My thoughts and trying to clarify.

Video Cam Direct Upload

This is a response to GoldenGun85's video Agnosticism and Postmodernism and the subsequent response by Veritas48. The issue is the fallacy of equivocation in reference to two supposed definitions of the word 'relative'.

Overview of the potential root causes behind contemporary subjectivist thinking.

So odd that I was listening to Greg on the radio and he happened to address this...apparently popular topic. Thought I'd share this and get your thoughts.

Rachel the Relativist's kid brother, "Sam the Ethical Subjectivist" is confronted with the possibility of Universal Moral Principles by their family pet and companion "Oscar the dog" who also in fact recently situated his feces on their imaginary living room carpet.

Even Science is subjective at this point. Until we attain a Grand Unification Theory in physics, we have to look at things in terms of Quantum Mechanics, Classical Mechanics, or General Relatively. Similarly, Math is subjective. So claiming an objective truth is very, very difficult (impossible I would argue).

Subjectivism and possible applications for Deafhood

Continuing the explanation from part 1.

Eradicating strawmen, false beliefs, and generalizations. In other words, showing that the two aren't so different. Please watch Randy Helzerman's wonderful video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmxwToIj8XM#VN9VlAXo0q8

Continuation of 1 and 2.

Eradicating strawmen, false beliefs, and generalizations. In other words, showing that the two aren't so different. Please watch Randy Helzerman's wonderful video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmxwToIj8XM#VN9VlAXo0q8

Ben has a response to Veritas's vid that elaborates a bit more on the "environment" and "inter-" aspects of morality. Check it out. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxq2mZ2vOOk Eradicating strawmen, false beliefs, and generalizations. In other words, showing that the two aren't so different. Please watch Randy Helzerman's wonderful video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmxwToIj8XM#VN9VlAXo0q8

Continuation of parts 1,2, and 3.

Eradicating strawmen, false beliefs, and generalizations. In other words, showing that the two aren't so different. Please watch Randy Helzerman's wonderful video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmxwToIj8XM#VN9VlAXo0q8

Resolving a few false dychotomies: 1. Humans vs. Nature 2. State of nature vs. Civilization 3. Inherently Good vs. Inherently Evil 4. Determinism vs. Radical Subjectivism

We're all subjective. Why choose atheism, which you have said is rather "tolerant" and "unconcerned" as the greatest danger, over a religion that imposes itself and doesn't allow other religions within its area of control, one that leads to extremism, or one that is broadly appealing to 'Christians' who don't want to get deeply into religion? After all, aren't Catholics not going to heaven, and aren't Lukewarm Christians going to be "spit out"?

The John Galt Band vs. Subjectivism! Lyrics: Wishful ghosts have made me function, all the world is now at stake No more ghosts, no more distractions I'll take care of all the rest But there's a table in my way How I wish it went away But my wish is not enough In spite of everything they said to me All of this is my invention All is just the way I see Used to ponder your abstractions Till I found there is no "it" But there's a table in my way How I wish it went away But my wish is not enough In spite of everything they said to me If all of this is my creation, if all is just the way I see, if I am capable of wanting then why is there just nothing there indeed?

The Cranky Young Catholic thinks about subjectivism.

wukdar, hope you read descriptions because the anger in this video at inmendham's petty tactics spills through in some of my reply to you. I do actually find your view (e.g. on the enlightening relaizations of quantum mechanics) narrow minded, but I don't feel the need to be so mocking as I was for a moment. I.E. I was not calling you "dumb ass" I could have said "not call jihad on our dumb ass"... eh... You are very smart (inmendham not so much so, but somewhat smart in sporadic areas). I normally don't use plays on names, but for a while I had "Apemendham" as the name in the title... you know, I think it would have been justifiable this time... it is the jist of Inmendham that his philosophy about overcoming the inner ape is joined with him acting out as the ape regularly. Inmendham can see the need for compassion and fairness... but give him a couple tools to express petty subjectivism (as opposed to enlightened subjectivism) and he's all over it "for fun". ---- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0

trilogy of subjectivism - 1st part (philosphical) a short film about solipsism, subjectivism, prison of the mind, uncommunication, language, doors of perception, technology and finally revolution video&audio by daìmon

trilogy of subjectivism - 3rd part (oriental) a short film about subjectivism and prison of the mind, transcendence and escape, doors of perception and collapse of mind-world borders, technology and uncommunication, solipsism and re-birth, nirvana and finally revolution video&audio by daìmon

Evolution vs. peanut butter, Evolution vs. bananas, Laraque vs Ivanans, Bush vs. all people, Bush standing vs Bush standing, Don Imus vs. black people, Geraldo vs. Oreilly, mother vs. son, Rumsfield vs. evidence, Newt vs. all spanish people, list of logical fallacies from The Art of Reason, post hoc, appeal to majority, appeal to force, appeal to authority, appeal to emotion, begging the question, diversion, non sequiter, subjectivism, straw man, false alternative, ad hominem, tu quoque, poisoning the well, appeal to ignorance, complex question

An extremely brief introduction to the different schools of thought in meta-ethics.

Philosophical lecture concerning a fixed point of reference. Relativism, subjectivism, and absolutism. Quirky, even strange, but funny; Frank Peretti, Christian author explains it well in this short taken from the full length version.