Discover

Why Epiphenomenalism Must be Wrong


Title:
Why Epiphenomenalism Must be Wrong

Description:
When i read and look what philosophers say and write, i notice they still take epiphenomenalism as a serious option, although they do not necessarily believe in it. In this video i try to show that even the possibility of epiphenomenalism is based on a mistake. Please comment!

Author:
Cheiz87

Tags:
body, chalmers, daniel, david, dennett, dualism, epiphenomenalism, immaterial, interactionism, material, materialism, mind, monism,

Related Videos:

Science of Consciousness (David Chalmers)
An interview with David Chalmers discussing his theory of consciousness, the hard problem, and the explanatory gap.
David Chalmers Sings "The Zombie Blues"
David Chalmers sings the "Zombie Blues" at the close of the University of Arizona's "Toward a Science of Consciousness" conference. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie David Chalmers is a leading thinker in the philosophy of mind. He is Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Centre for Consciousness at the Australian National University.
David Chalmers - Neural Correlate of Consciousness Pt. 1
David Chalmers at 2nd Association for the Scientific Studies of Consciousness conference Main topic being discussed is "Foundational issues in the cognitive neuroscience of consciousness" This is part 1 of 4. Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj1JaidwGvM Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mm63yK7u24A Part 3: http://www.divshare.com/download/3283407-c91 Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=317Hhk-e-fc Part 3 will lead you to a link where you can download the mp3 file.
Response to Cosmicpilgrim
I respond to cosmic pilgrim's video on 'the hard problem'. Here are the links I referred to during the video: John Horgan & David Chalmers http://bloggingheads.tv/video.php?id=287 My audio presentation on the Ultimate Illusion (click on show #6) http://www.reasonworks.com/TA.html
Experimental Philosophy Anthem
http://www.myspace.com/experimentalphilosophy
Quantum physics and Consciousness ... connected?
Take a look down the Rabbit Hole. Some short clips of some of the film 'what the bleep do we know - quantum edition'. Controversial film, I know, but very thought provoking none-the-less. Our beliefs about who we are, and what is real, are not simply observations, but rather form ourselves and our realities. Science publication for those interested: http://www.quantumconsciousness.org/documents/CogScipub.pdf S.Hameroff, Cognitive Science 31 (2007) 10351045 featuring many academics from all areas of science; http://www.whatthebleep.com/scientists/ -William Tiller, Professor Emeritus of Material Science and Engineering at Stanford University -Dr. Amit Goswami. Worked with Deepak Chopra and is employed by the Institute of Noetic Sciences. -Dr. John Hagelin, Director of the Institute of Science, Technology and Public Policy at Maharishi University of Management, professor of physics at MUM since 1984, and Minister of Science and Technology of the Global Country of World Peace. -Dr. Stuart Hameroff, an anesthesiologist, author, and associate director of the Center for Consciousness Studies at the University of Arizona -Dr. Andrew Newberg, assistant professor of radiology at the University of Pennsylvania Hospital, and physician in nuclear medicine -Dr. David Albert, a philosopher of physics and professor at Columbia University. -Miceal Ledwith, author and former professor of theology at Maynooth College in Ireland; Daniel Monti, physician and director of the Mind-Body Medicine Program at Thomas Jefferson University -Dr. Jeffrey Satinover, well known psychiatrist, author and professor.
John Searle: Beyond Dualism Pt. 1
John Searle is an American philosopher interested in philosophy of mind. Here are some key elements of Searle's position. * Rejects computational theory of mind with his Chinese Room argument. * Rejects Cartesian dualism. Probably rejects property dualism as well. * Study of consciousness using scientific method IS possible. This is very much against previously conceived notion that goes something like "consciousness is known subjectively only, thus scientific inquiry from third person perspective cannot explain consciousness." * Reduction of consciousness to neurobiological phenomena is not strictly possible since nuerobiological phenomena loses the qualitative feel of subjectivity. One must tackle this problem directly without eliminating consciousness. * Rejects epiphenomenalism, so he admits free will is real. I think he now takes somewhat agnostic position on this issue. This is part 1. Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRwOuE7IJoA Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctniu92XvzI Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFg4ikxHjY4 Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5U8HrlHb70 Part 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buvUPUwojiM Part 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnnOz5wCl8M Part 7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MP-RegfGdA Part 8: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-UqjoJOK-0
Rorty on truth
Richard Rorty explains his view of truth.
Anno's Solipsism II
An illustration of the fragility of reality and its nature as a construct of the human mind, as presented by Hideaki Anno in Evangelion. Part of a series on Solipsism in Evangelion (numbering is of no real significance).
Consciousness, Qualia, and Self
Dr. V.S. Ramachandran, Director of the Center for Brain and Cognition at UCSD, discusses consciousness, qualia, and self.