"Genocide" and the Bible Part 12 The Canaanites
Title:
"Genocide" and the Bible Part 12 The Canaanites
Description:
God was destroying a culture and its carriers--not necessarily all the individuals in it. Roughly, it was the 'nations' that were destroyed, and it was the 'individuals' who were driven out. What this would strongly suggest is that the punishment on the Amorites/Canaanites is NOT extermination but rather total expulsion from the Land! oThis is an altogether DIFFERENT issue now--from 'genocide' to 'expulsion from the Land'. And THIS UNDERSTANDING makes perfect sense of a couple of other verses now: (Lev 18.24-29; also Lev 20.22) Notice in verses 28-29, God holds Israel to the same standard--both as a nation (vs.28) and as individuals (vs.29)! He didn't intend to annihilate them (when they later 'went pagan'), but he warned them of 'expulsion from the Land' in the SAME WAY He did the Canaanites! For this comparison to work in the verse, the punishment ("vomit") MUST mean expulsion. But WAS it the same way? Absolutely! To read about Israel/ Judahs expulsion: Deut 28.30-33, Is 57:5; 2 Kgs 17.17, Jer 13.27, I Kgs 15.12; 22.46; 2 Kgs 23.7, Ezek 45.9; Is 59.6-10: God judged them to be expelled from the Land. He sent the Babylonians to 'drive them out'. They were SUPPOSED to obey God and go into exile--the prophets told the people to surrender to 'dispossession' to AVOID BEING KILLED! This is basically the same motif--'migrate or be executed'. The number of people actually killed in the attacks of Babylonia would have been small, but the number transplanted out of the Land would have been considerable. It is interesting to note that the Assyrians 'drove out' Israel and USED the deportation/transplantation strategy to basically 'annihilate' a culture, without killing the mass of people--they knew that a dispossessed people would be assimilated into larger social groups, as basically happened with some of the northern ten tribes. The Assyrians did this routinely. Summary: The Israelites had been promised a specific area of land, since the time of Abraham. Most of the local indigenous peoples were either descendants of Abraham or very familiar with the traditions of those people. When the "time had come," God judged the Canaanites and decreed for them to be expelled from the Land. Their tenure was up--they were evicted. New tenants were moving in. The Canaanites were given decades and decades of notice--in many ways and at different times. With the 'eviction notice' published, the Canaanites could decide to either vacate the premises peacefully or deal with military force. If they vacated peacefully, they could choose their locations, mode of travel, and not have to deal with unpleasant military overseers. God did not desire to annihilate the people. His expressed intentions were to move them away from His people. He gave them ample opportunity to leave peacefully before Israel arrived. Israel was severely restricted in the Conquest. They were not allowed to be simple 'land grabbers' or 'wealth seekers' or 'self-righteous' or 'land scorchers' or 'international empire builders' or 'captive-abusive'. And God allowed no double standards. When Israel began to look like 'Canaanites', God judged them IN THE SAME WAY...and 'vomited' them from the Land as well. This expulsion was also accompanied by the harsh measures of warfare faced by the Canaanites. The punishment of the Amorites/Canaanites was thus one of 'deportation'--NOT one of genocide. Sources: The History of Ancient Palestine by G.W. Ahlstrom. Fortress: 1993, 990pp Glen Miller: http://www.christian-thinktank.com/ James Patrick Holding: http://www.tektonics.org/
Author:
mdean1215
Tags:
truth, genocide, murder, israelites, christian, god, bible, atheism, agnosticism, apologetics, skepticism, morality, fundamentalist, religion, literalism, homicide, ethnic, cleansing, intolerance, crime, humanity, child, deconversion, story, holysinecure, ProfMTH,
"Genocide" and the Bible Part 12 The Canaanites
Description:
God was destroying a culture and its carriers--not necessarily all the individuals in it. Roughly, it was the 'nations' that were destroyed, and it was the 'individuals' who were driven out. What this would strongly suggest is that the punishment on the Amorites/Canaanites is NOT extermination but rather total expulsion from the Land! oThis is an altogether DIFFERENT issue now--from 'genocide' to 'expulsion from the Land'. And THIS UNDERSTANDING makes perfect sense of a couple of other verses now: (Lev 18.24-29; also Lev 20.22) Notice in verses 28-29, God holds Israel to the same standard--both as a nation (vs.28) and as individuals (vs.29)! He didn't intend to annihilate them (when they later 'went pagan'), but he warned them of 'expulsion from the Land' in the SAME WAY He did the Canaanites! For this comparison to work in the verse, the punishment ("vomit") MUST mean expulsion. But WAS it the same way? Absolutely! To read about Israel/ Judahs expulsion: Deut 28.30-33, Is 57:5; 2 Kgs 17.17, Jer 13.27, I Kgs 15.12; 22.46; 2 Kgs 23.7, Ezek 45.9; Is 59.6-10: God judged them to be expelled from the Land. He sent the Babylonians to 'drive them out'. They were SUPPOSED to obey God and go into exile--the prophets told the people to surrender to 'dispossession' to AVOID BEING KILLED! This is basically the same motif--'migrate or be executed'. The number of people actually killed in the attacks of Babylonia would have been small, but the number transplanted out of the Land would have been considerable. It is interesting to note that the Assyrians 'drove out' Israel and USED the deportation/transplantation strategy to basically 'annihilate' a culture, without killing the mass of people--they knew that a dispossessed people would be assimilated into larger social groups, as basically happened with some of the northern ten tribes. The Assyrians did this routinely. Summary: The Israelites had been promised a specific area of land, since the time of Abraham. Most of the local indigenous peoples were either descendants of Abraham or very familiar with the traditions of those people. When the "time had come," God judged the Canaanites and decreed for them to be expelled from the Land. Their tenure was up--they were evicted. New tenants were moving in. The Canaanites were given decades and decades of notice--in many ways and at different times. With the 'eviction notice' published, the Canaanites could decide to either vacate the premises peacefully or deal with military force. If they vacated peacefully, they could choose their locations, mode of travel, and not have to deal with unpleasant military overseers. God did not desire to annihilate the people. His expressed intentions were to move them away from His people. He gave them ample opportunity to leave peacefully before Israel arrived. Israel was severely restricted in the Conquest. They were not allowed to be simple 'land grabbers' or 'wealth seekers' or 'self-righteous' or 'land scorchers' or 'international empire builders' or 'captive-abusive'. And God allowed no double standards. When Israel began to look like 'Canaanites', God judged them IN THE SAME WAY...and 'vomited' them from the Land as well. This expulsion was also accompanied by the harsh measures of warfare faced by the Canaanites. The punishment of the Amorites/Canaanites was thus one of 'deportation'--NOT one of genocide. Sources: The History of Ancient Palestine by G.W. Ahlstrom. Fortress: 1993, 990pp Glen Miller: http://www.christian-thinktank.com/ James Patrick Holding: http://www.tektonics.org/
Author:
mdean1215
Tags:
truth, genocide, murder, israelites, christian, god, bible, atheism, agnosticism, apologetics, skepticism, morality, fundamentalist, religion, literalism, homicide, ethnic, cleansing, intolerance, crime, humanity, child, deconversion, story, holysinecure, ProfMTH,
Popular searches: Cuba, Scuba Diving, Skydiving, Dubai, Niagara Falls, Rainforest, Surfing, Snowboarding, Sandboarding, Pyramids, Everest, Stonehenge, Bear Grylls
Related Videos:
![]() | Grant miller - Colder than ice (extended version) Colder than ice 1986. (extended version) |
![]() | Snap .......Cult of Snap Snap! is an electronic music group formed in 1989 by German producers Michael Münzing and Luca Anzilotti. The act has been through a number of line-up changes over the years, but was most successful when fronted by rapper Turbo B, who performed on the UK number 1 singles "The Power" and "Rhythm Is a Dancer". Their first album World Power is one of the most successful dance albums of all time, with worldwide sales estimated at 7 million. Banda alemana de música electrónica, combinaban el rap ... |
![]() | Adding Fractions with Unlike Denominators This is an easy step by step demonstration on adding fractions with unlike denominators. www.thefreetutor.com |
![]() | Patrick Miller Pista "Chess" En Vivo 1994 (1) Este es el evento que ofrecio el Señor Patrick miller en la pista "Chess" en el lla lejano 1994, que gratos recuerdos del mejor equipo de audio de todos los tiempos, Cuando lo que importaba era pasar un buen rato con todos los amigos, Gracias al que grabo este video y al que lo paso ah DVD, Espero y sea de su agrado.... Saludos |
![]() | "Genocide" and The Bible Part 2 Is genocide condoned in the OT? The argument that I THINK someone might make about this might look like the following: 1. The biblical God CANNOT commit any unjust act (Authority: theological tradition) 2. God ordered the killing of children (Authority: biblical text) 3. The killing of children can never be a 'just' act, regardless of competing ethical demands in a given situation. (Authority: someones personal moral intuition) 4. God, therefore , ordered an 'unjust act'. (authority ... |
![]() | "Genocide" and the Bible Part 20 The Amalekites & 1 Sam 15 I Samuel 15 So, what options would Israel have had concerning the fatherless Amalekite family, once the warriors had been eliminated in battle? There are ONLY four options to consider: 1. Take them back as slaves (or to be sold as slaves) 2. Take them back and turn them over to social relief programs/processes in Israel. 3. Leave them there in the desert to their fate 4. Kill them there in the desert Option 1: Take them back as slaves (or to be sold as slaves). This was, of course, what some ... |
![]() | Sam Harris vs David Wolpe 09 A debate. |
![]() | From Noah to Abraham Please watch this video right through to the end: to do otherwise would be to miss the punchline. The myth of noah devastates the Old Testament. This is partly due to the flood story itself, but even more devastating is what comes after, which ends up making a mockery of the entire book of Genesis and the authenticity of Yahweh himself. I think this video will, for many people, be a 'keeper' well worth favouriting. I hope so anyway, it is a point I alluded to in a video response over six ... |
![]() | Hokuto Hyakuretsu-Ken Kenshiro's signature move in Hokuto no Ken. This is my favourite representation of it. |
![]() | Connolly on religion Clip from Billy Connolly's "Was it something I said?" |
Popular searches: Cuba, Scuba Diving, Skydiving, Dubai, Niagara Falls, Rainforest, Surfing, Snowboarding, Sandboarding, Pyramids, Everest, Stonehenge, Bear Grylls

العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
Español








