Title:
NOBLE MOORISH SPEAKS ABOUT HIS 25 MILLION LAWSUIT ABOUT THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL.
Description:
(PART 2)THE NOBLE MOORISH GOD BREAKS DOWN THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL..THE POLICE OFFICER THEN SAID THAT I DID NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO TRAVEL AND THAT I CAN PREACH TO THE JUDGE. HE ALSO ASKED FOR MY IDENTIFICATION, I HANDED HIM MY MOORISH NATIONALITY CARD WHICH IS REGISTERED IN THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS BY C.M. BEY AA222141. I WOULD LIKE TO STATE THAT ALLAH EL IS NOT UNDER ANY STATES JURIDISTION. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE LANDMARK CASE DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD 60 US(19 HOWARD) 393(1857) HELD THAT NEGROES SL;AVE OR FREE WERE NOT INCLUDED AND WERE NOT INTENDED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CATEGORY OF "CITIZEN" AS THE WORD WAS YSED IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION ACCORDING TO THESE FACTS OF THE ESTABLISHED LAW OF THE LAND. THE TRUE NOBLES OF THE MOORISH EMPIRE(FREE MOORS) WERE NOT INCLUDED AND WERE NOT INTENDED TO BE INCLUDED AS CITIZENS(SUBJECTS) OF THE UNION STATES. I ALLAH EL MUST ALSO STATE THAT THE RIGHTS TO TRAVEL IS A CONSTITUTIONAL, WELL AS A HUMAN RIGHT. THERE ARE NUMEROUS CASES THAT PROVE THIS FACT. CASE # 1 "THE USE OF HIGHWAY FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION IS NOT A MERE PRIVILEGE BUT A COMMON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OF WHICH THE PUBLIC AND INDIVIDUALS CANNOT RIGHTFULLY BE DEPRIVED" CHICAGO MOTOR COACH V. CHICAGO 169 NE. 221. CASE # 2 " THE RIGHT OF THE CITIZEN TO TRAVEL UPON THE PUBLIC HIGHWAYS AND TO TRANSPORT HIS PROPERTY THERE ON, EITHER BY CARRIAGE OR BY AUTOMOBILE IS NOT A MERE PRIVILEGE WHICH A CITY MAY PROHIBIT OR PERMIT AT WILL, BUT A COMMON LAW RIGHT WHICH HE HAS UNDER THE RIGHT TO LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS" THOMPSON V. SMITH 154 SE 579.CASE #3 " THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL IS A PART OF THE LIBERTY OF WHICH THE CITIZEN CANNOT BE DEPRIVED WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW UNDER THE 5TH AMENDMENT" KENT V. DULLES .CASE # 4 " THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL IS A WELL ESTABLISHED COMMON RIGHT THAT DOES NOT OWE IT'S EXISTENCE TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, IT IS RECOGNIZED BY THE COURTS AS A NATURAL RIGHT" SCHACTMAN V. DULLES 96 APP DC 287,255 F2D 938 AT 941. AFTER I ALLAH EL GAVE THE OFFICER MY I.D. THE OFFICER'S BACK UP TOLD HIM TO TELL ME TO STEP OUT THE CAR. I WAS PLACED IN THE FIRST OFFICER'S CAR, I WAS NEVER READ MY RIGHTS ARE TOLD WHAT I WAS DETAINED FOR. 2 HOURS WHILE STILL IN THE COP'S CAR I WAS ARRESTED AND MY CAR WAS ALSO TOWED. AT THE LOCK UP I LATER FIND THAT I WAS ARRESTED FOR NOT HAVING A VALID DRIVER'S LICENSE. AT THIS TIME I ALLAH EL SUFFERED, ,LOSS OF FREEDOM, MONETARY LOSS, RIGHTS VIOLATED AND IMPRISONMENT BECAUSE I EXCISED A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT. THIS ACTION THAT WAS TAKEN BY THE POLICER OFFICER IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS THAT ARE GAUARANTEED BY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND INTERNATIONAL LAW. ANY ACTION BY A POLICE OFFICER,OFFICER OF THE COURT, PIBLIC SERVANT OF THE GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL TO ASSERT UNLAWFULLY AUTHORITY UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW WILL BE CONSTRUED AS A DIRECT AND WILLFUL VIOLATION OF OUR CONSTITUION, AND TREATIES PROTECTED RIGHTS AND PROTECTED TO THE FULL EXTENT OF NATURAL LAW. TITLE 28 USC 17469. FURTHER MORE I ALLAH EL WOULD LIKE TO SITE THE FOLLOWING CASES: CASE #1 HERTADO V. CALIFORNIA 110 US 516 THE U.S. SUPREME COURT STATES VERY PLAINLY: "THE STATE CANNOT DIMINISH RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE" CASE #2 BENET V. BOGGS 1 BALDW 60 "STATUES THAT VIOLATE THE PLAIN AND OBVIOUS PRINCIPLES OF COMMON RIGHT AND COMMON REASON ARE NULL AND VIOD" CASE # 3"THE ASERTION O FEDERAL RIGHTS WHEN PLAINLY AND REASONABLY MADE IS NOT TO BE DEFEATED UNDER THE NAME OF LOCAL PRACTICE" DAVIS V. WECHSLER 263 US 22 AT 24. CASE # 4 " WHERE RIGHTS SECURED BY THE CONSTITUTION ARE INVOLVED THERE CAN BE NO RULE MAKING OR LEGISLATION WHICH WOULD ABROGATE THEM" MIRANDA V. ARIZONA 384 US 436,491 CASE # 5 " THE CLAIM AND EXERCISE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT CANNOT BE CONVERTED INTO A CRIME" MILLER V. US, 230 F 486 AT 489. CASE # 6 THERE CAN BE NO SANCTION OR PENALTY IMPOSED UPON ONE BECAUSE OF THIS EXERCISE OF CONSTITUTIONAL; RIGHTS" SHENER V. CULLEN 481 F 946.
Author:
noblemoorishgod
Tags:
BLACK POWER, MOORISH SCIENCE AND LAW,
NOBLE MOORISH SPEAKS ABOUT HIS 25 MILLION LAWSUIT ABOUT THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL.
Description:
(PART 2)THE NOBLE MOORISH GOD BREAKS DOWN THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL..THE POLICE OFFICER THEN SAID THAT I DID NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO TRAVEL AND THAT I CAN PREACH TO THE JUDGE. HE ALSO ASKED FOR MY IDENTIFICATION, I HANDED HIM MY MOORISH NATIONALITY CARD WHICH IS REGISTERED IN THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS BY C.M. BEY AA222141. I WOULD LIKE TO STATE THAT ALLAH EL IS NOT UNDER ANY STATES JURIDISTION. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE LANDMARK CASE DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD 60 US(19 HOWARD) 393(1857) HELD THAT NEGROES SL;AVE OR FREE WERE NOT INCLUDED AND WERE NOT INTENDED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CATEGORY OF "CITIZEN" AS THE WORD WAS YSED IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION ACCORDING TO THESE FACTS OF THE ESTABLISHED LAW OF THE LAND. THE TRUE NOBLES OF THE MOORISH EMPIRE(FREE MOORS) WERE NOT INCLUDED AND WERE NOT INTENDED TO BE INCLUDED AS CITIZENS(SUBJECTS) OF THE UNION STATES. I ALLAH EL MUST ALSO STATE THAT THE RIGHTS TO TRAVEL IS A CONSTITUTIONAL, WELL AS A HUMAN RIGHT. THERE ARE NUMEROUS CASES THAT PROVE THIS FACT. CASE # 1 "THE USE OF HIGHWAY FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION IS NOT A MERE PRIVILEGE BUT A COMMON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OF WHICH THE PUBLIC AND INDIVIDUALS CANNOT RIGHTFULLY BE DEPRIVED" CHICAGO MOTOR COACH V. CHICAGO 169 NE. 221. CASE # 2 " THE RIGHT OF THE CITIZEN TO TRAVEL UPON THE PUBLIC HIGHWAYS AND TO TRANSPORT HIS PROPERTY THERE ON, EITHER BY CARRIAGE OR BY AUTOMOBILE IS NOT A MERE PRIVILEGE WHICH A CITY MAY PROHIBIT OR PERMIT AT WILL, BUT A COMMON LAW RIGHT WHICH HE HAS UNDER THE RIGHT TO LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS" THOMPSON V. SMITH 154 SE 579.CASE #3 " THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL IS A PART OF THE LIBERTY OF WHICH THE CITIZEN CANNOT BE DEPRIVED WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW UNDER THE 5TH AMENDMENT" KENT V. DULLES .CASE # 4 " THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL IS A WELL ESTABLISHED COMMON RIGHT THAT DOES NOT OWE IT'S EXISTENCE TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, IT IS RECOGNIZED BY THE COURTS AS A NATURAL RIGHT" SCHACTMAN V. DULLES 96 APP DC 287,255 F2D 938 AT 941. AFTER I ALLAH EL GAVE THE OFFICER MY I.D. THE OFFICER'S BACK UP TOLD HIM TO TELL ME TO STEP OUT THE CAR. I WAS PLACED IN THE FIRST OFFICER'S CAR, I WAS NEVER READ MY RIGHTS ARE TOLD WHAT I WAS DETAINED FOR. 2 HOURS WHILE STILL IN THE COP'S CAR I WAS ARRESTED AND MY CAR WAS ALSO TOWED. AT THE LOCK UP I LATER FIND THAT I WAS ARRESTED FOR NOT HAVING A VALID DRIVER'S LICENSE. AT THIS TIME I ALLAH EL SUFFERED, ,LOSS OF FREEDOM, MONETARY LOSS, RIGHTS VIOLATED AND IMPRISONMENT BECAUSE I EXCISED A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT. THIS ACTION THAT WAS TAKEN BY THE POLICER OFFICER IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS THAT ARE GAUARANTEED BY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND INTERNATIONAL LAW. ANY ACTION BY A POLICE OFFICER,OFFICER OF THE COURT, PIBLIC SERVANT OF THE GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL TO ASSERT UNLAWFULLY AUTHORITY UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW WILL BE CONSTRUED AS A DIRECT AND WILLFUL VIOLATION OF OUR CONSTITUION, AND TREATIES PROTECTED RIGHTS AND PROTECTED TO THE FULL EXTENT OF NATURAL LAW. TITLE 28 USC 17469. FURTHER MORE I ALLAH EL WOULD LIKE TO SITE THE FOLLOWING CASES: CASE #1 HERTADO V. CALIFORNIA 110 US 516 THE U.S. SUPREME COURT STATES VERY PLAINLY: "THE STATE CANNOT DIMINISH RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE" CASE #2 BENET V. BOGGS 1 BALDW 60 "STATUES THAT VIOLATE THE PLAIN AND OBVIOUS PRINCIPLES OF COMMON RIGHT AND COMMON REASON ARE NULL AND VIOD" CASE # 3"THE ASERTION O FEDERAL RIGHTS WHEN PLAINLY AND REASONABLY MADE IS NOT TO BE DEFEATED UNDER THE NAME OF LOCAL PRACTICE" DAVIS V. WECHSLER 263 US 22 AT 24. CASE # 4 " WHERE RIGHTS SECURED BY THE CONSTITUTION ARE INVOLVED THERE CAN BE NO RULE MAKING OR LEGISLATION WHICH WOULD ABROGATE THEM" MIRANDA V. ARIZONA 384 US 436,491 CASE # 5 " THE CLAIM AND EXERCISE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT CANNOT BE CONVERTED INTO A CRIME" MILLER V. US, 230 F 486 AT 489. CASE # 6 THERE CAN BE NO SANCTION OR PENALTY IMPOSED UPON ONE BECAUSE OF THIS EXERCISE OF CONSTITUTIONAL; RIGHTS" SHENER V. CULLEN 481 F 946.
Author:
noblemoorishgod
Tags:
BLACK POWER, MOORISH SCIENCE AND LAW,
Popular searches: Cuba, Scuba Diving, Skydiving, Dubai, Niagara Falls, Rainforest, Surfing, Snowboarding, Sandboarding, Pyramids, Everest, Stonehenge, Bear Grylls
Related Videos:
![]() | whats your status pt 1: the birth certificate you are born in sin (social insurance number) |
![]() | Moorish 2008 Baron Berwyn entertaining everyone at Court/Feast |
![]() | Identification Fraud check my law library |
![]() | Moors in court 2...STATE OF NEW JERSEY vs. MURAKUSH SOCIETY (Noble Aemer K.C. El) PART 2/2 aboriginallawfirm.ning.com When you study LAW you can defend yourself against the CORPORATE beast, which is the US Corporation and its corporate STATES. The Moor is not in the Jurisdiction of the court nor the Corporate US that is why they can't prosecute him. |
![]() | UCC 1-207.4 reserves your common law rights Themeaning of life is problem solving! This is how they control the people on the slave colonies. They solve the basic problems of food, clothing & shelter by providing you with jobs. Every two weeks they pay you in debt notes & within ten days you have given it all back. You don't even know it's not real money & that the nations are all bankrupt & under bankruptcy everything is prepaid. You are so brainwashed you can't believe it, you deny it & you continue to go along with the corporate ... |
![]() | Moors in court 2...STATE OF NEW JERSEY vs. MURAKUSH SOCIETY (Noble Aemer K.C. El) PART 1/2 aboriginallawfirm.ning.com www.rvbeypublications.com When you study LAW you can defend yourself against the CORPORATE beast, which is the US Corporation and its corporate STATES. The Moor is not in the Jurisdiction of the court nor the Corporate US that is why they can't prosecute him. |
![]() | The Decline of Moorish Power/ Jose Piementa Bey pt4 Great lecture by Jose Piementa Bey To see all parts go to my channel and click on playlist |
![]() | Noble Moorish God speaking about the lawyers ;and the de-facto government. The lawyers are the ones that have overthrowed the republic form of government. by way of creating the de-facto government. every thing that they do is against the de-jure form of government. we the people have no say in the laws and polices that are carryed out by this people.( LEARN WHY YOU DON'T NEED A LAWYER OR A ATTORNEY TO HANDLE YOUR AFFAIRS. FIND OUT WHAT A LAWYER OR A ATTORNEY IS AND WHO DO THEY REALLY WORK FOR.)( THIS PAMPLET IS A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE POWERS THAT BE. IT IS DESIGNED ... |
![]() | right to travel diver license vs the right to travel. check out TITLE 18 USC 31 Motor vehicle. - The term "motor vehicle" means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.(10) Used for commercial purposes.— The term used for commercial purposes means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other ... |
![]() | right to travel part 2 right to travel vs driver license:Title 18, United States Code, Sec. 31 PART I - CRIMES CHAPTER 2 - AIRCRAFT AND MOTOR VEHICLES Sec. 31. Definitions When used in this chapter the term - ''Motor vehicle'' means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo see motor vehicle means for commercial use,too bad the state ... |
Popular searches: Cuba, Scuba Diving, Skydiving, Dubai, Niagara Falls, Rainforest, Surfing, Snowboarding, Sandboarding, Pyramids, Everest, Stonehenge, Bear Grylls

العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español









