Discover

Be Part of the Solution: Stand with Israel!


Title:
Be Part of the Solution: Stand with Israel!

Description:
When it comes to Israel, the great civil rights leader, Eldridge Cleaver, was right: you're either part of the solution or part of the problem. Rabbi Abraham Cooper - Associate Dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center - describes the egregious double-standard, often, applied to Israel, and its dire ramifications for university students worldwide. Tyrannical despots warn us that Israel is 'evil'; their hypocrisy tells us one thing - the emperor wear no clothes! Islamic-extremist agents provocateurs fill the halls of the Concordia Universities of the world, armed with their go-nowhere message of Jihad, endless hate, and chaos. Be proud and stand, now, with Israel, the only true democracy in the Middle East; join, David, in his eternal struggle against the mendacious Goliath. The recent 2007 motion for the University and College Union in the UK expresses clear support for a boycott against Israeli academics/institutions and instructs the union executive to pass on Palestinian propoganda promoting a boycott to all branches for discussion. The motion also declares that neutrality over the middle east is not possible or desireable, in effect (as Ronnie Fraser of the Academic Friends of Israel explained) declaring war on Israel by the union. Such an idea of singling Israel out and treating it not on merit but as evil by nature is very likely to fall foul of the European Union's legal definition of antisemitism. Being such clever boffins, the UCU of course had a solution. In the text of the motion the UCU by their own resolution have defined their boycott as "not antisemitic". The fact that the UK Government's report into antisemitism disagrees with them seems not to bother these clever people in the slightest. The vote was counted at 158 to 99, those in favour of promoting a boycott in the majority. After the vote the General Secretary of the Union, Sally Hunt, said "I do not believe a boycott is supported by the majority of UCU members, nor do I believe that members see it is a priority for the union". The motion calls for the executive of UCU to: - circulate a Palestinian call for an academic boycott of Israel for information and discussion in local branches - organise a UK-wide campus tour for Palestinian academic/educational trade unionists (presumably promoting the boycott) - encourage members to consider the "moral implications" of existing and proposed links with Israeli academic institutions - issue guidance to members on appropriate forms of action The careful wording is a result of the past boycott efforts that saw the AUT threatened with legal action, and proposed boycotters informed by university administrations that they would be in breach of their contracts and liable to lose their jobs if they persued suggested boycott action. However they are worded, such boycotts are discriminatory, against all academic values, and the result of radicals trying to hijack a number of unions in the UK for their own purposes. http://www.wiesenthal.com/site/pp.asp?c=fwLYKnN8LzH&b=242023 Statement by Rhodes Scholars on Proposed UCU Boycott of Israeli Universities The United Kingdom's University and college Union has recently encouraged its members to consider abandoning all links to Israeli academic institutions. As Rhodes Scholars, we find this proposed boycott to be unjustified and an egregious violation of the basic rules of the academic community. Freedom of speech and inclusion of all parties who are committed to pursuing truth are essential values in academic life. Encouraging boycotts of universities and their professors violates these fundamental values. Differences must be rationally discussed, not silenced through such exclusionary tactics. Singling out Israeli universities for censure also suggests an unjust double standard and unfair prejudice against the Jewish State. We urge the University and College Union to abandon this effort immediately. Statement Signatories James Eli Adams Mark David Agrast Associate Professor & Senior Fellow Director Center for American Progress of Graduate Studies Washington, D.C. Department of English Cornell University T.A. Barron, Author Thomas C. Berg St. Ives Professor University of St. Thomas School of Law James Braden, Attorney Fred Cohen San Francisco, California University of California at San Francisco Kalman J. Cohen, Professor John V. Fleming Emeritus Fairchild Professor Emeritus The Fuqua School of Business Princeton University Duke University David S. Goldbloom, MD, FRCPC Joel K. Goldstein Professor of Psychiatry Vincent C. Immel Professor of University of Toronto Law St. Louis University School of Law Peter J. Kalis, Attorney James H. Merrell Lucy Maynard Salmon Professor of History Vassar College Thomas W. Merrill Joseph Nye, Former Dean Charles Keller Beekman Kennedy School of Government Professor Harvard University Columbia Law School Betsy L. Roe David H. Roe, President Central College Central College Thomas D. Rowe, Jr. Dr. Larry J. Sabato Elvin R. Latty Professor of Director, Center for Politics Law University of Virginia Duke University Andrew W. Savitz Kurt L. Schmoke, Dean Author of The Triple Bottom Howard University School of Line Law and former Mayor of Baltimore, Maryland David Vitter, United States R. James Woolsey Senator Former Director of Central Intelligence Edwin M. Yoder Jr. Author and Editor

Author:
SWCCampus

Tags:
boycott, Cooper, Israel, proud, UCU, Wiesenthal,

Related Videos:

Out of time: Radical Islam Taking Over Europe & West
Great news clip on islamisation of Europe. If these statistics don't wake you up, I don't know what will. Radical Islam is a grave threat to Europe, there is no denying this. Europe as we know it will be taken by Muslims within the next 100 years. It's time we stop being politically correct with Islam and confront it for what it is.
Anti-Semite
Video clip of a Springfield Massachusetts police officers wife admiting shes an Anti-Semite
Rabbi Cooper Denounces Hamas Op-Ed Free Ride!
It's unconscionable that The Times has given editorial credibility to terrorists. By Marvin Hier and Abraham Cooper LA Times/July 22, 2007 Memo to Al Qaeda's Ayman Zawahiri: Forget the mule pack; give your video cam a rest. Our nation's leading media outlets are making an offer you can't refuse: If you can keep it to 1,250 words, the next time you want to communicate directly to the American people, the Los Angeles Times, Washington Post and New York Times want your byline. Inconceivable? Consider Hamas' summer hot streak. Not only has it driven Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas out of Gaza, threatened Israeli civilians and bombarded fellow Palestinians, but it has scored the ultimate media trifecta. First, the New York Times and the Washington Post simultaneously ran Op-Ed articles by Ahmed Yousef, a senior leader of Hamas who defended his group's bloody putsch in Gaza. Now, the Los Angeles Times has opened its Op-Ed page to Hamas political bureau deputy Mousa Abu Marzook for his insidious take on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. "Why should any Palestinian 'recognize' the monstrous crime carried out by Israel's founders and continued by its deformed modern apartheid state, while he or she lives 10 to a room in a cinder-block, tin-roof United Nations hut?" Marzook asked in his article in The Times earlier this month. Of course, he knows very well why Palestinians are in the position they're in. It's because of the refusal of the Arabs to accept the 1947 U.N. resolution for a two-state solution in the Holy Land. The architects who laid the foundation for the U.N. refugee huts are the Arabs themselves. And why is that misery still continuing in the Palestinian territories today? Because of the delusional aspirations of their Islamic fundamentalist leaders who will not accept the rights of the Jewish people to any homeland in the Middle East. Had the Arab states then, or Hamas today, chosen peace, no Palestinian would be living in refugee camps and there would be no suicide belts. In reaction to a firestorm of protest, the New York Times' public editor defended his newspaper's publication of Yousef's piece by stating that "the point of the Op-Ed page is advocacy" and that "if you get only one side, that's not debate," a view we're sure some editors at the Los Angeles Times share. But how to explain the radical makeover from terrorist pariah to sought-after guest commentators in our national newspapers of record? Perhaps the editors at The Times and their colleagues back East think they are performing a service by accepting Op-Ed articles that allow people like Abu Marzook to speak unencumbered to the American people. What better way to prove to these radicals that the pen is mightier than the sword? But this is a dangerously flawed and naive approach. Hamas, an offshoot and affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood, is as committed to its vision of an Islamic state governed by Sharia law as Hitler was to his "1,000-year Reich." And the editors turn a blind eye to Hamas' founding charter, which invokes the infamous forgery "The Protocols of the Elders Of Zion." Also ignored is the reality that Israel is in a struggle with a group of religious fanatics who embrace a culture of death, preferring the next world to this one; whose ideology abhors compromise; and who surely view their newfound status in the U.S. media as a complete capitulation by a crucial segment of America's elite. This is the issue before us -- should the nation's Op-Ed pages be thrown open to everyone? Are there no constraints or red lines? Whatever happened to the basic standards that civilized people are expected to live by? Like a belief in the reverence and sanctity of all human life; an abhorrence of violence toward others, especially innocents; the desire and ability to be reasonable and avoid extremes. Has Hamas suddenly embraced any of these values? Of course not. So why is The Times conferring a journalistic honoris causa degree on terrorists whose modus operandi is to deliberately target innocent civilians of all faiths on buses, in theaters and in shopping malls? So what will the editors' answer be? That simply because Abu Marzook can turn a good phrase, mass murderers will from now on be entitled to their point of view? Let's be clear: This issue is not about giving ink to Hamas' views. Their statements and actions deserve real-time coverage, just the way the statements and actions of Hitler and Stalin received coverage by the most prestigious newspapers in the world's most important democracy. But such people do not deserve the status of a sagely byline, because that destroys the distinction between honorable men and women bound by basic principles of humanity and the despots and terrorists eager to destroy those values. If the criteria is simply because "it is an important story," then would the editors have welcomed articles by Auschwitz's Dr. Josef Mengele justifying his gruesome medical experiments, or by the Virginia Tech killer explaining why he committed mass murder? Of course, newspapers have the right and responsibility to inform their readers about dictators and purveyors of terror. But they don't have the right to bestow editorial credibility on those bent on genocide. It is true that, just like Hitler, Hamas was democratically elected. But it is equally true that once it took power, like Hitler, it made it brutally clear that its god is the bullet, not the ballot. So if terrorism doesn't do it for the editors, when will their moral outrage kick in? When the KKK or Nazi party submit their rants for consideration? On Sept. 12, 2001, it would have been an inconceivable question to ask, but not today. When will Osama bin Laden's guest column appear? What price "relevance"? Rabbi Marvin Hier is dean and founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Rabbi Abraham Cooper is associate dean of the Wiesenthal Center.
James Blunt - You're Beautiful official video & lyrics
http://music.dom.gr LYRICS: My life is brilliant. My life is brilliant. My love is pure. I saw an angel. Of that I'm sure. She smiled at me on the subway. She was with another man. But I won't lose no sleep on that, 'Cause I've got a plan. You're beautiful. You're beautiful. You're beautiful, it's true. I saw your face in a crowded place, And I don't know what to do, 'Cause I'll never be with you. Yeah, she caught my eye, As we walked on by. She could see from my face that I was, Flying high, And I don't think that I'll see her again, But we shared a moment that will last till the end. You're beautiful. You're beautiful. You're beautiful, it's true. I saw your face in a crowded place, And I don't know what to do, 'Cause I'll never be with you. You're beautiful. You're beautiful. You're beautiful, it's true. There must be an angel with a smile on her face, When she thought up that I should be with you. But it's time to face the truth, I will never be with you. http://clubs.pathfinder.gr/nodas2
California Debate: Humane Immigration Policy
Barack details practical, progressive, and humane federal policy that fundamentally addresses issues of immigration.
Islam Cartoon
Islamic Cartoon of a slave (Bilal), becoming a free man.
Drake discusses UCI anti-Semitism at Hillel summit in D.C.
At the recent Hillel summit in Washington, D.C. Michael Drake, Chancellor of UC Irvine, discusses anti-Semitic speakers who regularly visit his campus.
The Real arabs !!
the real arabs and muslim now day ,just wanted to show u that we are normal people and live normal lives in the middle east and even in the gulf , and that we don't live with donkeys and camels with tents in the desert lol , dont froget to leave a comment thanx all
DEAN OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY ON AHMADINEJAD INVITE
SEPTEMBER 24, 2007 CNN
Cinema Paradiso: Totò e Alfredo (Maturità)
Cinema Paradiso: Totò e Alfredo (Maturità) Music by Ennio Morricone Overdub Alert!: Please be aware that I overdubbed the initial melody in the waltzy section as it seemed like the thing to do. (not trying to pull a fast one on anyone) From 0:43 seconds onward it's all the one original track solo. Taylor NS54-CE, hybrid classical