URSICINUS (ROMAN GENERAL)
'Ursicinus' was the "master of cavalry" (''magister equitum'') in the Eastern Roman Empire ''c.'' 349-359.[1]
In 353, Ammianus Marcellinus was attached to the command of Ursicinus at his headquarters in Nisibis.[2] He was recalled from Nisibis in 354 by the Caesar Constantius Gallus to take part in the investigation of treason in Antioch.[3]
When, in 355, Claudius Silvanus revolted against Emperor Constantius II in Gaul, Ursicinus was sent to him with a letter of recall by Constantius. However, Ursicinus had Silvanus killed and took his place.
Ursicinus was dismissed after the destruction of Amida (Diyarbakır, Turkey) in 359,[4], for which he was officially blamed.[5]
The Roman historian Ammianus Marcellinus revered Ursicinus, and his account is greatly biased towards him.
1. Wallace-Hadrill, A., ''Ammianus Marcellinus. The Later Roman Empire (AD 354-378)'', Harmondsworth, 1986, p. 486.
2. Ammianus Marcellinus, ''Res Gestae'', 14.9.1,2; Thompson, E.A., ''The Historical Work of Ammianus Marcellinus'' Groningen, 1969, p. 3.
3. Matthews, J., ''The Roman Empire of Ammianus'', London, 1989, p. 34.
4. Trombley, F., "Ammianus Marcellinus and fourth-century warfare: a protector's approach to historical narrative", in J.W. Drijvers and D. Hunt, eds. ''The Late Roman World and its Historian'', London, 1999 p. 20
5. Ammianus Marcellinus, ''Res Gestae'' 20.2.2-5; Barnes, T. D., ''Ammianus Marcellinus and the Representation of Historical Reality'', Ithaca and London, 1998, p. 63.
In 353, Ammianus Marcellinus was attached to the command of Ursicinus at his headquarters in Nisibis.[2] He was recalled from Nisibis in 354 by the Caesar Constantius Gallus to take part in the investigation of treason in Antioch.[3]
When, in 355, Claudius Silvanus revolted against Emperor Constantius II in Gaul, Ursicinus was sent to him with a letter of recall by Constantius. However, Ursicinus had Silvanus killed and took his place.
Ursicinus was dismissed after the destruction of Amida (Diyarbakır, Turkey) in 359,[4], for which he was officially blamed.[5]
The Roman historian Ammianus Marcellinus revered Ursicinus, and his account is greatly biased towards him.
| Contents |
| References |
References
1. Wallace-Hadrill, A., ''Ammianus Marcellinus. The Later Roman Empire (AD 354-378)'', Harmondsworth, 1986, p. 486.
2. Ammianus Marcellinus, ''Res Gestae'', 14.9.1,2; Thompson, E.A., ''The Historical Work of Ammianus Marcellinus'' Groningen, 1969, p. 3.
3. Matthews, J., ''The Roman Empire of Ammianus'', London, 1989, p. 34.
4. Trombley, F., "Ammianus Marcellinus and fourth-century warfare: a protector's approach to historical narrative", in J.W. Drijvers and D. Hunt, eds. ''The Late Roman World and its Historian'', London, 1999 p. 20
5. Ammianus Marcellinus, ''Res Gestae'' 20.2.2-5; Barnes, T. D., ''Ammianus Marcellinus and the Representation of Historical Reality'', Ithaca and London, 1998, p. 63.
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves

العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español