poulain

Une vidéo pour Ukase...

Lyrics: hada ga tokeru moreru iki ga karamaru marude watashi anata no ________ yubisaki ga nazori tadoritsuiteiku no wo tarenegashita mama matteiru ikanai de watashi no hoho ni nukumori wo nokoshita mama de hanareteiku no wakatteta kedo anata wo saigo no koi ni suru wa hoteru karada agete watashi no karada wo sono kuchi de ai shite aimai na ima itami ga karada wo ukase anata wo naka de kanjiru sayonara mo iwanai you na anata dakara kuyashii keredo suki ni natta no anata ni fureta kyou no yoru wo mune ni ikiru wa motto motto motto watashi wo mite yo jiyuu ni sasete ageru kara aimai na ima itami ga karada wo ukase anata wo naka de kanjiru ikanai de watashi no hoho ni nukumori wo nokoshita mama de hanareteiku no wakatteta kedo anata wo saigo no koi ni suru wa sayonara mo iwanai you na anata dakara kuyashii keredo suki ni natta no anata ni fureta kyou no yoru wo mune ni ikiru wa --- ENGLISH Skin feeling as if it was melting, leaking sighs entwining All, entirely from our __________ Our fingertips grope along Since I've been kept waiting, I've got trouble holding back my desires as it is... Don't go The traces of warmth left on my cheek is from you, parting I understood... however, in the end, I fell in love with you My body heat rose from that mouth loving my body During that moment, now vague, the pain in my body rose since I felt inside of you 'Cause it seemed like you didn't even say goodbye It was mortifying, but I had came to liking you Now, the night when I touchd you will live inside my chest Since I'm giving you the freedom to do this, Look at me more, more, and more During that moment, now vague, the pain in my body rose from feeling inside you Don't go... The warmth left on my cheek from before was from your parting I understood... however, in the end, I fell in love with you 'Cause it seemed like you didn't even say goodbye It was mortifying, but I had came to liking you The night when I touchd you will live inside my chest

Saa me wo akete boku wo mite yo Hoora mada nukumori sae Boku no te no hira ni dakareteiru ima wa Mou itami mo nai naka de Anata wa nani o ima mo omotteiru no Kono senaka wo tsutsumu yoru to yami ni e wo egaku boku wa Toki to iu na no mono ni ayatsurarete Oozora ni ukabeta omoide no naka de odoru futari wo mitsume naiteita Saigo made sayonara sae iezu kono basho de nemuri ni ochita anata wo daiteitakute Yurenagara ashi o ukase ... Kono itami wo masu yoru ni onaji kotoba wo kurikaeshi Yurenagara sora ni ashi wo ukasete Oozora ni ukabeta omoide no naka de boku wo mitsumeta anata wa hohoende Saigo made ude wo nobashite usureteiku koe wa ima wo mitsumeru koto wo inotte Sotto Oozora ni ukabeta omoide no naka de odoru futari wa ima mo hohoende Nagai yoru no owari wo tsugeru kono ude de nemuri ni ochita anata wo daiteitakute Yurenagara ashi o ukase ... Yurenagara sora ni mi o yosete ...

Malice Mizer- "Bel Air" off the single, "Bel Air." It was also on the album "Merveilles" (shown in the vid.) The Single featured "Bel Air", "Bel Air" (inst.) and "Color Me Blood Red" Lyrics: Saa me wo akete boku wo mite yo Hoora mada nukumori sae Boku no te no hira ni dakareteiru ima wa Mou itami mo nai naka de Anata wa nani o ima mo omotteiru no Kono senaka wo tsutsumu yoru to yami ni e wo egaku boku wa Toki to iu na no mono ni ayatsurarete Oozora ni ukabeta omoide no naka de odoru futari wo mitsume naiteita Saigo made sayonara sae iezu kono basho de nemuri ni ochita anata wo daiteitakute Yurenagara ashi o ukase ... Kono itami wo masu yoru ni onaji kotoba wo kurikaeshi Yurenagara sora ni ashi wo ukasete Oozora ni ukabeta omoide no naka de boku wo mitsumeta anata wa hohoende Saigo made ude wo nobashite usureteiku koe wa ima wo mitsumeru koto wo inotte Sotto Oozora ni ukabeta omoide no naka de odoru futari wa ima mo hohoende Nagai yoru no owari wo tsugeru kono ude de nemuri ni ochita anata wo daiteitakute Yurenagara ashi o ukase ... Yurenagara sora ni mi o yosete ... (thanks to lyricdownloads.com)

Live performance kage wo ukase mimamorareta iki　hyoujou sae usuku neji magatta kao no hagarenu kawa to tadarete ito wo hiku gekijou ni kamoku wo shinjitsu wo nagasu me　ashita ni wa furuezu kuchi wo akete ra　rara　ra　rara　ra　ra sono chiisa na hako bakari mitsume ra　rara　ra　rara　rara　ra kuro wa soko e shizumi naze to toi miserare itaku hitaru me ga afure　tsugi ni nani wo temaneki umiotosu utsusareta danpen wo sashi　kurau you ni ne wo akasu nani wo mokuteki to shi nani wo tsutaetai no ka muimi na seishin kaimei wa nani wo sukuu no ka ra　rara　ra　rara　ra　ra sono chiisa na hako no naka de sae ra　rara　ra　rara　rara　ra kuro wa fukaku shizumi naze to toi mikaserare itaku hitaru me ka afure　kurikaeshite yuku kanashimi ni miserare itaku urumu dake no me ni nani wo motome negaou kinku yori omoi soko ni My observed breaths are raising the shadows Even my facial expression gets weak The skin that won't come off from this twisted face I'm pulling on that rotten string with a silent violent emotion My eyes she'd the truth Open your untrembling mouth tomorrow La lala la lala la la I do nothing but stare at this small box La lala la lala lala la The darkness sinks to the bottom Painfully charmed I'm asking why My flooded eyes overflow What attraction do I give birth to next I point to the projected fragment To receive it I have to reveal the root What purpose do I have and what do I want to convey? What does my meaningless soul elucidation save me from? La lala la lala la la Even in this small box La lala la lala lala la The darkness sinks deeply I'm painfully charmed by the question "why" My flooded eyes overflow It keeps being repeated Painfully I'm enchanted by this loneliness What should my eyes that are nothing but clouded be searching for? In this place that is heavier than a forbidden word...

Some photographs of the mid 80's London Ontario.

Another questionable ukase on Durant Avenue.

moi et ukase au paddock

pivot is a nearly world wide thing if you want to read somthing boring look below Big Words are colossal superfluous colloquys. --72.141.137.136 04:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)--~shaqdee--72.141.137.136 04:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)--72.141.137.136 04:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)zzy== BIG WORDS == Big Words were indubidly proliferated per Sir Thomasical Gergantiunation II. Unequivocally there was unambiguous astronomical day when Gergantiunation excogitated the conglomerate erudition of paraphernalia. Notwithstanding he was insensate Gergantiunation conceived in envisageing deductive that diacritic conceivably permitted sonorousness perspicacious by commissioning morphemes that bagatelle posterior kumtux. A dexterous consummatent and stupid were consanguineous! Contents [hide] 1 Appropriateness 2 Contradistinction 3 Connivance 4 Breviloquent 5 Utilization in Métier Superintendence [edit] Appropriateness Image:BigWord.jpg The veracious denouement of applicability Big Words (above) The counterfactual denouement of applicability Big Words (below)Mobilization of Big Words in how idiosyncratic germaneness it and allotment accede appositeness it. Primogenial when in a commodious confabulation exigency (Analogous when your consorted multitudinous of perspicacious plebeians) vamoose adjacent with their repartee and masquerade cognize by salaaming your belfry and prehending your mentum. When preferential upon for your presupposition, conjecture some Big Words you contemplationed in the concordance lang syne eventide (you COMPASSED this IMPECCABLE??). If personage impoverished a echerché ukase, eschew diaphoresis it. Aloof beget up a Big Word. For exemplification, indujasinous is katanationous. Pressurizeing up Big Words is consequential languid. Some bumptious populace qualifiedness discourse that isnt a confabulation. Reciprocate by opprobriuming his trenchancy and asseverate that he scrupulous doesnt discern what it parsimonious. To do this befittingly one must abscond unhindered, non-sesquapadalian habituateing antecedent such velitation. If Big Words are pertinenced decorously they can sustenance superlatively. [edit] Contradistinction Some commonality have antithetical the appositeness of Big Words. Their antagonism with colloquys of cyclopean apportionments is that Big Words subordinate narcissism and they sanctimoniousness kumtux it. These nonsensical milquetoasts are maladroit and exigency to get a élan vital. George Dubya Bush (is fallacious at Big Words ex: strategery) ostensibled a oppugn on Big Words. The discernment abaft the adjudication is that grandiose confabulations presage our sovereignty and our paesanos. This is a brobdingnagian debacle to the Big Word commonality. [edit] Connivance There has been a treacherousness that is emolumenting substratum. These abettors credulous that Big Words engender multitude modulation ignoramus and not scintillating. notwithstanding they are not Big Word oppugnants they are still Big Word tyrannicals. Congeries of this denomination are nonpareil deferment interminably from. If you rendezvous a abettor, calcitrate them in the genitalia and conjecture "Big Words are indeed, indubidly, delectable!" and excursion abroad. [edit] Breviloquent Big Words can be a fishcake when with impertinent sausages of south amazonia and get this you modulate inspicuous strudel. But memorialize, it takes many nauticals to preponderant the pictorialization of Big Words. In denouement, if you cannot envisage this exposition then you sir, are an ignoramus vexed by pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis. [edit] Utilization in Métier Superintendence Big Words assist the facilitation of efficacious communication by leveraging multilingual platforms, ergo subsequently resulting in an influx of expeditious enterprise which defracts the subvectoring of effective eCommerce capitalization techniques. Word!

Joe Biden, Regular Guy: I know this debate was mostly about Sarah Palin, but let's not be sexist and forget about Joe Biden. I thought he was great, not least because he came across as what Palin pretends to be but isn't—and what this campaign could really use: a regular person who resists pat categorizing, rather than a caricature in a polarized drama that bears no relation to life. I'm not saying that's Biden's usual public mode by any means: Man-off-his-meds can be more his style. But last night on the stage next to Palin, he was a guy in a dark suit who calmly confounded a script that's getting awfully tiresome. He wasn't the Elite Insider to her Maverick Outsider; the way Biden drew on his career accomplishments, he made 36 years in the Senate sound like real-world experience with real challenges for an independent minded person—not (as McCain often does) arcane ritual, and not like the vague grandstanding Palin invokes when she refers to her executive experience. He didn't come across as Professorial Wonk to her Main Street Mom, either, and not just because he said "champ" and invoked his blue-collar origins; he marshaled facts with ease, gave them punch because he knew what he was talking about, where for all her folksiness, her own patter sounded totally canned. And he wasn't the Old Guy to her Young Gal; only six years younger than McCain, Biden may say "ladies and gentlemen," but he seems a generation apart, lacking the condescendingly old-school tone I hear in everything McCain says about his running mate. Maybe it's that Biden has a hands-on dad aura, which he comes by totally honestly. (Shouldn't we be parsing that choke-up? Seemed completely real to me.) Race, gender, age, class, education, values, experience: This is a campaign in which both sides like to talk about surmounting divisions and bringing both sides together. But doggone it, you don't very often get to see someone just walking the walk. http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/10/03/joe-biden-regular-guy.aspx Sarah Palin has put a new face and voice to the long-standing, powerful, but inchoate movement in US political life that one might see as a mutant variety of Poujadism, inflected with a modern American accent. There are echoes of the Poujadist agenda of 1950s France in its contempt for metropolitan elites, fuelling the resentment of the provinces towards the capital and the countryside towards the city, in its xenophobic strain of nationalism, sturdy, paysan resistance to taxation, hostility to big business, and conviction that politicians are out to exploit the common man. In 1980, Ronald Reagan profitably tapped the movement with his promises of states rights, low taxes and a shrunken government in Washington; the Reagan Democrats who crossed party lines to vote for him are still the most targeted demographic in the country. In 1992, Ross Clean out the Barn Perot and his United We Stand America followers looked for a while as if they were going to up-end the two-party system, with Perot leading George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton in the midsummer polls. In 1996, Pat Buchanan (The peasants are coming with pitchforks) appealed to the same bloc of voters with a programme that was militantly Christian, white, nativist, provincial, protectionist and anti-Washington. In 2000, Karl Rove cleverly enrolled this quasi-Poujadist faction in his grand alliance of libertarians, born-agains and corporate interests. Its worth remembering that in 2004 every American city with a population of more than 500,000 voted for Kerry, and that the election was won for Bush in the outer suburbs, exurbia and the countryside peasants with pitchforks territory. For an organisation so wedded to its big-city corporate clients, the Republican Party has been hugely successful in mopping up the votes of low-income, lightly educated rural and exurban residents. Most large American cities, especially in the West, are situated in counties that extend far beyond the city limits. Liberal urban governments with high property-tax rates and progressive environmental policies wield great power (some say tyranny) over their rural hinterlands, delivering ukases about land use and conservation: brush-cutting is to be limited to 40 per cent of the property; setbacks of 100 feet are required from streams and wetlands; new churches are denied building permission because they are deemed large footprint items in critical habitat areas etc. So the householder or farmer sees the city making unwarranted infringements of his God-given right to manage his land as he pleases, and imagines his precious tax-dollars being squandered on such urban fripperies as streetcar lines and monorails. http://www.lrb.co.uk/v30/n19/raba01_.html

I thought America was a free country. A country with freedom of expression, thanks to the First Amendment, which allowed people like Larry Flint to express themselves publicly. On Youtube, there is no such liberty, as unlike many other countries (in Europe, Scandinavia, Russia etc) where minors can watch naked people without becoming criminals laters (by the way far less than in the US!), collaborationist-minded zealous puritans are eager to flag pro-free speech people and lobotomize them. These snitchers worth the Iranian islamist vice squads. These 'manners' reminds the one of the Stasi and KGB or the chinese cultural sanitizations. One day, someone will even report to the thoughtcrime police of Youtube his brother, or his sister, of his parents (just remember the Khmer Rouges!) Youtube is a public area. No one is forced to read everything or to watch every video, and certainly not forced to follow Youtube snitchers' ukases on who is unmutual... Anyone walking on an Italian, Spanish, French or Russian beach will watch topless women. But never in USA where sex crimes are far higher. Guess why!

I thought America was a free country. A country with freedom of expression, thanks to the First Amendment, which allowed people like Larry Flint to express themselves publicly. On Youtube, there is no such liberty, as unlike many other countries (in Europe, Scandinavia, Russia etc) where minors can watch naked people without becoming criminals laters (by the way far less than in the US!), collaborationist-minded zealous puritans are eager to flag pro-free speech people and lobotomize them. These snitchers worth the Iranian islamist vice squads. These 'manners' reminds the one of the Stasi and KGB or the chinese cultural sanitizations. One day, someone will even report to the thoughtcrime police of Youtube his brother, or his sister, of his parents (just remember the Khmer Rouges!) Youtube is a public area. No one is forced to read everything or to watch every video, and certainly not forced to follow Youtube snitchers' ukases on who is unmutual... Anyone walking on an Italian, Spanish, French or Russian beach will watch topless women. But never in USA where sex crimes are far higher. Guess why!

I thought America was a free country. A country with freedom of expression, thanks to the First Amendment, which allowed people like Larry Flint to express themselves publicly. On Youtube, there is no such liberty, as unlike many other countries (in Europe, Scandinavia, Russia etc) where minors can watch naked people without becoming criminals laters (by the way far less than in the US!), collaborationist-minded zealous puritans are eager to flag pro-free speech people and lobotomize them. These snitchers worth the Iranian islamist vice squads. These 'manners' reminds the one of the Stasi and KGB or the chinese cultural sanitizations. One day, someone will even report to the thoughtcrime police of Youtube his brother, or his sister, of his parents (just remember the Khmer Rouges!) Youtube is a public area. No one is forced to read everything or to watch every video, and certainly not forced to follow Youtube snitchers' ukases on who is unmutual... Anyone walking on an Italian, Spanish, French or Russian beach will watch topless women. But never in USA where sex crimes are far higher. Guess why!

I thought America was a free country. A country with freedom of expression, thanks to the First Amendment, which allowed people like Larry Flint to express themselves publicly. On Youtube, there is no such liberty, as unlike many other countries (in Europe, Scandinavia, Russia etc) where minors can watch naked people without becoming criminals laters (by the way far less than in the US!), collaborationist-minded zealous puritans are eager to flag pro-free speech people and lobotomize them. These snitchers worth the Iranian islamist vice squads. These 'manners' reminds the one of the Stasi and KGB or the chinese cultural sanitizations. One day, someone will even report to the thoughtcrime police of Youtube his brother, or his sister, of his parents (just remember the Khmer Rouges!) Youtube is a public area. No one is forced to read everything or to watch every video, and certainly not forced to follow Youtube snitchers' ukases on who is unmutual... Anyone walking on an Italian, Spanish, French or Russian beach will watch topless women. But never in USA where sex crimes are far higher. Guess why!

I thought America was a free country. A country with freedom of expression, thanks to the First Amendment, which allowed people like Larry Flint to express themselves publicly. On Youtube, there is no such liberty, as unlike many other countries (in Europe, Scandinavia, Russia etc) where minors can watch naked people without becoming criminals laters (by the way far less than in the US!), collaborationist-minded zealous puritans are eager to flag pro-free speech people and lobotomize them. These snitchers worth the Iranian islamist vice squads. These 'manners' reminds the one of the Stasi and KGB or the chinese cultural sanitizations. One day, someone will even report to the thoughtcrime police of Youtube his brother, or his sister, of his parents (just remember the Khmer Rouges!) Youtube is a public area. No one is forced to read everything or to watch every video, and certainly not forced to follow Youtube snitchers' ukases on who is unmutual... Anyone walking on an Italian, Spanish, French or Russian beach will watch topless women. But never in USA where sex crimes are far higher. Guess why!

I thought America was a free country. A country with freedom of expression, thanks to the First Amendment, which allowed people like Larry Flint to express themselves publicly. On Youtube, there is no such liberty, as unlike many other countries (in Europe, Scandinavia, Russia etc) where minors can watch naked people without becoming criminals laters (by the way far less than in the US!), collaborationist-minded zealous puritans are eager to flag pro-free speech people and lobotomize them. These snitchers worth the Iranian islamist vice squads. These 'manners' reminds the one of the Stasi and KGB or the chinese cultural sanitizations. One day, someone will even report to the thoughtcrime police of Youtube his brother, or his sister, of his parents (just remember the Khmer Rouges!) Youtube is a public area. No one is forced to read everything or to watch every video, and certainly not forced to follow Youtube snitchers' ukases on who is unmutual... Anyone walking on an Italian, Spanish, French or Russian beach will watch topless women. But never in USA where sex crimes are far higher. Guess why!