12 11 10 10
Michigan 13 17 17 18 19 19 18 16 15
Minnesota 10 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8
Mississippi 8 7 7 6 5 5 5 5 4
Missouri 16 13 13 11 10 10 9 9 9
  1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Montana 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1
Nebraska 6 5 4 4 3 3 3 3 3
Nevada 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3
New Hampshire 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
New Jersey 12 14 14 14 15 15 14 13 13
New Mexico 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3
New York 43 45 45 43 41 39 34 31 29
North Carolina 10 11 12 12 11 11 11 12 13
North Dakota 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1
Ohio 22 24 23 23 24 23 21 19 18
Oklahoma 8 9 8 6 6 6 6 6 5
Oregon 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5
Pennsylvania 36 34 33 30 27 25 23 21 19
Rhode Island 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
South Carolina 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
South Dakota 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
Tennessee 10 9 10 9 9 8 9 9 9
Texas 18 21 21 22 23 24 27 30 32
Utah 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3
Vermont 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Virginia 10 9 9 10 10 10 10 11 11
Washington 5 6 6 7 7 7 8 9 9
West Virginia 6 6 6 6 5 4 4 3 3
Wisconsin 11 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 8
Wyoming 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Total: 435 435 435 437 435 435 435 435 435

Notes


★ Delegate counts in ''italics'' represent temporary counts assigned by Congress until the next decennial census or by the U.S. Constitution in 1789 until the first U.S. Census.

★ Elections held in the year of a census use the apportionment determined by the previous census.
1. census.gov
2. The state of Maine was formed out of portions of Massachusetts in 1820.
3. The state of Maine was formed out of portions of Massachusetts in 1820.
4. The state of West Virginia was formed out of portions of Virginia in 1863.
5. The state of West Virginia was formed out of portions of Virginia in 1863.

See also



List of states ordered by number of electors in the presidential elections, which is two more for each state.

United States Congress

United States House of Representatives

Alabama paradox

Apportionment paradox

Redistricting

Gerrymandering

List of U.S. states by population

External links



Congressional Apportionment by the U.S. Census Bureau

★ 'Cut-the-knot.org:'
:
The Constitution and Paradoxes
:
A Java Simulation of Adams' method
:
A Java Simulation of Hamilton's method
:
A Java Simulation of the Huntington-Hill method
:
A Java Simulation of Jefferson's method
:
A Java Simulation of Webster's method

★ 'Thirty-thousand.org:'
:
A Brief History of Apportionment
:
Forty or Thirty Thousand?
:
The Size of the U. S. House of Representatives and its Constituent State Delegations Authorized Number of Seats by Year and by Congress 1789 to 2006
:
Outcomes of Presidential Elections and the House Size

This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.